Am 08.12.10 15:28, schrieb Phil Schaffner:
Although CentOS 3 EOL was announced by Tru on Nov 3, 2010 it is still
listed on the home page with no indication of the EOL status. This has
been the source of some confusion already.
Fixed. Sorry.
Ralph
On 09/12/10 01:05, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 02:55 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
Second, iptables is a de-facto standard for Linux, just as pf is pretty
much the standard firewalling on BSD. Windows and Solaris got their own
firewalling methods as well. My point
On 08/12/10 23:01, Warren Young wrote:
On 12/8/2010 3:04 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
it is still not recommendable to trade security for simplicity.
Security is never an absolute, is *always* a tradeoff against simplicity.
We could store our servers 16 feet underground and encased in
Hello,
I'm using selenium rc for automated testing on a centos box.
working on the box itself has no problem as long as i start the server through
terminal.
though if i wanted to run tests remotely i have a problem with firefox not
knowing on which display to run.
i have a vnc client
Em 07-12-2010 13:13, Ray Van Dolson escreveu:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:41:24AM -0200, Clovis Tristao wrote:
Em 06-12-2010 15:55, Mathieu Baudier escreveu:
Also, there will soon be a MediaWiki 1.16 package in EPEL[1]. There is
Good news!
Actually my dependencies were probably from EPEL in
Hello,
ssh sets the DISPLAY variable itself provided that :
- the X11 forwarding is enabled in the remote sshd server :
in /etc/ssh/sshd_config : you must have : X11Forwarding yes
(man sshd_config)
- you start the ssh connection with option -X, or you enable the X11 forwarding
in your local
Em 09-12-2010 08:09, Clovis Tristao escreveu:
Em 07-12-2010 13:13, Ray Van Dolson escreveu:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:41:24AM -0200, Clovis Tristao wrote:
Em 06-12-2010 15:55, Mathieu Baudier escreveu:
Also, there will soon be a MediaWiki 1.16 package in EPEL[1]. There is
Good news!
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:37:02 pm Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 03:11 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
The even more horrendous problem, which is so pervasive it affects
everyone, is the insistence on
I guess the reason it jars us here is because most people post properly.
Except the gmail lusers who haven't figured out how to turn off multipart
html crap.
+1
Unfair: the 'text' formatting mode from GMail is very standard
compliant, trimming the lines etc.
Maybe one should just more
Hi,
I have CentOS 5.0 installed my system.It shows kernel panic - not
syncing : fatal exception error during boot process.Can any one please
suggest to resolve this kernel panic? I am very eager to solve this without
upgrade the version for home work.
Thanks
--
Regards,
M.Satheesh.
2010/12/9 masatheesh masathe...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have CentOS 5.0 installed my system.It shows kernel panic - not
syncing : fatal exception error during boot process.Can any one please
suggest to resolve this kernel panic? I am very eager to solve this without
upgrade the version for
A preliminary development version of ext4 was included in version 2.6.19[4] of
the Linux kernel. On 11 October 2008, the patches that mark ext4 as stable code
were merged in the Linux 2.6.28 source code repositories,[5] denoting the end
of the development phase and recommending ext4 adoption.
cybernet wrote:
A preliminary development version of ext4 was included in version
2.6.19^[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4#cite_note-3 of the Linux
kernel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel. On 11 October 2008,
the patches that mark ext4 as stable code were merged in the Linux
ok, then i'm really sorry for informing you wrong
anyway
since we started a kernel talk
why CentOS has and old but stable kernel ?
From: Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 3:15:58 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 5.5
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:49 -0600, David G. Mackay wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:41 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:37 -0600, David G. Mackay wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:01 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
Nope, ARP is gone. But it gets a replacement as a
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of cybernet
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 8:19
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 5.5 x86_64 live cd
ok, then i'm really sorry for informing you wrong anyway
since we
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Tom H
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 11:34 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:16 +, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I guess the reason it jars us here is because most people post properly.
Except the gmail lusers who haven't figured out how to turn off
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 06:00:58 am Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Or would you prefer paying kilobucks per month for a tariffed OC3/12/48 or
Gigabit provisioned Metro E? (that's all I can get, and it does cost
kilobucks to get
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:06:34 pm Warren Young wrote:
That's great if you are wise enough to forsee all problems that an
automatic update can cause.
I am not that wise.
Nor am I; that's why I have testing server VM's on which to stage updates.
Even on the production servers,
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 12:02:44 am Robert Nichols wrote:
On 12/07/2010 05:11 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/Presentations/selinux_four_things.pdf
I am having difficulty with the pdf file - both adobe and kpdf have
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:11 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 12:02:44 am Robert Nichols wrote:
On 12/07/2010 05:11 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/Presentations/selinux_four_things.pdf
I am having
On 25/11/10 14:12, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
[...snip...]
Will you be confronted with IPv6 in the (not so) near future? Forget
OpenVPN, it is still beta there, while it has been implemented in
strongswan for ages, and part of there standard test plan.
