[CentOS] Badlock bad luck

Hello, I run a CentOS 6 machine with samba, serving approx. 150 Windows users with samba running as an NT-like PDC. After today's samba update (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 etc.), nobody can log in. They all get the "Trust relationship failed" error message. If I downgrade: yum downgrade

Re: [CentOS] mount bind problem

In /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit, there's "mount -a -n -t nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs,gfs2i,glusterfs -O no_netdev". I have other same type servers. And on other servers with same /etc/fstsb, file system is correct. There's no difference between normal server's rc.sysinit and this problem server's

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 7 ipa Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 7 openchange Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 7 samba Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 7 libldb Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 7 libtevent Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 7 libtdb Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 7 libtalloc Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0621 Important CentOS 5 samba Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0621 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0621.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 6 libldb Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0613 Critical CentOS 5 samba3x Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0613 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0613.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 6 ipa Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 6 samba4 Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0611 Critical CentOS 6 samba Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0611 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0611.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0612 Critical CentOS 6 openchange Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0612 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

I have fas account, Do I access to developer program? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS-virt] Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (wa

Sorry, I will out of the office til 4/21/16. -- Stephen=C2=A0Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Director=C2=A0of=C2=A0Technology Phone:=C2=A0813-579-3200 Fax:=C2=A0813-882-0209 Email:=C2=A0steve.clark@netwolves.c= om

[CentOS-virt] Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (wa

Sorry, I will out of the office til 4/21/16. -- Stephen=C2=A0Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Director=C2=A0of=C2=A0Technology Phone:=C2=A0813-579-3200 Fax:=C2=A0813-882-0209 Email:=C2=A0steve.clark@netwolves.c= om

[CentOS-virt] Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (wa

Sorry, I will out of the office til 4/21/16. -- Stephen=C2=A0Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Director=C2=A0of=C2=A0Technology Phone:=C2=A0813-579-3200 Fax:=C2=A0813-882-0209 Email:=C2=A0steve.clark@netwolves.c= om

[CentOS-virt] Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Problems with scsi

Sorry, I will out of the office til 4/21/16. -- Stephen=C2=A0Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Director=C2=A0of=C2=A0Technology Phone:=C2=A0813-579-3200 Fax:=C2=A0813-882-0209 Email:=C2=A0steve.clark@netwolves.c= om

[CentOS-virt] Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Problems with scsi

Sorry, I will out of the office til 4/21/16. -- Stephen=C2=A0Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Director=C2=A0of=C2=A0Technology Phone:=C2=A0813-579-3200 Fax:=C2=A0813-882-0209 Email:=C2=A0steve.clark@netwolves.c= om

[CentOS-virt] Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Problems with scsi-target-utils when hosted on dom0 centos 7 xen box)))))

Sorry, I will out of the office til 4/21/16. -- Stephen=C2=A0Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Director=C2=A0of=C2=A0Technology Phone:=C2=A0813-579-3200 Fax:=C2=A0813-882-0209 Email:=C2=A0steve.clark@netwolves.c= om

[CentOS-virt] Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Problems with scsi-target-utils when hosted on dom0 centos 7 xen box))))

Sorry, I will out of the office til 4/21/16. -- Stephen=C2=A0Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Director=C2=A0of=C2=A0Technology Phone:=C2=A0813-579-3200 Fax:=C2=A0813-882-0209 Email:=C2=A0steve.clark@netwolves.c= om

[CentOS-virt] Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Problems with scsi-target-utils when hosted on dom0 centos 7 xen box)))

Sorry, I will out of the office til 4/21/16. -- Stephen=C2=A0Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Director=C2=A0of=C2=A0Technology Phone:=C2=A0813-579-3200 Fax:=C2=A0813-882-0209 Email:=C2=A0steve.clark@netwolves.c= om

[CentOS-virt] Out of Office. (was: Out of Office. (was: Problems with scsi-target-utils when hosted on dom0 centos 7 xen box))

Sorry, I will out of the office til 4/21/16. -- Stephen=C2=A0Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Director=C2=A0of=C2=A0Technology Phone:=C2=A0813-579-3200 Fax:=C2=A0813-882-0209 Email:=C2=A0steve.clark@netwolves.c= om

Re: [CentOS-virt] Problems with scsi-target-utils when hosted on dom0 centos 7 xen box

On 2016-04-12 09:43 AM, Nathan Coulson wrote: By natively, I take it using kernel /vmlinuz (vs kernel /xen) Not yet, but working on setting up such an environment. (At this time, I was using virt-install to reproduce the problem, and the original server we are testing on did not support kvm

