Greetings -
I saw Andrew Holway's post yesterday referencing using PCI passthrough as a
solution to someone else's issue. Not being familiar with it, the post made
me look into it more to see if it is something to use for my setup. From my
research on the web, I have two questions to make
I do have two centos 6.6 servers. With a performance optimized rsync I
get an speed of 15 - 20 MB/s
The options I use are:
rsync -aHAXxv --numeric-ids --progress -e ssh -T -c arcfour -o
Compression=no -x
If I copy files by smb to/from the servers I do get 60 - 80 MB/s, a dd
(r/w) on the
On 01/23/2015 09:24 AM, Jeff Boyce wrote:
1. If you use PCI passthrough on a graphics card to allow a virtual
guest direct access to the graphics card for it use, does the host still
have use of the graphics card also?
No.
2. Or, once you pass it to the guest, the host can then no longer
On Thu, January 22, 2015 9:39 pm, Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:30:03PM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Just out of curiosity: how do you guys look at it? This asks me for
password... In general it is good idea to place something into open URL
I think that's what he wanted you to
On Fri, January 23, 2015 5:37 am, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:30:03PM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, January 22, 2015 9:05 pm, Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason
On Fri, January 23, 2015 2:05 pm, Warren Young wrote:
On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu
wrote:
As a matter of fact I tend to not use GUI admin tools since long ago.
Bring back Xconfigurator!
I do prefer 3ware web RAID admin
interface anything else (it
On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
As a matter of fact I tend to not use GUI admin tools since long ago.
Bring back Xconfigurator!
I do prefer 3ware web RAID admin
interface anything else (it more transparently prevents me from making
fatal
On Fri, January 23, 2015 12:54 pm, Patrick Flaherty wrote:
I do have two centos 6.6 servers. With a performance optimized rsync I
get an speed of 15 - 20 MB/s
The options I use are:
rsync -aHAXxv --numeric-ids --progress -e ssh -T -c arcfour -o
Compression=no -x
If I copy files by smb
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 13:32 -0800, Keith Keller wrote:
snip
But (getting back a little to the original topic) getting to the 3ware
web interface should not require root privileges on the client, since
it's just the browser connecting to the 3ware http(s) listener. The OP
seemed to be
On Fri, January 23, 2015 3:32 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-23, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu
wrote:
I do prefer 3ware web RAID admin
interface anything else (it more transparently prevents me from making
Hey guys,
Is there any way to find out the last user to access a file on a CentOS
6.5 system?
Thanks
Tim
--
GPG me!!
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0073
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0073.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
On Fri, January 23, 2015 2:31 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, January 23, 2015 2:05 pm, Warren Young wrote:
On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu
wrote:
As a matter of fact I tend to not use GUI admin tools since long ago.
Bring back Xconfigurator!
I
On 2015-01-23, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu
wrote:
I do prefer 3ware web RAID admin
interface anything else (it more transparently prevents me from making
fatal blunders - probably just me).
No, not just you.
Saludos Cesar,.
Chequea:
1. Que DNS usan los equipos de tu lan para resolver dominios?
2. Si es un DNS local actuando como forwarder, tienes una entrada en el DNS
server para ese dominio,subdominio apuntando a la ip de tu server?
3. Si tu ISP esta haciendo resolucion a tu IP por NAT, deberias
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:50:44PM -0500, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Is there any way to find out the last user to access a file on a CentOS
6.5 system?
Unless you're using auditd (or a similar service) to watch the file,
no. You could probably use the logs and `last` to see who was logged
in at the
Le diste permiso al puerto 80 por iptables a tu lan, básicamente es eso, ya
que colocaste el host y la ip a resolver,
Saludos,
El 23/1/2015 17:59, César Martinez cmarti...@servicomecuador.com
escribió:
Saludos amigos listeros por molestarles haber como me pueden ayduar a
resolver un problema
Gracias por responder si tengo esa regla es mas tengo abierto todos los puertos
para la lan y para la wan solo lo que se necesita
--
Saludos
César Martínez
Ingeniero de Sistemas
Enviado desde mi móvil Samsung Galaxy
El 23 de enero de 2015 17:42:09 GMT-05:00, Wilmer Arambula
On Fri, January 23, 2015 3:13 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:50:44PM -0500, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Is there any way to find out the last user to access a file on a CentOS
6.5 system?
Unless you're using auditd (or a similar service) to watch the file,
no. You could
Hello all,
I have a machine running Centos 6.6 connected to a port on a Cisco Catalyst
3750 series switch. That port is part of VLAN 48. I have VLAN 48 on the
CentOS machine too.
The IP network on VLAN 48 is 192.168.48.0/255.255.255.0. The address on the
CentOS side is 192.168.48.101, the
Saludos amigos listeros por molestarles haber como me pueden ayduar a
resolver un problema que paso a describir, tengo un servidor cento 6.6
el cuál hace proxy firewall y dhcp, este servidor en su hostname se
llama ns, el proveedor de internet tiene una resolución desde fuera para
resolver el
At work I'm used to tools like eTrust Access Control (aka SEOS). eTrust
takes away the ability to manage the eTrust config from root and puts it
in the hands of security admin. So there's a good separation of duties;
security admin control the security ruleset, but are limited by the OS
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 07:45 -0500, David Both wrote:
rant
snip
I disable and remove PackageKit to prevent that kind of stuff.
