On 6/15/20 5:40 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 09:42, Manuel Wolfshant
mailto:wo...@nobugconsulting.ro>> wrote:
On 6/15/20 2:46 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I got inspired by Adi's earlier suggestion and after reading
> pxe is working for me in this test virtualbox build.
>
> $ md5sum initrd.img vmlinuz
> 89251241a484010b98280ce00b3a3763 initrd.img
> 9261bb24add6bb4ff9ef6aaf348aaf35 vmlinuz
>
> ( yum updated )
>
> [centos@localhost ~]$ uname -a
> Linux localhost.localdomain 4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64 #1
> On Jun 17, 2020, at 4:53 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Noam Bernstein said:
>> Of course. My only question is whether the observation that the gap for
>> CentOS 8 is indeed larger than we have come to be used to for CentOS 7.
>
> So, I took a look... and the answer is "it's
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:53 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Noam Bernstein said:
> > Of course. My only question is whether the observation that the gap
> for CentOS 8 is indeed larger than we have come to be used to for CentOS 7.
>
> So, I took a look... and the answer is "it's
On 17/06/2020 21:05, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 6/17/20 3:32 PM, Phil Perry wrote:
On my home file server for example, which is not connected to the
internet, what does it matter if the release is 1 month or 3 months
out of date? I can install the server in the knowledge it's going to
work, and
Once upon a time, Noam Bernstein said:
> Of course. My only question is whether the observation that the gap for
> CentOS 8 is indeed larger than we have come to be used to for CentOS 7.
So, I took a look... and the answer is "it's not" (with a small sample
set). I took dates from Wikipedia
On 6/17/20 1:51 PM, Ulf Volmer wrote:
...
Just to make it sure: Did you try to disable firewalld?
With my experience with libvirt and vlan bridges on Fedora, libvirt may
include unwanted firewall rules which drops the traffic over the bridges.
I haven't done that yet, so I'll try that next.
On 6/17/20 3:32 PM, Phil Perry wrote:
On my home file server for example, which is not connected to the
internet, what does it matter if the release is 1 month or 3 months
out of date? I can install the server in the knowledge it's going to
work, and be supported with updates for 10 years
> On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:46 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS
> wrote:
>
> The answer is not inherently in the distribution itself. Make your
> analysis about your needs an requirements and the choice is then yours.
>
> One could argue that the gap between disclosure of one security issues
> and the
Am 17.06.20 um 21:37 schrieb Noam Bernstein via CentOS:
On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:32 PM, Phil Perry wrote:
I get what you are saying, but what difference does it make if it has? What
does it matter if the lag is 1 week, or 1 month, or more? The only reason it
will matter to you is if you are
> On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:32 PM, Phil Perry wrote:
>
> I get what you are saying, but what difference does it make if it has? What
> does it matter if the lag is 1 week, or 1 month, or more? The only reason it
> will matter to you is if you are trying to do something with CentOS that is
> time
On 17/06/2020 20:06, Noam Bernstein via CentOS wrote:
On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Phil Perry wrote:
Nothing has changed in this regard for as long as I've been a CentOS user or
been involved in the CentOS community.
This is the essence of the question, to me. I agree that _in_principle_
> On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Phil Perry wrote:
>
> Nothing has changed in this regard for as long as I've been a CentOS user or
> been involved in the CentOS community.
This is the essence of the question, to me. I agree that _in_principle_
nothing has changed, and I don't even see any
On 17/06/2020 18:38, Michael Kofler wrote:
Hi,
I am the author of said blog article.
FIRST: It was never my intention to criticize the CentOS
team. I appreciate the hard work you are doing. If my blog
text (which is in German langugage) gave a wrong impression,
I apologize.
SECOND: I LOVE
On 6/17/20 10:38 AM, Michael Kofler wrote:
Hi,
I am the author of said blog article.
FIRST: It was never my intention to criticize the CentOS
team. I appreciate the hard work you are doing. If my blog
text (which is in German langugage) gave a wrong impression,
I apologize.
SECOND: I LOVE
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 13:11, Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
>
> Hi Johnny,
> thank you for your and all centos team works.
>
> Many of us know how much work is needed for building new releases and
> maintaining C6 and C7, plus CentOS Stream and modules (Appstream). This is
> a huge work for a small
On 2020-06-17 12:38, Michael Kofler wrote:
Hi,
I am the author of said blog article.
FIRST: It was never my intention to criticize the CentOS
team. I appreciate the hard work you are doing. If my blog
text (which is in German langugage) gave a wrong impression,
I apologize.
SECOND: I LOVE
On 17.06.20 17:36, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 6/17/20 11:04 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> ...
>> It shows as being defined to 1. I'm going to try adding to
>> sysctl.conf and see if that makes any difference, though.
> No difference. What is aggravating, though, is virtually every howto on
> bridging out
Hi,
I am the author of said blog article.
