[CentOS] how to install opencl on centos 6.7

Hi, I'm building x264, and want to use opencl acceleration function. How to install opencl on centos 6.7 to support intel integrated GPUs for 'Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3'? Thanks! Regards andrew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] how to install opencl on centos 6.7

Hi, I'm building x264, and want to use opencl acceleration function. How to install opencl on centos 6.7 to support intel integrated cpu for 'Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3'? Thanks! Regards andrew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Vault missing CentOS 6.7

> On Aug 1, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Jonathan Billings <billi...@negate.org> wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2016, at 5:32 PM, Will McKeon <wmck...@circadence.com> wrote: >> I needed to pull some rpms from the CentOS 6.7 vault for compatibility >> testing. I noticed that 6.7

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Vault missing CentOS 6.7

On Aug 1, 2016, at 5:32 PM, Will McKeon <wmck...@circadence.com> wrote: > I needed to pull some rpms from the CentOS 6.7 vault for compatibility > testing. I noticed that 6.7 wasn't in the Vault repo file yet, but that the > repos exist. I was just wondering what the ETA is for

[CentOS] CentOS-Vault missing CentOS 6.7

Hey all, I needed to pull some rpms from the CentOS 6.7 vault for compatibility testing. I noticed that 6.7 wasn't in the Vault repo file yet, but that the repos exist. I was just wondering what the ETA is for the Vault repo file to be updated with 6.7. Thanks

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

Thu Jul 28 17:39:16 UTC 2016 , m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > What I > used to do was ssh-add -s libcoolkeypk11.so. It would then ask for a PIN, > and add it. Now, it still asks for the PIN, but then announces that it > failed to add it to the agent. Not sure if this is good or bad news :-/ On up

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: > Tue Jul 26 21:17:40 UTC 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I could try the reinstall, but it's very odd - everything worked, and >> now, after the upgrade, it doesn't. Oh, and here's another twist on this: >> Under 6.7, if I'd logged into my

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

Tue Jul 26 21:17:40 UTC 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I could try the reinstall, but it's very odd - everything worked, and now, > after the upgrade, it doesn't. Oh, and here's another twist on this: Under > 6.7, if I'd logged into my webmail via firefox, and while that was > happening, I

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us] >> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:15 PM >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> > >> >I am perplexed. I updated my workstation at work Wed before I left, >> > from 6.7 to 6.8. Then, yesterday, I went

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

> -Original Message- > From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us] > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:15 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info > > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Folks, > &

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Folks, > >I am perplexed. I updated my workstation at work Wed before I left, > from 6.7 to 6.8. Then, yesterday, I went to use ssh-add -s > libcoolkeypk11.so, which I've done many times before to add the certs > from my PIV card... and 100% of the time if fails,

[CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue

Folks, I am perplexed. I updated my workstation at work Wed before I left, from 6.7 to 6.8. Then, yesterday, I went to use ssh-add -s libcoolkeypk11.so, which I've done many times before to add the certs from my PIV card... and 100% of the time if fails, letting me SSH_AGENT_FAILURE, cannot

Re: [CentOS] Console screen changed on updating from CentOS 6.7 to CentOS 6.8?

On May 31, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Walter H. wrote: > > How do I get the standard console with 80x25 back? Why? Is it just because they’re VMs and you’re running them on a GUI hosted by some other OS, and you don’t want them taking a lot of screen space? Personally, I’m

[CentOS] Console screen changed on updating from CentOS 6.7 to CentOS 6.8?

Hello, I have several CentOS 6 VMs, I have updated the first one successfully, but there is one thing I miss or I don't like; How do I get the standard console with 80x25 back? Hello, this is /boot/grub/grub.conf default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title

[CentOS] Successful update from CentOS 6.7 to CentOS 6.8, but ...

