[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1980 Critical CentOS 5 nspr Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1980 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1980.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

On 11/4/2015 11:36 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: Absolutely, I see your point. This was the starting point - you add the device on the ESXi server, you reboot the VM, the VM sees the device, no problem. Now, I ask - do I have to reboot the VM? Logically I hope there ought to be a way for me not to

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1980 Critical CentOS 5 nss Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1980 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1980.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7, ATI card, 30" monitor

> -Original Message- > From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us] > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 11:58 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 7, ATI card, 30" monitor > > John R Pierce wrote: > > On 11/3/2015 8:11 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 11/3/2015

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7, ATI card, 30" monitor

Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us] >> >> John R Pierce wrote: >> > On 11/3/2015 8:11 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >> >> On 11/3/2015 7:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >>> Well, I got my user back to being able to use his system,

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1982 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1982 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1982.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

On 11/4/2015 12:52 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: I don't get this for some reason... not even sure why. ESXi's default behaviour seems to be to allow hotplug, that does not seem to be deactivated. I am just not sure. Wonder if this could be the Centos 7 vs 6 - perhaps that is what I ought to test

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

>> > vmware esxi 5.5.0 (free, using vsphere client to manage), vm is minimal > centos 7 64bit. I added a 16gb vdisk and immediately see this in dmesg... > > [155484.386792] vmw_pvscsi: msg type: 0x0 - MSG RING: 1/0 (5) > [155484.386796] vmw_pvscsi: msg: device added at scsi0:1:0 >

Re: [CentOS-es] OpenVPN - No me conecta !

Aun no consigo conectar mis equipos :( Estoy terminando, reiniciando y finalmente corriendo ipsec verify y me muestra lo siguiente. *shell# /etc/init.d/openvpn restart* Apagando openvpn: [ OK ] Iniciando openvpn: [ OK ] *shell#

Re: [CentOS] Changing the centos name on boot

Hey Billings, Thanks for the response. Just a quick question, you are talking about initramfs or initrd ?? My /boot dosent seem to have a initrd.img rather does seem to have a initramfs.. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at

Re: [CentOS] Changing the centos name on boot

Hi Billing and others, Thanks to your help, learnt a lot about plymouth and yay, it actually works :-) Thanks to all the help and the fast response :-) On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Ramaseshan S wrote: > Hey Billings, > Thanks for the response. > Just a quick

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:57 PM, wrote: > Boris Epstein wrote: > >> > >> My turn for a dumb question: from not paying a lot of attention to this > >> thread, the answer isn't clear to me: has the *host* recognized the > >> disk? If not, the guest's not going to see it. > > > >

Re: [CentOS] Server used in DOS attack on UDP port 0

Am 04.11.2015 um 11:22 schrieb Andrew Holway: The server in question is a Centos 7 based FreeIPA server, OpenVPN concentrator and DNS server. Can have been a DNS amplification attack. https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA13-088A

Re: [CentOS] Two WiFi routers

On 11/04/2015 09:10 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: If all of the routers are providing access to the same network, you can set up the same SSID, wifi password, and security type for all the routers and the clients should seamlessly switch between them as they move around. As a point of

Re: [CentOS] stale file handle issue [SOLVED]

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:59:14PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> The answer is that the large exported filesystem is a very large XFS... >> and at least through CentOS 6, upstream has *never* fixed an NFS bug >> that I find, googling, being complained about in '09:

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

Boris Epstein wrote: >> >> My turn for a dumb question: from not paying a lot of attention to this >> thread, the answer isn't clear to me: has the *host* recognized the >> disk? If not, the guest's not going to see it. > > IMO your question is not dumb at all. Unfortunately, I don't have an >

Re: [CentOS] stale file handle issue [SOLVED]

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, November 4, 2015 11:59 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> The answer is that the large exported filesystem is a very large XFS... >> and at least through CentOS 6, upstream has *never* fixed an NFS bug >> that I find, googling, being complained about in '09: it gags

