CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1838
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1838.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1839
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1839.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
Source:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1840
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1840.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1839
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1839.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1849
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1849.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1846 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1846.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1850
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1850.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1826 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1826.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On 11/03/2014 02:29 PM, Axel S wrote:
Hello all, and thank you very much for the Centos 7 HVM AMI [1], greatly
appreciated!
This AMI does not work on the newly launched AWS Frankfurt region
(eu-central-1). Any plans for fixing that?
According to the AWS announcement [2], The Region
Mis saludos a todos.
desde un centos 6.5 quiero capturar por snmp el trafico de varios routers,
y graficar todo el paso por esos routeres, trafico por ips, segmentos de
red, accesos top
conocen alguna solucion libre para hacerlo en el centos.
att.
paul criollo
Paul,
Me parece que cacti te puede servir
www.cacti.net
Saludos.
www.wyzer.cl
Mensaje original
De: paulcrio...@gmail.com
Fecha: 11/11/2014 21:11 (GMT-04:00)
Para: linux-p...@linux.org.pe
Asunto: [CentOS-es] MONITOREO TRAFICO DE VARIOS ROUTERS, POR IPS,
POR
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org]
En nombre de paulcrio...@gmail.com
Enviado el: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 7:11 PM
Para: linux-p...@linux.org.pe
Asunto: [CentOS-es] MONITOREO TRAFICO DE VARIOS ROUTERS, POR
IPS,POR SEGMENTOS
muy facil de instalar, no tan powerd como cacti pero entrega los números
que cacti no te da, es bandwidthd Ojo que termina con D
http://linuxtrove.com/wp/?p=272
Saludos
El 12 de noviembre de 2014, 9:50, ylarg...@cimex.com.cu escribió:
-Mensaje original-
De:
Otra opción es Ntop, igual fácil de instalar con yum
Saludos
El 12/11/2014, a las 8:08, Pablo Alberto Flores pabfl...@uchile.cl escribió:
muy facil de instalar, no tan powerd como cacti pero entrega los números
que cacti no te da, es bandwidthd Ojo que termina con D
nagios y sabbix tambien son buenas alternativas
Atte Jose Manuel
GPG Key ID: UBCMEOLVQMHEILINJBE
El Miércoles 12 de noviembre de 2014 7:58, Luis de la Barra ldela...@vtr.net
escribió:
Paul,
Me parece que cacti te puede servir
www.cacti.net
Saludos.
www.wyzer.cl
Mensaje
Otra opción fuera de linux es el prtg muy potente y efectivo (pido
disculpas a la lista pero este me a servido mas que el nagios porque es
automático y el nagios hay que hacer cosa por cosa)
El 12/11/2014 10:08, Jose Manuel Ajhuacho Vargas jose_t...@yahoo.es
escribió:
nagios y sabbix tambien son
Otra opción fuera de linux es el prtg muy potente y efectivo (pido disculpas a
la lista pero este me a servido mas que el nagios porque es automático y el
nagios hay que hacer cosa por cosa) El 12/11/2014 10:08, Jose Manuel
Ajhuacho Vargas jose_t...@yahoo.es
escribió:
nagios y sabbix
Me sumo a lo que dice Jose, para el nivel de detalle que necesitas lo más
practico es trabajar con flows que envíen tus equipos de comunicaciones a un
colector para su análisis.
Netflow Analyzer es de pago, pero también hay opciones como ntop o nfsen.
Con ntop también puedes generar flows desde
On 11/11/2014 11:51 AM, Nux! wrote:
Thanks Gotz,
I'll definitely do some storage on them, Gluster/DRBD/ISCSI, but also general
traffic; I just want to replace 1 Gbps as much as possible, budgets allows.
lots of infiniband stuff, 20gbps grade, exceptionally cheap off ebay.
--
Karanbir
From: Gilbert Sebenste seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Frank Cox wrote:
yum install nm-connection-editor
Yeah, I'm having a tough day, THAT is where it should be found,
but isn't, under Gnome, on this one machine. Typing what you did above
gave me an error of no such
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 11/12/2014 12:10 PM, John Doe wrote:
From: Gilbert Sebenste seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Frank Cox wrote:
yum install nm-connection-editor
Yeah, I'm having a tough day, THAT is where it should be found,
but isn't, under Gnome, on this one machine. Typing what
Hello,
We are using CentOS 6.6 and keepalived 1.2.13 on two servers for
failover, no load-balancing. Failover is governed by the NIC being
present, and the Apache and Tomcat processes being present. Both servers
are configured as 'EQUAL' (not master/backup). An initial priority of
100 is set, and
On Tue, November 11, 2014 13:05, Alexander Farber wrote:
And ignore the Chrome people getting
the certificate warning at https://harte-lyne.ca too ;-)
We operate our own CA. If you 'TRUST' us then you can add the the root cert
for our CA by visiting
On Tue, November 11, 2014 19:33, Igor Zubkov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Alexander Farber wrote:
Dear James,
everyday I look into my Gmail SPAM folder and your mails (sent to
Centos list) are there. Noone else is there but you.