Hello, I have several CentOS 6 VMs, I have updated the first one successfully, but there is one thing I miss or I don't like; How do I get the standard console with 80x25 back? this is /boot/grub/grub.conf default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for Infiniband with CentOS 6.7

for example: [andy@node01 /]$ cat /sys/class/net/ib0/address 80:00:00:48:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:78:3d:4 [andy@node01 /]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ib0 DEVICE="ib0" TYPE=Infiniband ONBOOT="yes" BOOTPROTO="static" NM_CONTROLLED="yes"

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for Infiniband with CentOS 6.7

Did You take a Look under Sys Class net? On Our Cluster i create The ifcfg Bye Hand. Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 26.05.2016 um 13:38 schrieb Peter Kjellström <c...@nsc.liu.se>: > > On Wed, 25 May 2016 11:48:55 -0400 > Pat Haley <pha...@mit.edu> wrote: > >>

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for Infiniband with CentOS 6.7

On Wed, 25 May 2016 11:48:55 -0400 Pat Haley <pha...@mit.edu> wrote: > We have a new install of CentOS 6.7 with infiniband support > installed. We can see the card in hardware and we can see the mlx4 > drivers loaded in the kernel but cannot see the card as an ethernet > interfa

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for Infiniband with CentOS 6.7

We have a new install of CentOS 6.7 with infiniband support installed. We can see the card in hardware and we can see the mlx4 drivers loaded in the kernel but cannot see the card as an ethernet interface, using ifconfig -a. Can you recommend an install procedure to see this as an ethernet

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for Infiniband with CentOS 6.7

On 25/05/16 03:08, Pat Haley wrote: > > Hi All, > > We looking for suggestions on dealing with mellanox drivers in CentOS 6.7 > > We tried installing mellanox drivers > (MLNX_OFED_LINUX-3.2-2.0.0.0-rhel6.7-x86_64) on a Quanta Cirrascale > server running Centos 6.7 - 2.

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for Infiniband with CentOS 6.7

On Tue, 24 May 2016 21:08:27 -0400 Pat Haley <pha...@mit.edu> wrote: > Hi All, > > We looking for suggestions on dealing with mellanox drivers in CentOS > 6.7 Unless you really need a specific feature in MOFED I'd recommend you stay with the, so called, in-box drivers already

[CentOS] Recommendations for Infiniband with CentOS 6.7

Hi All, We looking for suggestions on dealing with mellanox drivers in CentOS 6.7 We tried installing mellanox drivers (MLNX_OFED_LINUX-3.2-2.0.0.0-rhel6.7-x86_64) on a Quanta Cirrascale server running Centos 6.7 - 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64. When we rebooted the machine after installing

Re: [CentOS] DOS line ends on /var/log/boot.log on CentOS 6.7 ?

Recently, I'm seeing DOS line ends, ^M, on my /var/log/boot.log file. Honestly, I don't check this very often so I can't say exactly when this occurred. Is this just MY experience or are others seeing this also. I checked a C6 /var/log/boot.log from 5 years ago and ^M chars are there all

Re: [CentOS] DOS line ends on /var/log/boot.log on CentOS 6.7 ?

On 05/19/2016 09:56 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: Hello all -- Recently, I'm seeing DOS line ends, ^M, on my /var/log/boot.log file. Honestly, I don't check this very often so I can't say exactly when this occurred. Is this just MY experience or are others seeing this also. Additionally, boot/log

Re: [CentOS] DOS line ends on /var/log/boot.log on CentOS 6.7 ?

On 19.05.2016 18:56, Kay Schenk wrote: Hello all -- Recently, I'm seeing DOS line ends, ^M, on my /var/log/boot.log file. Honestly, I don't check this very often so I can't say exactly when this occurred. Is this just MY experience or are others seeing this also. this file shows ident content,

[CentOS] DOS line ends on /var/log/boot.log on CentOS 6.7 ?

