Hi all;
On OS Hardening ( http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection )
there's a section on Physical Protection that includes requiring a
single-user mode password. There's four lines that look something like
this:
echo Require the root pw when booting into single user mode /etc/inittab
echo
On 16 June 2011 08:26, Cody Jackson supertanke...@gmail.com wrote:
On OS Hardening ( http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection )
there's a section on Physical Protection that includes requiring a
single-user mode password. There's four lines that look something like
this:
echo Require the
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote:
On 16 June 2011 08:26, Cody Jackson supertanke...@gmail.com wrote:
perl -npe
's/ca::ctrlaltdel:\/sbin\/shutdown/#ca::ctrlaltdel:\/sbin\/shutdown/'
-i /etc/inittab
I think God kills a kitten whenever perl is invoked when
simple sed would do ...
Hi,
I have a host with 3 guests ( 2 CentOs 1 Windows 2003 )
If I shutdown or reboot host the virtual machines starts up with no problems,
If I pull down power supply when power come back host regulary
startup, the vm startup ( autostart ) but vm machines network doesn't
works
until I connect to
I've finally got a new machine coming that will allow me to play with
virtualization. What might most of you recommend for the type of
virtualization software I use. I seem to recall that xen might not be
the best choice due to it's lack of development. I could be wrong,
though. For the
On 06/16/2011 08:07 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've finally got a new machine coming that will allow me to play with
virtualization.
I presume this means the cpu has virtualization extensions.
What might most of you recommend for the type of
virtualization software I use. I seem to recall
:) de acuerdo no habia leido eso perdona.
A continuación te los mando:
Una question, para saber si la sincronización se hara correctamente, ambos
discos han de aparecer del modo: [U,U] ?¿
mdadm --detail /dev/md0
Version: 0.90
Creation Time: Fri Jun 10 12:23 2011
Raid Level: raid1
Array Size:
Eduardo muy buenas!
Te acabo de enviar un correo, però te explico gracias a los pasos que me
mandaste el primer dia he conseguido lo siguiente:
Te mando el cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities: [raid1]
Md0: active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
104320 blocks [2/2] [UU]
Md1: active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0]
2011/6/16 Oriol Borràs obor...@jsf.es:
Eduardo muy buenas!
Te acabo de enviar un correo, però te explico gracias a los pasos que me
mandaste el primer dia he conseguido lo siguiente:
Te mando el cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities: [raid1]
Md0: active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
104320 blocks
Tenemos un problema Eduardo y es que creo que al ser de Argentina vamos al
reves en el sentido horario, es decir yo ahora ya no estoy en la oficina por lo
que no puedo ver el servidor y los datos te los mandaré mañana :)
Por otro lado creo que te he agregado en Linkedin, ya que va bien tener
El día 14 de junio de 2011 14:11, test t...@giron.sld.cu escribió:
Deseo saber como hacer que un usuario pueda tener derecho de r,w,x sobre una
carpeta y archivos de un lugar determinado ejemplo /www o /ftp pero que a
la vez pueda subir y bajar archivos de ella.
Si el usuario no es dueño
On 06/15/2011 05:52 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Drawback is that such KVM guest is not as easy to move to another host
if current host can not boot. Copying image and config files will be
much faster.
There is no reason that should be true. Copying 20GB out of an LV
should take exactly
On 06/15/2011 07:04 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Looking at some very sparse notes I made on the decision, I think what
tipped the choice was that both qcow2 and lvm added overheads, but lvm
was on the whole system i.e. the host has additional processing on
every i/o whereas qcow2 overheads
On 6/16/11, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
I think you were misinformed, or misled.
That wouldn't be new for me as far as system administration is concerned :D
LVM should not present any
noticeable overhead on the host. Using raw files to back VMs presents
a significant overhead to
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:56 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 06/15/11 9:44 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Mike Williamsdmikewilli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Low humidity would be my first guess. The relative humidity in your
server room should be between 50% +/- 10%.
