Re: [CentOS] Ubiquiti Model UAP-AC-PRO

I would just buy a cloudkey and not have to bother installing the software onto your machine directly. If you do not have a power over ethernet switch you'll need a micro USB cable and power supply adapter to run it but after that it takes care of running your software for you you don't have to

Re: [CentOS] What's Next

That is not a concern. Ryzen is already taking the desktop market by storm. Ryzen is not an Intel design. Intel excels in single threaded performance and does very well in multi-thread workloads. Ryzen so far is at least 20 percent faster in multi-thread loads at the same price level.

[CentOS] softwarecollections.org

Who do I contact about softwarecollections being offline? I am having to bypass that repo for right now and the packets disappear in the ether on their way..:) William Warren ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Yes you would break all kinds of things. In a nutshell folks are saying you are free to try but when it blows up...you better have a total backup to restore the entire box. Your first priority should be getting whatever is holding you back from proper system updates and security out of the way.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

What constraint is requiring you to run a highly vulnerable server? On Nov 8, 2016 00:34, "Dipal Bhatt" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce > wrote: > > > On 11/7/2016 8:33 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > > > >> Unfortunately, there's

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

ALL systems need patching so obsessing about uptime is insecurity on its face. It doe not matter if it is windows or linux or anything else. On 4/30/2016 11:33 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Sat, April 30, 2016 8:54 am, William Warren wrote: uptime=insecurity. This sounds like MS Windows

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

uptime=insecurity. Patches must be kept up these days or your uptime won't matter when your server gets compromised. On 4/22/2016 4:33 AM, Rob Townley wrote: tune2fs against a LVM (albeit formatted with ext4) is not the same as tune2fs against ext4. Could this possibly be a machine where

Re: [CentOS] www.centos.org/forums/

actually that isn't true either. Just install a newer version of firefox or chrome or whatever..then you are independent of the operating system in many cases. On 3/26/2016 9:00 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: On 25.03.2016 17:29, Eero Volotinen wrote: @Eero: IMHO you are missing some

[CentOS] ssh issues with centos 6

I have a new centos 6 install. Randomly i get out of memory messages and my ssh file transfer dies. I have tried this in filezilla as well as winscp. I have disabled motd in ssh and i also had entropy problems so i enacted rngd -r /dev/urandom -o /dev/random but did not stop the out of memory

Re: [CentOS] Good Anti-virus for Linux desktops and servers

On 8/15/2012 3:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote: the only method I know that works consistently is to block all direct web and ssl access and force use of a web proxy, so the SSL is between the remote server and the proxy server, which is your security gateway. The way I've handled this in previous

Re: [CentOS] Good Anti-virus for Linux desktops and servers

. Thanks GM On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:02 PM, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: On 8/13/2012 12:25 AM, Gregory Machin wrote: Hi. I'm look for an enterprise quality Anti-virus / Malware for my Linux machines . Mostly Ubuntu on the desktop, CentOS and RHEL

Re: [CentOS] Good Anti-virus for Linux desktops and servers

On 8/13/2012 12:25 AM, Gregory Machin wrote: Hi. I'm look for an enterprise quality Anti-virus / Malware for my Linux machines . Mostly Ubuntu on the desktop, CentOS and RHEL servers. I must have real time scanning, on demand scanning, and centralized management. Is there anything out

Re: [CentOS] A problem with power outages

On 3/25/2012 2:39 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Ryan Wagoner wrote: Additionally if your computer BIOS supports configuring the AC recovery power mode to always on, the computer will start back up. Most default to last state, which doesn't work as well since shutting down will power off the

Re: [CentOS] A problem with power outages

get a ups that has a usb connection. What you can do then is when you loose power after x amount of time the ups software will gracefully shutdown the server automatically. some ups software will even start the server back up once a sufficient charge has been obtained. On 3/24/2012 7:33 AM,

Re: [CentOS] md raid 10

will come back to centos6..:) Centos 6 is great but it's not right for this particluar machine..:( On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:29 AM, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: why will Centos 6 not boot

Re: [CentOS] md raid 10

: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they are doing that allows that to boot. That ubuntu version has probably switched to grub2. Good luck debugging it when

[CentOS] md raid 10

why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID1 with CentOS-6.2

What's funny is WD is just being idiotic. Seagate does NOT have that extended error checking. I have two barracuda green drives in an sbs 2k8 server on a sas 6 ir and they work perfectly. On 2/29/2012 3:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Miguel Medalha wrote: A few months ago I had an enormous