Hello all -- Recently, I'm seeing DOS line ends, ^M, on my /var/log/boot.log file. Honestly, I don't check this very often so I can't say exactly when this occurred. Is this just MY experience or are others seeing this also. Additionally, boot/log seems very sparse. Is an old issue still in

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/11/2016 11:44 AM, Patrick Rael wrote: >> On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: >>> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <pr...@lumeta.com> >>> said: >>>>Is there an ETA on the openssl s

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

On 05/11/2016 11:44 AM, Patrick Rael wrote: > On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <pr...@lumeta.com> >> said: >> >>> Hi, >>> Is there an ETA on the openssl sec

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

On 05/11/2016 11:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Patrick Rael wrote: On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <pr...@lumeta.com> said: Hi, Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for Cent

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) >>>> for CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on >>>> 5/9, eagerly awaiting the same for 6.7. >>>> >>> Looks like R

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

Patrick Rael wrote: > On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <pr...@lumeta.com> >> said: >> >>> Hi, >>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for &g

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <pr...@lumeta.com> said: Hi, Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly a

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

On Wed, 11 May 2016 09:20:54 -0600 Patrick Rael <pr...@lumeta.com> wrote: > Hi, > Is there an ETA on the openssl security update > (CVE-2016-0799) for CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for > CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly awaiting > the same for 6.7. The fi

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

On Wed, 11 May 2016, Steve Snyder wrote: On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <pr...@lumeta.com> said: Hi, Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly awaiting

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <pr...@lumeta.com> said: > Hi, > Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for > CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly > awaiting > the same for 6.7. &

[CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

Hi, Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly awaiting the same for 6.7. Thanks! -->Pat ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org ht

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.7 problem updating kernel

On Mon May 9 2016 15:24:20 UTC, Jonathan Billings wrote: > >>On Mon, May 9, 2016 10:26, James B. Byrne wrote: >> >> Any ideas as to what happened and how to fix it? >> > > It looks like your package update was interrupted by a > SIGHUP signal (that's what the Hangup is from). The > %posttrans

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.7 problem updating kernel

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:26:06AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > > We have four identical hardware system. On one of them the most > recent kernel update yields this error: > > # yum history info 332 > [...] > Scriptlet output: >1 error: %posttrans(kernel-2.6.32-573.26.1.el6.x86_64)

[CentOS] CentOS-6.7 problem updating kernel

We have four identical hardware system. On one of them the most recent kernel update yields this error: # yum history info 332 Loaded plugins: etckeeper, fastestmirror, priorities Transaction ID : 332 Begin time : Wed May 4 10:21:07 2016 Begin rpmdb:

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.7: kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label "": (..... (Correctable Patrol Data ECC))

Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 12:15:21 PM, you wrote: DL> After update from centos 6.6 to centos 6.7 and reboot it, I have get a DL> lot of this error into /var/log/messages: >> May  3 11:27:20 s-virt kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label >> "": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.7: kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label "": (..... (Correctable Patrol Data ECC))

Il giorno mar, 03/05/2016 alle 12.15 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto: > After update from centos 6.6 to centos 6.7 and reboot it, I have get > a > lot of this error into /var/log/messages: > > > > > May  3 11:27:20 s-virt kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label >

[CentOS] Centos 6.7: kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label "": (..... (Correctable Patrol Data ECC))

After update from centos 6.6 to centos 6.7 and reboot it, I have get a lot of this error into /var/log/messages: > May  3 11:27:20 s-virt kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label > "": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=2 RDWR=Read RAS=6093 CAS=896, CE Err=0x1 > (Correctable Patrol

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

On 04/28/2016 07:51 AM, isdtor wrote: > Johnny Hughes writes: > [...] >> I should have the CentOS-6 (and CentOS-5) version of Firefox 45 out in a >> couple of minutes .. currently building metadata and testing them on >> https://ci.centos.org/ > > Broken, at least on CentOS5. The same file/addon

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

Johnny Hughes writes: [...] > I should have the CentOS-6 (and CentOS-5) version of Firefox 45 out in a > couple of minutes .. currently building metadata and testing them on > https://ci.centos.org/ Broken, at least on CentOS5. The same file/addon download problem that has plagued every new

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

te: >>>>> The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it fails on >>>>> CentOS >>>>> 6.7. >>>>> >>>>> I know there is the ESR release supplied by upstream, but that is >>>>> based on >>>

