Dne 14.4.2011 11:31, Timothy Lee napsal(a):
No objections. But please add a link for the English translation (yes,
even inside the English page), so that a person on the translated page
can access the English version if necessary.
Regards,
Timothy Lee
I have just updated the translation
El 15/04/11 04:44, David Hrbáč escribió:
Dne 14.4.2011 11:31, Timothy Lee napsal(a):
No objections. But please add a link for the English translation (yes,
even inside the English page), so that a person on the translated page
can access the English version if necessary.
Regards,
Timothy
Hello guys,
we have done some progress on the new web site project.
We need your comments for the design of the front page.
We have 3 proposals or the design of the frontpage.
Please look at them, we need your help :)
http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/websitever2/
Best regards,
Marian
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0353
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0353.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
4af04eaafd692331c48fcf122a38284f
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0337 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0337.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
b33b25344560f84dd12a82047345f3fa
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0373 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0373.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
c01c86a863ec7724d5351776d62450e4
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0342
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0342.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
4a178e1740228495b3f112d842663a8d
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0359
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0359.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
31ed6ca2e213bed33847e6f2e116695b
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0337 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0337.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
04d76e94af7d17ddefdde420eb3a8d97
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0370 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0370.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
712eb48747851eaec39a295af3106151
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0353
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0353.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
6fa55e58d791036867edfa187564000f
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0378
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0378.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
619a293df04db258d71f8f4643ee261c
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0373 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0373.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
db845cbac7ed905e44bdbe38a805bf73
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0342
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0342.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7e2ed18dc6317fdaacfd2ecedf0e0164
On 12/04/11 22:22, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez wrote:
Fernando Rojas de la Torre wrote:
¿que es lo que puede ocasionar que a pesar que tengo especificado un
cliente con
lo asigna otro servidor de dhcp?
host xen.main {
hardware ethernet xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx;
fixed-address
Hola muy buenas, quería saber si existe algún software que te
replique todos los cambios que hagas en un servidor, en otro. Sé que hay
herramientas como drbd con el sistema de ficheros ocfs2 o gfs que
inclusive se pueden poner los nodos como los dos primarios para poder
escribir en la misma
2011/4/14 Fernando Rojas de la Torre fernando.ro...@uniondetula.gob.mx:
On 12/04/11 22:22, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez wrote:
Fernando Rojas de la Torre wrote:
¿que es lo que puede ocasionar que a pesar que tengo especificado un
cliente con
lo asigna otro servidor de dhcp?
host xen.main {
Hola,
2011/4/15 Maykel Franco Hernandez may...@maykel.sytes.net:
Hola muy buenas, quería saber si existe algún software que te
replique todos los cambios que hagas en un servidor, en otro. Sé que hay
herramientas como drbd con el sistema de ficheros ocfs2 o gfs que
inclusive se pueden poner
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 11:26 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 04/14/2011 08:04 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Then try both for your use case and your hardware. We have wide raid6 setups
that does well over 500 MB/s write (that is: not all raid6 writes suck...).
/me replaces all of Peter's
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 11:19 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:44:00PM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:11 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:07:55PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 4/14/11, John R
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 11:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/14/2011 7:32 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
HAHAHAAAAHA
The XFS codebase is the biggest pile of mess in the Linux kernel and you
expect it to be not run into mysterious problems? Remember, XFS
For a few days I can't boot a server in graphical mode.
The screen goes black and a have a CUI login.
I can login a user and at this point 'startx' get the graphical interface up
in /etc/inittab/
x: 5:respawn: /etc.X11/prefdm -nodaemon
and xdmcp is alivre
On this server we have 12 stations
- Stick to APC
Five years ago I would have said that. Having worked with Liebert's
GXT2 GXT3units now for the last few years, I'm not so sure I'd want
to go back to APC. For us the biggest bonus of Liebert was we got true
online (double conversion) UPS kit at the same price point as APC's
Line
On Friday, April 15, 2011 02:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 7:44 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Now, if OpenIndiana resists using illumos...
openindiana is under the Illumos project umbrella. They aren't going to
use anything else.
Eh? I was under the impression that they are separate
To pass from Centos 5.5 to 5.6 it was easy as an upgrade.
Will it be the same from 5.6 to 6.0 or a full install will be better.
---
Michel Donais___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:28 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5 kernel my time is
2011/4/15 Michel Donais don...@telupton.com:
To pass from Centos 5.5 to 5.6 it was easy as an upgrade.
Will it be the same from 5.6 to 6.0 or a full install will be better.
well, usually upgrading major version is not easy or preferred method.
use full install instead.
