Another option is to migrate to an RHEL 8 -compatible OS, like Rocky
Linux, AlmaLinux, Oracle Linux, Springdale Linux.
(I remind that CentOS Stream is no more a RHEL 8 twin.)
I have already migrated successfully all my CentOS 8 boxes to Rocky. (I
am informed that in Academic Institutions in
On 21/7/2021 12:32 π.μ., Ian Mortimer wrote:
We've been using the 10 year support to convince researchers to install
CentOS instead of their preferred option Ubuntu. We've now lost that
argument so most will go to Ubuntu. Those who need 10 year support
will move to Oracle.
Rocky Linux is
On 9/7/2021 1:14 μ.μ., Gionatan Danti wrote:
While I fully understand & agree on the motivation for keeping Rocky
(and other clones) 1:1 with Red Hat, it should be understood that
current RHEL packages selection itself is drifting away from
small/medium business needs. So the core issue is a
On 8/7/2021 8:53 μ.μ., Gionatan Danti wrote:
That said, lets face in: current CentOS is not really a community, at
least in the sense that a community can steer the project direction.
Nobody polled for Stream or asked about it. Stream simply happened due
to an unilateral Red Hat decision.
On 8/7/2021 5:46 μ.μ., Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Μaybe "we" could fill this gap? Describe this state of EPEL? Did you
requested such missing packages? From the early on (EL8.0) I requested
such EPEL packages, some fedora maintainers branched there packages into
EPEL8. Even a request for a
On 8/7/2021 6:53 μ.μ., Valeri Galtsev wrote:
THAT must have been part of the reason for mscot. Also, they call
mascot Beasty (as in diminutive from :"beast"). And if you pronounce
the abbreviation of Berkeley Software Distribution (the one FreeBSD is
successor of): BSD, and then "beasty" they
On 8/7/2021 6:19 μ.μ., Valeri Galtsev wrote:
...
Of course, tastes differ, but still, only those who tasted both things
can have fairly say what is better to one's own taste.
...
But even as part of our infrastructure fled to FreeBSD...
...
As a side note:
l never used FreeBSD, even though
On 7/7/2021 8:17 μ.μ., Valeri Galtsev wrote:
And I feel safe running (and planning to run for long future to come)
quite reputable ones with long history of such: FreeBSD (servers),
Debian (number crunchers, workstations).
I feel totally safe and confident with the fully community-driven
On 7/7/2021 12:47 μ.μ., J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote:
There's also Alma, which is where I've gone after being with CentOS
since 5.3
AlmaLinux is a great project too, IMHO, but things show that the new
industry standard (replacing CentOS) will probably be Rocky Linux.
(Yes, RHEL
On 30/4/2021 7:27 μ.μ., Gionatan Danti wrote:
The correct answer is to buy RH: fine. But do not let Stream touch
anything which require a kABI compatible modules. As said above, the
Stream move is squarely addresses *cloud* vendor requests and needs.
Again, fine. But please leave apart the
On 21/6/2021 3:16 μ.μ., Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Hey all,
in preparation to migrate an EL7 server I noticed that the
openldap-servers package is not shipped in EL8 anymore.
Is it possible to operate 389-ds as standalone ldap server? I am
asking this for the context of CentOS Linux
On 28/4/2021 4:28 μ.μ., R C wrote:
you think you can fund something like that with a bake sale or so?,
maintaining a separate distro for the same thing is VERY expensive
I agree, of course, yet it seems that those who decide to maintain a
separate distro are decided to do so and obviously
On 28/4/2021 10:35 π.μ., Nikolaos Milas wrote:
All that, in turn, are very much dependent on community involvement
and project management & financing.
By the way, I think that CentOS, before it was "absorbed" by Redhat,
could/might have addressed the community for fund raisin
On 28/4/2021 1:23 π.μ., Gionatan Danti wrote:
If the Springdale release is a 100% RH clone, why do different teams
(Alma and Rocky) are trying to re-package the same 100%
binary-compatible RH clone?
Simply because each one of these projects obviously wants to remain
independent from the
On 16/4/2021 10:10 π.μ., Felix Kölzow wrote:
you may take a look at _rear_ (it is that easy how it looks like)
You may also want to check mondo:
http://www.mondorescue.org/about.shtml (the website is not updated
regularly!)
I am using it for many years, since CentOS 5 (until now with
On 3/2/2021 1:26 π.μ., R C wrote:
The reason why I have some Centos stuff is because it is very close to
Redhat, and where I work we use A LOT of redhat
machines/servers/clusters, so it is just convenience. That is why I
used Centos, and if this mechanism/program is available, well, I'll
use
On 22/1/2021 2:25 μ.μ., Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote:
Also, I can still expect they will again change their mind close to
2021's end. In short, I have hard time trusting RH in such a situation.
That's exactly how I feel too. I don't trust them.
I think we can expect Rocky Linux to
On 21/1/2021 11:17 μ.μ., Valeri Galtsev wrote:
I tried Oracle Linux. After installation it took forever to update yum
database, or do you yum search. Also: I didn't find mirrors... All
this sort of ruled it out for me.
Don't worry, Rocky Linux is in good track; Latest update:
On 8/1/2021 11:01 π.μ., Fabian Arrotin wrote:
With my SysAdmin hat on, I'd say that the only real impacting bit is the
shorter lifetime (5y instead of 10), but with overlap between stream
versions, so one would have time to have a look, reflect in automation,
reinstall/migrate, enjoy
With my
On 15/12/2020 12:47 π.μ., Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote:
your suggestions?
My course of action is to wait for Lenix (Ref.:
https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fork-by-cloudlinux)
and Rocky Linux (https://rockylinux.org/) by CentOS original founder.
IMHO,
On 13/12/2020 9:44 μ.μ., Simon Avery wrote:
There are 4,606 people on their Slack right now
...which, by the way, is being acquired by SalesForce!
Find a successor of Slack!
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 13/12/2020 1:05 μ.μ., Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Just an update, name of the project will be "Lenix", and I missedin
announcement that unlike CentOS they plan to publish all the build tools
and environment so other clones can be built even if they stray, a very
commendable approach.
Sounds
On 13/12/2020 6:48 π.μ., Gordon Messmer wrote:
Red Hat is giving us the thing that has been requested more often, by
more people, than any other change in CentOS, and the result is that
the press is full of stories about users being angry, because five
people on the mailing lists sent a lot
On 10/12/2020 2:39 μ.μ., Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Joshua Kramer wrote:
It can, however, be mitigated if RedHat backtracks, admits their
mistake, and affirmatively commits to support future CentOS point
releases. I'll be interested to see how this turns out.
It may already
On 9/12/2020 4:32 μ.μ., Brendan Conoboy wrote:
As CentOS Stream grows, I expect many companies who sell hardware will
become active members of the community.
Probably, but this is not the point. The value of CentOS is that in
essence it is identical to RHEL.
This allows its use in multiple
On 9/12/2020 3:19 μ.μ., Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I still hope that you will not disappoint CentOS admins and users so
badly and that you will continue to support CentOS 8 (and CentOS 7) in
its current/expected form.
A petition has started, to request IBM/Redhat to continue CentOS 8
On 8/12/2020 6:58 μ.μ., Satish Patel wrote:
What is going on here https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
CentOS 8's future is not looking bright. Recently deployed CentOS8 on
my production workload and now hearing this. What do other folks think
about this?
I will totally
Hello,
MERRY CHRISTMAS to all in list!
After I upgraded to latest: CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) I am
facing nfs crashes which cause the system to hang frequently.
This is caused by cp to nfs-mounted shares.
Below is dmesg output; you will see call traces. These cause system to
On 25/9/2019 7:31 μ.μ., Xinhuan Zheng wrote:
I guess it is very common for administrative purpose, to dump and restore a
CentOS 7 system. I usually use dump/restore commands. However, I’m having
trouble to handle installing bootloader and creating initramfs for C7 system.
Does anyone know a
On 7/10/2017 7:35 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I am still trying to find a solution.
The problem was finally traced down to a Cisco ASA bug (this firewall
device lies between the connected networks); bug CSCuq80704 was resolved
by an ASA software update.
NFS packets were incorrectly being
On 4/10/2017 3:09 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Problem solved - at least in my case - by changing the NFS Export
Options (of the NFS shared directory, at the data storage system) from
secure to insecure.
In the end, it occurred that the issue re-appeared after a couple of days.
So, it seems
On 2/10/2017 11:46 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Unfortunately, it doesn't work for me.
Problem solved - at least in my case - by changing the NFS Export
Options (of the NFS shared directory, at the data storage system) from
secure to insecure. That is, I changed from:
rw,no_root_squash
On 2/10/2017 11:19 πμ, Patrick Begou wrote:
This config is working fior me, with just using an older kernel.
Thanks Patrick,
Unfortunately, it doesn't work for me. I tried booting with an older
kernel (3.10.0-514.21.1.el7.x86_64) and/or downgrading rpcbind to
rpcbind-0.2.0-38.el7.x86_64
On 22/9/2017 8:15 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I have created bug report: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13891
for this.
I have also created
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494834
and I have uploaded a lot of (hopefully useful) information, but there
doesn't seem to exist
On 22/9/2017 3:46 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Based on the facts and experience, it looks like a bug. After all, it
occurred right after upgrade to 7.4, without any system configuration
changes.
I have created bug report: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13891 for
this.
Isn't
On 22/9/2017 2:58 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
...
or through /etc/fstab:
10.201.40.34:/data/col1/hesperia-mount /hesperiamount2 nfs
auto,noatime,nolock,bg,nfsvers=3,intr,tcp,actimeo=1800 0
Correction: the /etc/fstab nfs mount line has one more zero:
10.201.40.34:/data/col1/hesperia
On 2/6/2017 1:46 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
After a bit of search, I found the associated reports:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13351
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454876
No solution yet, but -as a workaround- it seems that -at least- nfs
problems are indeed solved
On 8/8/2017 9:16 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
For your reference, I am also including the php-fpm configuration
I now browsed today's php-fpm log file (/var/log/php-fpm/www-error.log -
which is rotated daily) and I found two PHP records about this website,
with the following content
On 8/8/2017 8:57 πμ, John R Pierce wrote:
does the user apache is running as have write access to that folder ?
Thank you for your reply, John.
Yes, there is write access:
# ls -l /var/webs/wwwgreekgeo/log/php*
-rw-rw 1 root apache 0 Aug 7 22:58
/var/webs/wwwgreekgeo/log/php_error_log
Hello,
I am running httpd-2.4.6-45.el7.centos.x86_64 with
php-fpm-7.0.22-1.el7.remi.x86_64 (on CentOS 7).
My main problem: On this httpd server I have several vhosts running, but
apparently I am facing intermittent problems with php-fpm communication
on only one of them.
Most of the sites
On 2/6/2017 2:05 μμ, hw wrote:
That´s a good thing, though it can be difficult to run systems
using ancient software.
You may want to check the following paradigm (from another open source
perl-based application) to create a Perl environment within your system,
avoiding to tamper with it:
On 2/6/2017 10:58 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Have you checked if this bug/behavior has been reported or should we
file a bug report?
After a bit of search, I found the associated reports:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13351
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454876
On 2/6/2017 10:40 πμ, Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE wrote:
Reverting to rpcbind-0.2.0-38.el7 solves the problem for me
Thank you very much Philippe,
I notice that I have upgraded to rpcbind-0.2.0-38.el7_3.x86_64 on May 26.
Have you checked if this bug/behavior has been reported or should we
Hello,
We have a VM (under KVM - a VPS service by our ISP) running CentOS 7.
On it we have 2 NFS mounts, one for backup and one as a live file system
(where there are two user homes as well):
On 1/6/2017 9:52 μμ, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
1. Make sure both users are not logged in.
2. Create new mountpoints
3. Edit fstab to point to new mountpoints.
4. Edit /etc/passwd to refer to the new mountpoint for the two users
5. mount -a
Would that do the trick for you?
Thanks Mauricio,
On 1/6/2017 6:06 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
...then remove the mount from fstab and the initial mount point
/scimount and finally rename /scimount2 to /scimount ?
Correction:
...then remove the mount from fstab and the initial mount point
/mynfsmount and finally rename /mynfsmount2
Hi,
I am running CentOS 7 (fully updated) on a VM. This has a mounted nfs
share (via fstab) (which mounts a remote storage system) on which we
have created the home directories of 2 users
Here are the home directories:
/mynfsmount
|
|--/user1
|--/user1
We want to move this whole branch
On 6/5/2017 12:09 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
The VM booted fine after /etc/fstab update!
I did another test, which was also successful.
Below follows the output from the process (after booting in
troubleshooting mode using the CentOS 7 media disk):
1) Continue
2) Read-only mount
On 6/5/2017 12:20 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
[Perhaps I should have manually edited /etc/fstab as well to enter the
new UUID?]
Yes, that was it!
The VM booted fine after /etc/fstab update!
Case closed. It was a tricky one!
Thank you all for your feedback and kind assistance!
Cheers,
Nick
On 5/5/2017 9:10 μμ, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
xfs_admin -U restore /dev/vdal
Bingo!
I had to unmount the boot partition (being in Troubleshooting mode), run
the above command, which provided a new UUID and at last the partition
was recognized as xfs. (I forgot to copy the output to paste
On 5/5/2017 8:34 μμ, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Your /mnt/sysimage/boot is under tmpfs not real disk...
Sorry, I am not an expert, but it does seem to NOT be under tmpfs:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
...
/dev/vdal497M 192M 306M 39% /mnt/sysimage/boot
...
Why do you say
On 5/5/2017 8:46 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
If so, may it be that this fix has not been rolled out to CentOS repos
yet?
Note: Both the original (backed up) and the restored (clone) VM are
up-to-date. No new updates available in the standard CentOS repos.
Nick
On 5/5/2017 8:29 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I am very puzzled with "unknown filesystem".
After more googling, I found this bug report with a very recent fix:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399487
It seems to me that this may be relevant in our case.
On 5/5/2017 3:45 μμ, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
BTW: see also this paragraph in the provided RH EL link:
24.7.3. Resetting and Reinstalling GRUB 2
But i think is not your problem
Yes, I have done that, without change in behavior.
Also, after changing partitions flag does your fdisk command
On 5/5/2017 3:15 μμ, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
...
grub2-install /dev/vda
...
Was this one of the command you already tried?
Yes, I have tried that multiple times, both from Troubleshooting Mode
(booting using CentOS 7 Installation CD) and from within the actual
system (booted using
On 5/5/2017 1:57 μμ, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
what do you get when you boot the VM (I imagine with supergrub2 you
described) and run this
lspci
lspci -kn
Here you are:
# lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440FX - 82441FX PMC [Natoma] (rev 02)
00:01.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation
On 5/5/2017 1:42 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hmm, it seems that the boot flag should be removed from /dev/vda2
partition?
Actually, I tried this and left the boot flag only to /dev/vda1. I
rebooted and I am still getting the same error. :-(
I was hoping we were close to a solution...
Nick
On 5/5/2017 1:19 μμ, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Could you verify, if /dev/sda is your boot disk, with the command
fdisk -l /dev/sda
?
It's /dev/vda in my case:
# fdisk -l /dev/vda
Disk /dev/vda: 21.5 GB, 21474836480 bytes, 41943040 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size
On 5/5/2017 5:11 πμ, Barry Brimer wrote:
Are the correct volumes referenced in your /etc/default/grub file?
Thanks Barry for your feedback.
Here is the output:
http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/scratchvm-data-20170505-01.png
What can you tell from that?
Cheers,
Nick
On 5/5/2017 2:22 πμ, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
when you boot via supergrub2, you get this kernel version (uname -r)?
every kernel has it own initramfs where some binaries, libraries,
modules and configuration files get copied from the running VM, so you
need to boot from a newly created
On 4/5/2017 5:56 μμ, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
dracut -f /boot/initramfs-.img
I did:
# dracut -f /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64.img
3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64
and it ended without reporting any error. However, when I rebooted,
nothing changed ("no such device: . Entering
On 4/5/2017 5:20 μμ, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
Dumb question: the file starts with a dot, doesn't show up in "ls" without "-a".
Of course, I check with ls -la.It is empty indeed.
Even dumber question: the erroring UUID exist in the origin of
thecloned guest? I guess you have rebuilt
On 3/5/2017 5:24 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Using the supergrub2 disk I can boot and login successfully. Otherwise
(i.e. directly) the box won't boot.
In the meantime, I also tried rescatux
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/rescatux/) repair disk; it failed as
well. The situation remains
On 3/5/2017 10:41 μμ, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
Does the UUID of root filesystem in /etc/fstab match the actual UUID
as reported by blkid? And remove/etc/lvm/cache/.cache if it exists
Thank you Marcelo for replying,
The directory /etc/lvm/cache/ is empty.
And, yes, the UUID matches:
#
Hello,
I'm struggling to make a cloned CentOS 7 VM (under KVM) to work.
The VM was cloned using mondorestore. Restore appears successful but the
VM won't boot; see:
http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/supergrub2-scratchvm-20170503-04.png
I booted with CentOS 7 disk in troubleshooting mode
On 5/1/2017 11:04 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Can others please report the content of /boot/grub2/device.map on
their CentOS 7 (physical or virtual) installations?
Thank you all for your reports. Since it seems this is generally the
case with CentOS 7, does anyone also have access to RHEL 7
On 4/1/2017 7:37 μμ, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I don't see that on VMs that I manage. Some of the physical machines
that I manage do have duplicates in the device.map.
Thank you Gordon for your feedback!
Can others please report the content of /boot/grub2/device.map on their
CentOS 7
On 29/12/2016 11:24 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
...I have found that all my CentOS 7 installations (VMs under KVM)
have the same /boot/grub2/device.map, which seemingly refers to two
HDs, although the VMs in fact include only one (virtual) HD.
...
This is NOT the case with my CentOS 5
Hello,
After repeated failing efforts to restore CentOS 7 backups (taken using
mondorescue software), I have found that all my CentOS 7 installations
(VMs under KVM) have the same /boot/grub2/device.map, which seemingly
refers to two HDs, although the VMs in fact include only one (virtual)
On 7/5/2015 5:01 μμ, Robert Nichols wrote:
I use rdiff-backup, but I hesitate to recommend a tool that has been
unsupported for over 6 years and does have quite a few bugs.
I have had good experience with mondrescue (mondoarchive, mondorestore)
for years. It's a free, active project.
See:
On 8/1/2014 8:28 μμ, Les Mikesell wrote:
The concept doesn't even make sense for TCP connections where the
stack requires acks and sequencing. Are you trying to bridge to a
capture device or something?
Thank you all for your enlightening feedback, which helped me better
understand my
On 7/1/2014 6:19 μμ, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
If you put it that way only xxx will receive packets, to balance betwin
both of them
you will need this:
-A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT
--to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx-yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:80
On 8/1/2014 11:54 πμ, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
Well, I had only used with a range. Maybe you can take a look on a
software load-balancer, like haproxy, or use something like nginx. Then
forward to the load-balancer instead to the servers.
Thanks,
Actually, I don't want load
Hello,
On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables):
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
-A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p
I am using webtatic on CentOS 5.x.
I started using it some years back because as I can remember (vaguely) I
had problems using php53 RPMs (can't remember details, however).
Thanks for php 5.4 info - I haven't used it yet.
I installed remi (php 5.5) on CentOS 6.x but, yes, it seems many apps
On 4/10/2013 5:36 μμ, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 04.10.2013 um 13:51 schrieb Nikos Gatsis - Qbit ngat...@qbit.gr:
Hello list
I'm managing a web server with centos-release-5-9.el5.centos.1.
I have php-5.1.6-40.el5_9 right now and I'd like to update it to php53.
I wander if its easy or
On 18/4/2013 5:11 μμ, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I*strongly* second that. In real, professional work environments, you've
got developers, testers, and production, on*separate* boxes; if you're
short on hardware and cash, a VM on the dev box is the way to go.
To expand on this correct advice:
Hi,
I just tried to build using
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/SRPMS/pdns-3.1-2.el6.src.rpm on
CentOS 6.4 final (kernel: 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64), but it failed when
looking for ldap libs:
Note: I did not change anything in the original spec file.
...
+ ./configure
On 9/4/2013 11:56 μμ, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Interesting. Is there another ldap option in the configure? I ask, since
the above shows that the ldap_set_option is*not* set
Thanks for the reply.
I don't see anything:
$ ./configure --help | grep -i ldap
$
But, in any case, the
On 21/3/2013 11:06 πμ, Austin Einter wrote:
My question is why it is redirecting wrongly to domain/login.php.
I would suggest you visit postfixadmin project forum and/or subscribe to
their mailing list.
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
Hello,
I was following directions at:
http://www.sogo.nu/english/support/faq/article/how-to-install-sogo-and-sope-through-yum-1.html
to install SOGo on CentOS 5.9 and, noticing that among the dependencies
is memcached and rpmforge includes a much more recent version than EPEL,
I preferred
Hello,
I have inherited a Java app, available as a jar, which has been moved
from an HPUX server as is. [This app simply downloads a data file from
an ftp server, processes its data and creates graph files.]
It works fine on a CentOS 5 x86_64 machine with: jre-7u9-linux-x64.rpm
but I've
On 27/1/2013 5:11 μμ, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Taking gtk2 as in our example here, if you wanted a new gtk2 in
CentOS-5.9, then you would have to rebuild the following packages:
A quick (?) question:
What is the best way to view dependencies?
1. We can use yum deplist xxx.rpm to view
On 27/1/2013 5:11 μμ, Johnny Hughes wrote:
So upgrading one package can cause a domino effect that means you have
either broken a bunch of packages or you have to rebuild a bunch of
packages.
That is why you should *only* upgrade what is VITAL for your
application(s), and in a carefully
On 25/1/2013 11:28 μμ, Leon Fauster wrote:
not the CentOS(-Team) but the user it self is risking this …
True. CentOS/RHEL are using the least-risk policy by rarely updating
packages, except for serious bug/security fixes and that helps provide
peace of mind from the base OS.
Yet, I have come
On 26/1/2013 7:42 πμ, Les Mikesell wrote:
If you find a 100% reliable solution, please post it.
I suggest very carefully selecting particular packages (and groups
thereof) from whatever repos (or from individual experienced users'
efforts), testing them thoroughly on test systems (usually a
On 21/1/2013 7:14 μμ, Richard Reina wrote:
However I need glibc-2.15
Read: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-list/2012-August/msg00015.html
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 19/1/2013 10:35 μμ, Boris Epstein wrote:
Any advice on what may help us would be greatly appreciated.
Have you checked HAProxy (http://haproxy.1wt.eu)?
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 19/1/2013 10:35 μμ, Boris Epstein wrote:
Any advice on what may help us would be greatly appreciated.
Some reading that might help in making up your mind:
http://www.chinanetcloud.com/blog/load-balancing-haproxy-vs-nginx
http://www.techopsguys.com/tag/netscaler/
On 11/1/2013 1:44 μμ, fakessh @ wrote:
I do not know the only thing I can tell you that laziness is a value in
the computer
You are partly right.
However, IMHO building dovecot using standard openldap-devel on CentOS 5
means that, even though the final RPM works, it will use *ancient*
On 12/1/2013 11:09 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
++ export LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS} -L/usr/local/openldap/lib64
Or, more correctly:
export LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS} -L/usr/local/openldap/lib64 -lldap
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On 20/4/2012 11:10 μμ, fakessh wrote:
look my personal rpm source of dovecot
its more simply and stable
http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.4-1.centme.el5.src.rpm
Hi fakessh,
I was looking at your:
http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.8-1.centme.src.rpm package (after
adapting to build
On 19/12/2012 9:43 πμ, M. Fioretti wrote:
what about Sogo: Is it slower/more complicated to install... any comment is
appreciated!
I have not used SoGo yet, but I have read good things about it from many
admins. It is probably the only one free/open-source solution which
works well with
On 11/12/2012 4:33 πμ, Markus Falb wrote:
I had a look at your sreenshot. Output stops at the moment init is
taking over. I suspect that console output is going elsewhere, maybe to
a serial console. That way it could well be that the machine is doing
something but you just can not see it.
On 12/12/2012 7:37 πμ, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/10/2012 05:01 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I still wonder what caused that delay.
What does getenforce output? It sort of looks like you went from an
SELinux-disabled configuration to an enforcing or permissive
configuration and required
On 12/12/2012 7:35 μμ, Markus Falb wrote:
Sadly, boot.log on my CentOS 5 machines is empty and so will be yours.
Yes, I had checked already, it's always 0 size...
Thanks for your info.
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I am using a VM with CentOS 5.8 x86_64 under KVM. I only have console
access to the VM through a virtual console (web based).
Tonight, after a routine yum update, I did a shutdown -r now due to
kernel update and the VM won't start. See console screenshot vm1.png:
On 11/12/2012 1:07 πμ, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Is this really error? I
Thanks for replying.
Don't know, but it hangs there forever (at least it appears so - haven't
waited more than half an hour, but it's already too much).
maybe you need to disable selinux before trying to mount rescue
On 11/12/2012 1:24 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Any ideas why it keeps waiting forever at that point?
After having left it alone for an hour or so, I found it had booted
successfully. Didn't find anything serious in /var/log/messages.
I still wonder what caused that delay.
So, red alarm
On 8/11/2012 12:59 μμ, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Hi all.
I am currently installing drbd on Centos 6.3 x86_64 and have two possible
repos to choose.
Which one in your opinion is better/provides more stable packages/etc.?
IMHO, you will have no problems whatever you choose, but note that
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
