Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Richard > Sent: den 25 januari 2016 16:19 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6? > > > You're just seeing this now on a 6.7 system? I don't

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Leon Fauster > Sent: den 25 januari 2016 17:03 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6? > > > upstream provide a EL6 supplementary repository with

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

Alice, your rant is just whining. It's open source. If you don't like it, modify it. You cannot compare something which you basically get for free to what is funded by for-profit companies. On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 01/25/2016 01:28 AM,

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

Once upon a time, Peter Duffy said: > The thing which always gets me about systemd is not the thing itself, > but the way it was rolled out. When I first installed Red Hat 7, if a > window had appeared telling me about systemd and asking me if I wanted > to use it, or stick

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0063 Important CentOS 7 ntp Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0063 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0063.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Sun, January 24, 2016 11:45, Peter Duffy wrote: > > Trouble is that when you go from 6 to 7, you also have the delights of > systemd and grub 2 to contend with. > . . . > Similarly with others who have commented, I simply cannot > understand why the maintainers of crucial components in >

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> Date: Monday, January 25, 2016 07:18:06 + > From: Sorin Srbu > > Hi all, > > Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my > CentOS 6.7 x64-installation wasn't going to be supported anymore > by Google Chrome. > > "This computer will soon stop

Re: [CentOS-es] DRP- Disaster Recovery Plan

Gracias a todos por sus respuestas. En efecto Isidro: creo que mondo rescue se ve bastante simple y efectivo y se acerca a lo que quiero. Angel: pues puedo probar, ya que tengo 3 servers igualitos. Ya les iré contando. Gracias a todos. *Gerardo Barajas Puente* 2016-01-23 20:02 GMT-06:00 angel

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0063 Important CentOS 6 ntp Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0063 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0063.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

> I believe that RHEL7 (and CentOS7) both have systemd integrated into them > enough > that it isn’t as simple as “choose init system” on install. That's because of systemd. Even if most of the linux distros don't, giving the choice is a bit less difficult with any other init system. The main

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

> If that is the case, why do you run CentOS 7 on the server? You can stay > with CentOS 6 for now and either wait till Linux systemd-free distribution > mature enough to be run on server is available. Which it almost is: Devuan > (systemd-free fork of Debian) has released "alpha" version about

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:15:47AM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > >>It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you > >>have to do something special to get fonts shown that aren't > >>monospace. > >The default _is_ monospace (specifically, the monospace system font). > Yes and I

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Mon, January 25, 2016 7:59 am, Sylvain CANOINE wrote: > >> I believe that RHEL7 (and CentOS7) both have systemd integrated into >> them enough >> that it isn’t as simple as “choose init system” on install. > > That's because of systemd. Even if most of the linux distros don't, giving >

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/24/2016 10:45 AM, Peter Duffy wrote: It would be very interesting to know how many other users are still on CentOS/Red Hat 6 as a result of reluctance to enjoy all the - erm - improvements in 7. That's were I am, CentOS 6.7 with a 3.18 LTS kernel from the Xen4CentOS repo on machines with

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Jonathan Billings > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 11:47 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +, Always

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 11:46 -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +, Always Learning wrote: > > Of course Alice can. All of us can. Hopefully it is constructive > > criticism. Seeing good software being replaced by less good, less > > useful and more awkward

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

Was there any real conclusion about Google Chrome on CentOS and how to get around this problem? http://chrome.richardlloyd.org.uk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

Am 25.01.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Richard : > > >> Date: Monday, January 25, 2016 07:18:06 + >> From: Sorin Srbu >> >> Hi all, >> >> Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my >> CentOS 6.7 x64-installation

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 03:20:35PM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you > have to do something special to get fonts shown that aren't > monospace. The default _is_ monospace (specifically, the monospace system font). You _are_ doing

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 18:41 +0500, Micky wrote: > Alice, your rant is just whining. It is pertinent. It is lucidly expressed and many concur. > It's open source. If you don't like it, modify it. That can be an onerous burden especially when one lacks knowledge and time. > You cannot compare

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +, Always Learning wrote: > Of course Alice can. All of us can. Hopefully it is constructive > criticism. Seeing good software being replaced by less good, less > useful and more awkward software usually provoke the software's users to > protest.

Re: [CentOS] What to do when you've been hacked?

On Mon, January 25, 2016 12:04 pm, Benjamin Smith wrote: > No, we haven't been hacked. ;) > We have a prospective client who is asking us what our policy is in the > event > of unauthorized access. Obviously you fix the system(s) that have been > compromised, but what steps do you take to

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Jan 23, 2016, at 4:32 PM, Yamaban wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 00:20, Alice Wonder wrote: > >> For example, when selecting a font for the gedit text editor - there is no >> way to ask it to only show monospace fonts. > > IMHO the gnome UI devs played to much with MacOS

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Jan 24, 2016, at 4:47 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > > You can start > applications, move windows around, and manage files. What do people really > want from a DE? Given a choice between Helix GNOME [*] and GNOME 3, I’ll certainly pick Gnome 3. However, it is also a

Re: [CentOS] What to do when you've been hacked?

On Jan 25, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > > We have a prospective client who is asking us what our policy is in the event > of unauthorized access. Tell them you use the Mr. Miyagi defense: “Don’t get hit.” Your prospective client sounds like they’re

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 2016-01-25, Always Learning wrote: [...] > As a C5 Gnome 2 user I dread G3 when I move my desktop to C6. Mate seems > an alternative. Anyone know more about the G2 folk ? C6 features G2. Nothing to dread. -- Liam ___

[CentOS] What to do when you've been hacked?

No, we haven't been hacked. ;) We have a prospective client who is asking us what our policy is in the event of unauthorized access. Obviously you fix the system(s) that have been compromised, but what steps do you take to mitigate the effects of a breach? What is industry best practice? So

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:28 +, Liam O'Toole wrote: > C6 features G2. Nothing to dread. Wonderful. Thanks :-) -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/25/2016 09:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 03:20:35PM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you have to do something special to get fonts shown that aren't monospace. The default _is_ monospace (specifically, the

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/24/2016 11:46 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 01/24/2016 11:31 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org >>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >>> Behalf Of John Hodrien >>> Sent: den 24 januari 2016 12:47 >>> To: CentOS mailing list >>> Cc:

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:26:51PM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: > I know CentOS 7 is systemd -- ok, maybe I can deal with that having > had some exposure to it, though I'm VERY fond of good ole system V > init scripts. And I actually had been looking forward to gnome3, but > now I'm not too sure about

Re: [CentOS] What to do when you've been hacked?

On Monday, January 25, 2016 11:56:19 AM Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 25, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > > We have a prospective client who is asking us what our policy is in the > > event of unauthorized access. > > Tell them you use the Mr. Miyagi defense:

Re: [CentOS] What to do when you've been hacked?

On Mon, January 25, 2016 6:12 pm, Benjamin Smith wrote: > On Monday, January 25, 2016 11:56:19 AM Warren Young wrote: >> On Jan 25, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Benjamin Smith >> And much more. > > Which I'd consider "best practices" and we do them. They are specifically >

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

I personally love Gnome3 on Fedora. It took me about a week to adjust my mindset though -- I did that over a Xmas break. It did help that I read the release notes first (so I was not surprised at the major change) and went through the tutorial the developers provided. An interesting exercise

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On 01/25/2016 01:28 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: I personally love Gnome3 on Fedora. It took me about a week to adjust my mindset though -- I did that over a Xmas break. It did help that I read the release notes first (so I was not surprised at the major change) and went through the tutorial the

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 11:55:54PM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > > Oh and as far as a silent majority that prefers Gnome 3 - > > Ubuntu was by far the most common distribution for desktop users. > > It is quickly being overtaken by Mint - with the Cinnamon and Mate > builds, not the Gnome 3

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0064 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0064 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0064.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: