Re: [CentOS] sendmail on Centos 7.7

On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 12:20 -0800, John Pierce wrote: > and, of course... > > $ host smtp-relay.gmail.com but ... the originator referred to smtp-relay.gmail.com.com (note the double "com") ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] sendmail on Centos 7.7

On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 10:55 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > [smooge@smoogen-laptop ~]$ host -t MX smtp-relay.gmail.com.com > smtp-relay.gmail.com.com mail is handled by 10 mx203.inbound-mx.org. > smtp-relay.gmail.com.com mail is handled by 10 mx203.inbound-mx.net. .w

Re: [CentOS] Is there an sshguard script for logwatch?

On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 13:44 +0100, Adrian van Bloois wrote: > I wonder if there is a script to analyze logfiles for llogwatch and > sshguard? > Anyone knows? You can take an existing script, for another piece of software reported by Logwatch, retain the beginning and ending parts, and create

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 network-scripts

On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 15:59 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > Frontpanel, 256 words (12-bit words), and paper tape. But I also never > had that straight-8 on the net, either, but, via uucp, I did have the > T6K on Usenet. My second machine was 9 bits = 8 + parity. 10 years later I was working on 36

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 network-scripts

On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 11:17 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 10/4/19 10:40 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > Do not make any changes [in the program] unless they are absolutely > > necessary. Especially with production programs. > Take the transition from horse and buggy to automobile for instance. >

Re: [CentOS] OT: hardware: sanitizing a dead SSD?

On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 15:46 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > SSD disks must be shredded as the data has been written over multiple > sectors many times to 'even the writes'. This allows for even a 'dead' > disk to be disassembled with 'off-the-shelf' equipment to extract > items from the

[CentOS] [OFF-TOPIC] Reminder to tighten ALL types of security

This posting is off-topic because it is not about Centos. Please refrain from replying to the list as that will generate further off-topic traffic inevitably irritating subscribers. On the balance of probabilities, I think everyone will benefit from reading at least the first 6 pages of a 19

Re: [CentOS] Down C6 ALL without torrent ?

On Mon, 2018-04-23 at 22:44 +0100, J Martin Rushton wrote: > You might also want to look at repoview(8). It will generate a > searchable website for you. See > https://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/CentOS/7/x86_64/repoview/ > for example Thank you. I was unaware of repoview's existence.

Re: [CentOS] Down C6 ALL without torrent ?

On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 07:56 +, Jürgen Gotteswinter wrote: > > Unsure how to remaster two DVDs, total 6GB?, onto a USB stick. I can copy > > both DVDs to a directory. To make the directory contents into a single ISO > > is, currently, beyond my knowledge but will Google. > > > Just drop

Re: [CentOS] Down C6 ALL without torrent ?

On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 07:59 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Aha, now I understand what you want. It probably doesn't exist on master > repository server. You can re-master DVD from two of them or from a copy > of content of both in some directory on hard drive. Unsure how to remaster two DVDs,

Re: [CentOS] Down C6 ALL without torrent ?

On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 18:59 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 19 April 2018 at 05:04, Always Learning <cen...@u68.u22.net> wrote: > > Comfort-ability is not my criteria. The BIOS is supposed to be 4 or 5 > > years old. It won't boot from DVDs, yet it will boot from zi

Re: [CentOS] Down C6 ALL without torrent ?

On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 14:22 -0700, Mark Milhollan wrote: > >>On Wed, April 18, 2018 8:36 pm, Always Learning wrote: > >>>I have a machine with a BIOS that does not permit DVD installation. It > >>>accepts everything else including some old superseded media typ

Re: [CentOS] Down C6 ALL without torrent ?

On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 14:44 -0400, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 09:40 +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > > > Can we also challenge this "torrents are untrustworthy" attitude. > > Having, successfully so far, resisted/repelled several devious > > attacks from the Russians, I am

Re: [CentOS] Down C6 ALL without torrent ?

On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 09:40 +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > > On Wed, April 18, 2018 8:36 pm, Always Learning wrote: > >> I have an aversion to using anything that comes from unknown sources, as > >> used by Torrent. > Can we also challenge this "torrents are

Re: [CentOS] Down C6 ALL without torrent ?

