Hello,
My name is Rizky Ariestiyansyah here is my detail on the wiki
usernamer : ph03nix
FirstnameLastname : Rizky Ariestiyansyah
Please allow me to contribute edit the wiki and l10n also I can help create
event in Indonesia.
Thank you
--
Rizky Ariestiyansyah
Founder of Evone
Firefox OS
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0015 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0015.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
por si no lo habían leído, dedíquenle unos minutos a pensar en lo que
viene, en principio parece positivo. RedHat no me ha parecido una
empresa evil nunca, así que tengo la certeza de que será para bien:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-January/020100.html
Hoy nos hemos despertado con una noticia bastante interesante: CentOS une
su distribución bajo el paraguas de RedHat para crear una plataforma común
donde dar énfasis a las necesidades que tienen los proyectos de software
libre incluidos en ambas distribuciones. Para ver mas .. (
Según leo entonces se acabo centos como SO confiable y libre, es decir, red
hat, cobrara por las licencias, y utilidades que crean imprescindible para
las empresas, la verdad que bueno, habrá que ver como viene la unión sino
migrar a SO confiable y libre 100%,
De esta manera y por lo que se ha
Recuerden no hacer top-posting
On 01/08/2014 08:11 AM, Wilmer Arambula wrote:
Según leo entonces se acabo centos como SO confiable y libre, es decir, red
hat, cobrara por las licencias, y utilidades que crean imprescindible para
las empresas, la verdad que bueno, habrá que ver como viene la
Si es como Oracle con MySQL viéndolo desde ese punto de vista sera
beneficioso, de lo contrario para mi creo que muchos migraran solo el
tiempo lo dira,
Saludos,
El 8 de enero de 2014, 8:51, Ernesto Pérez Estévez, Ing.
ernesto.pe...@cedia.org.ec escribió:
Recuerden no hacer top-posting
On
Hijole... la verdad a mi me cayó como musica para mi oidos al nivel
empresarial; a nivel personal tengo miedo. Tengo miedo que CentOS no pase a
más que mera distro comercial, siendo absorbida por Red Hat.
Si puedo asegurar que cientos de host usan CentOS, incluso en algunos
Hostin de VPS
On 01/08/2014 09:59 AM, David González Romero wrote:
Hijole... la verdad a mi me cayó como musica para mi oidos al nivel
empresarial; a nivel personal tengo miedo. Tengo miedo que CentOS no pase a
más que mera distro comercial, siendo absorbida por Red Hat.
Si puedo asegurar que cientos de
El día 8 de enero de 2014, 9:29, Ernesto Pérez Estévez, Ing.
ernesto.pe...@cedia.org.ec escribió:
On 01/08/2014 09:59 AM, David González Romero wrote:
Hijole... la verdad a mi me cayó como musica para mi oidos al nivel
empresarial; a nivel personal tengo miedo. Tengo miedo que CentOS no pase a
A RedHat, que gana con esto?
Ciertamente mi temor va con RedHat, los de CentOS pueden estar vislumbrados
ahora porque el Papa del Clon nos ha pedido laburar juntos y probablemente
hayan puesto guita...
No obstante era un terreno grande que Red Hat había perdido, pues muchas
empresas medianas
Hola gente!!!
Bueno después de filosofar sobre la alianza RH-CentOS ahora caigo con una
tecnica, bajando los pies a la tierra.
Tenia una MV con LVM y le puse una cantidad N de espacio al disco (100Gb)
después me di cuenta que era prudente ampliar este espacio a 120Gb y
procedi a ampliar el
On 01/08/2014 12:24 PM, David González Romero wrote:
Hola gente!!!
Bueno después de filosofar sobre la alianza RH-CentOS ahora caigo con una
tecnica, bajando los pies a la tierra.
te voy a decir una variante:
- en línea no es.. apagaré la máquina, pero con la ventaja de que como
es una VM,
- te bajas gparted
parted no sirve igual?
- apagas la máquina
- redimensionas el lv
Ya esto se hizo, o sea tengo a mi favor:
(parted) print free
Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 134GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End
On 01/08/2014 01:19 PM, David González Romero wrote:
es una de las variantes.. la otra es con la máquina apagada hacer usar
virt-resize
No puedo está en ESXi :-(
uy qué pena!