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

> I should have the CentOS-6 (and CentOS-5) version of Firefox 45 out in a > couple of minutes .. currently building metadata and testing them on > https://ci.centos.org/ Btw. this is the first ESR after the controversial removal of the "ask me every time" cookie policy. When the new browser

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Johnny Hughes <joh...@centos.org> wrote: > On 04/27/2016 09:23 AM, James Pearson wrote: > > Phil Wyett wrote: > >> On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:27 -0400, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >>> The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

On 04/27/2016 09:23 AM, James Pearson wrote: > Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:27 -0400, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it fails on >>> CentOS >>> 6.7. >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

Phil Wyett wrote: On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:27 -0400, Phelps, Matthew wrote: The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it fails on CentOS 6.7. I know there is the ESR release supplied by upstream, but that is based on version 38. We have regularly installed the Mozilla "

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:27 -0400, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it fails on CentOS > 6.7. > > I know there is the ESR release supplied by upstream, but that is based on > version 38. We have regularly installed the Mozilla

[CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it fails on CentOS 6.7. I know there is the ESR release supplied by upstream, but that is based on version 38. We have regularly installed the Mozilla "Linux" version of Firefox in a central location for our users, and this has w

Re: [CentOS-es] Samba 4 y centos 6.7

El día 13 de marzo de 2016, 3:19, Oscar Osta Pueyo escribió: > Hola, > Si no entendí mal, usas bind, por que no usas el dns incluido en el modo ad > de samba 4. Te puede evitar problemas. > estoy usando los que recomienda samba4 BIND9_DLZ . >> > igual te interesa >> >

Re: [CentOS-es] Samba 4 y centos 6.7

no conocía nethserver, voy a echarle un vistazo, gracias! > El 13 mar 2016, a las 10:19, Oscar Osta Pueyo > escribió: > > Hola, > Si no entendí mal, usas bind, por que no usas el dns incluido en el modo ad > de samba 4. Te puede evitar problemas. > > Tema

Re: [CentOS-es] Samba 4 y centos 6.7

El día 10 de marzo de 2016, 14:05, Ricardo escribió: > igual te interesa > > http://www.zentyal.org/server/ > > hay una edición de pago y otra es de la comunidad. > > gracias , lo estoy considerando como un plan B , pero quiero encontrar el problema del plan a :) --

Re: [CentOS-es] Samba 4 y centos 6.7

igual te interesa http://www.zentyal.org/server/ hay una edición de pago y otra es de la comunidad. > El 10 mar 2016, a las 18:57, Ricky Gutierrez > escribió: > > Hola lista , estoy intentando montar un ad con samba4 y los paquetes > de sernet , he realizado lo que

[CentOS-es] Samba 4 y centos 6.7

Hola lista , estoy intentando montar un ad con samba4 y los paquetes de sernet , he realizado lo que manda la doc , el detalle esta que al unir la maquina al dominio no reconoce la zona dns interna creada con el ad. haciendo las pruebas en el servidor todo me apunta que esta correcto: smbclient

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

On 03/07/16 09:06, Johnny Hughes wrote: > This it is a very easy process to create an installable usb key: > -- yes, it is. for some reason or other, i seldom remember to use it. too much using gui desktop. ;-) for sure, this reply and reply from John R Pierce are being added to my 'tricks and

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

On 03/07/16 01:54, John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/6/2016 8:25 PM, g wrote: >> ok. so how about; >> >>yum shell install < pkginstalllist.file > > > yum install $(cat pkginstallist.file) > or > yum install `cat pkginstallist.file` > > should work unless that list is stupid long. > --

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 08/03/16 02:45 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 19:36, Digimer wrote: > >> On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856 > > What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 8 March 2016 at 19:36, Digimer wrote: > On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856 > >>> > >>> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock > >> ... > >>> got to be down to how the build

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856 >>> >>> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock >> ... >>> got to be down to how the build roots are constructed. >>> >>> Decided to do a quick test of something

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 8 March 2016 at 19:13, Digimer wrote: > On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote: > >>> >

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer wrote: > >> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote: >>> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer wrote: > On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote: > >>> >

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote: > >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote: >>> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote: > On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster >

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote: > >> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster >> wrote: >>> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote: > On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster > wrote: > > > >> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer : > >>> I'm not surprised, given that it is

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster wrote: > >> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer : >>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking >>> if anyone tried building it

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer : > > I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking > > if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the > > same

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer : > I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking > if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the > same issue as I describe below? > > Alternatively, any tips/advice on solving my build

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

On 8 Mar 2016 00:51, "Digimer" wrote: > > I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking > if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the > same issue as I describe below? > > Alternatively, any tips/advice on solving my build

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, 8 March, 2016 00:05:59 >> Subject: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7? > >> Hi all, >> >> I was trying to rebuild mtr >> (http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Sourc

Re: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

entos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 8 March, 2016 00:05:59 > Subject: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7? > Hi all, > > I was trying to rebuild mtr > (http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/mtr-0.75-5.el6.src.rpm) > and I keep getting: > > &g

[CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?

Hi all, I was trying to rebuild mtr (http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/mtr-0.75-5.el6.src.rpm) and I keep getting: Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gu9Ds0 + umask 022 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + '[' /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mtr-0.75-5.el6.x86_64 '!=' / ']' +

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

This it is a very easy process to create an installable usb key: 1. Download the iso file from a mirror. 2. Check the sha256sum with this from the command line: sha256sum 3. verify the output is the same as this list (for CentOS-6.7): http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.7/isos/x86_64

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

On 3/6/2016 8:25 PM, g wrote: ok. so how about; yum shell install < pkginstalllist.file yum install $(cat pkginstallist.file) or yum install `cat pkginstallist.file` should work unless that list is stupid long. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

> Date: Sunday, March 06, 2016 22:25:55 -0600 > From: g > > On 03/06/16 22:15, Richard wrote: > <<>> > >> "shell" is a yum command, invoked as shown below. I don't believe >> there is any program called "yum-shell" (even though that is the >> man page reference). >> >>

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

On 03/06/16 22:15, Richard wrote: <<>> > "shell" is a yum command, invoked as shown below. I don't believe > there is any program called "yum-shell" (even though that is the man > page reference). > >shell Is used to enter the 'yum shell', when a filename is >specified the

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

talled 6.5 dvd1 on >> my laptop without any problems. > > It contains the packages on the media. Netinstalls grab the latest > versions of the packages. If you do a netinstall, and then a yum > upgrade after rebooting, nothing needs to be updated. If you download > eve

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

wording being >> that netinstall has been a part of last 2 or 3 versions. >> >> 'selection on default'? do not recall seeing anything related to such. > > OK I just ran the CentOS 6.7 netinstall ISO in gnome-boxes and it's > not the graphical anaconda that I'm used t

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

> Date: Sunday, March 06, 2016 21:32:15 -0600 > From: g > > On 03/06/16 19:19, Richard wrote: >>> Date: Sunday, March 06, 2016 17:12:24 -0600 >>> From: g >>> On 03/06/16 14:48, Richard wrote: >>> <<>> You may want to look at the yum "shell"

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

On 03/06/16 19:19, Richard wrote: >> Date: Sunday, March 06, 2016 17:12:24 -0600 >> From: g >> On 03/06/16 14:48, Richard wrote: >> <<>> >>> You may want to look at the yum "shell" option (man yum-shell). >>> >> interesting. >> >> would you presume that something like this

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

and yum group list hidden and then yum group install "group name goes here" "another group name goes here" > > something else interesting about fresh install, i installed 6.5 dvd1 on > my laptop without any problems. It contains the packages on the media. Netin