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID1 with CentOS-6.2

first off..if you are using the on bios raid turn it off. Secondly black drives form WD intentionally put themselves into deep cycle diags every so often. This makes them impossible to use in hardware and FRAID setups. I have 4 of them in raid 10 under mdraid and i had to disable bios raid

Re: [CentOS] SSD Drives

On 2/2/2012 5:19 PM, Peter A wrote: On 02/02/12 17:01, William Warren wrote: On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote: If you're worried about io reliability, then buy a (way more expensive) SLC drive, rather than the consumer level MLC... We have some SLC drives here that from their manufacturer

Re: [CentOS] SSD Drives

On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote: Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each

Re: [CentOS] SSD Drives

On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote: On 02/02/12 14:05, Mike wrote: On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote: On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote: Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would solve my I

Re: [CentOS] Is avahi essential?

On 1/11/2012 6:42 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Rilindo Foster wrote: So I looked up avahi on the web, but as far as I could see it is not doing anything essential; so I was wondering if stopping avahi-daemon would have any bad effect? Avahi is a mdns daemon. You can safely disable it in most

Re: [CentOS] Disable autoneg on r8169?

On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full duplex. 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot: Any other ideas? udev rules? mii-tool? ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/30/2011 8:33 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: On Sunday, October 30, 2011 08:38 PM, William Warren wrote: Or move to another distro that has timely security updates and long term support like Centos. What...Ubuntu LTS? ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 9:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 10/21/2011 06:25 AM, Steve Walsh wrote: On 10/21/2011 10:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Vreme: 10/21/2011 12:25 PM, Fajar Priyanto pis(e: As far as I am aware, how I understood official explanation, packages that are introduced in CR repo

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 10:17 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:02, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Giles Coochey wrote: So Centos 6.0 is EOL? not familiar with the rhel life cycle are you? Read this: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

On 10/21/2011 12:54 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote: Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now, you updated to a point release, then,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0

On 8/28/2011 12:43 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Always Learning Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 12:31 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 On Sun, 2011-08-28 at

Re: [CentOS] UPS issues with PFC PSU

On 8/24/2011 10:28 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Rudi Ahlersr...@softdux.com wrote: Because the original post made no mention of CentOS at all. At least that's my guess and that's also the first impression I had about the post. Sorry I should have initially

Re: [CentOS] Problem getting eth0 up

Is there a technical reason...like the system won't network at all.. as to not removing network manager? On 8/17/2011 9:58 AM, Lisandro Grullon wrote: Alfred, I would not delete network manager, it would be better if you stop it service NetworkManager stop and disable from booting chkconfig

Re: [CentOS] hardware isues

On 8/17/2011 9:59 AM, lists-centos wrote: Original Message Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 01:33:39 PM + From: lists-centos To: William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] hardware isues Original Message

Re: [CentOS] hardware isues

On 8/14/2011 6:39 AM, lists-centos wrote: did you add the broadcom card, or did it come installed? i'm wondering if there's some type of conflict between it and the onboard NICs. Original Message Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 11:29:25 PM -0400 From: William

Re: [CentOS] instlaling onto mdadm centos 6

On 8/13/2011 7:40 AM, B.J. McClure wrote: On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 00:01 -0400, William Warren wrote: I am attempting to use mdraid for booting my machine but it never does. Does the centos 5 guide for linux software raid work for centos 6? Dunno, but boot partition must be raid 1. Grub does

[CentOS] hardware isues

I have a broadcom bcm5722 and a dual intel pro/1000 pt nic in a dell t110. The setup sees the cards and i put them into automatic mode. After the install no cards are detected at all. Astaro 8.01 detects and utilizes all of these cards just fine. I have also tried ubuntu server 10.04 lts

[CentOS] instlaling onto mdadm centos 6

I am attempting to use mdraid for booting my machine but it never does. Does the centos 5 guide for linux software raid work for centos 6? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] managing a rack full of centos servers

On 7/19/2011 7:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote: to date, I've done all my administration on a manual 1 at a time basis, as each system has been pretty much unique. its looking like I might need to setup a deployment of a dozen or 2 basically identical machines, all running pretty much the same

Re: [CentOS] firewall?

