Re: [CentOS] lshw in centos 7

On 11 January 2018 at 20:23, david wrote: > Folks > > I've been running lshw for years in both Centos 6 and Centos 7, yet just > recently it started hanging. Neither a Control^C nor a "kill" of the > process cured the hang; only a reboot. > Is this just one system or a range of

[CentOS] lshw in centos 7

Folks I've been running lshw for years in both Centos 6 and Centos 7, yet just recently it started hanging. Neither a Control^C nor a "kill" of the process cured the hang; only a reboot. When I run it by hand from the command line, it displays stuff on the next line overwriting it with

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 autofs flakyness

We have had this problem before but not for a long time.The problem was eventually traced to a router (we think)and corrected when the old router was replaced. On Thursday, January 11, 2018 2:17 PM, "m.r...@5-cent.us" wrote: I have a user who couldn't get in via

Re: [CentOS] 1600x900 not available

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 01:34:00PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Sean Smith wrote: > > > setting my resolution to 1600x900 is a cheesy, yet effective, way to do > > get what I need. > > > > ...Now if I can just get my touchpad to FRICK'N disable while typing. > > > If/when you do, *PLEASE*

[CentOS] CentOS 7 autofs flakyness

I have a user who couldn't get in via WinSCP to a server. Got him to log in via putty, and that was fine. But he still couldn't get in the other way. At my manager's suggestion, I restarted autofs... and everything worked. Note that his home director5y was already automounted via NFS, after he

Re: [CentOS] 1600x900 not available

I run KDE too, if you find out how then please post, thanks. - Original Message - From: "m roth" To: "centos" Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 2:15:18 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] 1600x900 not available Sean Smith wrote: > > On 01/11/2018 12:34 PM,

Re: [CentOS] 1600x900 not available

Sean Smith wrote: > > On 01/11/2018 12:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Sean Smith wrote: >> >>> setting my resolution to 1600x900 is a cheesy, yet effective, way to do >>> get what I need. >>> >>> ...Now if I can just get my touchpad to FRICK'N disable while typing. >>> >> If/when you do,

Re: [CentOS] 1600x900 not available

On 01/11/2018 12:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Sean Smith wrote: setting my resolution to 1600x900 is a cheesy, yet effective, way to do get what I need. ...Now if I can just get my touchpad to FRICK'N disable while typing. If/when you do, *PLEASE* post the solution. If you're a manager,

Re: [CentOS] 1600x900 not available

Sean Smith wrote: > setting my resolution to 1600x900 is a cheesy, yet effective, way to do > get what I need. > > ...Now if I can just get my touchpad to FRICK'N disable while typing. > If/when you do, *PLEASE* post the solution. If you're a manager, or gamer, I guess touchpads are great. If

Re: [CentOS] 1600x900 not available

On 01/10/2018 11:45 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 09:25:04AM -0600, Sean Smith wrote: I have no idea how.  All I can find is the Hi-DPi settings in Gnome-Tweak but, of course, it only lets  me choose to scale from "1" to "2" which makes things way too big. It's better to