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

part > of last 2 or 3 versions. > > 'selection on default'? do not recall seeing anything related to such. OK I just ran the CentOS 6.7 netinstall ISO in gnome-boxes and it's not the graphical anaconda that I'm used to with Fedora. There's an "installation method" and it

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

> Date: Sunday, March 06, 2016 17:12:24 -0600 > From: g > > On 03/06/16 14:48, Richard wrote: > <<>> > >> You may want to look at the yum "shell" option (man yum-shell). >> > -- > > interesting. > > would you presume that something like this might run? > > yum-shell

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

Using boot pxe or netinstall with online mirror ;) Em 06/03/2016 8:12 PM, "g" escreveu: > > > On 03/06/16 14:48, Richard wrote: > <<>> > > > You may want to look at the yum "shell" option (man yum-shell). > > > -- > > interesting. > > would you presume that something like

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

On 03/06/16 14:48, Richard wrote: <<>> > You may want to look at the yum "shell" option (man yum-shell). > -- interesting. would you presume that something like this might run? yum-shell install < pkg-list.file > The dvd iso and netinstall approaches are very different. The dvd has >

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

> Date: Saturday, March 05, 2016 22:27:36 -0600 > From: g > > what got bombed was originally installed as 4.5 via dvd. so i have > not had 'joy' of knowing the problems of a fresh install in a while. > > i am glad to say that by chance, day before problems i did run a >

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

On 03/05/16 20:22, Fred Smith wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:48:17PM -0600, g wrote: >> >> >> On 03/05/16 09:04, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> You don't say how you created the media. >>> >> -- >> >> true, i did not say how i created cd's. > >> so you are saying that netinstall is incorrectly

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:48:17PM -0600, g wrote: > > > On 03/05/16 09:04, Chris Murphy wrote: > > You don't say how you created the media. > > > -- > > true, i did not say how i created cd's. > so you are saying that netinstall is incorrectly written because it ask > for a cd and not an

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

On 03/05/16 09:04, Chris Murphy wrote: > You don't say how you created the media. > -- true, i did not say how i created cd's. i used k3b as it is easier, less to remember, than using command line. usb's sticks were created using unetbootin and fedora-liveusb-creator. yes, i did not mention

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

> > > You don't say how you created the media. Also netinstall used the network as source, not from CD/DVD. So you should just leave the source selection on default. Chris Murphy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

- Mail original - > De: "g" <gel...@bellsouth.net> > À: "centos" <centos@centos.org> > Envoyé: Jeudi 3 Mars 2016 23:46:10 > Objet: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue > system: hp compact dc7800 dual 64

[CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue

system: hp compact dc7800 dual 64 bit cd/dvd: oem sata-- recognized as atapi dvd c dh48c2s sata5 cd/dvd: lg gp60ns50 usb dvd -- recognized as hl-dt-st dvdram gp60ns50 attempting install using centos 6.7 x86_64 netinstall

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7 Drivers for Compaq Storageworks TL891 Minilibrary

On 2/17/2016 4:56 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Mustafa Mohammed<netec...@yahoo.com> said: >I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers I set one of those up many years ago, probably RHEL 3

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7 Drivers for Compaq Storageworks TL891 Minilibrary

Once upon a time, Mustafa Mohammed <netec...@yahoo.com> said: > I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on > eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers I set one of those up many years ago, probably RHEL 3 timeframe. No drivers are necessary for

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7 Drivers for Compaq Storageworks TL891 Minilibrary

On 2/17/2016 3:54 PM, Mustafa Mohammed wrote: I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers thats a /really/ old tape library, like 18 or 20 years old, was originally a DEC product before the Compaq+DEC+HP transmutation

[CentOS] CentOS 6.7 Drivers for Compaq Storageworks TL891 Minilibrary

Hello all I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers Any help in finding the drivers will be much appreciated Regards Mustafa ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https

Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Feb 15, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Mike - st257 wrote: > > > > I have not yet found a USB-to-serial adapter detected as /dev/ttyACM1. > > Try /dev/ttyUSB0 ? > > Both naming schemes are correct, depending

  1   2   >