On 7/16/2011 12:33 AM, hadi motamedi wrote: Dear All I need to put my centos 5.6 server as firewall server in fron of a windows-running node before connecting it to the net. Can you please let me know what stuff do I need to put on my centos server? Thank you

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Server has no GUI

On 7/11/2011 10:43 AM, Keith Beeby wrote: Hi, So first daft question with Centos 6 (someone had to be first!) I've setup Centos 6 as a Server but as with Centos 5 it used to boot into the GUI but v6 doesn't do this, startx etc doesn't seem to work to launch the GUI Any suggestions on how

Re: [CentOS] How much SWAP Space.

On 7/6/2011 9:17 PM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: Hi, I have loaded CentOS 5.6 on HP DL 180G6 2U Rack Server and the physical RAM is 32 GB. As per http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/ch-swapspace.html It says it should be 1 x of Physical RAM or less. Not sure about the less

Re: [CentOS] 1U firewall hardware

On 5/15/2011 5:26 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote: You can use something like this Atom 525 dual core motherboard: http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/NF99.html Or this Atom C550 dual core board: http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/NC9C.html With the AD3INLAN-G daughterboard:

[CentOS] status of 5.6 updates

There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues for 5.6. I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] status of 5.6 updates

On 4/13/2011 5:20 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: William Warren wrote: There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues for 5.6. I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Download the repo DAG of CentOS 5.5

On 4/3/2011 2:33 PM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote: Yes, I know that, but I want to download for make a local repository On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 14:25 -0400, Winter wrote: On 4/3/2011 2:12 PM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote: hello somebody might help to create a script to download the repo DAG of

Re: [CentOS] question on software raid

On 4/1/2011 11:32 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors my .02 i would replace the drive. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] check memory configuration

What's there way to do this? AKA is there a proc command that will show me what chips i have installed in a server without having to crack the case? Just a general pointer is fine..:) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] check memory configuration

On 3/28/2011 5:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: William Warren wrote: What's there way to do this? AKA is there a proc command that will show me what chips i have installed in a server without having to crack the case? Just a general pointer is fine..:) lshw, dmidecode, cat'ing files in /proc

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 arecausing EPEL incompatibilities [OT]

On 3/21/2011 6:19 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: Now I have read this thread twice. :( -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - -

Re: [CentOS] Duplicate Mails

On 3/21/2011 7:53 PM, Max Hetrick wrote: On 03/21/2011 05:57 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Apologies if this caused any inconveniences. No apology necessary from you. Much appreciated for fixing it quickly, Ralph. If anyone is using Thunderbird, there's a handy add-on called Remove Duplicate

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: . I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with RH for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers installable binaries for free. Yes, but patches (support) cost money,

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 6:02 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote: On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: . I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with RH for RH and RH-based

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 7:00 PM, compdoc wrote: It'll be either Debian or Ubuntu from now on. Ubuntu makes a great server. But because of recent news I tried opensuse for the first time and I really like it. I understand the need for stability, but for what I do, having the newest (stable) kernel and

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 7:11 PM, compdoc wrote: to which news are you referring about ubuntu-wise? I meant recent redhat news about the change in how it will deliver code to the community. They mentioned opensuse as being a competitor, I believe. ___

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 7:29 PM, compdoc wrote: their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and Somehow a story led me to try opensuse. Sorry, don't know which it was that I read. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

On 3/20/2011 10:44 PM, Marko A. Jennings wrote: On Sun, March 20, 2011 7:29 pm, William Warren wrote: their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and mirrors..:) oracle is basically(pardon me here) Centos with charges. That's basically all oracle is going with unbreakable

Re: [CentOS] php53-5.3.3-1.el5_6.1

On 3/19/2011 8:42 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: Curious I do not see the php53 in the yum centos 5 repositories. Has this package been excluded? http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/php53-5.3. 3-1.el5_6.1.src.rpm

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 does not recognise SAS drives with LSI 1068E Controller

On 3/9/2011 12:10 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote: Hi, On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Some controllers want to map arrays to volumes and present the volumes to the OS instead of drives, so you have to go through the motions of assigning the resources to

[CentOS] KVM Question

..:) Thanks, William Warren ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Samba quota for AD users