Re: [CentOS] stale file handle issue [SOLVED]

On 11/4/2015 9:59 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: *sigh* The answer is that the large exported filesystem is a very large XFS... and at least through CentOS 6, upstream has*never* fixed an NFS bug that I find, googling, being complained about in '09: it gags on inodes > 32bit (not sure if that's

[CentOS] Two WiFi routers

Can I have two WiFi routers on the same LAN on my CentOS server? -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 and "ip link alias"

Thoughts please? Thanks, - Mike On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Mike - st257 wrote: > Hello List, > > After demystifying the cause for my /sbin/ifup-local not being executed by > network scripts for an Ethernet interface (don't let NetworkManager control > it or

Re: [CentOS] Two WiFi routers

Richard Zimmerman wrote: > I've got a 3 building network... > > Buildings 1/2 between then have 3 wireless routers all pointed to one > CentOS server. > > The 3rd building across the WAN has 3 wireless routers all into one > server... > > In my case They are for local LAN access so they are

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

Hi Boris, Just rescan the scsi host. #scsi-rescan #if you have sg3_utils package #lsscsi Or #echo "- - -" > /sys/class/scsi_host/host[n]/scan Julius > On Nov 4, 2015, at 15:31, Boris Epstein wrote: > > Hello all, > > Is there a way to recognize a hot-plugged disk (i.e.,

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

Hello Julius, Thanks - but it doesn't seem to work. I installed sg3_utils and ran #scsi-rescan but that seemed to have done nothing for some reason. Cheers, Boris. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Tnjulius wrote: > Hi Boris, > Just rescan the scsi host. > #scsi-rescan

[CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

Hello all, Is there a way to recognize a hot-plugged disk (i.e., to get the system to recognize it and build the appropriate /dev/sd* device for the new device) without a reboot? Thanks. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS-virt] CVE-2015-7835

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Jens Larsson wrote: > Hi, > > There was new packages (4.4.3-3) released on Oct 29, but they don't > address the CVE-2015-7835 problems. Does anyone have news about a > rebuild with this fix applied? Or should we make our own build? Actually they

Re: [CentOS] Two WiFi routers

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Timothy Murphy Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 9:07 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Two WiFi routers Timothy Murphy wrote: > Thanks for your response. > Do you have them

Re: [CentOS] Server used in DOS attack on UDP port 0

Have you a public IP on the server? Take a loot at your DNS configuration it could be an open resolver http://openresolver.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Two WiFi routers

The question is quite vague but the answer is yes. I've got a 3 building network... Buildings 1/2 between then have 3 wireless routers all pointed to one CentOS server. The 3rd building across the WAN has 3 wireless routers all into one server... In my case They are for local LAN access so

Re: [CentOS] Server used in DOS attack on UDP port 0

Did you run basic checks like rkhunter and so on? Is there password login enabled or only public key on ssh service. Weak passwords on ssh is usually primary reason on system compromise. Eero 4.11.2015 12.23 ip. "Andrew Holway" kirjoitti: > Hi, > > One of our AWS

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 129, Issue 1

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

[CentOS-virt] CVE-2015-7835

Hi, There was new packages (4.4.3-3) released on Oct 29, but they don't address the CVE-2015-7835 problems. Does anyone have news about a rebuild with this fix applied? Or should we make our own build? /jens ___ CentOS-virt mailing list

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

On 11/04/2015 10:27 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: >> Hello Julius, >> >> Thanks - but it doesn't seem to work. >> >> I installed sg3_utils and ran >> #scsi-rescan >> >> but that seemed to have done nothing for some

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:39:59PM +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > I think, this is possible with scsi disks > > > > > http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/vmware-add-a-new-hard-disk-without-rebooting-guest.html > > While

Re: [CentOS-virt] CVE-2015-7835

>> There was new packages (4.4.3-3) released on Oct 29, but they don't >> address the CVE-2015-7835 problems. Does anyone have news about a >> rebuild with this fix applied? Or should we make our own build? > > Actually they do includu CVE-2015-7835 (aka XSA-148) -- I just made a > mistake when I

