Can someone add CentOS 6:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/testing/CentOS-Testing.repo; to the
CentOS-Testing[1] section?
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
thanks,
jerry
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jerry Amundson jamun...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can someone add CentOS
6: http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/testing/CentOS-Testing.repo; to the
CentOS-Testing[1] section?
[1]
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jerry Amundson jamun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jerry Amundson jamun...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can someone add CentOS
6:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0026
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0026.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0013
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0013.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
On Mon, January 16, 2012 17:01, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 01/16/2012 10:16 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
...
The xmldump for this guest instance contains this:
...
Please post the xmldumps of the original guest and cloned
guest right after
cloning and without any modifications.
On 01/17/2012 06:46 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Mon, January 16, 2012 17:01, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 01/16/2012 10:16 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
...
The xmldump for this guest instance contains this:
...
Please post the xmldumps of the original guest and cloned
guest right after
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck
l.wandreb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:18:26 -0600
Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
I would get a dell r210 from the outlet site and then load pfsense,
been running in multiple locations, solid and works great.
Do NOT use
Am Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:02:01 +0200
schrieb Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com:
Back to the topic though, how does one guarantee 100% uptime on the
firewall level when you use a standard dedicated server?
pfSense offers failover via CARP
___
CentOS
On 01/16/12 11:05 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
If the script you are running is hardcoded to require ia32-libs, then
that install method is not compatible with CentOS. You probably will
have to read the script's code to see whether it fits CentOS.
indeed, the install.pl in zdesktop seems to
Thanks, I found the package perl-ExtUtils-Embed caused this problem.
An Yang an.eurof...@gmail.com 於 2012年1月17日下午3:55 寫道：
At 2012-01-17 Tue 15:42 +0800，Lenin wrote：
Has anyone compiled Vim 7.3 on CentOS 6.2 64bit ?
I got the following error after *configure --enable-perlinterp make*:
On 01/16/2012 12:34 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
With companies like Facebook and Google offering cash prizes for people
who can find security holes in their products, has there ever been any
consideration given to offering cash rewards to people finding security
exploits in CentOS or in
Hugh E Cruickshank writes:
Hi All:
We have been looking at implementing deduplication on a backup server.
From what I have been able to find the available documentation is
pretty thin. I ended up trying to install LessFS on this CentOS 5.7
box but we have now encountered problems with fuse
Jason T. Slack-Moehrle writes:
Hi All,
I want to build a dedicated firewall/router as I am launching a NPO and I can
host this in my garage. (Comcast offered me a 100 x 20 circuit for $99/mo
with 5 statics)
[...]
Thoughts, opinions, suggestions are welcome as to what to do!
From: Harold Pritchett har...@uga.edu
I am attempting to install Etherpad on a CentOS 5.7 system.
Maybe analyze the fedora srpm...
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/sdz/etherpad/fedora-13/SRPMS/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hello,
I have an HP Pavilion g series laptop with an ATI vision A6 video
chipset. I tried elrepos ati driver but found that the laptop would
freeze intermittently and frequently. So I unloaded that driver and am
running with nomodeset argument just to get a desktop.
I went to the ATI site but
17.1.2012 13:11, Phil Savoie kirjoitti:
I have an HP Pavilion g series laptop with an ATI vision A6 video
chipset. I tried elrepos ati driver but found that the laptop would
freeze intermittently and frequently. So I unloaded that driver and am
running with nomodeset argument just to get a
On 01/17/2012 07:00 AM, Markku Kolkka wrote:
17.1.2012 13:11, Phil Savoie kirjoitti:
I have an HP Pavilion g series laptop with an ATI vision A6 video
chipset. I tried elrepos ati driver but found that the laptop would
freeze intermittently and frequently. So I unloaded that driver and am
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
I want to build a dedicated firewall/router as I am launching a NPO and
I can host this in my garage. (Comcast offered me a 100 x 20 circuit for
$99/mo with 5 statics)
I use two Dell R310's in a master/backup setup with shorewall and
CentOS Experts,
I am receiving the following in /var/spool/mail/root. I cleaned out the
file and then rebooted and the same errors came back. Is it possible to
analyze the data and advise if there is an issue with my system? This is
a completely fresh install.
From u...@localhost.srv.net
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
It is to my understanding that the /boot partition should never be
placed on LVM and should be a physical partition on the hard drives
(or on top of a RAID array). Is this an accurate statement?
/boot on LVM is quite safe as long as it is below
CentOS Linux + Fwbuilder FTW!
El 17/01/12 14:38, Steve Thompson escribió:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
I want to build a dedicated firewall/router as I am launching a NPO and
I can host this in my garage. (Comcast offered me a 100 x 20 circuit for
$99/mo with 5
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank h...@forsoft.com wrote:
If not LessFS can you suggest an alternate deduplication software?
Backuppc dedups (and compresses) at the file level using hardlinks.
Trust you to always come up with an interesting suggestion or two. I
will have
On 01/17/2012 11:40 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
on LVM is quite safe as long as it is below 2GB
It's not possible put /boot on LVM when you working with GRUB.
Grub works with 2 stages:
1º - MBR ( Master Boot Record ) , with instruction to access the
partition where store kernel , initrd and
On 01/17/2012 11:38 AM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
CentOS Experts,
I am receiving the following in /var/spool/mail/root. I cleaned out the
file and then rebooted and the same errors came back. Is it possible to
analyze the data and advise if there is an issue with my system? This is
a
On 1/16/2012 3:13 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Well I wasn't necessarily advocating it here, just asking whether people
would feel more or less secure using CentOS if such a prize program
existed (whether run by CentOS or RHEL), and why or why not.
Well, no.
Usually attacks to system are caused
Well one of the lessons of the recent threads seems to be that there is
a lot of disagreement over what constitutes a misconfigured server.
Some people consider a server misconfigured if it doesn't use a firewall
to limit access to sshd, some people consider it misconfigured if sshd
uses
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Bennett Haselton benn...@peacefire.org wrote:
But there seems to be some consensus, at least, that exploits do get
found which allow apache to run arbitrary code (even under its
unprivileged account),
Web servers are particularly prone to this because webapps
I've read that it's not recommended to automatically apply updates via
yum-updated on production servers, but I keep encountering servers that
have this enabled.
Are any of you doing automatic yum updates on production servers in CentOS
5 via yum-updatesd? Have you experienced any negative side
On 01/17/2012 02:30 PM, P J wrote:
I've read that it's not recommended to automatically apply updates via
yum-updated on production servers, but I keep encountering servers that
have this enabled.
Are any of you doing automatic yum updates on production servers in CentOS
5 via yum-updatesd?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
Is anyone running mediatomb under CentOS-6?
I've installed it from rpmforge.repo
(I think it used to be in the epel repository under CentOS-5)
but I don't know how to configure it.
I'm trying to use it to see photos
Best reason I can think of is application feature deprecation.
If an update contains changes to the default configuration file then the
file will normally be installed with the '.rpmnew' extension.
If an application decides to deprecate and phase out options which you
actually use in the current
From: P J pauljfli...@gmail.com
I've read that it's not recommended to automatically apply updates via
yum-updated on production servers, but I keep encountering servers that
have this enabled.
Some parameters/configurations/functionalities might
change/appear/disappear, depending on the
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
For example, I want to access a directory /Photos/ on my TV,
but I've no idea how to add this to the sqlite database,
if indeed one has to do this.
I can access the local web-page at 192.168.2.2:50500
but this does
On 1/17/2012 8:11 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Bennett Haseltonbenn...@peacefire.org
wrote:
But there seems to be some consensus, at least, that exploits do get
found which allow apache to run arbitrary code (even under its
unprivileged account),
Web servers are
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Bennett Haselton
benn...@peacefire.org wrote:
Pretty much all software testing is predicated on this notion -- that as
you find and fix more bugs (of any kind, not just security bugs),
eventually the mean time to find the next bug should get larger.
On 01/16/2012 07:26 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
It is to my understanding that the /boot partition should never be
placed on LVM and should be a physical partition on the hard drives
(or on top of a RAID array). Is this an accurate statement?
Not necessarily never but not if your boot loader
On 01/16/2012 07:38 PM, Muhammad Panji wrote:
even if you need more swap you can make (additional) swap file.
Swap files are just *awful*. Performance when swapping is bad enough,
but going through the filesystem layer means updating atime and mtime on
reads and writes. Things get real ugly
On 01/16/2012 09:48 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
I am getting the following error when I start the Virtual machine manager
...
Error polling connection 'qemu:///system': internal error Cannot find
suitable emulator for x86_64
Install libvirt and run the libvirtd service.
On 01/17/2012 10:30 AM, P J wrote:
I've read that it's not recommended to automatically apply updates via
yum-updated on production servers, but I keep encountering servers that
have this enabled.
Are any of you doing automatic yum updates on production servers in CentOS
5 via yum-updatesd?
On 1/17/2012 9:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Bennett Haselton
benn...@peacefire.org wrote:
Pretty much all software testing is predicated on this notion -- that as
you find and fix more bugs (of any kind, not just security bugs),
eventually the mean time to
On 01/17/2012 12:13 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
On 1/17/2012 9:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Bennett Haselton
benn...@peacefire.org wrote:
Pretty much all software testing is predicated on this notion -- that as
you find and fix more bugs (of any kind, not just
Are we sure this is the same problem?
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Peter Brady pdbr...@ans.com.au wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
Am 14.01.2012 00:16, schrieb Thomas Burns:
don't know how to investigate this. What should I do?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/17/2012 10:30 AM, P J wrote:
I've read that it's not recommended to automatically apply updates via
yum-updated on production servers, but I keep encountering servers that
have this enabled.
Are any of you
From: John R Pierce Sent: January 16, 2012 21:45
I hope you know, dedup systems rarely scale well, as the
corpus of files
get bigger and bigger, they can really grind to a halt.
Thanks, I have read that but I have not seen any quantitative
qualifications on this so I was planning on doing
From: Nataraj Sent: January 16, 2012 23:56
The ZFSonlinux project from LLNL looks promising (native mode kernel
implementation, pool version 28), although the version that supports
mountable filesystems is still in the RC stage. I would want
some solid
testing before deploying in a backup
From: David Hrbác Sent: January 16, 2012 22:55
I've got something in my repo
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/fuse-les
sfs.html.
Might be somewhat outdated. You can try it and we can build new
versions. As to alternatives I'm happy with rdiff-backup.
Hi David:
Both
From: Lars Hecking Sent: January 17, 2012 01:51
Maybe try CentOS6. We've had numerous fuse issues with other software
on CentOS5 and one recommendation was to use a newer kernel, which
essentially means a newer distro.
I had considered this but I have been avoiding it. All our production
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank h...@forsoft.com wrote:
Later this year or early next year we will replacing all our production
servers and use the latest RHEL available at the time (probably RHEL6).
We will then look at upgrading all the backup and development servers
to
From: Les Mikesell Sent: January 17, 2012 05:56
Big disks are cheap these days - I wouldn't worry that much about the
total space that much and you'll still be able to keep a lot online.
This is true for current hardware however I am attempting to reuse our
existing hardware that has been
On 01/17/12 1:00 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Les Mikesell Sent: January 17, 2012 05:56
Big disks are cheap these days - I wouldn't worry that much about the
total space that much and you'll still be able to keep a lot online.
This is true for current hardware however I am
Hi Folks,
I've inherited an old RH7 system that I'd like to upgrade to
CentOS6.1 by means of wiping it clean and doing a fresh install.
However, the system has a software raid setup that I wish to keep
untouched as it has data on that I must keep. Or at the very least, TRY
to
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012, Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez
lore...@lorenzomartinez.es wrote:
CentOS Linux + Fwbuilder FTW!
El 17/01/12 14:38, Steve Thompson escribió:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
I want to build a dedicated firewall/router as I am launching a NPO and
I
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I would always say it is best practice to manually install updates on
at least one machine of a specific type and make sure everything is OK
... then automatically machines that are like that one after you are happy.
I
From: John R Pierce Sent: January 17, 2012 13:17
penny wise, and pound foolish comes to mind here. that older server
probably has 1-2 single core processors, too, right? a 2
socket modern
2U could virtualize a dozen of those and outperform each one.
This may be true in your
On 01/17/12 1:30 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Hi Folks,
I've inherited an old RH7 system that I'd like to upgrade to
CentOS6.1 by means of wiping it clean and doing a fresh install.
However, the system has a software raid setup that I wish to keep
untouched as it has data on
On 01/17/2012 09:29 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Nataraj Sent: January 16, 2012 23:56
The ZFSonlinux project from LLNL looks promising (native mode kernel
implementation, pool version 28), although the version that supports
mountable filesystems is still in the RC stage. I would want
So whats good practice for installing Java/JDK and Tomcat for EL6 these
days? The base repository included Tomcat6.6 is built with GCJ which
I'd rather avoid. I'm fine with using OpenJDK ... Do most folks just use
the Apache tarball for Tomcat and install it in a user directory or
So, the more I look at various ways to lay out my infrastructure, the more I am
thinking about specs for hardware.
Starting with firewalling.
How does one determine the specs for a firewall?
What I mean is:
1. motherboard/CPU - p4? Dual-Core? Intel i3, i5, i7?
2. RAM? 4gb? 8gb? More? 32gb?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank h...@forsoft.com wrote:
Big disks are cheap these days - I wouldn't worry that much about the
total space that much and you'll still be able to keep a lot online.
This is true for current hardware however I am attempting to reuse our
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:14 PM, P J pauljfli...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback guys, I agree about best practices but it's nice to
get direct feedback from your peers.
In general it is very, very rare for an update to break anything -
after all that is the whole point of the
On 01/17/12 3:36 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
So, the more I look at various ways to lay out my infrastructure, the more I
am thinking about specs for hardware.
Starting with firewalling.
How does one determine the specs for a firewall?
What I mean is:
1. motherboard/CPU - p4?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:40 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
So whats good practice for installing Java/JDK and Tomcat for EL6 these
days? The base repository included Tomcat6.6 is built with GCJ which
I'd rather avoid. I'm fine with using OpenJDK ... Do most folks just use
the
On 01/17/2012 03:36 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I wouldn't trust any of the software block-dedup systems with my only
copy of something important - plus they need a lot of RAM which your
old systems probably don't have either.
I am interested in backuppc, however from what I read online it
On 01/17/2012 02:36 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/17/2012 09:29 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Nataraj Sent: January 16, 2012 23:56
The ZFSonlinux project from LLNL looks promising (native mode kernel
implementation, pool version 28), although the version that supports
mountable
On 01/18/2012 01:46 AM, Nataraj wrote:
On 01/17/2012 02:36 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/17/2012 09:29 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Nataraj Sent: January 16, 2012 23:56
The ZFSonlinux project from LLNL looks promising (native mode kernel
implementation, pool version 28),
On 01/17/12 4:41 PM, Nataraj wrote:
On 01/17/2012 03:36 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I wouldn't trust any of the software block-dedup systems with my only
copy of something important - plus they need a lot of RAM which your
old systems probably don't have either.
I am interested in
On 1/17/2012 3:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:14 PM, P Jpauljfli...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback guys, I agree about best practices but it's nice to
get direct feedback from your peers.
In general it is very, very rare for an update to break anything -
after
On 01/17/2012 02:35 PM, Phil Savoie wrote:
Thank you for this. Guess I'm stuck then. Great... No wireless and
limited video. I guess I really know how to pick 'em. Again, thank you
for your time.
Go to ElRepo site, or ElRepo mailing list and report a problem.
As for wireless, use Elrepo
On 01/16/2012 07:11 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Hey guys,
I have a mic plugged into my sound card. It worked late last night but
not today. When I try to select the mic using System/Preferences/Sound
I'm provided with several options to choose from.
On the Hardware tab I choose the Internal
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:52 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
a pure firewall at gigE speeds really doesn't need that much ram and
only a fair-to-middling processor. more than 2 cores would likely be
wasted. Its when you start layering other server functionality on top
of the
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:24 -0500, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES_instruction_set
something to keep in mind... wikipedia will be dark Wednesday, Jan 18th
on account of their joining the stop SOPA protest.
http://sopastrike.com/
for the next 32 hours, linky goodness
On 01/17/2012 01:30 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I've inherited an old RH7 system that I'd like to upgrade to
CentOS6.1 by means of wiping it clean and doing a fresh install.
However, the system has a software raid setup that I wish to keep
untouched as it has data on that I must keep.
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:40 PM
Subject: [CentOS] Java+Tomcat on CentOS 6.x
So whats good practice for installing Java/JDK and Tomcat for EL6 these
days? The base repository included Tomcat6.6 is built
On 01/17/2012 04:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/17/12 4:41 PM, Nataraj wrote:
On 01/17/2012 03:36 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I wouldn't trust any of the software block-dedup systems with my only
copy of something important - plus they need a lot of RAM which your
old systems probably don't
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Nataraj incoming-cen...@rjl.com wrote:
I wouldn't trust any of the software block-dedup systems with my only
copy of something important - plus they need a lot of RAM which your
old systems probably don't have either.
I am interested in backuppc, however
On 01/17/2012 07:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Nothing will fix a file if the disk underneath goes bad and you aren't
running raid. And in my case I run raid1 and regularly swap disks out
for offsite copies and resync. But, backuppc makes the links based on
an actual comparison, so if an old
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Nataraj incoming-cen...@rjl.com wrote:
At this point I am only reading the experience of others, but I am
inclined to try it. I backup a mediawiki/mysql database and the new
records are added to the database largely by appending. Even with
compression, it's
Just make sure you have a verified backup
before you do anything !!
If it's not backed up data, it's not important data.
I don't remember what version of the ext filesystem
was current during the RH7 days, but I would
seriously consider dumping the raid and reloading
in onto a newly formatted
On 01/17/12 6:38 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:24 -0500, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES_instruction_set
something to keep in mind... wikipedia will be dark Wednesday, Jan 18th
on account of their joining the stop SOPA protest.
80 matches
Mail list logo