FIRST: It was never my intention to criticize the CentOS
team. I appreciate the hard work you are doing. If my blog
text (which is in German langugage) gave a wrong impression,
I apologize.
SECOND: I LOVE CentOS. Otherwise it would not matter to
me. I
Once upon a time, Alessandro Baggi said:
> As reported in my previous message I'm not worried about how much time is
> required to build the new (major/minor) release, it will be ready when it
> will be. My major concern is about the "security update blackout" that take
> long as the build
Hi Johnny,
thank you for your and all centos team works.
Many of us know how much work is needed for building new releases and
maintaining C6 and C7, plus CentOS Stream and modules (Appstream). This is
a huge work for a small team. Again thank you.
For me OL is not an alternative.
As reported
On 2020-06-17 08:46, isdtor wrote:
Attempting to PXE boot from the BaseOS/x86_64/kickstart/images/pxeboot/ files
results in repeating messages
Invalid or corrupt kernel image
eventually changing to
Could not find kernel image: centos8.2.x86_64/vmlinuz
I downloaded the files again, from a
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:09:07PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 6/17/20 10:19 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> >...
> >I wonder about the authors conclusion; the fact that RHEL is the choice
> >for critical applications (what ever critical is) is known since
> >the early days. This applies
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:13 PM paride desimone wrote:
> Uhm, X dont't start :-(
>
>
I overlooked your post... my suggestions was for installation phase, but
you did install apparently.. did you install in graphic mode or by other
text based means (kickstart, pxe, ecc)? Or perhaps you installed
Uhm, X dont't start :-(
Il mer 17 giu 2020, 15:34 Gianluca Cecchi ha
scritto:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:56 PM paride desimone wrote:
>
> > Hi, i have a proliant dl380 g5, with an amd as1000. I try to install
> > centos8 with gui, but when try to start the new installed system, the
> >
Rommel Rodriguez Toirac writes:
> Hello all;
> Has anyone installed samba4 from sources (samba-4.12.3.tar.gz) on CentOS 7?
> I explain the problem: to install samba-4.12.3 you need to install a version
> equal to or greater than 3.4.7 of gnutls; this (gnutls) depends on nettle and
> gmp.
> I
On 6/17/20 10:19 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
...
I wonder about the authors conclusion; the fact that RHEL is the choice
for critical applications (what ever critical is) is known since the
early days. This applies randomly to C5.11, C4.9 or C8.2.2004.
So - cold soup get cooked again
Attempting to PXE boot from the BaseOS/x86_64/kickstart/images/pxeboot/ files
results in repeating messages
Invalid or corrupt kernel image
eventually changing to
Could not find kernel image: centos8.2.x86_64/vmlinuz
I downloaded the files again, from a different mirror, and they are all the
Hello all;
Has anyone installed samba4 from sources (samba-4.12.3.tar.gz) on CentOS 7?
I explain the problem: to install samba-4.12.3 you need to install a version
equal to or greater than 3.4.7 of gnutls; this (gnutls) depends on nettle and
gmp.
I am trying to install gnutls-3.6.14; I
> On Jun 17, 2020, at 9:10 AM, Alessandro Baggi
> wrote:
>
>
> Il 17/06/20 15:42, Scott Robbins ha scritto:
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:23:36PM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>>>
About Oracle as alternative. Oracle Linux is not an alternative to
CentOS but for RHEL and if I will force
On 6/17/20 11:04 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
...
It shows as being defined to 1. I'm going to try adding to
sysctl.conf and see if that makes any difference, though.
No difference. What is aggravating, though, is virtually every howto on
bridging out there refers to the deprecated brctl utility
> On Jun 17, 2020, at 9:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> On 6/17/20 8:06 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just read this blog article from austrian Linux expert Michael Kofler.
>>> For
>>> those among you who don't know the guy, he's my home country's number one
>>> Linux
On 6/17/20 9:59 AM, Deventer-2, M.S.J. van wrote:
Hi,
the first thing that comes to mind, did you set ip_forward to enable in
/etc/sysctl.conf ?
net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
Should explain why you IP on the bridge works but not on the vms.
First, thanks for the reply and excellent suggestion.
> Am 17.06.20 um 12:28 schrieb John Horne:
>> On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 23:36 +0200, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
>>> I have some scripts using certwatch from the crypto-utils package. This
>>> rpm seems to be unshipped with EL8. Any ideas whats the "new" tool to
>>> check pem cert files?
>>>
>> Hi,
Am 17.06.20 um 12:28 schrieb John Horne:
On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 23:36 +0200, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
I have some scripts using certwatch from the crypto-utils package. This
rpm seems to be unshipped with EL8. Any ideas whats the "new" tool to
check pem cert files?
Hi,
I have used the
Am 17.06.20 um 09:16 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs:
Hi,
I just read this blog article from austrian Linux expert Michael Kofler. For
those among you who don't know the guy, he's my home country's number one Linux
expert (known as "der Kofler") and most notably the author of a series of
excellent books
On 6/17/20 8:06 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just read this blog article from austrian Linux expert Michael Kofler.
