Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions

2013-12-06 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: den 6 december 2013 08:32 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions I see several of you guys say that the Megaraid as

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

2013-12-06 Thread Toralf Lund
On 06/12/13 04:15, Anthony K wrote: On 06/12/13 01:08, Toralf Lund wrote: OK. So it's my system. - Toralf Not necessarily! I wouldn't worry too much about VirtualBox 4.3 - it is terribly hosed; I suggest you downgrade back to 4.2.20 which, Problem is, I also tried a couple of different

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

2013-12-06 Thread Toralf Lund
On 05/12/13 18:50, John R Pierce wrote: On 12/5/2013 5:35 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: Precisely! An the host being the CentOS 6.5 system. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough about this, although it seemed obvious when I wrote the post. The guest OS really doesn't come into the picture at all, in that

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

2013-12-06 Thread Toralf Lund
On 05/12/13 19:08, Fernando Cassia wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Toralf Lund toralf.l...@pgs.com wrote: Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started exiting with a Segmentation fault just after

Re: [CentOS] 64bit centos and wine

2013-12-06 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
On 12/06/2013 08:10 AM, Igor Littig wrote: But when I'm installing libstdc++.i686 I'm getting the error Protected multilib versions: libstdc++-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 != libstdc++-4.4.7-3.el6.x86_64 first do a yum update ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions

2013-12-06 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/6/2013 12:04 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: BIOS... Now when you mention it, I didn't see any message on the screen at POST from the raid-card. Don't cards like these usually throw a message about setup, raid status, found harddrives etc during POST. This one didn't. the megaraid bios is nasty

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

2013-12-06 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking about switchboxes;-) Can it be configured to run an actual Windows partition? (This is how I use VirtualBox today.) Kernel Virtualization Mode or something. its a hypervisor

[CentOS] Fwd: 64bit centos and wine

2013-12-06 Thread Igor Littig
-- Forwarded message -- From: Igor Littig igor.lit...@gmail.com Date: 2013/12/6 Subject: Re: [CentOS] 64bit centos and wine To: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net I've been trying to do yum upgrade right now, but I'm getting the same multilib error with gnutls package and it

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

2013-12-06 Thread Giles Coochey
On 06/12/2013 08:18, Toralf Lund wrote: On 06/12/13 04:15, Anthony K wrote: On 06/12/13 01:08, Toralf Lund wrote: OK. So it's my system. - Toralf Not necessarily! I wouldn't worry too much about VirtualBox 4.3 - it is terribly hosed; I suggest you downgrade back to 4.2.20 which, Problem

Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions

2013-12-06 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: den 6 december 2013 08:19 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions In any case, I sent the thing back to the dealer

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: 64bit centos and wine

2013-12-06 Thread Igor Littig
Thanks, I was able to upgrade yum by deleting some mirrors which I didn't need slready. But I still cannot install wine. When I'm running configure script I'm getting checking whether gcc -m32 works... no configure: error: Cannot build a 32-bit program, you need to install 32-bit development

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: 64bit centos and wine

2013-12-06 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Igor Littig igor.lit...@gmail.com wrote: However, I've got libstdc++-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 installed. Maybe configure search the lbraries in a wrong place ? I am not sure. But there is something like compat-libstd* which may help. -- Regards,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

2013-12-06 Thread Scott Robbins
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:08:05AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking about switchboxes;-) Can it be configured to run an actual Windows partition? (This is how I use VirtualBox

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: 64bit centos and wine

2013-12-06 Thread Igor Littig
Oh, yes. I forgot that should be devel. I installed libstdc++-devel-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 and compat-libstd and rpm -qa shows that they are installed [igor@localhost wine-1.7.3]$ rpm -qa | grep libstdc compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-144.el6.i686 libstdc++-4.4.7-4.el6.i686

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: 64bit centos and wine

2013-12-06 Thread Lars Hecking
However, configure still cannot find the libraries, the same error. Here is the full output of configure Not helpful. The relevant details are in config.log. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] md5sum mismatch between CentOS 6.4 and 6.5 repository

2013-12-06 Thread Ralf Aumüller
Hello, when I download python-slip-dbus-0.2.20-1.el6_2.noarch.rpm from CentOS 6.5 repository the md5sum is different than when I download same file from 6.4. wget http://msync.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/Packages/ python-slip-dbus-0.2.20-1.el6_2.noarch.rpm -O