--
Eero
Will it be the same from 5.6 to 6.0 or a full install will be better.
Full installs are always recommended between major versions.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 04/14/11 5:43 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2011 02:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 7:44 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Now, if OpenIndiana resists using illumos...
openindiana is under the Illumos project umbrella. They aren't going to
use anything else.
Eh? I
2011/4/14 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com:
On 04/14/11 9:06 AM, admin lewis wrote:
Hi
I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by
apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ?
a simple smart ups 1000 could be enough ?
apc smartups or eaton powerware woudl be my
Michel Donais wrote:
To pass from Centos 5.5 to 5.6 it was easy as an upgrade.
Will it be the same from 5.6 to 6.0 or a full install will be better.
---
There is so big difference between them (base packages, package and
system design, dependencies) that full install will be necessary,
John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 5:43 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2011 02:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 7:44 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Now, if OpenIndiana resists using illumos...
openindiana is under the Illumos project umbrella. They aren't going to
use
On 2011-04-14 20:16, Les Mikesell wrote:
One thing in particular that I'd like to make faster is access to a set
of libraries (boost, etc.) that are in a directory mapped by several
windows boxes (mostly VM's on different machines)used as build servers.
I usually run samba with defaults, as
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rswrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 5:43 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2011 02:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 7:44 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Now, if OpenIndiana resists using illumos...
Thanks to all for the info.
Guess I will either keep CentOS 5 and have to compile my own kernel for the
discard option; or wait for CentOS 6...
Thx,
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Friday, April 15, 2011 03:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 5:43 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2011 02:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 7:44 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Now, if OpenIndiana resists using illumos...
openindiana is under the Illumos project
On Apr 15, 2011, at 4:48 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 5:43 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2011 02:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/14/11 7:44 AM,
On 04/14/2011 06:23 AM, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5 kernel my time is perfect. All
clients can
[Reposted now I've joined the list, so I hopefully don't get moderated out]
Hi,
I've upgraded lots of machines to 5.6 (thanks!) and there was one
particular machine that I'd also like to upgrade to PHP 5.3.
Unfortunately it seems I can't.
On the machine I have php-mssql installed, and it
On 04/14/2011 09:00 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Wanna try that again with 64MB of cache only and tell us whether there
is a difference in performance?
There is a reason why 3ware 85xx cards were complete rubbish when used
for raid5 and which led to the 95xx/96xx series.
_
I don't happen to
I uploaded the spec here:
http://ubliga.de/php-eaccelerator.spec
It's adjusted for RHEL/Centos 5.6 so that it works with stock php53
packages - no need to pull in packages from other repos.
Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
More PHP fun!
I can see in the spec files that php-mcrypt support was removed by Redhat. I
tried to find out why but I don't have sufficient access to redhat bugzilla. I
am wondering if it is actually necessary as I have also run across a post or
two that indicates applications that rely on
Some of the newer HP servers are very picky about power from UPS's, from
what I have read.
I have used several Best Ferrups UPSs over the years, other than one
that toasted it's transformer, have never had any trouble out of them
(just replace the battery every 3 to 4 years).
They are
On 15/04/11 12:23, John Beranek wrote:
[Reposted now I've joined the list, so I hopefully don't get moderated out]
Hi,
I've upgraded lots of machines to 5.6 (thanks!) and there was one
particular machine that I'd also like to upgrade to PHP 5.3.
Unfortunately it seems I can't.
On the
Am 15.04.2011 13:32, schrieb Geoff Galitz:
More PHP fun!
I can see in the spec files that php-mcrypt support was removed by
Redhat. I tried to find out why but I don't have sufficient access to
redhat bugzilla. I am wondering if it is actually necessary as I have
also run across a post or two
Rainer Traut wrote on 04/15/2011 07:55 AM:
...
Yeah, I had the same problem with missing php_mcrypt. ;)
I did a full rebuild of php53 with patched spec so that it produces
php53_mcrypt but that is not very elegant.
The more elegant way to do it is to make an rpm for only the missing
modules
John Beranek wrote on 04/15/2011 07:45 AM:
On 15/04/11 12:23, John Beranek wrote:
[Reposted now I've joined the list, so I hopefully don't get moderated out]
Hi,
I've upgraded lots of machines to 5.6 (thanks!) and there was one
particular machine that I'd also like to upgrade to PHP 5.3.
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 05:26:41 PM Ross Walker wrote:
2011/4/14 Peter Kjellström c...@nsc.liu.se:
...
