Re: [CentOS] kickstart problems since 7.3

> I just tried a kickstart setup for the first time since 7.3 and got an > error similar to the error in this unresolved Fedora bug report: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278260 > > Has anyone successfully done a kickstart setup using 7.3 on x86_64? I have with an http based ks

[CentOS] kickstart problems since 7.3

I just tried a kickstart setup for the first time since 7.3 and got an error similar to the error in this unresolved Fedora bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278260 Has anyone successfully done a kickstart setup using 7.3 on x86_64? I'd imagine this is part of QA, so

[CentOS] LVM appears to be very expensive on CentOS 7

After running a long series of benchmarks, it looks like there is a very significant performance difference between systems using LVM and systems not using LVM under CentOS 7. I'd appreciate it if anyone else can confirm these results. There are a couple of other surprising aspects of the

[CentOS] SASL attacks and SPAM

I wanted to pass this along. I'm sure it may be nothing new to most of you, but it has greatly reduced sasl attacks and spam. I found most of it here: https://scottlinux.com/2011/05/26/prevent-postfix-brute-force/ I added the fail2ban rule and modified my postfix main.cf as follows:

[CentOS] Problem with Centos & Alsa on reboot

I have a number of machines using Centos 6.8 They have M-Audio sound cards. When I set the output levels using alsamixer and save using 'alsactrl store' [creating a requested directory] the settings do not restore on reboot. I have no idea why they don't. running 'alsactrl restore' works so

Re: [CentOS] firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 crashing... unusable

ken wrote: > On 12/19/2016 11:13 AM, wwp wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:04:28 -0500 Lamar Owen wrote: >>> On 12/19/2016 08:44 AM, ken wrote: Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. > Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's

Re: [CentOS] missing rh-git29-git package

Hi Centos Team, It seems this is partially resolved. The issue now is that rh-git29-runtime cannot be found by yum but the package itself is in the repo directory: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/rh-git29/rh-git29-runtime-2.3-4.el7.x86_64.rpm

[CentOS] missing rh-git29-git package

Hi. We wish to install rh-git29 from the Software Collections repo and it's failing because of a missing rh-git29-git package. It appears to be absent still on the latest Centos 7.3. distro. [root@localhost ~]# yum install rh-git29 Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, priorities

Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?

On 12/19/2016 11:47 AM, lejeczek wrote: On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, devtoolset-6 is

Re: [CentOS] firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 crashing... unusable

On 12/19/2016 11:13 AM, wwp wrote: Hello, On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:04:28 -0500 Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/19/2016 08:44 AM, ken wrote: Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. > Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, ATI video, ex-X, still fighting [SOLVED]

Hey Mark, never got this hard problems. But: Radeon HD 8570 / R7 240/340 OEM OEM Cards sometimes needs a hack to be running on offical fglrx driver. Did it in the past on some HP rebranded ATI cards. can you send lspcik, mine looks like

Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?

On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, devtoolset-6 is available. devtoolset-6-runtime is

Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?

On 19/12/16 16:38, lejeczek wrote: On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, devtoolset-6 is

Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?

On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, devtoolset-6 is available. somewhere (semi)officially?

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

On Mon, December 19, 2016 12:41 am, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of >> geo.inbox.ignored >> Sent: den 16 december 2016 15:03 >> To: centos@centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list >> >> >> >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, ATI video, ex-X, still fighting [SOLVED]

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Still trying to get it running. Updated CentOS 7, ATI video card, trying > to use the radeon driver, and, using the previous kernel, X appears to > come up, but gdm fails; with the 514 kernel, X fails to start. > > And here's a twist: I just rebooted, with

Re: [CentOS] firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 crashing... unusable

Hello, On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:04:28 -0500 Lamar Owen wrote: > On 12/19/2016 08:44 AM, ken wrote: > > Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. > > > Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three > > > times. That comes to

Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?

On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, devtoolset-6 is available. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 crashing... unusable

On 12/19/2016 08:44 AM, ken wrote: Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three times. That comes to it being usable for about five minutes before it crashes. Anyone else getting this? For what

[CentOS] CentOS 7, ATI video, ex-X, still fighting

Still trying to get it running. Updated CentOS 7, ATI video card, trying to use the radeon driver, and, using the previous kernel, X appears to come up, but gdm fails; with the 514 kernel, X fails to start. And here's a twist: I just rebooted, with radeon.modeset=1 on the kernel line... and for

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and systemd: SysV initscript: how detect boot vs. interactive use?

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 08:50:54PM -0800, whitivery wrote: > It is a system with several servers (various platforms/distros). > > One piece of software runs on all of the servers. For it to operate > correctly, the instance on one server (prime) must start before the others > (auxiliary). > >

[CentOS] firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 crashing... unusable

Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three times. That comes to it being usable for about five minutes before it crashes. Anyone else getting this?

[CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?

hi everyone just a quickie to devel maybe. I'm looking at some bits: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, L. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: thunderbird displaying inline

Hi, Leonard, On 12/18/16 12:47, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: On Sun, 2016-12-18 at 11:56 -0500, mark wrote: This is odd. Just recently, at home, even though I have it set to display messages as plain text, I'm suddenly seeing pics attached to spam inline, as though I had it set to display

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

On 12/19/2016 12:41 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of >> geo.inbox.ignored >> Sent: den 16 december 2016 15:03 >> To: centos@centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list >> On 12/16/2016 07:29