Re: [CentOS] md5sum mismatch between CentOS 6.4 and 6.5 repository

2013-12-06 Thread Lars Hecking
md5sum python-slip-dbus-0.2.20-1.el6_2.noarch.rpm.* 20bb02e6f3b7b71e09dcaff7f3b0ca02 python-slip-dbus-0.2.20-1.el6_2.noarch.rpm.64 d37fe4404a7a5fdb27b29f9b5ed09c73 python-slip-dbus-0.2.20-1.el6_2.noarch.rpm.65 Something got mixed up somewhere. The first one (md5 20bb...) is from the

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: 64bit centos and wine

2013-12-06 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
On 12/06/2013 12:32 PM, Igor Littig wrote: Oh, yes. I forgot that should be devel. I installed libstdc++-devel-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 and compat-libstd and rpm -qa shows that they are installed [igor@localhost wine-1.7.3]$ rpm -qa | grep libstdc compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-144.el6.i686

Re: [CentOS] To discard... or not to discard...

2013-12-06 Thread Cian Mc Govern
I believe discard support is only available since kernel 3.1. It'd be great if it was added to RHEL 6 - I'm using Fedora 18 on any machines that require it in the meantime. Cian. On 4 December 2013 21:59, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 04.12.2013 um 19:20 schrieb Akemi Yagi

Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions

2013-12-06 Thread mark
On 12/06/13 02:22, Sorin Srbu wrote: From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us I wouldn't recommend the RocketRaid. We have a few of them here; they work ok, but Highpoint, who makes them, are *not* really great about updating drivers

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: 64bit centos and wine

2013-12-06 Thread Igor Littig
Ok... Sorry... If I'm doing just yum install wine it's installing 64bit wine, which is useless for me, because most of my windows applications require 32 bit libraries. 2013/12/6 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr On 12/06/2013 12:32 PM, Igor Littig wrote: Oh, yes. I forgot

Re: [CentOS] To discard... or not to discard...

2013-12-06 Thread Nux!
On 06.12.2013 12:20, Cian Mc Govern wrote: I believe discard support is only available since kernel 3.1. It'd be great if it was added to RHEL 6 - I'm using Fedora 18 on any machines that require it in the meantime. Discard has been supported in EL6 for a long time now! -- Sent from the

Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions

2013-12-06 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of mark Sent: den 6 december 2013 13:35 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions We have one really old Dell rack server with a PERC. Works

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

2013-12-06 Thread Toralf Lund
On 06/12/13 12:26, Scott Robbins wrote: On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:08:05AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking about switchboxes;-) Can it be configured to run an actual Windows

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

2013-12-06 Thread Steve Clark
On 12/06/2013 07:58 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: On 06/12/13 12:26, Scott Robbins wrote: On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:08:05AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking about switchboxes;-) Can it be

Re: [CentOS] 64bit centos and wine

2013-12-06 Thread John Doe
From: Igor Littig igor.lit...@gmail.com But when I'm installing libstdc++.i686 I'm getting the error Protected multilib versions: libstdc++-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 != libstdc++-4.4.7-3.el6.x86_64 Does anybody have ideas how can I work around this problem ? man yum.conf  

Re: [CentOS] ADMIN issue - manitu

2013-12-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:37:29 -0500: And here's two thoughts that just struck me: first, they have no way to apply to be whitelisted. I think there are ways, they do maintain a whitelist. Maybe Hostmonster is just not good enough to get on it. Did you consider that?

Re: [CentOS] Dragging app between workspaces not working

2013-12-06 Thread John Doe
From: Wes James compte...@gmail.com Yes, I know...  I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many panes, but the corner trick will have to do. I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to move the workspaces under the window. But I do not use compiz, so I do not know if it works with it... JD

Re: [CentOS] Dragging app between workspaces not working

2013-12-06 Thread Nux!
On 06.12.2013 13:51, John Doe wrote: From: Wes James compte...@gmail.com Yes, I know...  I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many panes, but the corner trick will have to do. I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to move the workspaces under the window. But I do not use compiz,

Re: [CentOS] ADMIN issue - manitu

2013-12-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:47:37 -0500: I keep hoping, perhaps foolishly, that others who get hit with this will add their voice, and that the list might go to using some other source to block spam. Oh, yeah, until the day where that list adds Hostmonster as well and

Re: [CentOS] Dragging app between workspaces not working

2013-12-06 Thread Wes James
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:51 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Wes James compte...@gmail.com Yes, I know... I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many panes, but the corner trick will have to do. I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to move the workspaces under the window.

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: 64bit centos and wine

2013-12-06 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
On 12/06/2013 01:51 PM, Igor Littig wrote: 2013/12/6 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr On 12/06/2013 12:32 PM, Igor Littig wrote: Oh, yes. I forgot that should be devel. I installed libstdc++-devel-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 and compat-libstd and rpm -qa shows that they are

Re: [CentOS] Dragging app between workspaces not working

2013-12-06 Thread Wes James
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:51 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Wes James compte...@gmail.com Yes, I know... I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many panes, but the corner trick will have to do. I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to move the workspaces under the window.

Re: [CentOS] Dragging app between workspaces not working

2013-12-06 Thread Wes James
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:51 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Wes James compte...@gmail.com Yes, I know... I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many panes, but the corner trick will have to do. I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to move the workspaces under the window.

Re: [CentOS] ADMIN issue - manitu

2013-12-06 Thread m . roth
Kai Schaetzl wrote: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:37:29 -0500: And here's two thoughts that just struck me: first, they have no way to apply to be whitelisted. I think there are ways, they do maintain a whitelist. Maybe Hostmonster is just not good enough to get on it. Did

Re: [CentOS] ADMIN issue - manitu

2013-12-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
The list pays very well. It's just that your hosting provider is regularly or irregularly on it. That's the only reason you think it doesn't pay. Not a good reason. It pays for everybody else on this list except you. Consider that. It may even pay for you, just that you don't notice (less

Re: [CentOS] To discard... or not to discard...

2013-12-06 Thread Cian Mc Govern
On 6 December 2013 12:53, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 06.12.2013 12:20, Cian Mc Govern wrote: I believe discard support is only available since kernel 3.1. It'd be great if it was added to RHEL 6 - I'm using Fedora 18 on any machines that require it in the meantime. Discard has been

Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions

2013-12-06 Thread m . roth
Keith Keller wrote: On 2013-12-06, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: and yes, as has been said before, megacli is a rather messy complex command line. The newer storcli command line tool is slightly less horrifying. There are also GUI tools, but I don't have a lot of experience with

Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux testing effort

2013-12-06 Thread Chuck Munro
On 04.12.2013 14:05, n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 04.12.2013 14:05, John Doe wrote: From: Listsli...@benjamindsmith.com Our next big test is to try out ZFS filesystem send/receive in lieu of our current backup processes based on rsync. Rsync is a fabulous tool, but is beginning to show

Re: [CentOS] Dragging app between workspaces not working

2013-12-06 Thread Wes James
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Wes James compte...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:51 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Wes James compte...@gmail.com Yes, I know... I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many panes, but the corner trick will have to do. I

[CentOS] packet traversal

2013-12-06 Thread Robert Clove
Hi All I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the system or when we send a packet from a system? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] packet traversal

2013-12-06 Thread m . roth
Robert Clove wrote: Hi All I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the system or when we send a packet from a system? Hi, there. Sounds like you want to do a tcpdump, or some such, on eth0

Re: [CentOS] packet traversal

2013-12-06 Thread Robert Clove
Tcpdump wont tell the system calls On Saturday, December 7, 2013, wrote: Robert Clove wrote: Hi All I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the system or when we send a packet from a

Re: [CentOS] packet traversal

2013-12-06 Thread m . roth
Robert Clove wrote: On Saturday, December 7, 2013, wrote: Robert Clove wrote: I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the system or when we send a packet from a system? Hi, there.

Re: [CentOS] packet traversal

2013-12-06 Thread Wes James
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Robert Clove cloverob...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the system or when we send a packet from a system? Thanks This

Re: [CentOS] packet traversal

2013-12-06 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/6/2013 11:28 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the system or when we send a packet from a system? Hi, there. Sounds like you want to do a tcpdump, or

Re: [CentOS] packet traversal

2013-12-06 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/6/2013 11:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: If you know the process, you could use strace. that will only show user mode calls, which are basically select() and read(). as I said, the packet transversal is all done in the network related kernel modules, under the covers where strace can't