James A. Peltier wrote:
BTW: Can anyone try this to see if it is in fact a bug or not?
Create a file called
/etc/udev/rules.d/99-udev-override.rules
that contains
KERNEL==tty[A-Z]*, GROUP=some_other_group_than_uucp, MODE=0660,
OPTIONS=last_rule
with mode of 0644 reboot and
On 6/16/11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
actually, its 40-60%, I believe. and you should have a humidifier as
part of your A/C, since cooling air sucks the moisture out of it. I
would NOT rely on a fishtank to provide any significant humidity.
Well, can't be so sure the fish
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
Mint/Ubuntu don't have an easy way to boot into the command line.
To boot into
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
On Jun 15, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
Like RHEL/CentOS, Ubuntu LTS is absolutely appropriate for server use.
In fact, it's sort of
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
those days will be over soon as even fedora has now switched to upstart
CentOS 7 (based on upstream 7) will be a vastly different beast
CentOS 7 will most probably have systemd not upstart.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Or edit /etc/inittab to boot to runlevel 3, or just init 3 from the
command line (which you can reach via ctrlalt-f1) or I think you can
append 3 to the kernel line...
That doesn't work on Debian/Ubuntu because runlevels 2-5 are the
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:17:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Or edit /etc/inittab to boot to runlevel 3, or just init 3 from the
command line (which you can reach via ctrlalt-f1) or I think you can
append 3 to the kernel line...
That
On 6/16/11 1:56 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/15/2011 05:52 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Drawback is that such KVM guest is not as easy to move to another host
if current host can not boot. Copying image and config files will be
much faster.
There is no reason that should be true.
Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:17:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Or edit /etc/inittab to boot to runlevel 3, or just init 3 from the
command line (which you can reach via ctrlalt-f1) or I think you
can append 3 to the
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 06/15/2011 10:41 PM, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot
of advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional
wisdom might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
Three is evil, four
- Original Message -
| James A. Peltier wrote:
|
| BTW: Can anyone try this to see if it is in fact a bug or not?
|
| Create a file called
|
| /etc/udev/rules.d/99-udev-override.rules
|
| that contains
|
| KERNEL==tty[A-Z]*, GROUP=some_other_group_than_uucp,
| MODE=0660,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:15:28PM +0100, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:17:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Or edit /etc/inittab to boot to runlevel 3, or just init 3 from the
command line
Laurence Hurst wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:15:28PM +0100, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:17:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Or edit /etc/inittab to boot to runlevel 3, or just init 3 from
On 06/16/2011 05:59 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
What about the destination? Wouldn't it likely be harder to find a place to
put
the LV copy than space to write a file? Or can you copy back and forth?
Yes, you can copy the content of a partition to a file and use it that
way, or the reverse.
On 06/16/2011 06:15 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
2 isn't much used, except as a set of steps
I think you're referring to Solaris' init. I'm not aware of any Linux
init systems that start up by stepping through runlevels.
___
CentOS mailing list
On 6/16/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
runlevels, traditionally, have not been defined (although the LSB has
In Linux? I mean, runlevel 3 was multi-user text mode as far back as Sun
OS - I can remember putting things into 3, because X would
while () {
crash
respawn
}
On 06/16/2011 12:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/16/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
runlevels, traditionally, have not been defined (although the LSB has
In Linux? I mean, runlevel 3 was multi-user text mode as far back as Sun
OS - I can remember putting things into 3, because X would
On 06/16/2011 12:58 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/16/2011 12:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/16/2011 10:43 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
runlevels, traditionally, have not been defined (although the LSB has
In Linux? I mean, runlevel 3 was multi-user text mode as far back as Sun
OS - I can
No. I worked with both SCO and ISC linux in the late 80's and early 90's and
run level 5 was used for X. In fact I think
it was used also in DGUX for X.
I don't know about ISC UNIX (aka Interactive UNIX) but SCO did not use run
level 5 for X. I cut my teeth on System V UNIX including
34 matches
Mail list logo