My current plan too once I determine it won't break my boxes.
snip
For those historically ignorant developers, I say that they had *BETTER* care
how it has
On Thu, January 22, 2015 12:27, Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:36:24AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
If one has already done all that and, following the most recent FF
update, all that is displayed is a video window with the Flash
logo/Button in the middle. And regardless of how
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote:
On 22 January 2015 at 13:22, Darren Williams d.willia...@bradford.ac.uk
wrote:
The idea of using a VHD(X) was to enable use to use disk imaging tools
such as ghost, wds etc to deploy images of this
On Thu, January 22, 2015 22:23, Always Learning wrote:
Surely Linux users change to Root to do system work, rather than
attempt to make Root changes in the middle of doing ordinary GUI
tasks whilst logged-in as a normal user ?
I logon with my normal user id and run a development desktop.
There was no announce for RHSA-2015:0074 Important: jasper security update
Coincidence or has it something to do with the recent errata-discussion?
Thanks
Patrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Steve,
Thanks, makes sense.
I just don't see why I have to effectively waste an extra IP address to get
my connection established.
Boris.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:10:57PM -0500, Boris Epstein wrote:
This makes two
Saludo Cesar,
- Puede to DHCP proveer los DNS de tu ISP en el lease si no tienes uno
local.
- Lo mejor seria tener tu propio DNS, con tu zona creada para tu lan.
- Si estan haciendo nat con una ip publica, es nat o nat doble?
Saludos,
Julio Villarreal
http://www.juliovillarreal.com
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 16:02 -0800, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-23, Bill Maltby (C4B) centos4b...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Exactly where did you report this bug? If it was to RH, and you're not
a RH customer, you shouldn't be surprised if they ignored the bug,
since they probably consider
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I have a machine running Centos 6.6 connected to a port on a Cisco Catalyst
3750 series switch. That port is part of VLAN 48. I have VLAN 48 on the
CentOS machine too.
The IP network on VLAN 48 is
Less,
You are 100% right. Of course I brought up my eth0 - but, like you said,
with no IP. Meanwhile, I brought up eth0.48 with 192.168.48.100.
However, until I would bring up eth0 with an IP address (any in the
network) I would have no connection. Why? That's what I fail to understand.
Boris.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Less,
You are 100% right. Of course I brought up my eth0 - but, like you said,
with no IP. Meanwhile, I brought up eth0.48 with 192.168.48.100.
However, until I would bring up eth0 with an IP address (any in the
On 2015-01-23, Bill Maltby (C4B) centos4b...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, my rant was much more about it interrupting me, without being
asked, to do some updates that I didn't yet request *and* being
persistent about it over time in *my* (not Freedesktop.org's) work
space.
Perhaps if you'd
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:10:57PM -0500, Boris Epstein wrote:
This makes two of us. I've done everything as you have described and it
simply does not work.
Are you actually seeing VLAN tagged traffic, or is the cisco switch
just providing a normal stream?
At work we have hundreds of VLANs,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
wrote:
Less,
You are 100% right. Of course I brought up my eth0 - but, like you said,
with no IP. Meanwhile, I brought up eth0.48 with
Gracias respondo tus inquietudes
- Puede to DHCP proveer los DNS de tu ISP en el lease si no tienes uno
local.
respuesta: esto tengo definido en mi dhcp
option domain-name-servers 192.168.197.4;
option netbios-name-servers 192.168.197.4;
- Lo mejor seria tener tu propio DNS, con tu zona creada
We have lots of servers with a similar setup (i.e. tagged vlans and no
ip on eth0) and this works just fine.
What is the actual vlan configuration on your switchport?
Regards,
Dennis
On 24.01.2015 01:34, Boris Epstein wrote:
Steve,
Thanks, makes sense.
I just don't see why I have to
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 16:18 +1300, Rob Kampen wrote:
On 01/23/2015 04:05 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to
be forced to ignore or deal with this crap.
Anybody
On 23 January 2015 at 12:06, Darren Williams d.willia...@bradford.ac.uk
wrote:
Using VM's was a suggestion I put forward but some of our staff didn't
like the idea!
*sigh* technology politics is annoying. good luck with that.
We can't virtualise Windows as we run many CAD and Media app's
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:30:03PM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, January 22, 2015 9:05 pm, Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 21:19 -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
I object to this sort of crap. Hidden, no reason for an *IX desktop to
be forced to ignore or deal with
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Hi,
I do have two centos 6.6 servers. With a performance optimized rsync I
get an speed of 15 - 20 MB/s
The options I use are:
rsync -aHAXxv --numeric-ids --progress -e ssh -T -c arcfour -o
Compression=no -x
If I copy files by smb to/from the servers I do get 60 - 80 MB/s, a dd
(r/w) on the
Using VM's was a suggestion I put forward but some of our staff didn't like the
idea!
We can't virtualise Windows as we run many CAD and Media app's that require
high end graphics card utilisation.
The Linux image is mainly used for coding type activities and so virtualising
that would seem
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium
On Fri, January 23, 2015 06:50, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
I don't want this stupid thing popping up every time I switch from my
normal active user logons to my dead one (used to get around the
unaddressed bug I filed over a month ago about switching run levels
causing crashes and running
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0074 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0074.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
rant
I run a small consulting service and work with both individuals and (very) small
businesses. The objective of my consulting business is to help average people
move to Linux when they decide that they have had enough of the M$ money wheel
and endless malware infections.
Not one
On 22 January 2015 at 13:22, Darren Williams
d.willia...@bradford.ac.uk wrote:
The idea of using a VHD(X) was to enable use to use disk imaging tools such as
ghost, wds etc to deploy images of this type of system to over 500 machines.
We have not found an imaging solutions that can image
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0074 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0074.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
50 matches
Mail list logo