While I do concede the obvious point regarding rebuild time (raid6 takes
from long to very long to rebuild) I'd like to point out:
* If you do the math for a 12 drive raid10 vs
On Friday, April 15, 2011 07:24 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 04/14/2011 09:00 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Wanna try that again with 64MB of cache only and tell us whether there
is a difference in performance?
There is a reason why 3ware 85xx cards were complete rubbish when used
for raid5
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2011 07:24 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 04/14/2011 09:00 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Wanna try that again with 64MB of cache only and tell us whether there
is a difference in
On 15/04/11 13:49, Phil Schaffner wrote:
John Beranek wrote on 04/15/2011 07:45 AM:
On 15/04/11 12:23, John Beranek wrote:
[Reposted now I've joined the list, so I hopefully don't get moderated out]
Hi,
I've upgraded lots of machines to 5.6 (thanks!) and there was one
particular machine
On 04/15/2011 06:05 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Woohoo, next we will be seeing md raid6 also giving comparable results
if that is the case. I am not the only person on this list that thinks
cache is king for raid5/6 on hardware raid boards and the using hardware
raid + bbu cache for better
Hello,
Earlier this week I installed a test server with CentOS 5.6 with
Virtualization enabled during the installer. Today I installed another
server using the same method (they are identical servers). I just did a
yum update and I found something curious. Both servers have a different
Hello Cal,
Thank you for your reply.
It's possible that your #2 server has not rebooted or had problems with
the latest kernel or just has the default set to something other than
0 in grub.conf.
I did a reboot and checked the grub.conf. Should have mentioned that.
What's the output of:
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 16:37 +0200, Hans Vos wrote:
Hello Cal,
Thank you for your reply.
It's possible that your #2 server has not rebooted or had problems with
the latest kernel or just has the default set to something other than
0 in grub.conf.
I did a reboot and checked the
Hello,
Ryan is right. The mirrors need to sync up. That's most likely the
cause. Still, it's curious why you have two kernels listed in grub.conf
and only one listed from yum. You should also see the 2.6.18-238.el5xen
kernel listed.
Well, I copied the /var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt file from
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Hans Vos h...@laissezfaire.nl wrote:
Well, I copied the /var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt file from server 1 to
server 2. Then run yum update and all kinds of errors came flying at me.
So I just SCP'ed the whole /var/cache/yum directory of server 1 to
server 2.
On 4/15/2011 10:48, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/15/11 4:38 AM, Howard Fleming wrote:
I have used several Best Ferrups UPSs over the years, other than one
that toasted it's transformer, have never had any trouble out of them
(just replace the battery every 3 to 4 years).
They are picky
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 17:00 +0200, Hans Vos wrote:
Hello,
Ryan is right. The mirrors need to sync up. That's most likely the
cause. Still, it's curious why you have two kernels listed in grub.conf
and only one listed from yum. You should also see the 2.6.18-238.el5xen
kernel listed.
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 11:07 -0400, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Hans Vos h...@laissezfaire.nl wrote:
Well, I copied the /var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt file from server 1 to
server 2. Then run yum update and all kinds of errors came flying at me.
So I just SCP'ed the
Not sure the outcome of copying the yum directory. I would have just
run yum clean all then yum update.
Ah, thanks, I will put that in my personal Wiki for future reference.
Noob here and it is a test environment at home :). Thanks for your help.
--
Kind regards,
Hans Vos
On 04/15/2011 04:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/14/2011 06:23 AM, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5
On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2011 07:24 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 04/14/2011 09:00 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Wanna try that again
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2011
On 04/13/2011 07:54 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
They are definitely in there, just slow.
- KB
Hi guys,
Still without SRPM's in 5.6/os/SRPMS/
--
Filipe
Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I'm a Thunderbird user almost since day one, but now I'm looking for
something else. For whatever reason, it doesn't work well for me - every
once in a while it becomes non-responsive (UI completely frozen for
several seconds, CPU usage goes to 100%) and I just can't afford to
waste time
On 04/15/11 12:07 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
I'm a Thunderbird user almost since day one, but now I'm looking for
something else. For whatever reason, it doesn't work well for me - every
once in a while it becomes non-responsive (UI completely frozen for
several seconds, CPU usage goes to 100%)
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org wrote:
I'm a Thunderbird user almost since day one, but now I'm looking for
something else. For whatever reason, it doesn't work well for me - every
once in a while it becomes non-responsive (UI completely frozen for
several
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:30:10PM -0500, Jeff wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org wrote:
I'm a Thunderbird user almost since day one, but now I'm looking for
something else. For whatever reason, it doesn't work well for me - every
once in a while
On 04/15/2011 12:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
I think T-bird gets locked up when its SENDING mail if the server takes
too long to reply at the early stages of the protocol. that or DNS
lookups take too long.
