At 15:09 -0800 28/1/15, David C. Miller wrote:
Although I hate Oracle with a fury, one good thing is that they put
all the updates they rebuild for their RHEL clone in a publicly
viewable site. I'm guessing they pay Redhat for extended support on
end of life RHEL4 to get access to the source
Hi,
For reasons which are too tiresome to bore you all with, I have an
obligation to look after a suite of legacy CentOS 4.x systems which
cannot be migrated upwards.
I note on https://access.redhat.com/articles/1332213 the following
comment from a RHN person:
We are currently working on
On Wed, January 28, 2015 5:09 pm, David C. Miller wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Simon Banton cen...@web.org.uk
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 6:10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
Hi,
For reasons
- Original Message -
From: Simon Banton cen...@web.org.uk
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 6:10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
Hi,
For reasons which are too tiresome to bore you all with, I have
On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
Saw this on the Exim List:-
SNIP
I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ?
upstream references:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2015-0235
Note that in the
On 28/01/15 06:58, Peter Lawler wrote:
despite upstream not referencing their 5th edition
in their notes.
Apologies for replying to myself on the list.
Upstream referenced the bug in their 5th edition via a link in their a
BZ, that's how I missed it from their Security Advisory page:
On Tue, January 27, 2015 2:35 pm, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
Saw this on the Exim List:-
SNIP
I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about
Packages are being built for CentOS 5, 6 7 at the moment:
https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560128242682966017
https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560138182441070592
On 27 January 2015 at 20:22, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu
wrote:
On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler
On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
Saw this on the Exim List:-
SNIP
I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ?
upstream references:
On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
Saw this on the Exim List:-
SNIP
I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ?
upstream references:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html
When I read this I
On 28/01/15 07:30, Cian Mc Govern wrote:
Packages are being built for CentOS 5, 6 7 at the moment:
https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560128242682966017
https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560138182441070592
Thanks Cian :)
Pete.
___
CentOS mailing
Saw this on the Exim List:-
From: Tony Finch dot--a...@dotat.at
Subject: [exim] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname remotely exploitable
via exim
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:33:45 +
The Exim mail server is exploitable remotely if configured to perform
extra security checks on the HELO
12 matches
Mail list logo
