[CentOS] solved - Re: Require option in Apache

2017-02-18 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I finally found it in: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/howto/access.html same formats as we had in the allow/deny options. On 02/18/2017 11:48 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So I have read everything that my search foo can find on the require option. I want to specify IP addresses. The only

[CentOS] Require option in Apache

2017-02-18 Thread Robert Moskowitz
So I have read everything that my search foo can find on the require option. I want to specify IP addresses. The only examples I am finding are in: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/howto/auth.html And only IPv4 addresses and only dotted aggregation. No IPv6 examples and no CIDR

Re: [CentOS] usb drives & Orico ORICO 9548U3-BK

2017-02-18 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > I decided to build an archive server for the purpose of backing up > other fedora/centos desktops at the office. I built a machine and have > installed Centos 7.3 on it with all updates current. I also purchased > a 3.0 usb sata drive cabinet (Orico ORICO 9548U3-BK) and installed two >

Re: [CentOS] usb drives & Orico ORICO 9548U3-BK

2017-02-18 Thread Joseph L. Casale
> Is there a way to manually assign usb drives to a specified device > label. Is there a way to force two usb drives to be labeled as > /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd? > UUID=f915a354-28bf-4110-bec9-3767ef1fe52c /boot    xfsdefaults  0 0 Don't use device names, use UUIDs like the above.

[CentOS] usb drives & Orico ORICO 9548U3-BK

2017-02-18 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
Everyone, Is there a way to manually assign usb drives to a specified device label. Is there a way to force two usb drives to be labeled as /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd? I decided to build an archive server for the purpose of backing up other fedora/centos desktops at the office. I built a machine

Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen updates in the Testing Repo for XSA-207 and XSA-208

2017-02-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/18/2017 08:14 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/17/2017 02:32 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> Given the circumstances, might it make sense to offer formal advisories >> of some type for these to indicate when the packages going to live are >> for security or other reasons? >> > > We release xen

Re: [CentOS-virt] xen 4.7 or 4.8

2017-02-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/18/2017 02:07 AM, Christoph wrote: > > Hi > > are there somewhere pkgs with xen 4.7 or 4.8 for centos7? > The SIG has agreed to maintain every other release (even numbered release) of Xen. So there will be a 4.8 set of packages at some point. There are currently no released 4.8

Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen updates in the Testing Repo for XSA-207 and XSA-208

2017-02-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/17/2017 02:32 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > Given the circumstances, might it make sense to offer formal advisories > of some type for these to indicate when the packages going to live are > for security or other reasons? > We release xen every 2nd (even numbered) release as a goal (4.4, 4.6,

[CentOS-virt] xen 4.7 or 4.8

2017-02-18 Thread Christoph
Hi are there somewhere pkgs with xen 4.7 or 4.8 for centos7? -- -- Greetz Christoph ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt