Re: [CentOS] systemd-journald corruption

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 2:09 PM Chris Adams wrote: >> > I have several recently-installed CentOS 7 servers that keep having >> >

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

On 4/26/2016 7:27 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: bash is mostly compatible with bourne (can run most bourne scripts) which is why /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash on GNU and most other *nix systems. when bash is invoked as /bin/sh, it reverts to more Bourne like behaviors in some circumstances

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

On 04/26/2016 07:21 PM, Digimer wrote: On 26/04/16 10:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all news to me, and I cannot

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

On 26/04/16 10:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >> >> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one >> of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's >> all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

On 04/26/2016 06:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs.

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs.

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

There was the "Shell Shock" Vulnerability patched on the 24th of September 2014 Maybe this person was Misinformed after this incident. Microsoft and Ubuntu just announced BASH for Windows ( they called it Linux on Windows or something like that ). On 27 April 2016 at 13:47, Digimer

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

On 26/04/16 09:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: > Hello List, > > Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one > of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all > news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the claim. > Is this true,

[CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

Hello List, Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or something else?

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/26/2016 03:27 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: Hey guys, I tend to work on small production environments for a large enterprise. Never more than 15 web servers for most sites. But most are only 3 to 5 web servers. Depends on the needs of the client.I actually like to install Apache and PHP from

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0695 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0695 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/26/2016 03:27 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: So what I'd like to know is it better in your opinion to install from repos than to install by source as a best practice? Your tools should save you time. Building packages should involve three steps: download the source, update the version number in

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

If you need more recent versions checkout softwarecollections.org. It has more recent rebuilds of the big package suites that install under /opt and don't collide with the system installed packages. There is a CentOS specific channel in there somewhere.

Re: [CentOS] where, if at all, is my virtual printer output?

On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:57:31 -0500 (CDT) Michael Hennebry wrote: > Now there are two virtual printers, > one named Cups-PDF Out of the box, cups-pdf creates a pdf and puts it on your desktop. You can configure that with /etc/cups/cups-pdf.conf -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 4/26/2016 3:27 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: I like to use the latest, stable versions of apache and php for my clients without having to create a custom RPM every time a new version comes out. So what I'd like to know is it better in your opinion to install from repos than to install by source as a

[CentOS] where, if at all, is my virtual printer output?

I recently installed the package that allows having virtual printers under CUPS. I used the localhost:631 GUI to add a virtual pdf printer. I do not remember what I did. Now there are two virtual printers, one named Cups-PDF and the one I named pdfprinter. I cannot find the output from either. I

[CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

Hey guys, I tend to work on small production environments for a large enterprise. Never more than 15 web servers for most sites. But most are only 3 to 5 web servers. Depends on the needs of the client.I actually like to install Apache and PHP from source and by hand. Although I know that's

Re: [CentOS] username.pem

Best label available I can see is sshd_var_run_t. Not exactly named well but it would work. chcon -R -t sshd_var_run_t /var/lib/ssh-x509-auth On 04/26/2016 11:31 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Hi, folks, Our system gets/creates /var/lib/ssh-x509-auth/,pem, then deletes it when the log

Re: [CentOS] systemd-journald corruption

Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 2:09 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > I have several recently-installed CentOS 7 servers that keep having > > systemd-journald corruption > > Determined with 'journalctl --verify' or another way?

Re: [CentOS] systemd-journald corruption

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 2:09 PM Chris Adams wrote: > I have several recently-installed CentOS 7 servers that keep having > systemd-journald corruption Determined with 'journalctl --verify' or another way? (which stops ALL logging, including syslog). > Interestingly, they

[CentOS] systemd-journald corruption

I have several recently-installed CentOS 7 servers that keep having systemd-journald corruption (which stops ALL logging, including syslog). Interestingly, they are all spam-scanning servers running amavisd-new (so could be some particular pattern is triggering it). Is there a "supported" way to

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Flash

On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 19:04 +0200, Yamaban wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:54, wwp wrote: > > > Hello Andreas, > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler wrote: > > > >> Hello every one I installed the official > >> flash plugin from adobe > >> > >> About Plugins tells me: >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Flash

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:04:41PM +0200, Yamaban wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:54, wwp wrote: > > >Hello Andreas, > > > > > >On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler wrote: > > > >>Hello every one I installed the official > >>flash plugin from adobe > >> > >>About Plugins tells me: >

[CentOS] Re: Firefox and Flash

On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:54, wwp wrote: Hello Andreas, On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler wrote: Hello every one I installed the official flash plugin from adobe About Plugins tells me: Datei: libflashplayer.so Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so

[CentOS] username.pem

Hi, folks, Our system gets/creates /var/lib/ssh-x509-auth/,pem, then deletes it when the log out. selinux (in permissive mode) complains. First, I changed the context to cert_t, and *now* it complains that ksh93 wants write, etc access on the directory. grep ssh-x509-auth

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Flash

Hello Andreas, On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:18:15 +0200 Andreas Benzler wrote: > Do as allready commited: > > close firefox > uninstall fash > start firefox > close firefox > install flash > hopefully this works for you. > > config is inside $HOME/.mozzilla It simply

[CentOS] evolution libsoup and samba bug 765106

Hello everyone, while i was play around with winhq install winbind-clients. After this I never can open evolution with exchange ews connector. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765106 I patches libsoup by my self diff -up ./libsoup/soup-auth-ntlm.c.prev ./libsoup/soup-auth-ntlm.c

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Flash

Do as allready commited: close firefox uninstall fash start firefox close firefox install flash hopefully this works for you. config is inside $HOME/.mozzilla Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2016, 13:54 +0200 schrieb wwp: > Hello Andreas, > > > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 134, Issue 13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Flash

Hello Andreas, On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler wrote: > Hello every one I installed the official > flash plugin from adobe > > About Plugins tells me: > > Datei: libflashplayer.so > Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Flash

> Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 09:26:11 + > From: Liam O'Toole > > On 2016-04-26, Alice Wonder > wrote: >> On 04/26/2016 12:03 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: >>> Hello every one I installed the official flash plugin from adobe >>> >>> About

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Flash

On 2016-04-26, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 04/26/2016 12:03 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: >> Hello every one I installed the official flash plugin from adobe >> >> About Plugins tells me: >> >> Datei: libflashplayer.so Pfad: >> /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Flash

On 04/26/2016 12:03 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: Hello every one I installed the official flash plugin from adobe About Plugins tells me: Datei: libflashplayer.so Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11.2.202.577 Status: Aktiviert

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Flash

While this is a developer edition only i delete rm -rf $HOME/.mozilla this be can be done better but now flash looks ok to Datei: libflashplayer.so Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11.2.202.616 Status: Aktiviert Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202

[CentOS] Firefox and Flash

Hello every one I installed the official flash plugin from adobe About Plugins tells me: Datei: libflashplayer.so Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11.2.202.577 Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE) Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 But it is:

Re: [CentOS-virt] version(qemu-kvm) with parallel port support

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Subscriber wrote: > > Whether there is a version of the qemu-kvm with support for parallel > port (passthrough). I need parallel port for Windows VM (security > dongle LPT). > > I use > on one host > # /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm