CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1030
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1030.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Hello! I'm looking at options for configuring an OpenStack CI job that
tests OpenStack components with the latest versions of libvirt and qemu.
Fedora's virt-preview [1] repository is pretty much what we need.
However, we would really rather run this job using CentOS. The job's
configuration
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello! I'm looking at options for configuring an OpenStack CI job that
tests OpenStack components with the latest versions of libvirt and qemu.
Fedora's virt-preview [1] repository is pretty much what we need.
On 08/11/2014 11:36 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello! I'm looking at options for configuring an OpenStack CI job that
tests OpenStack components with the latest versions of libvirt and qemu.
Fedora's virt-preview [1]
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
That's right. We want to test OpenStack with bleeding edge versions of
libvirt and qemu, but want the underlying OS to be something supported
for a longer period of time than a given Fedora release. CentOS + a
testing
On 08/11/2014 01:58 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
That's right. We want to test OpenStack with bleeding edge versions of
libvirt and qemu, but want the underlying OS to be something supported
for a longer period of time
hola saben que aplicación reemplaza a system-config-network en centos 7
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Hi.
I'm installed yum-cron and set:
# by default MAILTO is unset, so crond mails the output by itself
# example: MAILTO=root
MAILTO=r...@domain.org.ua
I see in log that yum-cron done it's job:
# grep yum /var/log/cron
Aug 11 03:08:02 venti run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[4516]: starting
0yum.cron
Hello fellow CentOS-users,
on the net there are lots of Spamassassin related HOWTOs - describing how
to create a shell script for Postfix and how to install Spamassassin and
start its spamd daemon - step by step. Additionally antivirus setups are
described...
But I have a strong feeling, that
Hi Adam,
there is no spamd.conf file in the spamassassin package for CentOS 6:
# rpm -ql spamassassin|grep -i spamd.conf
#
That's the point of my question: I am looking for advice for how to use the
postfix and spamassassin packages - i.e. not installing both programs
manually from
We have our setup documented. I'll pull out the stuff for our environment and
send over something more general. It may take a few hours before I get time
though.
Adam King
IT Systems Administrator
Skipton Girls High School
01756 707600
www.sghs.org.uk
- Original Message -
From:
Ha what a co-incidence, just did this an hour ago
I roughly followed this
http://www.rosehosting.com/blog/how-to-install-and-integrate-spamassassin-with-postfix-on-a-centos-6-vps/
my master.cf looks like this
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=nobody
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:30 AM, 1...@setevoy.kiev.ua wrote:
Hi.
I'm installed yum-cron and set:
# by default MAILTO is unset, so crond mails the output by itself
# example: MAILTO=root
MAILTO=r...@domain.org.ua
I see in log that yum-cron done it's job:
# grep yum /var/log/cron
Aug
On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 22:45 -0600, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
could it be the mirror that the out dated one is hitting isn't to to
date/in synch yet?
But on the server, the software states the latest version is installed.
: freshclam -V
ClamAV 0.98.4/19275/Sun Aug 10 17:26:35 2014
: clamd
Try systemctl stop firewalld, I had to disable that too
Adam King
IT Systems Administrator
Skipton Girls High School
01756 707600
www.sghs.org.uk
- Original Message -
From: Neil Aggarwal n...@jammconsulting.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 4:21:33 AM
Subject:
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 03:28 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
On one Centos 6.5 server, but not on other C 6.5 servers, Logwatch daily
tells me:-
Last Status:
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.98.3 Recommended version: 0.98.4
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 11:37 +, Richard wrote:
From: Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net
Last Status:
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.98.3 Recommended version: 0.98.4
: freshclam -V
ClamAV 0.98.4/19275/Sun Aug 10 17:26:35 2014
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 08:28 -0400, Brian Miller wrote:
Last Status:
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.98.3 Recommended version: 0.98.4
Could it be that the package installed but the running daemon did not
get restarted? I don't know if
On 08/09/2014 09:45 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sat, August 9, 2014 9:15 am, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Tom:
I thought we were supposed to be moving forward
That is my thought exactly. This is a step backwards.
I guess I will disable firewalld and go back to iptables.
Systemd,
there are some bugs in docker-0.11.1-22.el7, when will latest version
docker be relased for el7?
--
Peng Yong
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
You and 4 other guys are moving things from Linux to FreeBSD.
The rest of the world is moving things from UNIX and Windows to Linux.
CentOS-7 rebuild RHEL sources and most all of the important Enterprise
Linux things are moving to RHEL.
RHEL runs the stock exchanges, the banks, etc.
Free
Hello again, here is what I'm trying at my CentOS 6.5:
1) Installed postfix and spamassassin packages
2) Configured postfix - it works well (I omit details here)
3) Added -x to the SPAMDOPTIONS in /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
4) Added the following 2 lines to the /etc/postfix/master.cf:
smtp
On Mon, August 11, 2014 8:28 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 08/09/2014 09:45 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sat, August 9, 2014 9:15 am, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Tom:
I thought we were supposed to be moving forward
That is my thought exactly. This is a step backwards.
I guess I will disable
Am 2014-08-11 13:38, schrieb Alexander Farber:
Hello fellow CentOS-users,
on the net there are lots of Spamassassin related HOWTOs - describing
how
to create a shell script for Postfix and how to install Spamassassin
and
start its spamd daemon - step by step. Additionally antivirus
Can you explain why you'd use milter over spamassassin? Genuinely interested as
we could certainly get better spam filtering...
Adam King
IT Systems Administrator
Skipton Girls High School
01756 707600
www.sghs.org.uk
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org
while you haven't settled on anything you could consider amavisd as well...
http://www.amavis.org/
On Mon, August 11, 2014 11:43 am, Adam King wrote:
Can you explain why you'd use milter over spamassassin? Genuinely
interested as we could certainly get better spam filtering...
Adam King
IT
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu
wrote:
You only spotted 4 _last_ guys running away to UNIX. The rest fled quite a
while ago.
I wasn't aware that this was a forum for whining that upstream's vision of
a system didn't match one's own. You stated your
On 11.08.2014 15:43, Tom Bishop wrote:
You and 4 other guys are moving things from Linux to FreeBSD.
The rest of the world is moving things from UNIX and Windows to Linux.
CentOS-7 rebuild RHEL sources and most all of the important Enterprise
Linux things are moving to RHEL.
RHEL runs the
On 11.08.2014 15:42, 彭勇 wrote:
there are some bugs in docker-0.11.1-22.el7, when will latest version
docker be relased for el7?
What bugs are you referring to? Since Red Hat backports patches these
bugs might already be fixed event though the version number might
suggest otherwise.
Regards,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu
wrote:
You only spotted 4 _last_ guys running away to UNIX. The rest fled quite a
while ago.
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 12:53 -0400, BC wrote:
I wasn't aware that this was a forum for whining that upstream's vision
Thanks :)
Adam King
IT Systems Administrator
Skipton Girls High School
01756 707600
www.sghs.org.uk
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org, ki...@sghs.org.uk
Sent: Monday, 11 August, 2014 5:55:22 PM
Subject: Re:
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 19:10 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
It's strange that people threaten to go FreeBSD simply because the
defaults are not to their liking. Not exactly a rational way to look
at things.
Leider nicht.
1. firewalld is not a full firewall - at best it is half-finished
On Aug 11, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
Stating one's dread of having imposed as a standard, a firewall that can
not control outgoing packets and has dumbed-down Micro$oft-like 'zones'
and the possible future removal of IP Tables from the very much admired
Centos
On 8/11/2014 11:36 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Aug 11, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
Stating one's dread of having imposed as a standard, a firewall that can
not control outgoing packets and has dumbed-down Micro$oft-like 'zones'
and the possible future
On 8/11/2014 11:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.08.2014 um 20:47 schrieb Kirk Bocek:
I have not even started to digest 7. What is the proper method of
getting back to an industrial strength firewall under 7? Does one
disable FirewallD and install iptables or does iptables install on top
of
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 14:36 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
'FirewallD' doesn't replace 'iptables' except in the sense of
activated system services
I just love using sv ipt ... (my abbreviations for service iptables).
Not keen on another 'service' duplicating my manual and automated
efforts.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 08:25:46PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
FirewallD just builds and modifies iptables rules.
Why do I need more complexity together with more learning time and more
effort and conversion of existing rules ? IP Tables works fine.
Absolutely no complaints.
Do you run
On 8/11/2014 12:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 08:25:46PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
FirewallD just builds and modifies iptables rules.
Why do I need more complexity together with more learning time and more
effort and conversion of existing rules ? IP Tables works
I need export an registers of a data base from command line.
It is possible with mysqldump?
for example:
mysqldump -u user -ppass db select *from users where id=20 ???
thank
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
echo select * from users where id=20; | mysql -u user -ppass -Ddb
Alan McRae
On 12/08/2014 08:10, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin wrote:
I need export an registers of a data base from command line.
It is possible with mysqldump?
for example:
mysqldump -u user -ppass db select *from users where
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 08:15:16 Alan McRae wrote:
echo select * from users where id=20; | mysql -u user -ppass -Ddb
Alan McRae
On 12/08/2014 08:10, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin wrote:
I need export an registers of a data base from command line.
It is possible with mysqldump?
for
On 11/08/2014 11:10 PM, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin wrote:
I need export an registers of a data base from command line.
It is possible with mysqldump?
for example:
mysqldump -u user -ppass db select *from users where id=20 ???
thank
Hi,
as I understand, you need to apply a 'WHERE'
great!!
thank for your answers, it is very useful for me
Regards
2014-08-11 17:33 GMT-04:00 Todor Petkov z...@online.bg:
On 11/08/2014 11:10 PM, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin wrote:
I need export an registers of a data base from command line.
It is possible with mysqldump?
for example:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Adam King ki...@sghs.org.uk wrote:
Thanks :)
Am 11.08.2014 um 18:43 schrieb Adam King:
Can you explain why you'd use milter over spamassassin? Genuinely
interested as we could certainly get better spam filtering...
just becaus eit is the only way where you
*https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119042
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119042*
*https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109039
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109039*
*https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/6770
On 12.08.2014 01:51, 彭勇 wrote:
*https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119042
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119042*
*https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109039
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109039*
*https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/6770
On 08/12/2014 07:25 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 14:36 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
'FirewallD' doesn't replace 'iptables' except in the sense of
activated system services
I just love using sv ipt ... (my abbreviations for service iptables).
Not keen on another
On 8/11/2014 12:07 PM, Kirk Bocek wrote:
OMG if it's that important I will, I will!
What's your malfunction? How about gathering information and knowledge
before starting a major upgrade?
___
I have now been alerted by two list members to the
48 matches
Mail list logo