Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 05/31/2017 08:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I've got an old RAID that I attached to a box. LSI card, and the RAID >> has 12 drives, for a total RAID size of 9.1TB, I think. I started shred >> /dev/sda the Friday before last... and it's still running. Is this >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID

On 05/31/2017 08:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I've got an old RAID that I attached to a box. LSI card, and the RAID has 12 drives, for a total RAID size of 9.1TB, I think. I started shred /dev/sda the Friday before last... and it's still running. Is this reasonable for it to be taking this

Re: [CentOS] more recent perl version?

On Jun 2, 2017, at 5:05 AM, hw wrote: > > Warren Young wrote: >> >> There are various options. We use mod_fcgid + Plack here. > I need to look into that when I have time. I wonder if it wouldn’t have been faster to just backport the app to Perl 5.16? How hard could it be?

Re: [CentOS] should NUMA be enabled?

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of hw Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 9:27 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] should NUMA be enabled? > should NUMA be enabled in the BIOS of a server that has > two sockets but only a

[CentOS] should NUMA be enabled?

Hi, should NUMA be enabled in the BIOS of a server that has two sockets but only a single CPU in one of the sockets? From what I´ve been reading, it is unclear to me if NUMA should be enabled only on systems with multiple CPUs in multiple sockets or if multiple cores of a single CPU in a

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS 6] Possible bug in updating glibc?

On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 06:40:57AM -0400, Leam Hall wrote: > I'm running a KVM host on updated CentOS 6. The guest is built from the > CentOS 6.9 dvd1 with just @base and @core package groups. > > When I went to install mysql it failed due to incompatibilities with the > libcc versions. Updated

Re: [CentOS] more recent perl version?

Nikolaos Milas wrote: On 2/6/2017 2:05 μμ, hw wrote: That´s a good thing, though it can be difficult to run systems using ancient software. You may want to check the following paradigm (from another open source perl-based application) to create a Perl environment within your system,

Re: [CentOS] yum install does not downgrade

Personally, I would do one of three things: 1. Use the -m command to run 'yum install ' which /might/ work. 2. Uninstall the newer package and install the version you want. (Check the 'state' directive to do this.) 3. Pin that package version when creating the server/VM so as not to be

Re: [CentOS] more recent perl version?

On 2/6/2017 2:05 μμ, hw wrote: That´s a good thing, though it can be difficult to run systems using ancient software. You may want to check the following paradigm (from another open source perl-based application) to create a Perl environment within your system, avoiding to tamper with it:

[CentOS] kvm/qemu and CPU load

Hi, I have a server using its 4 physical network interfaces bonded, with the bonding interface added to a bridge. The bridge has the IP, and three VMs are using the bridge. Two of the VMs are running Debian, one is running Windoze 7. CPU load caused by the qemu-kvm processes is way higher

Re: [CentOS] more recent perl version?

Warren Young wrote: On May 24, 2017, at 1:58 PM, hw wrote: It seems that lighttpd uses the perl version that is assigned in the configuration This is one of the advantages of Plack vs mod_perl, by the way: decoupling the Perl version from the web server version. while

Re: [CentOS] more recent perl version?

Warren Young wrote: On May 24, 2017, at 9:38 AM, hw wrote: Warren Young schrieb: On May 24, 2017, at 7:05 AM, hw wrote: apache uses mod_perl mod_perl was dropped from Apache in 2.4, and Red Hat followed suit with RHEL 7. What is it using instead? There

Re: [CentOS] NFS mount on Centos 7 crashing

On 2/6/2017 10:58 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote: Have you checked if this bug/behavior has been reported or should we file a bug report? After a bit of search, I found the associated reports: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13351 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454876 No

[CentOS] [CentOS 6] Possible bug in updating glibc?

Hey all, not sure if this was operator error or what. I'm running a KVM host on updated CentOS 6. The guest is built from the CentOS 6.9 dvd1 with just @base and @core package groups. When I went to install mysql it failed due to incompatibilities with the libcc versions. Updated just glibc

Re: [CentOS] yum install does not downgrade

On 01/06/2017 22:29, Tate Belden wrote: > Use the 'downgrade' option. Thanks Tate. I know the "downgrade" option well. I wouldn't have posted my question if it were that simple. As I said previously, we use ansible, and its "yum" module invokes: yum install package-version-release I expect

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade 6 to 7

Il 01 Giu 2017 10:13 PM, "Jerry Geis" ha scritto: I found this site https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool Is this still the case - there is no upgrade path from 6 to 7 ? I have a few remote servers I'd like to upgrade (if possible). Thanks, Jerry It

Re: [CentOS] NFS mount on Centos 7 crashing

On 2/6/2017 10:40 πμ, Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE wrote: Reverting to rpcbind-0.2.0-38.el7 solves the problem for me Thank you very much Philippe, I notice that I have upgraded to rpcbind-0.2.0-38.el7_3.x86_64 on May 26. Have you checked if this bug/behavior has been reported or should we

Re: [CentOS] NFS mount on Centos 7 crashing

Le 02/06/2017 à 08:41, Nikolaos Milas a écrit : Questions: * Is this a known issue/bug? I have same problem since last rpcbind package update (rpcbind-0.2.0-38.el7_3) * Have we possibly made any NFS misconfigurations (which however have not caused any errors for about a year now)?

[CentOS] NFS mount on Centos 7 crashing

Hello, We have a VM (under KVM - a VPS service by our ISP) running CentOS 7. On it we have 2 NFS mounts, one for backup and one as a live file system (where there are two user homes as well):