On 2015-01-10, Leon Fauster
leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 10.01.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Fred Smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:12:14AM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
Have you tried different window manager themes? Some of them have
larger grab areas.
Which
Am 10.01.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:12:14AM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
Have you tried different window manager themes? Some of them have larger
grab areas.
Which makes me wonder how one modifies a theme... there must be a
Hi All.
Looking for some guidance/experience with LVM and pvmove.
I have a LUN/PV being presented from a iscsi SAN. The LUN/PV is presented
to 5 servers as a shared VG they all have LV's they use for data, they are
all connected via iSCSI.
As the SAN I am using is being replaced I need to move
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 01:12:27PM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2015-01-10, Leon Fauster
leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 10.01.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Fred Smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:12:14AM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
Have you tried different
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 00:13 +1100, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
Hi All.
Looking for some guidance/experience with LVM and pvmove.
I have a LUN/PV being presented from a iscsi SAN. The LUN/PV is presented
to 5 servers as a shared VG they all have LV's they use for data, they are
all connected via
On 01/10/2015 10:10 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
But of course I am assuming that like in IPv4 IPADDR_START/END is
implemented.
I don't think so. The START and END bits of ifup-aliases appear to be
v4 specific.
Please give some guidance as I need this to done already and the hole
/48 must be
On 01/10/2015 05:13 AM, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
4. Use pvmove to move all the data from one PV to another.
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/LVM-HOWTO/#sharinglvm1
The key thing to remember when sharing volumes is that all the LVM
administration must be done on one node only and that all
I'm not sure how you plan to manage your /48, but this is how I've seen it
done in the past:
1) You are given a single IPv6 address (a /128) for your Internet-facing
router. You are expected to add this address to your untrusted interface.
You are also given the address of a router at your ISP
El 10/01/2015 a las 03:40 p.m., Gordon Messmer escribió:
On 01/10/2015 10:10 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
But of course I am assuming that like in IPv4 IPADDR_START/END is
implemented.
I don't think so. The START and END bits of ifup-aliases appear to be
v4 specific.
Please give some guidance
Le 10/01/2015 19:20, Akemi Yagi a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Nicolas BOURGEOIS nico...@graour.com wrote:
Hi,
I can't create pages in the /fr tree, so I can't create the new release
notes. I can only update existing pages.
Thanks
Nicolas
Hi Nicholas,
A homepage has now been
On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have
all IPv6s available for usage.
Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats
1,208,925,819,614,629,200,000,000 individual IPs ?
Or, its 65536 /64 subnets of
Hello.
It happens that at the company I'm working decided to start migration of
IPs tech.
So they got a /48 block. I were trying to add it with:
ifcfg-eth0-range1 (0 is already in use with IPv4 range):
IPV6ADDR_START=
IPV6ADDR_END=
CLONENUM_START=0
But of course I am assuming that
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Nicolas BOURGEOIS nico...@graour.com wrote:
Hi,
I can't create pages in the /fr tree, so I can't create the new release
notes. I can only update existing pages.
Thanks
Nicolas
Hi Nicholas,
A homepage has now been created for you. I'm not too
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Nicolas BOURGEOIS nico...@graour.com wrote:
Hi Akemi
I'm sorry. I thought it was buttons to edit pages when I go in a french page
which doesn't exist.
with ?action=edit, I can create the howto page.
Thank you for your time
Nicolas
Glad to hear things are
On 1/10/2015 5:13 AM, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
Looking for some guidance/experience with LVM and pvmove.
I have a LUN/PV being presented from a iscsi SAN. The LUN/PV is presented
to 5 servers as a shared VG they all have LV's they use for data, they are
all connected via iSCSI.
As the SAN I am
For those who don't know, as of version 21, Fedora has split into 3
streams: workstation, server, and cloud. This addresses many of the
concerns raised in this thread. See https://getfedora.org/ for details. I
gather we'll see the impact of this change with CentOS-8.
Kal
On 01/10/2015 07:39 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight Desktop install
of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than installing
Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally (10 to 20% of the time) fail to
start, and the abrt report
Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight Desktop install
of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than installing
Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally (10 to 20% of the time) fail to
start, and the abrt report indicates a signal 11 (SIGSEGV). I don't see
On Fri, January 9, 2015 17:36, John R Pierce wrote:
On 1/9/2015 2:32 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Enterprise, in the RHEL context, suggests stability or have I
misunderstood the USA definition of Enterprise ?
Enterprise to me implies large business
Enterprise literally means 'undertaking'.
El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribió:
On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have
all IPv6s available for usage.
Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats
On 01/10/2015 08:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my work...).
It's not crazy, that's the standard deployment for a building. It's
almost certainly not possible to use all of the addresses in such a
space, but that's the point. IPv6 is
On 1/10/2015 8:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribió:
On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have
all IPv6s available for usage.
Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP
On 1/10/2015 9:19 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Yup. It is actually just a way to figure out how to handle this with
easy. But this will be use for a wide spread implementation.
how to handle what? you've never explained what you're trying to do,
except in the most vague terms.
--
john r pierce
On 01/10/15 20:39, Robert Nichols wrote:
Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight Desktop install
of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than
installing Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally (10 to 20% of the
time) fail to
start, and the abrt report
On 01/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Currently we have a /26 range of IPv4. So we have eth0:1...eth0:59
Interface aliases are deprecated, IIRC. An interface can have multiple
addresses in V4 or V6 managed with the ip tool rather than ifconfig.
We need that same with IPv6 since we have
I am a newcomer to CentOS and I appreciate the discussion. It would seem to me
- and I am sure I am not the first one to state the obvious - Fedora is
primarily a desktop OS while CentOS is primarily a server OS.
The user needs are very different, the features needed are very, very
different,
On 1/10/2015 8:38 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/10/2015 08:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my
work...).
It's not crazy, that's the standard deployment for a building. It's
almost certainly not possible to use all of the addresses in
El 10/01/2015 a las 11:41 p.m., John R Pierce escribió:
On 1/10/2015 8:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribió:
On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have
all IPv6s available for usage.
On 2015-01-10, Fred Smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 01:12:27PM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2015-01-10, Leon Fauster
leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 10.01.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Fred Smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at
El 11/01/2015 a las 12:10 a.m., John R Pierce escribió:
On 1/10/2015 8:38 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/10/2015 08:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my
work...).
It's not crazy, that's the standard deployment for a building. It's
almost
I haven't seen this, but I'm curious if it has something to do with
your configuration. What I would suggest trying is working from a clean
config.
mv ~/.thunderbird ~/.thunderbird.backup
Try it like that. If it starts correctly, then it is your config and
you'll probably have
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/10/15 20:39, Robert Nichols wrote:
Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight Desktop install
of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than
installing Thunderbird. Thunderbird will
32 matches
Mail list logo
