On 1/30/2014 11:57 PM, Todor Petkov wrote:
what kind of LDAP server (389-DS, OpenLDAP)? Few months ago I tried to
configure Samba to authenticate against 389-DS. I found out, that Samba
does not read the 'password' value, but 'sambaNTPassword'.
its certainly true that Windows passwords are
Hi Jeffrey,
this PowerEdge has a replica of the data on another server.
Do you believe it is a hardware problem and not software?
What makes you think that?
Thanks
Il 30/01/2014 16:36, Jeffrey Hass ha scritto:
Allesio,
Are these VM's -- did you move the /VM files/ respectively to backup
I've tried to use texlive-2013-0.1.20130608_r30832.fc19.src.rpm but I can't
build it! I fall in a sort of circular dependancy:
rpmbuild --clean --rebuild ./texlive-2013-0.1.20130608_r30832.fc19.src.rpm
error: Failed build dependencies:
harfbuzz-devel is needed by
From: Patrick Begou patrick.be...@legi.grenoble-inp.fr
I've tried to use texlive-2013-0.1.20130608_r30832.fc19.src.rpm but I
can't build it! I fall in a sort of circular dependancy:
Maybe read this conversation:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/184862.html
Good
With the continuing annoyance from motion, my manager's asked me to go
looking again for a video surveillance appliance: basically, a
motion-detecting DVR and cameras. The big thing, of course, is a) price
(this is a US federal gov't agency, and being civilian, money is *tight*,
don't give me the
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
With the continuing annoyance from motion, my manager's asked me to go
looking again for a video surveillance appliance: basically, a
motion-detecting DVR and cameras. The big thing, of course, is a) price
(this is a US federal gov't
Matt Garman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
With the continuing annoyance from motion, my manager's asked me to go
looking again for a video surveillance appliance: basically, a
motion-detecting DVR and cameras. The big thing, of course, is a) price
(this is a
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I think you misunderstood me. I'm not looking for IP cameras - we'll be
getting cameras that plug into a surveillance DVR appliance. It's the
-DVR's- firmware software will do the recording and picture taking. What
we need is to be
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I think you misunderstood me. I'm not looking for IP cameras - we'll be
getting cameras that plug into a surveillance DVR appliance. It's the
-DVR's- firmware software will do the recording and picture taking. What
we need is to be
Matt Garman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I think you misunderstood me. I'm not looking for IP cameras - we'll be
getting cameras that plug into a surveillance DVR appliance. It's the
-DVR's- firmware software will do the recording and picture taking.
What
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I think you misunderstood me. I'm not looking for IP cameras - we'll be
getting cameras that plug into a surveillance DVR appliance. It's the
-DVR's- firmware software will do the recording and picture taking.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:50 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
c) The software bugs keep coming: I had trouble last year, when we went to
6.x,
Are you saying it worked right in 5.x? If that's the case, why not
wait until 2017 for something else?
I hear a couple years ago, $10? $19.99?, but my
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:45 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Mostly likely it *will*. I think we expect to get a surveillance appliance
- a DVR with firmware, and cameras as part of the package. The ancient USB
cheapie webcams will go.
I see, so you're looking at a complete package that includes
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:50 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
...but my manage says he'd like to
get out of the business of making video surveillance work, when there's
off-the-shelf stuff out there.
Sounds like a classic problem where you have three requirements...
1. Just works /
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:50 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
c) The software bugs keep coming: I had trouble last year, when we went
to 6.x,
Are you saying it worked right in 5.x? If that's the case, why not
wait until 2017 for something else?
Because it has to work,
On 1/31/2014 7:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
With the continuing annoyance from motion, my manager's asked me to go
looking again for a video surveillance appliance: basically, a
motion-detecting DVR and cameras. The big thing, of course, is a) price
(this is a US federal gov't agency, and
John R Pierce wrote:
On 1/31/2014 7:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
With the continuing annoyance from motion, my manager's asked me to go
looking again for a video surveillance appliance: basically, a
motion-detecting DVR and cameras. The big thing, of course, is a) price
(this is a US
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Are you saying it worked right in 5.x? If that's the case, why not
wait until 2017 for something else?
Because it has to work, perfectly, right now and every day, 24x7x365.25.
Turning it down is not an option.
Did it do that under
On 1/31/2014 12:55, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hmmm... that $99 each camera gets expensive, fast.
Have you considered that part of the reason you're having hardware
problems is that you're using $19 cameras, and expecting professional
results from them?
$99 for a networked PoE camera is
On 1/31/2014 11:55 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hmmm... that $99 each camera gets expensive, fast.
did I mention these are HD (1280x720) cams with decent low light
sensitivity (but not IR nightvision)? I didn't find any decent
quality weatherproof PoE cameras with mounting hardware for much
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Are you saying it worked right in 5.x? If that's the case, why not
wait until 2017 for something else?
Because it has to work, perfectly, right now and every day, 24x7x365.25.
Turning it down is not an option.
Warren Young wrote:
On 1/31/2014 12:55, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hmmm... that $99 each camera gets expensive, fast.
Have you considered that part of the reason you're having hardware
problems is that you're using $19 cameras, and expecting professional
results from them?
$99 for a
John R Pierce wrote:
On 1/31/2014 11:55 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hmmm... that $99 each camera gets expensive, fast.
did I mention these are HD (1280x720) cams with decent low light
sensitivity (but not IR nightvision)? I didn't find any decent
quality weatherproof PoE cameras with
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Are you saying it worked right in 5.x? If that's the case, why not
wait until 2017 for something else?
Because it has to work, perfectly, right now and every day, 24x7x365.25.
Turning it down is not an option.
Did it do that under
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Are you saying it worked right in 5.x? If that's the case, why not
wait until 2017 for something else?
Because it has to work, perfectly, right now and every day,
24x7x365.25. Turning it down is not an option.
On 1/31/2014 15:06, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
That's not going to happen. The budget won't allow that much for this
item.
So find the person who chose that arbitrary number, and explain to them
that in their ignorance, they chose a number that has no connection with
reality. Ask them -- now
Warren Young wrote:
On 1/31/2014 15:06, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
That's not going to happen. The budget won't allow that much for this
item.
So find the person who chose that arbitrary number, and explain to them
that in their ignorance, they chose a number that has no connection with
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:30 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The price is still right for CentOS 5.x... Why not reinstall and
ignore it for another 3 years? Even if RH backports the breakage to
the older driver you could probably keep using an older module.
We're trying to get rid of all 5.x
Hi,
I'm currently looking into the VMAC options that Keepalived had to
offer. This all looks very nice, but now I heard that the VMAC driver in
the linux kernel is not really stable if you are not on a 3.2 kernel or
later. Can anyone here tell me some more about this? Is this really
true? Should
On 1/31/2014 2:09 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
d) They*do* need to be on the network, so we can back up the pictures and
videos to a server. That means they*must* be up to date on security.
the Aircams are network devices. they use https and rtsp or whatever it
is.the PC/server running
30 matches
Mail list logo