>> For
>> those among you who don't know the guy, he's my home country's number one
>> Linux
>> expert (known as "der Kofler") and most notably the author of a
Il 17/06/20 15:42, Scott Robbins ha scritto:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:23:36PM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
About Oracle as alternative. Oracle Linux is not an alternative to
CentOS but for RHEL and if I will force to pay for enteprise system
currently I will pay RHEL, not OL. Over this, OL is
Hi,
the first thing that comes to mind, did you set ip_forward to enable in
/etc/sysctl.conf ?
net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
Should explain why you IP on the bridge works but not on the vms.
Regards,
Michel
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 09:43 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> As part of my initial KVM host
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 09:42, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:23:36PM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > > About Oracle as alternative. Oracle Linux is not an alternative to
> > > CentOS but for RHEL and if I will force to pay for enteprise system
> > > currently I will pay
In article ,
Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, Leroy Tennison wrote:
>
> > I have a gateway machine (currently Centos 7 with IPV4 only) with two
> > NICs. One is connected to the internet, the other to an internal
> > network (10.0.0.0/24) of mixed hardware (windows7, android tablets,
As part of my initial KVM host on C8 deployment, I decided to set up
some HA features on the new host, specifically NIC teaming. Teaming
seems to be bond++ of a sort, so I thought I would at least try it. So
here's the scenario:
1.) Server with two gigabit ethernet ports, two Cisco switches.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:23:36PM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> > About Oracle as alternative. Oracle Linux is not an alternative to
> > CentOS but for RHEL and if I will force to pay for enteprise system
> > currently I will pay RHEL, not OL. Over this, OL is not the only
> > enterprise
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:56 PM paride desimone wrote:
> Hi, i have a proliant dl380 g5, with an amd as1000. I try to install
> centos8 with gui, but when try to start the new installed system, the
> xserver don't start. There is a throuble with the amd es1000 driver. This
> grafic card, seems
> About Oracle as alternative. Oracle Linux is not an alternative to
> CentOS but for RHEL and if I will force to pay for enteprise system
> currently I will pay RHEL, not OL. Over this, OL is not the only
> enterprise distro that a "user" could choose. If support is needed there
> are SUSE
> Hi,
>
> I just read this blog article from austrian Linux expert Michael Kofler.
> For
> those among you who don't know the guy, he's my home country's number one
> Linux
> expert (known as "der Kofler") and most notably the author of a series of
> excellent books about Linux over the last 25
Thanks guys. I ll go through all your recò and links tomorrow and let
you know.
I might post my configuration so you can have a look at it.
Cheers
/Alfredo
On Wed., 17 Jun. 2020, 3:34 am Gordon Messmer,
wrote:
> On 6/16/20 1:56 AM, Alfredo De Luca wrote:
> > I have centos7 with 1 network
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Hi, i have a proliant dl380 g5, with an amd as1000. I try to install
centos8 with gui, but when try to start the new installed system, the
xserver don't start. There is a throuble with the amd es1000 driver. This
grafic card, seems not supported more from amd.
I need a minimalistic gui for study
*snip
>
>
> Thank you for sharing, I found it interesting.
>
> My 2 Cent
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
+1
Longtime user but with the current sturcture they have turned it (centos8)
On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 23:36 +0200, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> I have some scripts using certwatch from the crypto-utils package. This
> rpm seems to be unshipped with EL8. Any ideas whats the "new" tool to
> check pem cert files?
>
Hi,
I have used the 'x509watch' package for several years
Il 17/06/20 09:16, Nicolas Kovacs ha scritto:
Hi,
I just read this blog article from austrian Linux expert Michael Kofler. For
those among you who don't know the guy, he's my home country's number one Linux
expert (known as "der Kofler") and most notably the author of a series of
excellent
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 22:25 +0200, Robin Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 09:20 +0200, Robin Lee wrote:
> > Today when I ran yum update two packages came up microcode_ctl
> > and unbound-libs. The updating process went fine until it
> > outputted
> >
> > Running transaction
> > Updating :
Hi,
I just read this blog article from austrian Linux expert Michael Kofler. For
those among you who don't know the guy, he's my home country's number one Linux
expert (known as "der Kofler") and most notably the author of a series of
excellent books about Linux over the last 25 years.
On 17/06/2020 04:03, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> Am 16.06.20 um 22:04 schrieb Fabian Arrotin:
>> On 16/06/2020 15:06, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I updated a Dell XPS laptop from CentOS 8.1 (1911) to 8.2 (2004).
>>>
>>> Installed kernels are
>>>
> At 03:47 PM 6/16/2020, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>>The rule is in the wrong chain. The INPUT chain affects packets that
>>terminate at the same machine. You want to block packets that will
>>be passed on to the Internet, so your rule needs to be in the
>>FORWARD chain. (The OUTPUT chain affects
56 matches
Mail list logo