Re: [CentOS] packet traversal

2013-12-06 Thread m . roth
John R Pierce wrote: On 12/6/2013 11:28 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the system or when we send a packet from a system? Hi, there. Sounds like you want

Re: [CentOS] packet traversal

2013-12-06 Thread Robert Clove
Tcpdump wont tell the system calls On Saturday, December 7, 2013, wrote: Robert Clove wrote: Hi All I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the system or when we send a packet from a

Re: [CentOS] packet traversal

2013-12-06 Thread Andrew Holway
On 6 December 2013 19:25, Robert Clove cloverob...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the system or when we send a packet from a system? These slides might help

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Michael Hennebry
I've got a side of the case off. All the fans that are there are turning. There is a place for a front fan, but no fan there. Unless someone stole a fan, that is not new. The plastic front of the case would have pretty much blocked it. No obvious leakage from anything. The power supply is a sealed

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Warren Young
On 12/6/2013 16:34, Michael Hennebry wrote: There is a place for a front fan, but no fan there. It's common for cheap PC cases to have places for fans that the final PC manufacturer chooses not to populate. If you decide to put a fan there, be sure to orient it so it blows in line with the

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/6/2013 4:39 PM, Warren Young wrote: On 12/6/2013 16:34, Michael Hennebry wrote: There is a place for a front fan, but no fan there. It's common for cheap PC cases to have places for fans that the final PC manufacturer chooses not to populate. its pretty common on high end cases too. the

[CentOS] how to inject a kmod driver from elrepo into kickstart

2013-12-06 Thread psavoie1783
Hi All, I have a marvel chipset for my wired laptop connection. It uses the kmod-sk98lin-10.93.3.3-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm driver at elrepo. I would like to use this driver to activate the wired connection to kickstart my laptop as I have pxe booting set upon my home network. Could anyone

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Warren Young
On 12/6/2013 18:00, John R Pierce wrote: On 12/6/2013 4:39 PM, Warren Young wrote: On 12/6/2013 16:34, Michael Hennebry wrote: There is a place for a front fan, but no fan there. It's common for cheap PC cases to have places for fans that the final PC manufacturer chooses not to populate.

Re: [CentOS] how to inject a kmod driver from elrepo into kickstart

2013-12-06 Thread Patrick Lists
On 12/07/2013 02:39 AM, psavoie1783 wrote: Hi All, I have a marvel chipset for my wired laptop connection. It uses the kmod-sk98lin-10.93.3.3-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm driver at elrepo. I would like to use this driver to activate the wired connection to kickstart my laptop as I have pxe

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Michael Hennebry
I'd thought I'd sent this already. Apparently the last crap out was before I'd hit send. BTW the last few crap outs have been followed with processor area temps up to 60 C. I suspect that my jpg's are too big to go through as attachments, so I've put them on my web site:

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013, Warren Young wrote: On 12/6/2013 16:34, Michael Hennebry wrote: The power supply is a sealed unit, I think you'll find that once you unscrew it from the case, you'll expose another set of screws that will let you remove the power supply's lid. The odd hole in the back

Re: [CentOS] how to inject a kmod driver from elrepo into kickstart

2013-12-06 Thread psavoie1783
On 06/12/13 09:37 PM, Patrick Lists wrote: On 12/07/2013 02:39 AM, psavoie1783 wrote: Hi All, I have a marvel chipset for my wired laptop connection. It uses the kmod-sk98lin-10.93.3.3-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm driver at elrepo. I would like to use this driver to activate the wired connection

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Darr247
On 07 December 2013 @02:57 zulu, Michael Hennebry wrote: I do not remember which is the IDE and which is the new SATA. The SATA drive has the thin red cable connecting it to the motherboard. I suspect the pincushiony thing between the video card and the big black Intel fan of being the heat

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
What Refurbished means? The hardware by itself looks nice but it might be a noisy machine. HP support only windows Vista for this machine and I do not know what bios and CHIPS it was built upon yet. If it has the parts that this review claims:

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: What Refurbished means? newegg: Refurbished products have been tested to ensure compliance with original manufacturer specifications, and MAY include a limited manufacturer warranty - see the item's product page for details. The hardware by itself

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Hey Michael, The TPM can be an issue but once you install the OS(LINUX) on DISK(maybe on another machine) it should fly by default. What is the meaning of Trusted by HP\COMPAQ? I do not know yet. From what I understand a Refurbished means Used and was used in a company\office the last time