[CentOS] grub2-btrfs & yum-plugin-snapper , new from my last post here

2017-07-01 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hello Guys, While i work out the snapper on fedora 25 I've learnd more about python and snapper. Here the changes: Snapper: Created a combat util-linux 2.24.2 from fedora 20, static only. This make snapper rollback available (needfull thing). Tryed to patch snapper, there are to many changes.

Re: [CentOS] AMD Ryzen and CentOS

2017-07-01 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
Allan wrote: > I have a Desktop system With both Centos 6 and Centos 7 on it, and > it works fine with my Ryzen 1700X cpu. > > Centos 6 preexisten on the system before I upgraded it to Ryzen, > Centos 7 was installed with Ryzen. Never had any problems. I've

Re: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS

2017-07-01 Thread Pete Biggs
> You should check to see if your old SOA is still showing themselves > as authoritative for your domain. If they are, then anyone who uses > their nameservers will still get the old record(s) for your domain. > > If they are still showing themselves as authoritative (which I think > is the

Re: [CentOS] rsync and cause/source of an empty file

2017-07-01 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 06/30/2017 01:42 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: The setup is somewhat complicated in that the VAN will not permit direct rsync access and so we establish the link via sshfs and then mount remote location as local. sshfs doesn't seem to preserve/transmit ctime, so rsync won't be able to

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: CIA Outlaw Country attack against CentOS / Rhel (and Fedora?) Is this credible?]

2017-07-01 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 06/30/2017 08:47 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: My first take is that this doesn't represent a very serious threat. Do you disagree? The module doesn't represent an unknown security flaw, so my inclination is to say "no." I'd also note that if your systems aren't extremely old, they probably

Re: [CentOS] mdraid doesn't allow creation: device or resource busy

2017-07-01 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 06/29/2017 05:06 PM, adam_kalisz wrote: Do you have any ideas? What logs/ information should I provide if you want to have a look into this. Run "vgs" to see if the drives brought up an old volume group. Run "pvs" to see if they were imported into the volume group you were already

Re: [CentOS] rsync and cause/source of an empty file

2017-07-01 Thread Joseph L. Casale
-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James B. Byrne Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:43 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] rsync and cause/source of an empty file > We transfer files from a VAN provider at 15 minute intervals using > rsync

Re: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS

2017-07-01 Thread Richard
Original Message > Date: Saturday, July 01, 2017 10:57:42 +0100 > From: Pete Biggs > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS > > On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 11:37 +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Le 01/07/2017 à 11:00, Pete

Re: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS

2017-07-01 Thread Pete Biggs
On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 11:37 +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 01/07/2017 à 11:00, Pete Biggs a écrit : > > That is controlled by the TTL (time to live) entry. A DNS server must > > refresh it's cache within the TTL for the entry. Using the '-a' option > > to host will give you more information: >

Re: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS

2017-07-01 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 01/07/2017 à 11:00, Pete Biggs a écrit : > That is controlled by the TTL (time to live) entry. A DNS server must > refresh it's cache within the TTL for the entry. Using the '-a' option > to host will give you more information: So I would have to use the -a option with the old DNS server, to

Re: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS

2017-07-01 Thread Pete Biggs
> > In your experience, what's the "longest" a DNS cache is configured to > keep outdated information? A day? A week? A month? Longer? > That is controlled by the TTL (time to live) entry. A DNS server must refresh it's cache within the TTL for the entry. Using the '-a' option to host will give

[CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS

2017-07-01 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Hi, I just moved my main mail account and web content from a low-cost (low-quality) provider to my own root server running CentOS 7. I transferred the domain name from DNS management to my registrar, configured BIND, Apache, Postfix, Dovecot, NTP, SELinux, etc. Now things are running rather