Re: [CentOS-docs] introduction

> Is your wiki name IlyaDorokhov ? That's right > IlyasArinov has helped with Russian translation. So you might want to > coordinate with him. We always welcome more translators. Thank you, I'll contact him >Could you elaborate on this? Application to do what? I have an experience with linux

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.8

> has something changed in cron? > has there been an update? > Have looked in all the usual places. > > any help/suggestions? The environment maybe, enable debug output on the job and redirect or make sure the output is logged or picked up and mailed to you. More than likely the ssh config that

[CentOS] Centos 6.8

I have a file on a Centos 6.8 server that I want to download to another Centos 6.8 box in a remote location. rsync used to work fine from within a shell script run by cron using ssh and having set up passwordless login on each machine the script runs fine from the command line, but not when

[CentOS] NetworkManager vs. Firewalld vs. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*****

I've made 3 CentOS 7 installation attempts to configure a simple firewall/router box with 2 nics. I got myself into a circular scenario where NetworkManager and firewalld and /etc/sysconfig/network-scrpts/ifcfg-* were interfering or overwriting each other. Needed to perform ifdown enp3s7 on

Re: [CentOS] disable/mask NetworkManager leads to unit startup fails

On 16 January 2017 at 15:24, Oberdorfer Patrick wrote: > Hello! > > > > For me it was best practice to disable "NetworkManager" on headless > installations. > > Now suddenly I ran into an problem with several programs not starting > correctly upon boot anymore. >

[CentOS] disable/mask NetworkManager leads to unit startup fails

Hello! For me it was best practice to disable "NetworkManager" on headless installations. Now suddenly I ran into an problem with several programs not starting correctly upon boot anymore. The problem seems to be that their unit files contain "After=network.target" but network.target wont

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 1/16/2017 1:29 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 16/01/17 21:54, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/16/2017 12:44 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Here's an idea - untested. set up a network on the single nic - say 192.168.55.xx/24 set up the dhcp to offer leases from a subset of this network - say 192.168.55.128/28

Re: [CentOS] Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box

On Friday 13 January 2017 12:40:33 Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Gary Stainburn > > wrote: > > Also, it was suggested that I use nmcli in a cronjob to re-activate it if > > it > > drops. I can check to see if it's still active by 'grep'ing the IP

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 16/01/17 21:54, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/16/2017 12:44 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Here's an idea - untested. set up a network on the single nic - say 192.168.55.xx/24 set up the dhcp to offer leases from a subset of this network - say 192.168.55.128/28 set up fixed leases based upon mac

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 1/16/2017 12:44 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Here's an idea - untested. set up a network on the single nic - say 192.168.55.xx/24 set up the dhcp to offer leases from a subset of this network - say 192.168.55.128/28 set up fixed leases based upon mac address from the remainder of the network -

[CentOS-docs] introduction

- Ilya Dorokhov, Moscow; - Translation wiki pages to Russian language; - I will start with FAQ for CentOS7. Also I will gladly appreciate if you can offer more suitable application for my work. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 16/01/17 17:12, James A. Peltier wrote: VLANs are your friend, otherwise DHCPD is not going to understand how to properly answer your request for different networks on the same interface. - On 14 Jan, 2017, at 11:59, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: | Everyone, | | I am trying