AFAIK Samba doesn't directly support quotas..you CAN however setup quotas using the linux Filesystem quota manager. I'm a wimp and use webmin most times for that..:) of course i do NOT have that exposed externally(that's what vpn's are for..G.) On 3/1/2011 11:20 AM, John Hodrien wrote: On

Re: [CentOS] Alternative to cPanel

On 2/23/2011 9:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote: Hello all, I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my own on a Debian box he colo'd running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom built httpd/mysql/etc

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

On 2/21/2011 12:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ? Dag, The

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

On 2/21/2011 1:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org wrote: This is the last post I am making to this thread ... and maybe to this list in general. During the build processes, here are the files that we have had to add (at various

Re: [CentOS] server specifications

On 2/14/2011 12:29 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampenrkam...@kampensonline.com wrote: Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn in the ssytem

Re: [CentOS] Package updates for 5.4?

On 1/26/2011 8:35 PM, Mitch Patenaude wrote: We're running a large cluster, and are leery of upgrading them all to 5.5, but would like to find the latest security patches. Is there a repo for this? I can't seem to find a 5.4 specific update repo with anything since last March. Is 5.4 EOL'd?

Re: [CentOS] Let's talk about compression rates

On 1/22/2011 5:45 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote: On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote: I am sure there is a more relevant list you could take something of this nature to. Hi Karanbir can you name me a list for general Open Source discussions? thanks cheers

Re: [CentOS] how to convert 7 cd iso images into one dvd image?

On 1/14/2011 9:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 01/14/11 5:29 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: Home ISP blocking bittorrent; company now blocks bittorrent. I want/need an old release (CentOS 5.2) to install as a VirtualBox guest. I suppose I could install from the cd iso images, but it is a pain to

Re: [CentOS] Server unresponsive until reboot, memory exhausted

On 12/28/2010 5:18 PM, Nataraj wrote: On 12/28/2010 01:41 PM, james wrote: Do you have everything *else* updated? And what kind of web service are you running? There's a lot of third party freeware and commercial tools that was not written with any kind of resource management in mind, and

Re: [CentOS] lvm 1 drive fails whole vol data lost

On 12/26/2010 11:04 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wagonerrswago...@gmail.com wrote: RAID 5 does provide speed increases for read operations. There are still some applications where RAID 5 has its benefits. For a smaller department file server 3-4 TB drives in RAID

Re: [CentOS] lvm 1 drive fails whole vol data lost

On 12/24/2010 7:57 AM, Markandeya wrote: Dear Friends of CentOS, I read a reply by John R Pierce, Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk December 04, 2010 01:30PM do you realize that if any one of those 4 miscellaneous drives fails, you lose the whole volume? Can anyone confirm this? and thank you to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6

On 12/20/2010 3:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: *sigh* I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting close? mark ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] SATA NCQ and Linux Software RAID

On 12/20/2010 5:40 PM, Matt wrote: Does SATA Native Command Queueing and Linux software RAID1 play well together or is it better to turn off NCQ when doing software RAID? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] What NAS device(s) do you use? And why?

On 12/11/2010 11:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or home theater system. We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but I'm in the market for

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

On 12/8/2010 9:13 AM, Christopher Chan wrote: On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 09:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 12/8/10 4:22 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: On 30/11/10 03:52, cpol...@surewest.net wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: [...snip...] As was already mentioned in another

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

On 12/1/2010 2:12 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: Hello listmates, As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224 So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

On 12/1/2010 2:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu wrote: On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote: On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there are

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

On 12/1/2010 2:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu wrote: On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote: On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there are

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

On 11/28/2010 8:15 AM, Bob McConnell wrote: Marko Vojinovic wrote: On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:21 PM, John R. Dennisonj...@gerdesas.com wrote: You run it in Permissive mode, you deal with the exceptions as they arise

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

On 11/28/2010 7:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bob McConnellrmcco...@lightlink.com wrote: Marko Vojinovic wrote: On Sunday 28 November 2010 13:15:24 Bob McConnell wrote: Marko Vojinovic wrote: On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from RHEL 6 beta ?

