CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1413
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1413.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
9685cce41f19d878310bf2a386a835e9
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1413
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1413.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
9685cce41f19d878310bf2a386a835e9
slds lista , tengo una pregunta abra alguna manera de decirle al
shorewall q en ves de q use el archivo mesagges dentro del var/log sea
x asi decir iptables ?
es que necesito ver los mensajes generales del sistema y shorewall
genera mucho trafico.
sldss
--
rickygm
2011/11/1 troxlinux xserverli...@gmail.com
slds lista , tengo una pregunta abra alguna manera de decirle al
shorewall q en ves de q use el archivo mesagges dentro del var/log sea
x asi decir iptables ?
es que necesito ver los mensajes generales del sistema y shorewall
genera mucho trafico.
Vaya, no quisiera ver a nadie en esa situacion... y menos si te tratara de
algo en produccion
Estimado, seria ideal que indicaras la version que usas del CentOS y sobre
todo, que hiciste al agregar ese disco (comandos)
Tengo un Post de RedHat que me parece es lo que esta pasando
Pues, lo que hice fue:
root# shutdown -h now
conectar el hd sata
encender el equipo
y sufrir porque no levanto mas.
La version de Centos , es la 5.5
No instalé nada, ni actualice nada.
Desde la ultima vez que lo hice (dos o 3 meses), reinicie varias veces ya.
No quiero pecar de osado al decir:
If absolute 100% binary compatibility is not required, but admin-level
compatibility and source-level compatibility with upstream EL is, Scientific
Linux is covering that niche, and has their 6.1 out.
In which concrete use cases is 100% binary compatibility important?
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
One difference I ran into with samba authentication is in cent 5
/etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac is the file to change but in cent 6 its
/etc/pam.d/password-auth-ac. I found that changes I made only to
system-auth-ac in 5 had to be made to both
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Mathieu Baudier mbaud...@argeo.org wrote:
If absolute 100% binary compatibility is not required, but admin-level
compatibility and source-level compatibility with upstream EL is, Scientific
Linux is covering that niche, and has their 6.1 out.
In which
hi Patrick,
On 10/31/2011 11:29 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote:
thanks for quickly handling this. But aren't the updated xorg-x11-server
packages now missing in total? Or are they not yet ready for
cr?
They are missing from the CR repo now, I've got the srpm and debug info
stuff going out at
On 11/01/2011 06:53 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2011/11/1 Bob Hoffmanb...@bobhoffman.com:
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat
making a move to throw off centos compilations.
I read some stories about microsoft wanting to work closer with centos
2011/11/1 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de:
On 11/01/2011 06:53 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2011/11/1 Bob Hoffmanb...@bobhoffman.com:
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat
making a move to throw off centos compilations.
I read some stories about
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2011/11/1 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de:
On 11/01/2011 06:53 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2011/11/1 Bob Hoffmanb...@bobhoffman.com:
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat
Vreme: 11/01/2011 11:02 AM, Peter Peltonen piše:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Mathieu Baudiermbaud...@argeo.org wrote:
If absolute 100% binary compatibility is not required, but admin-level
compatibility and source-level compatibility with upstream EL is,
Scientific Linux is
In article calkwpeyupru5az9xu_d_brjc0m_e9xdlh1t5iub2u8rvrze...@mail.gmail.com,
Brian Mathis brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com wrote:
When Redhat announced the changes they made it very clear they were
trying to prevent other companies (like Oracle and Novell) who were
providing support to
On 01.11.2011 11:46, Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi Patrick,
On 10/31/2011 11:29 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote:
thanks for quickly handling this. But aren't the updated xorg-x11-server
packages now missing in total? Or are they not yet ready for
cr?
They are missing from the CR repo now, I've
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Peter Peltonen peter.pelto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Mathieu Baudier mbaud...@argeo.org wrote:
If absolute 100% binary compatibility is not required, but admin-level
compatibility and source-level compatibility with upstream EL
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
No clone distros, including CentOS and Scientific Linux, are perfect.
If someone asks which of the two has a better binary compatibility, I
would answer, they are equally good.
One of the 'selling points' as a big reason to
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Mitch Patenaude wrote:
I'm having trouble setting up ldap based authenication.
I have a virtual (KVM) CentOS 5.4 box set up to authenticate to a
389 (fedora) directory server, and that works fine.
However, I set up a virtual box running CentOS 6, and I can't get it
On 11/01/2011 01:46 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat
making a move to throw off centos compilations.
Having spoken to folks at Red Hat in an unofficial capacity, I strongly
believe that CentOS is appreciated by Red Hat. Changes Red
Vreme: 11/01/2011 04:50 PM, Digimer piše:
On 11/01/2011 01:46 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat
making a move to throw off centos compilations.
Having spoken to folks at Red Hat in an unofficial capacity, I strongly
believe that
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Vreme: 11/01/2011 04:50 PM, Digimer piše:
On 11/01/2011 01:46 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat
making a move to throw off centos compilations.
Having spoken
On 11/01/2011 12:27 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Vreme: 11/01/2011 04:50 PM, Digimer piše:
On 11/01/2011 01:46 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat
making a move to
Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a):
Real problem with recent release troubles with CentOS is that some
(or many?) are migrating to Ubuntu/Debian rather than to other RHEL
clones, which might eventually hurt the entire Red Hat community.
Well, there are no other RHEL clones except
Vreme: 11/01/2011 05:27 PM, Akemi Yagi piše:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rs wrote:
Vreme: 11/01/2011 04:50 PM, Digimer piše:
On 11/01/2011 01:46 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat
making a move to
- Original Message -
From: Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 10:46:57 PM
Subject: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about
redhat
making a move to throw off
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:19 AM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote:
For those of you that still are running CentOS 4... I have one system
that is still going... there is a problem with the newest release of
Dovecot under mbox. Certain spam is causing this error when users try to
log on.
On 11/01/11 9:47 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Well, there are no other RHEL clones except SL/Centos.
coughOracle Enterprise Linux/cough
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article calkwpeyupru5az9xu_d_brjc0m_e9xdlh1t5iub2u8rvrze...@mail.gmail.com,
Brian Mathis brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com wrote:
When Redhat announced the changes they made it very clear they were
trying to prevent other companies (like Oracle and Novell) who
Thanks to everybody for their suggestions, and for the pointer to getent, which
was a gap in my sysadmin toolchest.
I figured out the problem. The problem was that nslcd wasn't starting properly
because the nslcd user didn't exist. We're using the same base passwd file for
both centos5 and
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with
CentOS as long
as there are timely updates. That tells me you dont really care about getting
support from
the vendor. You can pick up workstation self support for $50 and
On 11/01/2011 02:27 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with
CentOS as long
as there are timely updates. That tells me you dont really care about getting
support from
the vendor.
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 01:57:29PM -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article
calkwpeyupru5az9xu_d_brjc0m_e9xdlh1t5iub2u8rvrze...@mail.gmail.com,
Brian Mathis brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com wrote:
When Redhat announced the changes they made it very clear they were
On 11/01/11 12:09 PM, fred smith wrote:
Also, one wonders, since most of it is GPL (or gpl-compatible), how can
they place acceptable use policies on it? (some of the non-gpl parts, sure,
but...)
the AUP is on the services that RH provides.
--
john r pierceN 37,
on 11/1/2011 10:30 AM Grant McChesney spake the following:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:19 AM, John Hintonwebmas...@ew3d.com wrote:
For those of you that still are running CentOS 4... I have one system
that is still going... there is a problem with the newest release of
Dovecot under mbox.
2011/11/1 David Hrbáč david-li...@hrbac.cz:
Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a):
Real problem with recent release troubles with CentOS is that some
(or many?) are migrating to Ubuntu/Debian rather than to other RHEL
clones, which might eventually hurt the entire Red Hat community.
I'm setting up a dedicated database server, and since this will be a
central service to my various web servers I wanted it to be as secure as
possible...so I am leaving SELinux enabled. However I'm having trouble
getting Apache to use mod_auth_pam. I also now can't get setroubleshootd
working to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/01/2011 04:16 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
I'm setting up a dedicated database server, and since this will be
a central service to my various web servers I wanted it to be as
secure as possible...so I am leaving SELinux enabled. However I'm
On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with
CentOS as long
as there are timely updates. That tells me you dont really care about getting
support from
the vendor. You can
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article
calkwpeyupru5az9xu_d_brjc0m_e9xdlh1t5iub2u8rvrze...@mail.gmail.com,
Brian Mathis brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com wrote:
When Redhat announced the changes they made it very clear
On 11/01/2011 03:50 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article
calkwpeyupru5az9xu_d_brjc0m_e9xdlh1t5iub2u8rvrze...@mail.gmail.com,
Brian Mathis brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com wrote:
When Redhat
Do you have the
allow_httpd_mod_auth_pam
boolean turned on?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk6wVZgACgkQrlYvE4MpobOg8gCgzbPmuUBJJ20iBhAQnCoTvZVU
On 11/01/2011 09:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with
CentOS as long
as there are timely updates. That tells me you dont really care about
On 11/01/2011 06:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/01/2011 09:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with
CentOS as long
as there are timely
- Original Message -
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 2:12:15 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
On 11/01/2011 03:50 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Rob Kampen
rkam...@kampensonline.com
On 11/01/11 3:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Just to be sure does that mean that for $2000 I can install on one physical
system and unlimited guests on that system or does that mean the $2000 are
only for the host system with the*ability* to host an unlimited number of
guests and I still
Do you have the
allow_httpd_mod_auth_pam
boolean turned on?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk6wVZgACgkQrlYvE4MpobOg8gCgzbPmuUBJJ20iBhAQnCoTvZVU
I have an older quad-core AMD processor that supports hardware
virtualization on a motherboard that does not support it in the bios.
Eventually I'll swap the mobo out on this box for one that will support
hardware virtualization and use qemu-kvm. I prefer kvm because of
SELinux and sVirt that
Any tips/tricks concerning it?
While I am used to using esx, I am forced to use vb on my wkst at my
new gig and can tell you there are age old bugs that have never been
resolved with respect to snap shot children not being cleaned up properly
and the xml config while having a nice programatic
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:47 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a):
Real problem with recent release troubles with CentOS is that some
(or many?) are migrating to Ubuntu/Debian rather than to other RHEL
clones, which might eventually hurt the entire Red Hat
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:30:57AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:47 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a):
Real problem with recent release troubles with CentOS is that some
(or many?) are migrating to Ubuntu/Debian rather than
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:47 AM, fred smith wrote:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:30:57AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:47 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a):
Real problem with recent release troubles with CentOS is that
On 01/11/11 22:26, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/01/2011 09:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with
CentOS as long
as there are timely
On 02/11/11 05:34, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 22:26, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/01/2011 09:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with
On 11/01/11 10:37 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
All I can tell you is that our virtualization licenses allow you to
install on 1 host (up to 2 sockets), and on*that* one host you can then
install as many RHEL guests as you like and they will all be entitled to
updates through RHN without
56 matches
Mail list logo