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello Julius, > > Thanks - but it doesn't seem to work. > > I installed sg3_utils and ran > #scsi-rescan > > but that seemed to have done nothing for some reason. > Dumb question: did dmesg even bother to notice

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

Hi, I think, this is possible with scsi disks http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/vmware-add-a-new-hard-disk-without-rebooting-guest.html Eero 4.11.2015 4.32 ip. "Boris Epstein" kirjoitti: > Hello all, > > Is there a way to recognize a hot-plugged disk (i.e., to get the system

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1981 Critical CentOS 7 nspr Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1981 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1981.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] Changing the centos name on boot

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 10:36:50AM +0530, Ramaseshan S wrote: > Sorry didnt know that > Here is an attached online link. > > http://tinypic.com/r/33pdcw6/9 Thats 'plymouth', specifically the text theme. Looking at the plymouth source, it uses /etc/system-release by default (and it looks for

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

> > > > was the controller you added the virtual disk to an IDE or scsi controller? > > -- > public gpg key id: 1362BA1A > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > It was a SCSI controller.

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

On 11/04/2015 11:05 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Jonathan Billings > wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:39:59PM +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote: >>> I think, this is possible with scsi disks >>> >>> >>

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > It should work fine. What esxi version you are using? > > Eero > 4.11.2015 6.27 ip. "Boris Epstein" kirjoitti: > > Eero, I know. It is EXSi 5.5 Thanks. Boris.

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

Zep, Thanks - nothing insulting about asking questions. I did run this command as root as I would never run stuff like this as any other user (or, perhaps, I'd use sudo if so forced). dmesg did not seem to detect the device addition, no. Cheers, Boris. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:32 AM, zep

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:39:59PM +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote: > I think, this is possible with scsi disks > > http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/vmware-add-a-new-hard-disk-without-rebooting-guest.html While I believe that this URL has technically correct advice, it's basically doing a subset of the

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

It should work fine. What esxi version you are using? Eero 4.11.2015 6.27 ip. "Boris Epstein" kirjoitti: > > > > > > > > was the controller you added the virtual disk to an IDE or scsi > controller? > > > > -- > > public gpg key id: 1362BA1A > > > >

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1981 Critical CentOS 7 nss-util Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1981 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1981.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

@Boris: If you have CentOS 6 + ESXi5.5, it should normally work fine. Have you retry the operation by adding another vDisk? monitor /var/log/messages Julius 2015-11-04 17:34 GMT+01:00 Boris Epstein : > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Eero Volotinen

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 and "ip link alias"

On 11/04/2015 05:16 AM, Mike - st257 wrote: But when I try to remove it, I'm either trying to do something_actually_ >not supported or I don't have the proper syntax to accomplish what I want. >~]# ip link delete dev eno1 alias "hit" >RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported The man page for

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1981 Critical CentOS 7 nss Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1981 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1981.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

Am 04.11.2015 um 17:26 schrieb Boris Epstein: It was a SCSI controller. It usually works very nice here, Have you added only the disk or by accident another scsi controller? This happens (you probably know) if you select another bus while creating the disc. VG Rainer

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1982 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1982 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1982.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] Two WiFi routers

Richard Zimmerman wrote: >> Do you have them on different channels? > > YES, definitely If you have the room in the spectrum, ch1, skip2, ch3, > skip 4, ch5, etc... I've actually have mine set with two empty channels > between them as the 3rd building is a machine / fabrication shop with

Re: [CentOS] Two WiFi routers

On 11/4/2015 11:45 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Richard Zimmerman wrote: Do you have them on different channels? YES, definitely If you have the room in the spectrum, ch1, skip2, ch3, skip 4, ch5, etc... I've actually have mine set with two empty channels between them as the 3rd building is

Re: [CentOS] Server used in DOS attack on UDP port 0

On Wed, November 4, 2015 4:22 am, Andrew Holway wrote: > Hi, > > One of our AWS machines was used in an DOS attack last night and I am > looking for possible attack vectors. Is it AWS as in Amazon Web Services? > AWS tells me it was sending UDP port > 0 > traffic to a cloudflare address.