At least in my case - no and no.
It freezes randomly but pretty often, no relation
On 04/15/2011 12:30 PM, Jeff wrote:
By default Thunderbird creates a local cache for IMAP accounts -- for
large accounts, this can be problematic. Have you tried disabling the
local synchronization?
Account Settings - Synch Storage - Uncheck Keep messages for this
account on this
On 04/15/11 12:45 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
On 04/15/2011 12:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
I think T-bird gets locked up when its SENDING mail if the server takes
too long to reply at the early stages of the protocol. that or DNS
lookups take too long.
At least in my case - no and no.
It
On 4/15/2011 3:46 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
On 04/15/2011 12:30 PM, Jeff wrote:
By default Thunderbird creates a local cache for IMAP accounts -- for
large accounts, this can be problematic. Have you tried disabling the
local synchronization?
Account Settings - Synch Storage - Uncheck
On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Christopher Chan
On 4/15/2011 7:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I do not see anything from Dell that is a model C151.
I also do not see anything in the RH bugzilla that is problematic for
older AMD processors and the clock, unless running KVM type virtual
machines.
Is this a VM or regular install?
If this a real
On 4/15/2011 4:58 PM, Mailing List wrote:
Johnny,
Sorry about the wrong system id number here is what it is.
Dell Inspiron C521
Bios Version 1.1.11 (08/07/2007)
It is not a VM, it is a regular install. I have not made any
changes to the kernel options. It has been fine with a
Hi there --
I am running a server with the 5.6 64-bit distribution, and I am looking for an
unrar rpm package.
I have several repositories set up on the server which are the following:
base
updates
extras
centosplus
contrib
c5-testing
All are enabled. When I do a yum search for unrar, nothing
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:38:49 -0400
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
All are enabled. When I do a yum search for unrar, nothing comes up. Is there
another repository
that I should add to the list, or is there a particular website that I can go
to get the package?
rpmfusion has it.
--
MELVILLE
On 04/15/11 2:38 PM, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
Hi there --
I am running a server with the 5.6 64-bit distribution, and I am
looking for an unrar rpm package.
I have several repositories set up on the server which are the following:
base
updates
extras
centosplus
contrib
c5-testing
On 4/15/2011 5:50 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:38:49 -0400
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
All are enabled. When I do a yum search for unrar, nothing comes up. Is there
another repository
that I should add to the list, or is there a particular website that I can go
to get the package?
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:54:23PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/15/11 2:38 PM, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
Hi there --
I am running a server with the 5.6 64-bit distribution, and I am
looking for an unrar rpm package.
I have several repositories set up on the server which are the
As matter of interest, does anyone know how to use an SSD drive for cach
purposes on Linux software RAID drives? ZFS has this feature and it
makes a helluva difference to a storage server's performance.
You cannot. You can however use one for the external journal of ext3/4
in full
Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org wrote:
I'm a Thunderbird user almost since day one, but now I'm looking for
something else.
Check out Mulberry. http://mulberrymail.com/ It hasn't been updated
in a while, but don't let that scare you off. It's a very solid mail
reader for Linux, Mac,
Will it be the same from 5.6 to 6.0 or a full install will be better.
Full installs are always recommended between major versions.
Thank's all for the advise; but is there any easy way to install a newer
version while keeping all configuration changes that have been made on a
previous one
On 04/15/11 7:40 PM, Michel Donais wrote:
Will it be the same from 5.6 to 6.0 or a full install will be better.
Full installs are always recommended between major versions.
Thank's all for the advise; but is there any easy way to install a newer
version while keeping all configuration changes
have all your configuration under a change management system, with an at
least semi-automated installation procedure, such as kickstart.
I nerver think kikstart was I need.
I will check what it is and how it work.
Thank's for the info.
---
Michel Donais
I tried out Scientific Linux 6 Live to see (basically) what I can
expect with CentOS 6 and was pleased to find that everything looks
pretty familiar and is easily customizable to make it look and feel
like 5.6 -- except for one thing that I also noticed in Ubuntu's
newest beta (my Dad uses Linux
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
have all your configuration under a change management system, with an at
least semi-automated installation procedure, such as kickstart.
Or have the self discipline to keep a text file (or other record) of
*all* changes you make to a system as root or
88 matches
Mail list logo
