Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

2016-04-30 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: For e-mail sent to people, yes. But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why blacklisting characters that are not allowed in a username is

Re: [CentOS] Bonding wired and wireless ifaces

2016-04-30 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 04/30/2016 01:26 PM, wwp wrote: I'm wondering if there's any interest in trying to bond em1 and eth0 (respectively wired and wireless interfaces here), and if any, how to do it in CentOS6. You might be able to round-robin your outgoing packets, but without support on the upstream switch,

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

2016-04-30 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > > For e-mail sent to people, yes. > > But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why > blacklisting characters that are not allowed in a username is a standards > problem. That's not how

[CentOS] Bonding wired and wireless ifaces

2016-04-30 Thread wwp
Hello all, I'm wondering if there's any interest in trying to bond em1 and eth0 (respectively wired and wireless interfaces here), and if any, how to do it in CentOS6. I've found this, which could possibly help (but I'm failing yet): http://r.outlyer.net/linux:bonding

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

2016-04-30 Thread Richard
Original Message > Date: Saturday, April 30, 2016 12:44:52 -0700 > From: Alice Wonder > > On 04/30/2016 12:22 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 04/30/2016 11:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> Is there any advice on characters to allow in usernames? >>

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

2016-04-30 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/30/2016 12:22 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/30/2016 11:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Is there any advice on characters to allow in usernames? ... I don't think a whitelist alphabet is best approach because of people with names that are not spelled with Latin characters. Is there an

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

2016-04-30 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/30/2016 12:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Sat, April 30, 2016 1:28 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently working on re-writing the parts of Roundcube I don't like (e.g. it uses inline

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

2016-04-30 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 04/30/2016 11:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Is there any advice on characters to allow in usernames? ... I don't think a whitelist alphabet is best approach because of people with names that are not spelled with Latin characters. Is there an existing blacklist of characters that technically

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

2016-04-30 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, April 30, 2016 1:28 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: > I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. > > I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently working > on re-writing the parts of Roundcube I don't like (e.g. it uses inline > JavaScript in a few places so CSP breaks it)

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

2016-04-30 Thread Richard
Original Message > Date: Saturday, April 30, 2016 11:28:23 -0700 > From: Alice Wonder > > I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. > > I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently > working on re-writing the parts of

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

2016-04-30 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, April 30, 2016 1:19 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 04/30/2016 11:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Sat, April 30, 2016 12:56 pm, William Warren wrote: >>> ALL systems need patching so obsessing about uptime is insecurity on >>> its >>> face. It doe not matter if it is windows or linux

[CentOS] E-mail advice sought

2016-04-30 Thread Alice Wonder
I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently working on re-writing the parts of Roundcube I don't like (e.g. it uses inline JavaScript in a few places so CSP breaks it) but - Is there any advice on characters to allow in

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

2016-04-30 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/30/2016 11:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Sat, April 30, 2016 12:56 pm, William Warren wrote: ALL systems need patching so obsessing about uptime is insecurity on its face. It doe not matter if it is windows or linux or anything else. As I said, I feel I hear MS Widows admins on

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

2016-04-30 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, April 30, 2016 12:56 pm, William Warren wrote: > ALL systems need patching so obsessing about uptime is insecurity on its > face. It doe not matter if it is windows or linux or anything else. > As I said, I feel I hear MS Widows admins on this list. There are only two things that

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

2016-04-30 Thread Alice Wonder
Not all patches require rebooting the kernel. Most do not. On 04/30/2016 10:56 AM, William Warren wrote: ALL systems need patching so obsessing about uptime is insecurity on its face. It doe not matter if it is windows or linux or anything else. On 4/30/2016 11:33 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

2016-04-30 Thread William Warren
ALL systems need patching so obsessing about uptime is insecurity on its face. It doe not matter if it is windows or linux or anything else. On 4/30/2016 11:33 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Sat, April 30, 2016 8:54 am, William Warren wrote: uptime=insecurity. This sounds like MS Windows

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

2016-04-30 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, April 30, 2016 8:54 am, William Warren wrote: > uptime=insecurity. This sounds like MS Windows admin's statement. Are there any Unix admins still left around who remember systems with kernel that doesn't need [security] patching for few years? And libc that does not need security patches

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

2016-04-30 Thread William Warren
uptime=insecurity. Patches must be kept up these days or your uptime won't matter when your server gets compromised. On 4/22/2016 4:33 AM, Rob Townley wrote: tune2fs against a LVM (albeit formatted with ext4) is not the same as tune2fs against ext4. Could this possibly be a machine where

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

2016-04-30 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
Then you either made a mistake or ran into a bug. Both "normal" disk partitions and logical volumes are regular block devices and tune2fs or other tool operating on block devices will see no difference between them and treat them identical. On 30.04.2016 12:42, Rob Townley wrote: > Not in my

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

2016-04-30 Thread Rob Townley
Not in my testing especially about the time of 6.4. On Apr 22, 2016 5:16 PM, "Gordon Messmer" wrote: > On 04/22/2016 01:33 AM, Rob Townley wrote: > >> tune2fs against a LVM (albeit formatted with ext4) is not the same as >> tune2fs against ext4. >> > > tune2fs operates