On 11/23/2010 9:18 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote: Hi again ! I am begining to play with my new servers. I got for starter 2 nodes (1u intel server platform, with a LSI Logic FC949ES FC card). I am like a child playing with his new toys at christmas... I can't wait for CentOS 6 to come out. I do

[CentOS] RHEL Released

It's on their website right now. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

On 10/31/2010 3:27 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: Hi All. Yesterday I was installing Centos 5.5 to my web server, and it looks like the main hard drive has gone AWOL. Fedora 12 put the file system into r/o mode. The drive is an Hitachi, still under warranty. There are bad sectors on it, and

[CentOS] netinstlal question

my church just got some ibm x335's donated. Cent 5 is only relaly dvd's. I do have a windows server using IIS for internal stuff. How would i setup a local repo for the dvd so i can point the net install iso to the windows box? ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit

On 7/14/2010 1:16 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: On 7/14/10, William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a linux system.

[CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit

I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network interfaces in the Kernel? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit

On 7/13/2010 9:11 PM, Ross Walker wrote: On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotineneero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote: 2010/7/14 William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com: I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the

Re: [CentOS] Simple solution for small network in a school ?

On 7/10/2010 10:59 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: Hi, I have to install a small network in a school in a nearby village. The network will be Linux-only, one server and fifteen desktops. Here's the idea. 1) Authentication should be managed centrally on the server. 2) User home directories should

Re: [CentOS] Intel ICH10R on CentOS 5.4

On 6/9/2010 7:44 PM, nate wrote: Hey there.. I was wondering if anyone could share experiences they have had with the Intel ICH10R SATA controller? I tried looking around but all I could find were RAID references, I have no interest in using the RAID functionality just basic SATA JBOD.

Re: [CentOS] Intel ICH10R on CentOS 5.4

On 6/9/2010 8:27 PM, John R Pierce wrote: William Warren wrote: jsut put the bios into sata or ata mode and not raid..then the raid functionality is zero..: even when its enabled, the raid functionaliy of the ICH??R chips is zero. :) enabling RAID in the BIOS simply sets

Re: [CentOS] Is every CentOS release supported for 7 years?

On 5/22/2010 3:39 PM, Aniruddha wrote: Coming from Gentoo - Debian I am to trying to understand the way CentOS works. In Debian very little happens in stable releases and you use apt-get update to apply security updates and apt-get dist-upgrade for a major upgrade. In CentOS there is an

Re: [CentOS] downgrade

On 4/2/2010 2:22 PM, mattias wrote: i no i can upgrade centos the new version but can i downgrade? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Backup and reload..

Re: [CentOS] Release 6?

I'm not surprised at the delay for RHEL 6. Consider 2.x is still supported this means they are supporting 4 different RHEL versions right now. I would actually wait until at least 2.x dies..if not maybe 3.x before spitting out another version. On 4/1/2010 7:16 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: On

[CentOS] testing

Having list issues..sorry. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] release

On 3/21/2010 9:31 AM, mattias wrote: I upgraded my centos from 5.0 to 5.4 But i still see 5.0 n the version number ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos did you reboot?

Re: [CentOS] what causes CUPS to dis-enable a printer?

On 2/10/2010 9:15 AM, Robert Heller wrote: At Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:37:28 -0600 CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org wrote: In our computer lab, there are 6 Centos 5.4 workstations. There is an HP printer with jet direct card. It often works. But sometimes users come and get me saying

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization - what do You recommend?

On 2/2/2010 6:20 AM, Rafa? Radecki wrote: Hi All. I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to use one of the following options: - KVM; - VMWare Esxi; - VMWare Workstation. I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something like LVM snapshots for

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

On 1/11/2010 1:33 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 1/11/2010 11:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote: Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: It seems X4500 (not available anymore) had Marvell SATA controllers, that are not supported with RHEL5. And those marvell controllers caused major grief for Sun,

Re: [CentOS] [OT] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

On 1/7/2010 9:30 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote: On 01/06/2010 09:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: Hello everyone, This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set up some storage servers to run

[CentOS] upgrade adivce

are appreciated..:) Sincerely, William Warren ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] upgrade adivce

On 12/30/2009 8:23 PM, Corey Chandler wrote: William Warren wrote: I have a new client that is running a fedora 4 system. Can i upgrade that box to centos 5 with a reasonable expectation of success or should i just back it up and do it from scratch? Also will the samba version

Re: [CentOS] storage servers crashing, hair being pulled out!

I'm looking at the controller myself. Have you tried updating either the firmware on the card the drivers or both? On 12/19/2009 10:55 PM, Gordon McLellan wrote: The other variable is the two machines running drbd have promise raid cards in them. I also have the same raid card in my personal

  1   2   >