Please finally fix your MX records or whatever is
On Wed, November 12, 2014 8:26 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Tue, November 11, 2014 13:05, Alexander Farber wrote:
And ignore the Chrome people getting
the certificate warning at https://harte-lyne.ca too ;-)
We operate our own CA.
Yes, that is what I was doing for years too (till we got
On Wed, November 12, 2014 8:50 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Tue, November 11, 2014 19:33, Igor Zubkov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Alexander Farber wrote:
Dear James,
everyday I look into my Gmail SPAM folder and your mails (sent to
Centos list) are there. Noone else is there
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:27 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John Horne wrote:
We are using CentOS 6.6 and keepalived 1.2.13 on two servers for
failover, no load-balancing. Failover is governed by the NIC being
present, and the Apache and Tomcat processes being present. Both servers
are
+1 to your logrotate thought; I'd dig deeper there.
check /var/lib/logrotate.status; see if it doesn't match up with days the
failover happens, that different httpd logs are rotating.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:50 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
But, the mail server is not broken. It is entirely to RFC specifications.
Google decides how to treat the resulting confusion respecting mail forwarded
by the CentOS list. Yahoo I understand simply drops it into the
That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's wrong at
all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out loud to the list
to put social pressure on him. Please move this to private mail and
understand that Gmail is *not* what rules email best practice and also try
to
On Wed, November 12, 2014 9:46 am, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's wrong at
all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out loud to the list
to put social pressure on him. Please move this to private mail and
understand that Gmail
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's wrong at
all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out loud to the list
to put social pressure on him.
Well, no. Per the headers:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John Horne wrote:
They are both virtual servers - so no UPS. Failover communication is
over the network.
Um, bingo: are the host systems on UPS's? What happens on the *host*
systems at 03:56? They don't, perhaps, take snapshots
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:50 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
wrote:
But, the mail server is not broken. It is entirely to RFC
specifications.
Google decides how to treat the resulting confusion
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's wrong at
all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out loud to the
Les Mikesell wrote on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:13:07 -0600:
Well, no.
Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
Gmail then please move it off-list as well. It's really not anyone's
problem on
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:13:07 -0600:
Well, no.
Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
Once upon a time, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com said:
Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
Gmail then please move it off-list as well. It's really not anyone's
problem on this
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com said:
Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
Gmail then
On 11/12/2014 10:13 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Kai Schaetzl
mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's
wrong at all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out
loud to the list to put social pressure
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 15:44 +, Richard Mann wrote:
+1 to your logrotate thought; I'd dig deeper there.
check /var/lib/logrotate.status; see if it doesn't match up with days
the failover happens, that different httpd logs are rotating.
Given that failover only occurs if Apache, Tomcat
I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for number
keys.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com
wrote:
On 8 November 2014 13:52, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 11/07/2014 02:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
On 11/07/2014 01:20
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM, g gel...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
centos-boun...@centos.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
smtp.mail=centos-boun...@centos.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not
verify) header.i=@;
The folks at my office have acquired a new Epson EasyMP wireless projector,
which requires a windows/MacOS plugin to use. Of course, they don't provide
one for Linux.
Here's their web page on it:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 16:45 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John Horne wrote:
snip
Given that failover only occurs if Apache, Tomcat or the NIC fail, I
can't find anything in log rotation that could cause this effect. For
failover to occur the Apache/Tomcat process must be non-existent (in
On 12 November 2014 @20:50 zulu, g wrote:
i believe problems are on your end, and not with server for James. i
do not see dmarc=fail or p=QUARANTINE in *any* of his email headers.
I think you're not seeing the full headers, then.
e.g. most of the headers of a recent message in here from
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Darr247 darr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 November 2014 @20:50 zulu, g wrote:
i believe problems are on your end, and not with server for James. i do
not see dmarc=fail or p=QUARANTINE in *any* of his email headers.
I think you're not seeing the full headers,
On 12 November 2014 @22:47 zulu, Darr247 wrote:
On 12 November 2014 @20:50 zulu, g wrote:
i believe problems are on your end, and not with server for James. i
do not see dmarc=fail or p=QUARANTINE in *any* of his email headers.
I think you're not seeing the full headers, then.
e.g. most of
I have a Brother MFC 7360N, and it is refusing to print.
Given a job, the printer state shows, Sending data to printer; the file
is in the spool dir; the job queue is empty, and nothing more happens.
I had used the Brother driver installer, and ran into a 32-bit problem. The
rpm runs
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:10:44PM -0500, Negative wrote:
I have a Brother MFC 7360N, and it is refusing to print.
Given a job, the printer state shows, Sending data to printer; the file
is in the spool dir; the job queue is empty, and nothing more happens.
I had used the Brother driver
On 11/13/2014 12:10 PM, Negative wrote:
I have a Brother MFC 7360N, and it is refusing to print.
I have a DCP-540CN which is a similar but I think older network printer.
I haven't tried it on CentOS 7 yet, but got it to work with Fedora 18
and 19 which are very similar. I do recall having to
Hi all,
Did anybody notice a really slow access from Windows 7 (especially from the MS
Office suite) when trying to open a Word-doc for example, that sits on a samba
share on a computer recently upgraded to CentOS 6.6?
It can take up to two-three minutes to open a 20 kB Word-doc...
I tested
53 matches
Mail list logo