Hi Valeri, > > Is it possible to download C6 combined parts 1 and 2 not using Torrent ? > Paul, you can go directly to the mirror server I maintain, it allows > direct download of DVD images: > > http://bay.uchicago.edu/centos I looked, but could not find a non-Torrent option for C6 combined

[CentOS] Down C6 ALL without torrent ?

Hi, I have a machine with a BIOS that does not permit DVD installation. It accepts everything else including some old superseded media types. Is it possible to download C6 combined parts 1 and 2 not using Torrent ? I have an aversion to using anything that comes from unknown sources, as used by

Re: [CentOS] FOSDEM Dojo update, videos

M - Some illumination on the speaker would be advantageous. Perhaps it would have been better filming/videoing from the right, rather than the left, side. Viewing it on my PC (running Centos of course), Mr Singh's talking is not always distinct. Different types of mic provide different

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 12:02 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > but will you contribute to building the non-systemd packages, and > working out how to retrofit old sysV init back into everything via > patches, etc ?every RPM that interacts with systemd will need to be > 'fixed' to do it the old

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 11:23 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > If you want to create a CentOS-7 variant that does not use systemd, > then start a Special Interest Group and create modified packages > to use something else instead ..., much like the this group did > with Debian: > >

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll - So Long, and Thanks for All the fish.

On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 18:25 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > Yes. And despite what people think, those agencies don't have super > powers. They have tools to help them, and lots of resources, but > nothing out of the ordinary. Untrue. They are in advance of mainstream developments. Spying has

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 10:39 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!" > And mine on medon.htt-consult.com done with Geany. Gedit works for me - webpages, PHP, init (with Vi) et cetera. -- Regards,

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 22:45 +0200, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit: > On my Slackware servers (no systemd, no funny network interface names), > I just edit /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and switch eth0 > and eth1 (and eth2 etc.) if needed. > > Keep It Simple. Un bon idea ! Ich auch Ikki ook

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 15:38 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > At home, I'm staying on CentOS 6 until it EoLs. Production and development +1 Then FreeBSD ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union. ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] upgrading Mysql 5.0.95

On Sun, 2017-03-19 at 10:24 -0400, Mark Weaver wrote: > Heavens no... I love my CentOS 5 server. I going to try and keep it > around as long as possible. I like and admire C5 too. Httpd applications on C5 also run, without problems in my experience, on C6. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 12:45 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Always Learning wrote: > > > >> Used a VCR or Cassette Player lately? > > > > My VCR broke. Replaced it with a DVD/HDD & USB3 unit. Replaced cassette > > player and tape recorders with broadcast

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 20:40 -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > Why the bleep can't stuff like this be simple KISS with simple > key=value > configuration files? Amen. Its incredibly simple to understand and doesn't require a doctorate in confused thinking ! -- Regards, Paul. England, EU.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

> Used a VCR or Cassette Player lately? My VCR broke. Replaced it with a DVD/HDD & USB3 unit. Replaced cassette player and tape recorders with broadcast quality handheld recorder DR-100mk3 and an amazingly good Sony PX440. Still retain the original functionality. C7 doesn't retain all the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my

On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 16:49 +, James Hogarth wrote: > On EL6 yes NM should be removed on anything but a wifi system but on > EL7 unless you fall into a specific edge case as per the network docs: > >

Re: [CentOS] Buttons too big in Firefox for Linux

On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 14:41 +, Gary Stainburn wrote: > To go down the CSS route means that I'll have to amend every CSS / > HTML to fix the problem. The idea is to use one .css file for entire web sites, or large divisions of a single web site. You could see if a Firefox plug-in can help.

Re: [CentOS] Preferred mail client

On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 21:06 -0500, Fred Smith wrote: > I figure that when God invented email, He intended it to be plain text. :) Amen. Can't hide a virus, links to dangerous or fake items or coding exploits in a simple plain text email. Web-page emails (HTML) was a Micro$oft invention and

Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue

Goeiemiddag Leonard, > On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 12:00 +0000, Always Learning wrote: > > (4) The 'extra' Apache Virtual Host file contains > > > > > > Why do you add dummy.domain.com:80 here as the match is done on the > ServerName? > > >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue

On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 11:06 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:23:05PM +0000, Always Learning wrote: > > > > Agreed. One of my Apache defences is to redirect probes/hacks to > > 127.0.0.1 :-) > > Would you be willing to share this rewrite

Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue

On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 12:54 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > James B. Byrne wrote: > > > > On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote: > >> > >> Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts. > > > > Better fight with bits than b

Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue

On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 11:08 -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: > On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote: > > > > > > Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts. > > > > Better fight with bits than blood. Agreed. One of my Apache def

Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue

On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 21:33 +, Chris Olson wrote: > .. A Firefox browser on one system . > Instead, a site located at the link https://gaibacoupontec.com > was displayed with a message indicating that there was an urgent > Firefox update required. Firefox, like other web browsers,

Re: [CentOS] Noise Cancellation of Server Noise

On Sun, 2016-12-25 at 13:38 -0600, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: > On 12/25/2016 11:53 AM, Mark Woolfson (Notebook) wrote: > > If the server decision makers had not gone for a server designed > > by accountants but a server designed by engineers then you would > > not have this problem. > maybe

[CentOS] Centos 5 Log-in Screen

I like Centos 5 so much I would like to use the same screen for log-on's in Centos 6. Is this possible? My desktop is Gnome. Thank you. Merry Christmas. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union. ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 08:27 -0600, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > . So, this is for a friend of mine, and I have > been told that they will not currently consider updating their userland > from 6.3 to 6.8 but only selected few packages. The picture seems to be > that their company runs a lot of apps

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 00:14 -0600, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > Thanks very much, understood. so, it seems, upgrading selected packages is > probably going to be fine except where the compatibility matters where it > would break all kinds of things. Please be realistic and professional. You simply can

[CentOS] Centos & USB3

I replaced my development machine with 6 cores, 32 GB etc. I thought it would be simply inserting the existing HDDs and changing /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth0 but, * in the UEFI "BIOS" USB2 and USB3 work. * in C5.11 USB2 works but USB3 does not. * in C6.5 (my install disk; OS be updated to C6.8)

Re: [CentOS] An 'orrible question: Outlook 365 under wine on CentOS?

On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 15:50 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Upper Management has decided on a policy that IMAP is going to go away in > the near future, and they want everyone on Lookout, sorry, Outlook 365. Working with these expert and highly knowledgeable folk must be an incredibly

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 09:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox ... > That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available, > therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg > enabled starting with

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 23:22 +0100, J Martin Rushton wrote: > Under Fedora23 issuing a yum command gets you a warning, then it > automatically runs the appropriate dnf command. Can you tell us the DNF for:- yum update yum groupinstall yum reinstall yum erase ?

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 14:12 -0700, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2016-09-08, John R Pierce <pie...@hogranch.com> wrote: > > On 9/7/2016 7:02 PM, Keith Keller wrote: > >>> Staying with excellent C6 until the end. > >> CentOS 7 is yum based, not dnf. > > >

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 19:59 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > >> Staying with excellent C6 until the end. > "Always Learning" seems to have a distaste for anything new or different > than what he already knows. My mind is never ever automatically closed to new 'things

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 16:43 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > DNF is a fork of yum that involves a nearly total rewrite. yum > development continues. Wonderful news from Santa Cruz, USA :-) -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 23:40 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > I think it should be called YUM. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF#Naming > DNF stands for Dandified yum. Since DNF is a tech preview > in Fedora 18 the Python module names can not be 'yum.*' as > that would clash with

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 18:03 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > DNF is a replacement for Yum that will probably be in a future RHEL > release, but is not used by any RHEL/CentOS yet. I think it should be called YUM. Nothing wrong with having a new version of Yum, especially when we have a new

Re: [CentOS] more than one IP address on network device?

On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 15:15 +0200, Yamaban wrote: > "ip addr show" and > "ip route show" > > should give the needed info, at least with Centos 7.x Works on C5 and C6 too. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

Re: [CentOS] .htaccess file

Hi, > My home system on a DSL line is getting worn out by bad behavior robots. > > Awhile back, I created a .htaccess file that block countries by IP blocks. > Its 2MB in size. Do you control your home server ? If so, then .htaccess is the wrong solution, because you need to incorporate

[CentOS] [Centos] rant

On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 10:56 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, August 24, 2016 10:46 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > > "Smaller" government, Cut taxes (for the rich). Make people pay for what > > they're already paying taxes to support > > > > > > Had you gone to noaa.gov, and

Re: [CentOS] Firefox crashing

On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 08:10 -0400, ken wrote: > This morning, the Firefox (45.3.0) installed (upgrade) just a few days > ago has crashed already a half dozen times. Anyone else having the same > problem? Some days FF on C5.11 crashes multiple times. Other days never. Nothing else on Centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 kickstart question

On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 09:11 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:55:07PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 22:21 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > > > > Is it a BIOS boot, or are you using the UEFI firmware for booting? >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 kickstart question

On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 22:21 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > Is it a BIOS boot, or are you using the UEFI firmware for booting? > Either way, you might need a small boot partition (not /boot) at the > beginning of the disk. /boot/efi formatted FAT16, circa 150 MB -- Regards, Paul. England,

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 09:46 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > On Wed, August 3, 2016 22:53, Alice Wonder wrote: > > > > I didn't realize ldd was recursive. I may have known that at one > > point (been using linux since MK Linux DR3 and building RPMs since > > 1999), but have a head injury results in

Re: [CentOS] php55w-fpm on CentOS 7: settings location

On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 13:55 -0400, Jason Welsh wrote: > What I do is create a php.php file on the root of my fileserver with > the following > > I use a text command: php -i -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Announcing release of MariaDB 10.1 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64 SCL

On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 14:22 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/20/2016 01:48 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 10:41 +0200, Honza Horak wrote: > > > >> QuickStart > >> -- > >> You can get started in three easy ste

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Announcing release of MariaDB 10.1 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64 SCL

On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 10:41 +0200, Honza Horak wrote: > QuickStart > -- > You can get started in three easy steps: > $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl > $ sudo yum install rh-mariadb101 > $ scl enable rh-mariadb101 bash yum install centos-release-scl No package

Re: [CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 23:06 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". Is this a C7 issue, as opposed to C5 or C6 matter ? Was the section empty or populated with entries ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU.

Re: [CentOS] how to update glib-2.28.8 to glib-2.40.0 or newer version

On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 13:54 +0800, qw wrote: > I'm trying to build gstreamer sdk on centos 6.7. The latest version of Centos 6, is 6.8 You may wish to update your 6.7 by typing:- yum update -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

Re: [CentOS] [CENTOS ]IPTABLES - How Secure & Best Practice

On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 07:16 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: > -A Forward -p all -i LAN-NIC -o INET-NIC -j ACCEPT If one requires all protocols, surely '-p all' is not required because it is the default ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

Re: [CentOS] [CENTOS ]IPTABLES - How Secure & Best Practice

On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 10:49 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/29/2016 03:00 AM, Leon Vergottini wrote: > > #!/bin/bash > > > > # RESET CURRENT RULE BASE > > iptables -F > > service iptables save > Why would you save the existing rule set? This script throws it away > later, when it runs

Re: [CentOS] Redirecting port 8080 to port 80 - how to add in /etc/sysconfig/iptables file?

On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 15:46 +0100, Always Learning wrote: > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 16:24 +0200, Alexander Farber wrote: > > > *nat > > :INPUT ACCEPT > > :OUTPUT ACCEPT > > :PREROUTING ACCEPT > > :POSTROUTING ACCEPT > > -A PREROUTING -p tcp --d

Re: [CentOS] Redirecting port 8080 to port 80 - how to add in /etc/sysconfig/iptables file?

On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 16:24 +0200, Alexander Farber wrote: > *nat > :INPUT ACCEPT > :OUTPUT ACCEPT > :PREROUTING ACCEPT > :POSTROUTING ACCEPT > -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dst 144.76.184.154 --dport 8080 -j REDIRECT > --to-port 80 http://www.karlrupp.net/en/computer/nat_tutorial # IMPORTANT:

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 10:47 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > But hey, what is my time worth in comparison to the security those > certificates provided? SECURITY that was trivially evaded in the end. > Exactly what mindless person or committee of bike-shedders decided > that software

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 19:49 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Which browser do you use? I still am in a process of finding replacement > for Firefox (the closest is midori, it doesn't fully fill the bill for me > though). There is a Mozilla folk called Palemoon by some Europeans (Sweeds, I think)

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 15:39 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. > This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's > foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). The same Mozilla

Re: [CentOS] problem i didn't seeing list file new on centos

On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 11:39 +0430, alireza baghery wrote: > hi > i have two server *CentOS 6.5* and > *CentOS 5.9 * You may wish to update your Centos to the latest versions:- Centos 5.11 Centos 6.8 -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 08:20 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, June 18, 2016 7:52 am, Always Learning wrote: > > > > Your connection is not secure > > > > The owner of harte-lyne.ca has configured their website improperly. To > > protect your informati

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 15:56 +0100, Michael H wrote: > On 17/06/16 15:46, James B. Byrne wrote: > > > > We operate a private CA for our domain and have since 2005. We > > maintain a public CRL strictly in accordance with our CPS and have our > > own OID assigned. Our CPS and CRL together with

Re: [CentOS] scp via another server

On Sun, 2016-06-12 at 20:43 +0200, H wrote: > There seems to be something broken when using scp between two remote > locations. Some posts on the 'net suggest using 'scp -3' to do an > intermediate copy to the workstation between the two remote servers > but that option does not seem to have

Re: [CentOS] remote backup

On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 17:17 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Besides, if it's that big a business, management *really* needs to spring > for a hot spare complete system, to deal with hardware outages, and there > should be mirrored d/bs, and *those* could be taken down, copied, and then >

Re: [CentOS] FYI: http

On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 16:25 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > what you put into location bar, instead of jut going directly to that > location? Helps filling search providers databases, especially if they > fed > you unexpiring cookie. But not all of search engines do that crap, > duckduckgo

Re: [CentOS] [exim] Exim not always logging Message-ID

Embarrassing apologies - Sorry wrong list. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [exim] Exim not always logging Message-ID

On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 13:27 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote: > My point is that a busy sysadmin shouldn't have to rely on intimate > knowledge of Exim's internal behaviour and oddities when trying > tracing a message from the logs. Some of us, well at least 1, have written a simple PHP programme,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and libGL failures

On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 14:41 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x4CA90C826AC163B3 > > (my public key) Thanks. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and libGL failures

On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 15:04 +0100, isdtor wrote: > (Btw., Johnny, your signatures haven't verified in months. Don't know if the > list server is the problem or our corp mail server). On mine I get "Signature exists, but need public key" -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place

Re: [CentOS] C6.8 YUM reference to Red Hat

On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 09:02 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > The Red Hat reference in yum I am working on for a future update. > > > > The /SCL is old and has been replaced by the SIG version of > > software collections: > > > > yum remove centos-release-SCL > > > > yum install

[CentOS] C6.8 YUM reference to Red Hat

Doing a yum update on C6.8 . : yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, protectbase Setting up Update Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.datente.com * epel: mirrors.n-ix.net * extras: mirror.softaculous.com * updates:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 Apache-2.2.15-53 re-write question

On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:33 +0100, Always Learning wrote: > RedirectMatch 301 ^(.*)$ http://new.domain.com/$1 should be:- RedirectMatch 301 ^/(.*)$ http://new.domain.com/$1 -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Un

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 Apache-2.2.15-53 re-write question

On Sat, 2016-05-28 at 13:03 -0600, Paul R. Ganci wrote: .. How about RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/test/ [NC] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/my-folder/[NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L] or

Re: [CentOS] what multimedia framework does Centos use

On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 12:11 +0800, qw wrote: > There are many popular types of multimedia framework, such as gstreamer > and directshow. I want to make transcoding program in centos 6.7 which > is installed in a server. ffmpeg is used as the core of transcoding > program. And I should choose

Re: [CentOS] dnf replacing yum?

On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Also, yum had associations which it was sad to lose. Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected users") replacement could be named MUD. Now we await the System-D controlling interface ;-) -- Regards, Paul. England, EU.

Re: [CentOS] google cloud compute with PEM file

On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 20:12 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On May 17, 2016, at 7:56 PM, Always Learning <cen...@u68.u22.net> wrote: > > (1) I would change the port from 22 to something more difficult to > > guess, perhaps 49026 (for example) and then block port 2

Re: [CentOS] google cloud compute with PEM file

On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 14:34 -0600, Dustin Kempter wrote: > Connecting to 104.197.158.61 [104.197.158.61] port 22. (1) I would change the port from 22 to something more difficult to guess, perhaps 49026 (for example) and then block port 22 in the firewall. (2) Allow to port 49026 (for

Re: [CentOS] C6: Gparted "the kernel failed to re-read partition table"

On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 07:03 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > Firstly, if at all possible, you're better off doing it with disks > unmounted, booting from a gparted live CD. > > Secondly, if that's not practical, that message is common when using, say > fdisk. Sometimes, running partprobe

Re: [CentOS] C6: Gparted "the kernel failed to re-read partition table"

On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 23:17 -0453, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > Is the disk or 1 of its partitions mounted ? If so, can it be > unmounted Hi William, its the only HDD on that machine. All the partitions are mounted. The error message refers to the HDD, not to any of the mounted

[CentOS] C6: Gparted "the kernel failed to re-read partition table"

On C6 (latest) I wanted to add an extra partition, number 14, to a 1TB GPT disk. It failed repeatedly. The error message is:- ~~~ GParted 0.19.1 Libparted 2.1 Create Primary Partition #1 (ext4, 33.00 MiB) on /dev/sda 00:00:01 ( ERROR ) calibrate New Partition #1 00:00:00( SUCCESS

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.1.0 stability

On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 16:44 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Nux! wrote: > > Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might not > > like the old ffmpeg I ship. > Nope. > > Yes, I'm on CentOS 6, but as this is a US federal organization (civil > sector), I did ask, and was

Re: [CentOS] C5.11 FF ESR 45.1.0 Cookies Button not functioning

On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 19:36 +0200, Yamaban wrote: > Most of the dialogs have been rewritten from XUL to HTML5. > > The dialog shown is build by opening a blank html page and > then inserting the code (html+css+js) to show the dialog. > > Thus 'about:blank' (internal called as

Re: [CentOS] C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation faults

On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 13:13 -0700, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > I think this site is always failing. It has an embedded video. > > http://www.sportsnet.ca/basketball/nba/free-association-podcast-much-toronto-raptors-fear-miami-heats-dwayne-wade-hassan-whiteside-joe-johnson/ on C5.11 using FF

Re: [CentOS] C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation faults

On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 20:44 +0100, Nux! wrote: > This consistently crashes it, for testing: > http://dl.nux.ro/video/Organshiftpregnancy.mp4 On C5.11 with FF 45.1.0 patched, using M-Player plug-in = no problem. It appears to be a low resolution ultra-sound picture of a baby in the womb.

Re: [CentOS] C5.11 FF ESR 45.1.0 Cookies Button not functioning

On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 16:53 +0100, Always Learning wrote: > firefox-45.1.0-1.1.el5.centos > > > Clicking:- > Edit > Preferences > Privacy > Show Cookies > > no longer works. It always did function before the upgrade to FF 45. SOLVED. Adbl

[CentOS] C5.11 FF ESR 45.1.0 Cookies Button not functioning

firefox-45.1.0-1.1.el5.centos Clicking:- Edit Preferences Privacy Show Cookies no longer works. It always did function before the upgrade to FF 45. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

Re: [CentOS] E-mail advice sought

On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 10:57 +0200, Leon Fauster wrote: > blacklisting is not a good practice, use the suggested whitelist ... I disagree from practical experience. My Exim mail servers (MTAs) refused connections from 'amateur' mail senders such as:- *dynamic.163data.com.cn

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 07:22 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Therefore, I have made a new temporary version available here, for > people who would opt to get the new version and not wait: > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/firefox-45.1.0-1.1.el5.centos/ Wonderful, marvellous and I'm

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 11:21 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > Given: RHEL5 goes end of life on 2017-03-31, which is 47 weeks, 6 days, 13 > hours, 40 minutes, and 50 seconds from now > > and that even now the updates are limited to critical (ie remote code > execution) pretty much might I suggest

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 03:05 +, Richard wrote: > This explains the extension signing, and timeline, a bit: > > > > Note that the unsigned override that you used is going away with FF47. Thanks for the link. I like the idea of a

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 03:05 +, Richard wrote: > The issue for ESR people is that they didn't get eased into it the > way standard FF users did - over the course of three releases. FF40 > was released in october of last year, so by now hopefully extension > developers have gotten their code

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0 > > Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see > https://rhn

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >