Hi,
on one of my Systems I'm seeing a strange phenomenon. When I do a ls
/var/log/named/ that command just freezes. An strace shows that ls is
endlessly doing this:
...
getdents(3, /* 66 entries */, 32768)= 3888
getdents(3, /* 85 entries */, 32768)= 5000
getdents(3, /* 70 entries */,
On 11/16/2011 09:37 PM, Smithies, Russell wrote:
I came across an old post comment yesterday (from
http://echenh.blogspot.com/2010/04/how-to-extend-lvm-on-vmware-guest-os.html
) discussing the hack of LVM on Linux VM guests and whether it's better not
to use it to simplify disk management.
On 11/15/2011 01:56 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Currently, CentOS build system should be in much better shape and we
will see how it will do for coming 6.2 point release (already in beta).
Thanks very much for that.
I found your account most interesting and
On 11/15/2011 04:31 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 11/15/2011 03:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
The preupgrade is what I've been using the last year, and why I'm now
building boxes here with 500M instead of 100M root partitions, figuring
that it's what's coming for CentOS, eventually.
On 11/15/2011 02:56 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Fedora is basically an incubator for new technologies and as such not
really an attractive system to install for end-users. If you deal with
servers you probably go with CentOS, SL, Debian, etc. and if you want
On 11/15/2011 05:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Timothy Murphygayle...@eircom.net
wrote:
Incidentally, I don't really understand
what is meant by the term desktop nowadays.
I always think of it as a contrast to laptop.
'Desktop' is in
On 11/15/2011 05:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:31 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 11/15/2011 03:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
The preupgrade is what I've been using the last year, and why I'm now
building boxes here with 500M instead
On 11/15/2011 05:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/15/2011 05:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Timothy Murphygayle...@eircom.net
wrote:
Incidentally, I don't really understand
what is meant by the term
On 11/06/2011 05:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
has anybody ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569
i wonder that the last build is more than a yaer ago and nobody hitted until
now
or nobody is secring his vhsost and so did
On 11/06/2011 05:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 14:27, schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn:
On 11/06/2011 05:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
has anybody ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569
i wonder that the last build
On 11/06/2011 06:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 18:35, schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn:
so as long as i use eaccelerator on 20 production servers since
years and the only CentOS test-system is broken i see no reason
to play with apc around because i do not like to switch for
one
On 11/02/2011 06:34 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 22:26, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/01/2011 09:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go
On 11/01/2011 06:53 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2011/11/1 Bob Hoffmanb...@bobhoffman.com:
I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat
making a move to throw off centos compilations.
I read some stories about microsoft wanting to work closer with centos
On 11/01/2011 09:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
David Miller wrote
---
You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with
CentOS as long
as there are timely updates. That tells me you dont really care about
On 10/30/2011 02:14 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 10/30/2011 01:44 PM, William Warren piše:
And that Johnny has been the answer we have been requesting for a
long time now. I figured the upstream packaging changes broke your
systems even when lance said that wasn't the case. The
Hi,
I ran into a Problem when using alias interfaces with vlans on a centos 5 box.
When I define such an interface and do a service network restart the
alias interface doesn't get started. Starting it manually works fine.
Also after changing DEVICE=eth0.10:0 to DEVICE=eth0:0 in the config file
On 10/23/2011 04:14 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 10/22/2011 06:00 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Running iostat shows no I/O activity when running the tests for /dev/vdb
which explains the insane numbers. The question is why I get such different
results when both devices are defined exactly
On 10/10/2011 08:27 PM, Nehemiah wrote:
but thats what I'm asking you to investigate. All you see is a symptom,
more data may clarify the situation. Weren't you taking data from both
inside the guests an on the host's disks. It was kind of unclear.
The guest number are the ones that are not
On 10/09/2011 04:32 PM, Nehemiah wrote:
On Saturday, October 8, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble benchmarking disk i/o in my vm's. The data I get seems
bogus.
have you tried perf top, you can see their other performance statistics
there. there is more
Hi,
I'm having trouble benchmarking disk i/o in my vm's. The data I get seems
bogus.
I have two centos 6 guests which use a raw image as volume. Each volume is
stored on its own physical disk and both disks are the same model. The host
system is fedora 15 with the virt-preview repo enabled.
On 10/05/2011 06:16 PM, Ed Heron wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 10:55 -0400, Rich wrote:
Since the Xen and Linux kernel people have finally made peace and Xen
is going to be included with the kernel, should I keep using the Xen
virtual server with Centos or should I switch to KVM? I am running
On 10/04/2011 03:54 PM, Volker Poplawski wrote:
On 26.09.2011 14:40, John Doe wrote:
From: Volker Poplawskivol...@openbios.org
I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel
82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6.
I had pbms with my Intel 1000e too.
Installed elrepo's
On 09/30/2011 03:31 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 09/29/11 6:22 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each
website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then
On 09/27/2011 05:15 AM, Muhammad Panji wrote:
Dear All,
I have an onboard Realtek RTL8111/8168B NIC. from lspci -vv :
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02)
It is detected, but why the speed is always
On 09/26/2011 09:02 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Not sure what those do, but lsof should show what files are open, and
'strace -p process_id' would show the system calls issued by a
process.
Thanks, that might be usefull. I'ill just have to find a way to strace
multiple process at once and find
What are you trying to say?
Karanbirs response is three weeks old and AFAICS the 6.0/cr repo is still
empty on the mirrors so there is no package for that problem available.
If there are problems getting 6.0/cr going then fine but in that case fixes
for such dangerous bugs should be made
On 09/23/2011 04:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Volker Poplawski wrote:
Hi all,
I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel
82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6.
The device eth0 suddenly stops working i.e. no more networking. When I
do ifconfig from console I get
Do
On 09/23/2011 04:30 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
What are you trying to say?
Karanbirs response is three weeks old and AFAICS the 6.0/cr repo is still
empty on the mirrors so there is no package for that problem available.
If there are problems
On 09/23/2011 06:57 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/23/2011 09:06 AM, Stefan Held wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 22.09.2011, 07:28 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
No matter what we try to do ... some kind of rolling updates for people
who do not want to wait ... or whatever the next thing is ... well
On 09/23/2011 07:12 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/23/2011 09:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 09/23/2011 04:30 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
What are you trying to say?
Karanbirs response is three weeks old and AFAICS the 6.0/cr repo
On 09/23/2011 07:57 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2011 01:29:51 PM Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
What you are suggesting here is that people should expect centos systems to
be insecure and go the RHEL if they want secure systems.
If the timeliness of security updates
On 09/23/2011 09:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/23/2011 12:29 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
[SNIP]
If there are issues that prevent this then
make an announcement to that effect so that people at least know that they
have to take matter in their own hands. Writing such an email would
Hi,
after updating one of my systems to 5.7 FTP connections stopped working.
After a bit of debugging I found out that the ip_nat_ftp module apparently
breaks things in 5.7.
So I you update your systems and suddenly FTP starts acting up check if you
have that module in
On 09/13/2011 12:38 PM, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Rudi Ahlersr...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Dukestdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
On 09/07/2011 10:55 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I grabbed a new SSD M4-CT064M4SSD2 from Crucial.
I am disappointed. I stuck the unit in an Atom machine (zotac) with
CentOS 6 on the disk.
It really doesn't feel faster than the previous 5400 RPM drive that
was in it.
The SSD is giving me (in
On 09/08/2011 03:28 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 09/07/2011 10:55 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I grabbed a new SSD M4-CT064M4SSD2 from Crucial.
I am disappointed. I stuck the unit in an Atom machine (zotac) with
CentOS 6 on the disk.
It really doesn't feel faster than the previous 5400
On 09/03/2011 09:24 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 9/3/11, Luigi Rosali...@luigirosa.com wrote:
Florin Andrei said the following on 02/09/11 21:51:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-August/017689.html
Is there something similiar for CentOS 6?
There was supposed to
On 08/31/2011 05:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:30:46PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 08/27/2011 09:12 PM, sylvan.dcu...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Dennis,
Thanks a lot for the wise reply.. really did boost my knowledge..
honestly was unware of the fact
On 08/30/2011 04:54 AM, Ed Morrison wrote:
Hi All:
I am trying to resize a centos (5.2) VM drive. I use VMware and I have
increased the size of the drive by 40G. I am running resize2fs on
/dev/sdb1 (which is my root partition) but when I do I get this error:
[root@centos ~]# resize2fs
On 08/27/2011 09:12 PM, sylvan.dcu...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Dennis,
Thanks a lot for the wise reply.. really did boost my knowledge..
honestly was unware of the fact that dom0 is just like another VM ...
Anyway I had never restricted dom0 mem and since my 4 vms were working fine
with no
On 08/27/2011 02:35 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
Thanks Guys
really apprecite your quick responses.
( Dennis was right in tellin me about PAE since my system is 64 bit and if
I
do run yum install kernel-PAE there is nothing found.)
actually i found something more as i was figuring my issue out.
On 08/26/2011 12:51 PM, benedict dcunha wrote:
Thanks Leonard,
Thanks for the immedite reply . apprecite.
actually many post s say the PAE kernel required for addressing more than 4
gb ram . but since my server already detects 32 gb ram , detecting 64 also
should not be an issue..
many posts
On 08/22/2011 07:01 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
I have a shared web server that users can SSH / SFTP into to access their
web content. Each users home directory is in a change root, and I use
mount -o bind to put their respective webpage's document root into their
home directory. Recently I
One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum
install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail. No need to deal with
alternatives if you don't intend to deal with sendmail anyway.
Regards.
Dennis
On 08/22/2011 08:45 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
It is obvious you
On 08/21/2011 11:30 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:11:24PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
A new .xxx domain suffix for sexual content is becoming available.
This has been available for a long time.
The important question is why in the world would you spam this list
On 08/19/2011 07:22 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:54:56PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
install the IUS package. Is there any reason to avoid IUS and stay with the
CentOS package?
No, not really.
TUV broke php53 and it won't be fixed in any useful timeframe; IUS'
On 08/16/2011 12:31 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi guys,
just wondering if anyone had feedback about this project :
http://karesansui-project.info/ ; I had a go at setting it up, and it
took about 5 minutes to get going and be productive.
their installer is extremely odd, its a tarball with
On 08/16/2011 11:27 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
On 08/16/2011 08:45 AM, Christian Anthon wrote:
what is the right way to deal with the new cr repository for centos 5
when you are running your own mirror. In particular the following
statement I don't fully understand:
The reason why we
On 08/16/2011 05:48 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I am using thunderbird on centos 6.
I get a message about cannot open the file as helper application
does not exist.
Which package needs to be installed for the pdf helper application?
evince
Regards,
Dennis
On 08/03/2011 11:17 AM, Marc Deop wrote:
On Tuesday 02 August 2011 11:20:17 John R Pierce wrote:
whats wrong with the packages built into CentOS 6 ?
I thought it was pretty much obvious was takling about a more updated
version of MySQL. I was wrong.
The thing is that I'd like to have the
On 08/02/2011 06:16 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 06:00:26 PM Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
On Friday 29 July 2011 22:45, Benjamin Smith wrote:
I have a tested copy of EL6 that I would like to duplicate to a
number of similar servers, but can't seem to find a sane
On 07/30/2011 01:03 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 07/30/2011 06:37 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:07:38PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use oprofile to debug a problem with idle virtual machines
eating 10% cpu but apparently the debuginfo
Hi,
I've got a strange situation where I cannot remove logical volumes even
right after they have been created:
[root@centos6 ~]# lvcreate -n c6minimal -L+5G vg_nexus
Logical volume c6minimal created
[root@centos6 ~]# lvremove /dev/vg_nexus/c6minimal
Can't remove open logical volume
On 07/31/2011 05:07 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:39 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 07/30/11 6:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
You can amalgamate that into a single entry .
that doesn't do the redirect. I *want* it so that if you go to any of
these URLs...
On 07/30/2011 06:37 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:07:38PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use oprofile to debug a problem with idle virtual machines
eating 10% cpu but apparently the debuginfo packages for Centos 6 do not
exist and so I cannot get
Hi,
I'm playing around with KVM virtualization on Centos 6 and I noticed then
after I created a regular minimal install in a VM this guest will
constantly use 10% of the cpu when idle.
Any ideas what the problem might be?
Regards,
Dennis
___
Hi,
I'm trying to use oprofile to debug a problem with idle virtual machines
eating 10% cpu but apparently the debuginfo packages for Centos 6 do not
exist and so I cannot get any useful information from the kernel.
Is there some way to at least get the kernel-debuginfo from somewhere?
Regards,
On 07/28/2011 11:49 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
Am 28.07.11 11:23, schrieb Peter Peltonen:
Hi,
A few more questions :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennisonj...@gerdesas.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
i think i am not
On 07/20/2011 01:50 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 07/20/2011 02:37 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Oh, I believe you I'm just puzzled why I need the package and you don't.
Can you post an rpm -qa|sort of the final Package list you have in the
installed System?
Regards,
Dennis
Already
Hi,
I'm trying to build a redundant duo of firewalls/routers/gateways and I'm
thinking about not putting any disks in them and instead using a usb-stick
raid-1 as storage.
Has anyone any experience with this? Since the machines will be running
pretty much only iptables, conntrackd and
On 07/19/2011 11:36 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 07/20/2011 12:15 AM, Kartik Subbarao wrote:
On 07/19/2011 12:36 PM, Kartik Subbarao wrote:
rpm -e $(rpm -qa |grep -i firmware)
This should be changed to:
rpm -e $(rpm -qa | grep -i firmware | grep -v kernel-firmware)
Since apparently kernel
Hi,
I'm looking into setting up a redundant firewall and I'm wondering how
feasible it is to use an USB stick as the only storage device in these
systems (i.e. no HDs).
The logs will go to a remote logging server but I'm wondering what else
needs to be changed to make something like this
On 07/06/2011 07:17 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
On 7/6/2011 10:42 AM, PLD wrote:
On 06/07/2011 13:03, Steve Campbell wrote:
I'm still trying to get xen working before Centos 6 and KVM just for
experience. I seem to be able to do most of what I what with VMs, but
I've run into another problem
On 06/22/2011 11:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
The problem with RHEL6/CentOS6 is that Redhat bought
Qumranet (the KVM company) and decided to only ship
KVM host support in RHEL6.
RHEL6/CentOS6 runs as Xen VM though, so you can use
RHEL5/CentOS5 Xen
Hi,
on one of our systems I see that while the time on the Centos 5.4 Host is
correct it lags behind on two of the 5.5 guests by almost 5 minutes but is
correct for the third domU. From what I understand the clock of the system
is controlled by the host and and guest cannot write to it (and
On 02/13/2011 09:27 AM, Nataraj wrote:
Is there a simple way to directly install a vm on an lvm (or proably
seperate LVM's for root and swap)? For example something like:
lvcreate -L 10G -n testvm_root vg_myvg
lvcreate -L 1G -n testvm_swap
Then somehow setup the VM to be able to directly
On 01/19/2011 05:48 PM, compdoc wrote:
I once tried moving my qcow2 VM guest files to a zfs-fuse volume, and the
VMs refused to boot after. They only ran while on ext3 or ext4.
I saw something similar when I put some images on an NTFS volume. This
worked under Fedora 11 but when I switched to
Hi,
about an hour ago two web-serving VMs died at the same time with the
following error on the console:
INFO: task httpd:4304 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message.
httpd D 00af1f714d1112e2 0 4304 22471
Hi,
I recently did some benchmarking on a Rackspace VM and was surprised that
bonnie++ showed a read throughput of almost 500MB/sec. Does anyone have an
idea how they achieve these speeds in a shared environment? While you can
achieve this with a RAID easily these days once you have lots of VMs
On 10/20/2010 08:12 AM, Grant McWilliams wrote:
If I understand that paper correctly, HVM+VT-d outperforms PV by quite
a
lot (if you have VT-d support on your system).
Thanks for that link. Just to make my criticism of the initial claim more
clear: I don't claim
On 10/19/2010 09:41 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 09:58:15PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 10/16/2010 08:11 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:16:42PM +0100, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
Hi Karanbir,
On 14 October 2010 19:59, Karanbir Singhmail-li
On 10/19/2010 01:16 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
On 10/19/2010 03:47 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 10/19/2010 09:41 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
It's because of the x86_64 architecture, afaik.
There was some good technical explananation about it,
but I can't remember the url now
On 10/16/2010 08:11 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:16:42PM +0100, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
Hi Karanbir,
On 14 October 2010 19:59, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 10/14/2010 07:48 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
I think xen is still on top in terms of performance and
201 - 273 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