Re: [CentOS] selinux getsebool request

On 04/12/2016 02:31 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > For example: > > unless => "/usr/sbin/getsebool httpd_can_network_connect | /usr/bin/grep on > &> /dev/null" D'oh! That's what I get for overcomplicating the whole darn thing. :) > > Incidentally one nice trick if you're dealing with potentially

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:17 PM, wrote: > The nice one I was looking at last year, before the turkey with Them told > me "sorry, it was too late to get that, here, take this, it's good...", > was in the $2k-$2700 range, an actual workstation, 7?00 model, NVidia > video card,

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

On Tue, April 12, 2016 2:33 pm, James Hogarth wrote: > On 12 April 2016 at 18:03, Valeri Galtsev > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, April 12, 2016 11:57 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> > James Hogarth wrote: >> >> On 12 Apr 2016 16:29, "Scott Robbins" wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

Peter Q. wrote: > it's sounds good! > > What about price? > On Apr 12, 2016 2:56 PM, "Lamar Owen" wrote: > >> You can get RHEL on Dell Precision mobile workstations. Laptops, just >> higher end. They're not outrageous, for business-class machines; they're more than

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

it's sounds good! What about price? On Apr 12, 2016 2:56 PM, "Lamar Owen" wrote: > You can get RHEL on Dell Precision mobile workstations. Laptops, just > higher end. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org >

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

You can get RHEL on Dell Precision mobile workstations. Laptops, just higher end. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

Dell provides linux laptops and lenovo too.. Eero 12.4.2016 10.39 ip. kirjoitti: > Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > > On Tue, April 12, 2016 1:43 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > > > In US you can buy some laptops without MS Windows OS (read: with Linux, > > most likely Ubuntu) from

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, April 12, 2016 1:43 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > In US you can buy some laptops without MS Windows OS (read: with Linux, > most likely Ubuntu) from some small manufacturers... I believe, one I *think* you can buy Dell laptops with no o/s. mark

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

On 12 April 2016 at 18:03, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, April 12, 2016 11:57 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > James Hogarth wrote: > >> On 12 Apr 2016 16:29, "Scott Robbins" wrote: > >>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:45:17AM +0200, Marcin

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On Tue, April 12, 2016 1:43 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > > I refuse to do anything at all on a Microsoft machine. I feel ill when I > see the M$ screens and remember the countless months of my life > frustratingly wasted trying to get M$ crap to work. Centos is true > liberation and how

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

On 4/12/16 12:15 PM, Todor Petkov wrote: On 4/12/2016 7:56 PM, David Nelson wrote: On 04/12/2016 09:51 AM, James Hogarth wrote: To the OP enumerate is always painful, I'd remove that for a start. This was my experience too, for what it's worth. When I first set up a new system pointed at

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

On 4/12/2016 7:56 PM, David Nelson wrote: > On 04/12/2016 09:51 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> To the OP enumerate is always painful, I'd remove that for a start. > > This was my experience too, for what it's worth. When I first set up a > new system pointed at LDAP it was absurdly slow to

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 09:44 -0400, Peter Larsen wrote: > On 04/05/2016 11:55 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > Me ? Well I am staying on C6 :-) > That's why we have choice. This is not the Microsoft "everyone has to > upgrade to Windows 10 like it or not" mentality. CentOS still has a > lot of

Re: [CentOS] selinux getsebool request

On 12 Apr 2016 6:10 p.m., "John Jasen" wrote: > > Out of faint curiosity, how do we push change requests upstream to RHEL? > > I'm using puppet to automate systems, including the application of > SELinux policy. While setsebool -P is non-damaging to repeat, it is time >

Re: [CentOS-docs] discussions around upstream documentation

On 04/12/2016 01:17 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > +1 here. A wiki has an "edit button" , a "preview button" and a "save > button". It's not a "commit to git, pull from git, format for wiki, > whatever" dance. It's already hard enough that people need to create a > wiki account, subscribe to a

[CentOS] selinux getsebool request

Out of faint curiosity, how do we push change requests upstream to RHEL? I'm using puppet to automate systems, including the application of SELinux policy. While setsebool -P is non-damaging to repeat, it is time consuming -- taking about 45 seconds per execution to process the existing policy

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

On Tue, April 12, 2016 11:57 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > James Hogarth wrote: >> On 12 Apr 2016 16:29, "Scott Robbins" wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:45:17AM +0200, Marcin Trendota wrote: >>> > W dniu 11.04.2016 o 20:07, Scott Robbins pisze: > >> After various

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

James Hogarth wrote: > On 12 Apr 2016 16:29, "Scott Robbins" wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:45:17AM +0200, Marcin Trendota wrote: >> > W dniu 11.04.2016 o 20:07, Scott Robbins pisze: > After various testing I ended up going with the Apache LDAP cache module > and doing

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

On 04/12/2016 09:51 AM, James Hogarth wrote: To the OP enumerate is always painful, I'd remove that for a start. This was my experience too, for what it's worth. When I first set up a new system pointed at LDAP it was absurdly slow to authenticate. Setting Enumerate to False in

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

On 12 Apr 2016 16:29, "Scott Robbins" wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:45:17AM +0200, Marcin Trendota wrote: > > W dniu 11.04.2016 o 20:07, Scott Robbins pisze: > > > > >>> Any ideas? > > >> DNS? > > > Is LDAP listed in the /etc/nsswitch.conf? > > > > In nsswitch.conf i

Re: [CentOS-virt] Problems with scsi-target-utils when hosted on dom0 centos 7 xen box

By natively, I take it using kernel /vmlinuz (vs kernel /xen) Not yet, but working on setting up such an environment. (At this time, I was using virt-install to reproduce the problem, and the original server we are testing on did not support kvm but the 2nd server does). On 2016-04-12 03:26

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:45:17AM +0200, Marcin Trendota wrote: > W dniu 11.04.2016 o 20:07, Scott Robbins pisze: > > >>> Any ideas? > >> DNS? > > Is LDAP listed in the /etc/nsswitch.conf? > > In nsswitch.conf i have: > passwd: files sss > shadow: files sss > group: files sss >

Re: [CentOS] mount bind problem

On 04/12/2016 05:37 AM, Sylvain CANOINE wrote: - Mail original - De: "望月忠雄" À: "centos" Envoyé: Mardi 12 Avril 2016 08:17:13 Objet: [CentOS] mount bind problem I have set on fstab /home with 'mount bind' but it seems like bind is not

Re: [CentOS] mount bind problem

Thank you Sylvain. I want try to use /etc/rc.d/rc.local. Are there any document about writing into /etc/rc.d/rc.local? Tadao 2016-04-12 19:37 GMT+09:00 Sylvain CANOINE : > > > - Mail original - > > De: "望月忠雄" > > À: "centos"

Re: [CentOS] mount bind problem

- Mail original - > De: "望月忠雄" > À: "centos" > Envoyé: Mardi 12 Avril 2016 08:17:13 > Objet: [CentOS] mount bind problem > I have set on fstab /home with 'mount bind' but it seems like bind is not > effective. Indeed. By default, nothing

Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS-docs Digest, Vol 112, Issue 8

On 17/03/16 13:09, Ben Hosmer wrote: >>Your CentOS Wiki home page [1] was created for you over three years >>ago (2013-02-26 21:03:39) and you last edited it the next day >>(2013-02-27 11:19:12). > >>I am unsure as to what you believe you need to do. > >>Alan. > > I'm sorry about

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

W dniu 12.04.2016 o 09:45, Marcin Trendota pisze: > DNS works fine. I think that sssd communicates with LDAP server with > every authentication - i have tons of following entries in log: > http://pastebin.com/rZVjk0gW > And it repeats for same user over and over again. Is this correct behavior?

Re: [CentOS] Slow authentication on C7

W dniu 11.04.2016 o 20:07, Scott Robbins pisze: >>> Any ideas? >> DNS? > Is LDAP listed in the /etc/nsswitch.conf? In nsswitch.conf i have: passwd: files sss shadow: files sss group: files sss DNS works fine. I think that sssd communicates with LDAP server with every

Re: [CentOS-docs] discussions around upstream documentation

On 04/12/2016 08:11 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: On 11/04/16 21:11, Akemi Yagi wrote: >On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Karsten Wade wrote: >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>On 04/11/2016 09:18 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: >>>What are the thoughts or concerns

[CentOS] mount bind problem

On CentOS release 6.7, there's file system problem. Aftert reboot /home is set under /home (/home/home) like followings. # ls -l /home total 48 -rw--- 1 root root 7168 Nov 15 19:10 aquota.group -rw--- 1 root root 7168 Jan 25 11:09 aquota.user drwxr-x--- 2 root root 4096 Jan 18