--
Ernesto Pérez
+593 9 9924 6504
___
CentOS-es mailing list
Hola lista!!
Tengo un sistema de correo montado en
Postfix+dovecot+MySQL+amavis-new+clamav+spanassassin+Horde 5+postfixadmin.
Funciona perfecto, recibe envía, etc... Pero cuando veo los log, me doy
cuenta que Camav no está chequeando los mails.
Busque en la red y me tropese que clamav tenia
El 8 de enero de 2014, 14:34, David González Romero
dgrved...@gmail.comescribió:
Pero a pesar de la pena, yo creo que en CentOS se puede particionar en
caliente...
Debe existir un metodo..
Saludos,
David
El 8 de enero de 2014, 15:52, Ernesto Pérez Estévez, Ing.
Vamos por parte
1- Salida de mi tabla de particiones con parted
(parted) print free
Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 134GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End SizeType File system Flags
32.3kB 1049kB 1016kB
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Yves Bellefeuille
Sent: den 8 januari 2014 01:36
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red
Hat
With great excitement I'd
On 7/1/2014 6:19 μμ, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
If you put it that way only xxx will receive packets, to balance betwin
both of them
you will need this:
-A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT
--to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx-yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:80
Hi,
I am searching for a command line tool to extract files from a pdf
portfolio?
Are there any capabilities to do this?
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Nicole
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 01/08/2014 09:59 PM, Nicole Hähnel wrote:
Hi,
I am searching for a command line tool to extract files from a pdf
portfolio?
Are there any capabilities to do this?
try pdftk, I use:
pdftk 1.44 a Handy Tool for Manipulating PDF Documents
Copyright (C) 2003-10, Sid Steward - Please Visit:
Am 08.01.2014 10:18, schrieb Rob Kampen:
On 01/08/2014 09:59 PM, Nicole Hähnel wrote:
Hi,
I am searching for a command line tool to extract files from a pdf
portfolio?
Are there any capabilities to do this?
try pdftk, I use:
pdftk 1.44 a Handy Tool for Manipulating PDF Documents
Copyright
On 01/08/2014 09:14 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Behalf Of Yves Bellefeuille
Sent: den 8 januari 2014 01:36
Wow. I'm not entirely sure this is good news. We'll see.
My first thought as well. Redhat already has Fedora as a testing ground. So
for Redhat acquiring another free distribution makes me
In article 52cc4b9e.3090...@hogranch.com,
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 1/7/2014 10:39 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk
controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it.
fwiw, centos 6.recent
- Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr escreveu:
De: Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr
Para: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 2014 6:43:16 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected
Assunto: Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic
On 7/1/2014 6:19 μμ, Antonio da Silva Martins
In article 525fd2f695e5e2f3215fc3c468a046e3.squir...@host290.hostmonster.com,
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Tony Mountifield wrote:
I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk
controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it.
I found a useful
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Tony Mountifield t...@softins.co.uk wrote:
I have no problem understanding the options and following the procedures.
My question was just to see whether other people's experience would suggest
it was worth the effort of going down the hardware RAID and
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
On 1/7/2014 10:39 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk
controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it.
fwiw, centos 6.recent should recognize that controller, I know
On Tuesday, January 7, 2014, Karanbir Singh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red
Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining
forces with Red Hat.
Great news guys, well done.
On 01/08/2014 02:14 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Yves Bellefeuille
Sent: den 8 januari 2014 01:36
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with
op 08-01-14 11:54, Johnny Hughes schreef:
On 01/08/2014 02:14 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Yves Bellefeuille
Sent: den 8 januari 2014 01:36
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS]
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Johnny Hughes
Sent: den 8 januari 2014 11:54
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red
Hat
Karanbir Singh (the Chair of the
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Le 08/01/2014 11:54, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
Red Hat wants their paid platforms to continue to be successful, they
therefore want their community projects to be successful.
I am a little bit dubious about that. Why would they sell RHEL, and give
away the same thing, CentOS, just recompiled
On 8/1/2014 11:54 πμ, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
Well, I had only used with a range. Maybe you can take a look on a
software load-balancer, like haproxy, or use something like nginx. Then
forward to the load-balancer instead to the servers.
Thanks,
Actually, I don't want load
Hello Alain,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:57:54PM +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
Le 08/01/2014 11:54, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
Red Hat wants their paid platforms to continue to be successful, they
therefore want their community projects to be successful.
I am a little bit dubious about that. Why
- Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr escreveu:
De: Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr
Para: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 2014 11:02:48 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected
Assunto: Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic
On 8/1/2014 11:54 πμ, Antonio da Silva Martins
From: Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr
Actually, I don't want load balancing; I want incoming http traffic (to
port 8080) to be forwarded to *ALL* defined target IP addresses.
Could you describe the traffic exchange you expect...?
1. http request to 8080.
2. request is forwarded to n servers on
Le 08/01/2014 14:54, Reindl Harald a écrit :
*which independence*??
CentOS is a*bug for bug* indentical rebuild of RHEL
you will never face*any* change or bugfix in CentOS
which is not done in the same RHEL package
so about*what* independance are you talking about?
For example to
They do that right now.
- CentOS Plus-Kernel
- CentOS Extras
- Xen4CentOS
Are all NOT upstream but CentOS original projects. Read the part about SIG
in the FAQ and you know what this will eventually become.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: centos-boun...@centos.org
Le 08/01/2014 15:01, Thomas Göttgens a écrit :
They do that right now.
- CentOS Plus-Kernel
- CentOS Extras
- Xen4CentOS
Is RHEL interested by Xen ? In RHEL 6, there is no more Xen support,
only KVM. This is the motivation for the Xen4CentOS project...
--
Administrateur Système/Réseau
Is there Xen Support in Fedora?
You're completely missing the point here. Redhat ist not going to influence
the direction centos is going, but merely saying it will advocate
'variations' of centos, i.e. additional package sets much like Xen4CentOS or
the much abused OpenStack (at least in that
On 01/08/2014 09:19 AM, Thomas Göttgens wrote:
Is there Xen Support in Fedora?
You're completely missing the point here. Redhat ist not going to influence
the direction centos is going, but merely saying it will advocate
'variations' of centos, i.e. additional package sets much like
Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
My first thought as well. Redhat already has Fedora as a testing
ground. So for Redhat acquiring another free distribution makes me
wary,
unnecessarily so maybe...
One thing that struck me in Karanbir's message was the marketing
mumbo-jumbo such as
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Thomas Göttgens tgoettg...@gmail.com wrote:
They do that right now.
- CentOS Plus-Kernel
- CentOS Extras
- Xen4CentOS
Are all NOT upstream but CentOS original projects. Read the part about SIG
in the FAQ and you know what this will eventually become.
I hope
On 01/07/2014 04:39 PM, John Doe wrote:
From: Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com
I just did a yum update on my CentOS 5.10 desktop machine and it installed FF
24. And tabs have appeared and cannot be [really] removed! Arg!!! *I HATE
TABS!* (Yes I did installed the hide tabs when there is
On 2014-01-08 8:02 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Actually, I don't want load balancing; I want incoming http traffic
(to port 8080) to be forwarded to *ALL* defined target IP addresses.
Sometimes the correct answer is, you can't do that. :)
You can talk TO port 80 on all the defined target IP
On 01/08/2014 10:16 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Thomas Göttgens tgoettg...@gmail.com wrote:
They do that right now.
- CentOS Plus-Kernel
- CentOS Extras
- Xen4CentOS
Are all NOT upstream but CentOS original projects. Read the part about SIG
in the FAQ and you
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Is Red Hat in business to make money ... of course they are. Does Red
Hat make more money or less money if their community projects do well?
Of course they make more money if more people use their community
projects. Red
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:16:46 +0100
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote:
On 01/07/2014 04:39 PM, John Doe wrote:
From: Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com
I just did a yum update on my CentOS 5.10 desktop machine and it installed
FF
24. And tabs have appeared and
- Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr escreveu:
De: Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr
Para: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 2014 11:02:48 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected
Assunto: Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic
On 8/1/2014 11:54 πμ, Antonio da Silva
Two weeks ago I reported a problem I was having in the CentOS 5 Security
Support forum. I could not get hash rounds, configured in /etc/libuser.conf, to
work on CentOS release 5.10 (Final), 2.6.18-371.3.1.el5 x86_64. The details are
here:
https://
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com wrote:
Actually, I don't want load balancing; I want incoming http traffic
(to port 8080) to be forwarded to *ALL* defined target IP addresses.
What is the goal (other than forward 1 request to 2 servers)?
It would kinda
On 01/08/2014 11:32 AM, Darr247 wrote:
On 2014-01-08 8:02 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Actually, I don't want load balancing; I want incoming http traffic
(to port 8080) to be forwarded to *ALL* defined target IP addresses.
Sometimes the correct answer is, you can't do that. :)
You can talk TO
On 1/8/2014 5:02 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Actually, I don't want load balancing; I want incoming http traffic (to
port 8080) to be forwarded to*ALL* defined target IP addresses.
that doesn't make any sense.
a SYN packet comes in, is forwarded to serverA and serverB
both servers reply with
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 11:23 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
that doesn't make any sense.
a SYN packet comes in, is forwarded to serverA and serverB
both servers reply with an 'ack' man, is the client tcp stack going
to be confused!
He didn't say anything about both servers replying,
On 1/8/2014 01:14, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Redhat already has Fedora as a testing ground.
True, but Fedora is a bleeding-edge Linux, while CentOS is a stable
Linux. Both have their place.
Red Hat knows there are pieces of the Linux market it will never be able
to grab significant share in.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Brian Miller cen...@fullnote.com wrote:
that doesn't make any sense.
a SYN packet comes in, is forwarded to serverA and serverB
both servers reply with an 'ack' man, is the client tcp stack going
to be confused!
He didn't say anything about both
Warren Young wrote:
On 1/8/2014 01:14, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Redhat already has Fedora as a testing ground.
True, but Fedora is a bleeding-edge Linux, while CentOS is a stable
Linux. Both have their place.
1++ (and boy, do I *hate* bleeding edge)
snip
I think that's the real reason Red Hat
On 01/08/2014 03:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
On 1/8/2014 01:14, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Redhat already has Fedora as a testing ground.
True, but Fedora is a bleeding-edge Linux, while CentOS is a stable
Linux. Both have their place.
1++ (and boy, do I *hate* bleeding edge)
On 01/09/2014 09:01 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
This is a good thing.
If that's it, I agree. We'll just have to see how it all plays out.
I can think of 101 different reasons as to why this move is good for
RedHat, and no reason why them picking up CentOS only to kill it
On 1/8/2014 12:23 PM, Peter wrote:
If this were to
happen then CentOS would be no worse off than it was before the move to
RedHat in the first place.
well, it would find itself having to scramble to reestablish independent
infrastructure.
--
john r pierce
When I run the GUI Virtual Machine Manager in an NX/freenx session and
open a console to a windows guest VM (haven't tried Linux w/X as a
guest yet), the mouse point location does not track correctly. Is
there some setting to improve this? X2go seems better in this
respect but I'm not sure I
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/08/2014 03:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
On 1/8/2014 01:14, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Redhat already has Fedora as a testing ground.
True, but Fedora is a bleeding-edge Linux, while CentOS is a stable
Linux. Both have their place.
1++ (and boy,
On 01/08/2014 04:37 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/08/2014 03:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
On 1/8/2014 01:14, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Redhat already has Fedora as a testing ground.
True, but Fedora is a bleeding-edge Linux, while CentOS is a stable
This is great news!! Congrats and thanks to everyone that has put in all
the hard work to make this a great environment.
Michael Weiner
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With great excitement I'd like to
hi,
On 01/08/2014 02:47 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
One thing that struck me in Karanbir's message was the marketing
mumbo-jumbo such as the next generation of emerging technologies and
a platform that is easily consumed.
Karanbir usually writes better than that, so I suppose that someone
On 01/07/2014 08:27 PM, Warren Young wrote:
I installed the RHEL 7 beta here to test while waiting for CentOS 7 to
arrive. On noticing that yum didn't work, I decided to set up a local
mirror. I rsync'd
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages/
to a local web
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
the voip setup for home/small users is the best example. if
asterisk@home were done as a part of the centos community, how cool
would that have been?
I'd throw SMEserver, ClearOS, and the old (up to CentOS5) version of
On 1/8/2014 17:00, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/07/2014 08:27 PM, Warren Young wrote:
(I'm trying to set up a CUPS server. So yeah, X11 is a prerequisite for
installing a printer now. Lovely.)
How about using http://localhost:631 with lynx or some other such text
based browser.
I ended up
71 matches
Mail list logo