Okay, I'll admit up-front I'm biased, as
David Sommerseth wrote:
MVNCH
That's the wonderful thing about standards,
everyone can have their own
- unknown
Actually, that's The nice thing about standards is that there are so
*many* of them.
mark
On 30/11/10 15:49, Ben McGinnes wrote:
That is there must be a specific IP address assigned to a user/password
combination. pptp does not really do this but I wrote sort of a backend
(or maybe frontend? ;-) ) to change the IP address assigned based on a
login and password. It is extra
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/8/2010 4:04 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
iptables is a de-facto standard on all Linux distributions nowadays. It
is not ratified by ISO, IETF or similar ... but how does that make the
real life scenario any
Christopher Chan wrote:
John Hinton wrote:
Has anyone noticed over the years, that every time a major new CentOS
release is just about to happen, suddenly there starts to be a few very
long and drawn out threads?
Really? Interesting.
Has anyone ever considered that the core team
We have several DELL R900 server with PERC 6/E adapter in it. O.S. is CENTOS
5.5. recently one of server continue pop-up messages on /var/log/message for
switch status between write back and write through.
==
Dec 6 08:09:31 host01 Server Administrator: Storage
On 12/09/2010 10:30 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 25/11/10 14:12, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
[...snip...]
Will you be confronted with IPv6 in the (not so) near future? Forget
OpenVPN, it is still beta there, while it has been implemented in
strongswan for ages, and part of there standard
On 12/06/2010 09:24 AM, Clovis Tristao wrote:
Hi,
How do I install php-xml 5.2.10 on CentOS 5.5?
I'm trying to install MediaWiki, and asks that package as a dependency.
Cheers,
I've found that a tarball install of 1.15.5 works fine on a CentOS5.5
machine without any special installation
On 12/9/2010 1:54 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
For the vast majority of issues with SELinux, it possible to overcome
them using the provided tools.
Of course, but I think you're mistaking possible for practical.
Everyone has different incentives and constraints.
Allow me build an analogy with
Warren Young wrote:
On 12/9/2010 1:54 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
For the vast majority of issues with SELinux, it possible to overcome
them using the provided tools.
Of course, but I think you're mistaking possible for practical.
Everyone has different incentives and constraints.
Allow
Hi,
I need to sign a bunch of RPM packages that have interdepencies:
build #1, sign #1, install #1, build #2, sign #2, install #2 etc.
Based on the info in bz436812 [1] I have created the key (RSA sign only,
4096bit, no sub keys) and put this in .rpmmacros:
%_signature gpg
%_gpg_path ~/.gnupg
On 12/9/2010 2:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Also, Apple dictates style; to a lesser degree, so does M$. There's no
dictated style guide for Linux.
That's outdated thinking. Apple's acquired some infamy among its fanboy
base for violating their old style guidelines, which AFAIR were last
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Warren Young wrote:
On 12/9/2010 2:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Also, Apple dictates style; to a lesser degree, so does M$. There's no
dictated style guide for Linux.
That's outdated thinking. Apple's acquired some infamy among its fanboy
How about this long since OT
Am 27.11.10 00:58, schrieb Alison:
total newbie on CentOS.
Nothing against you, you asked a completely valid question.
All others: Can this insanity please stop now? I'm really thinking about
setting a subject moderation filter on this subject.
Ralph
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 23:28 +0100, Patrick Lists wrote:
What's so hard about:
#!/bin/expect
It will take care of all that for you in a jiffie... Yea you need a
passphrase of which expect can handle for you.
John
___
CentOS mailing list
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 11:08 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:06:34 pm Warren Young wrote:
That's great if you are wise enough to forsee all problems that an
automatic update can cause.
I am not that wise.
Nor am I; that's why I have testing server VM's on
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 11:39 PM, Tom H wrote:
SELinux came as a result that someone found weaknesses and wanted to try
avoid security issues. Just like when firewalls began to become so
popular 20-30 years ago or so. There was a need to improve something,
and someone did the job.
On Friday, December 10, 2010 03:12 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2010 11:00:58 Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Or would you prefer paying kilobucks per month for a tariffed OC3/12/48
or Gigabit provisioned Metro E?
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 08:32 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:49 -0600, David G. Mackay wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:41 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:37 -0600, David G. Mackay wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:01 +0100, David
On Dec 9, 2010, at 10:41 AM, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote:
We have several DELL R900 server with PERC 6/E adapter in it. O.S. is CENTOS
5.5. recently one of server continue pop-up messages on /var/log/message for
switch status between write back and write through.
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 10:59 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 06:00:58 am Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Or would you prefer paying kilobucks per month for a tariffed OC3/12/48 or
Gigabit provisioned Metro E?
On 12/09/2010 11:56 PM, JohnS wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 23:28 +0100, Patrick Lists wrote:
What's so hard about:
#!/bin/expect
It will take care of all that for you in a jiffie... Yea you need a
passphrase of which expect can handle for you.
Thanks John. Never thought about
44 matches
Mail list logo