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1981 Critical CentOS 6 nss-util Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1981 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1981.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1981 Critical CentOS 6 nss Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1981 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1981.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1982 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1982 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1982.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] Two WiFi routers

On 11/4/2015 6:07 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Thanks for your response. Do you have them on different channels? If you have an android device with wifi (tablet, phone), install the freeware app "WiFi Analyzer", and put it in the display mode where it shows channels across the bottom and signal

[CentOS] stale file handle issue [SOLVED]

*sigh* The answer is that the large exported filesystem is a very large XFS... and at least through CentOS 6, upstream has *never* fixed an NFS bug that I find, googling, being complained about in '09: it gags on inodes > 32bit (not sure if that's signed, or unsigned, but). The answer was to

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

> > > It usually works very nice here, > Have you added only the disk or by accident another scsi controller? > This happens (you probably know) if you select another bus while creating > the disc. > > VG Rainer > > ___ > CentOS mailing list >

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello Julius, > > Thanks - but it doesn't seem to work. > > I installed sg3_utils and ran > #scsi-rescan > > but that seemed to have done nothing for some reason. > My turn for a dumb question: from not paying a lot of attention to this thread, the answer isn't clear to me:

Re: [CentOS] stale file handle issue [SOLVED]

On Wed, November 4, 2015 11:59 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > *sigh* > > The answer is that the large exported filesystem is a very large XFS... > and at least through CentOS 6, upstream has *never* fixed an NFS bug that > I find, googling, being complained about in '09: it gags on inodes > 32bit

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

> > > My turn for a dumb question: from not paying a lot of attention to this > thread, the answer isn't clear to me: has the *host* recognized the disk? > If not, the guest's not going to see it. > > mark > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list >

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1981 Critical CentOS 6 nspr Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1981 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1981.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] Two WiFi routers

On 11/04/2015 06:21 AM, Richard Zimmerman wrote: If you have the room in the spectrum, ch1, skip2, ch3, skip 4, ch5, etc Those channels are too close. They still overlap and cause interference. Effectively, the only useful channels for 2.4Ghz WiFi are 1, 6, and 11.

Re: [CentOS] stale file handle issue [SOLVED]

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:59:14PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > The answer is that the large exported filesystem is a very large XFS... > and at least through CentOS 6, upstream has *never* fixed an NFS bug that > I find, googling, being complained about in '09: it gags on inodes > 32bit >

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests

Le 03/11/2015 00:49, Jean-Marc LIGER a écrit : Le 02/11/2015 18:28, Johnny Hughes a écrit : On 10/31/2015 04:34 PM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: Hi Lucian, It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and with_libxl enabled. http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1348

[CentOS] Server used in DOS attack on UDP port 0

Hi, One of our AWS machines was used in an DOS attack last night and I am looking for possible attack vectors. AWS tells me it was sending UDP port 0 traffic to a cloudflare address. This instance had an incorrectly configured AWS security group exposing all ports. The server in question is a

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1978 Moderate CentOS 7 kernel Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1978 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1978.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS-virt] Resigning as lead of the Virt SIG

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 02:06:18PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 11/03/2015 08:53 AM, Lars Kurth wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I wanted to let you know that I feel I need to step down as leader of the > > Virtualisation SIG. When I originally was approached by KB to do this, it > > was always

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests

On 11/04/2015 04:31 AM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: > > > Le 03/11/2015 00:49, Jean-Marc LIGER a écrit : >> >> Le 02/11/2015 18:28, Johnny Hughes a écrit : >>> On 10/31/2015 04:34 PM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: Hi Lucian, It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and