Vreme: 10/12/2011 07:10 AM, Karanbir Singh piše:
Hi,
On 10/11/2011 06:23 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I do not have to read it (although I understood you the first time). My
its strange then you feel compelled to comment on something without
making an effort to even see what the other
Am 11.10.2011 11:27, schrieb Marko Weber:
Do i have to enable the epel-test repo to get itß
But test sounds not stable for me and we switched to centos for
stability.
anyone here can help me or give me any hints on drbd on centos 6?
Do i have to compile by hand?
No, use elrepo, do not
Hi Ljubomir,
i am completely confused now.
With elrepo u dont mean epel.repo or?
How do i enable this elrepo in Centos?
marko
Am 12.10.2011 12:16, schrieb Ljubomir Ljubojevic:
Vreme: 10/12/2011 07:10 AM, Karanbir Singh piše:
Hi,
On 10/11/2011 06:23 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I do
From: Marko Weber we...@zackbummfertig.de
i am completely confused now.
With elrepo u dont mean epel.repo or?
How do i enable this elrepo in Centos?
Google 'elrepo' and it is the first answer...
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Marko Weber wrote:
i am completely confused now.
With elrepo u dont mean epel.repo or?
How do i enable this elrepo in Centos?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=elrepol=1
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Bear in mind that RHEL kernel is not stock kernel,
there are number of back-ported patches in it. It is safer to use a
package with applied RHEL specific patches (if necessary) done by people
working with RHEL kernel
Hello List,
i am new to Centos and did my first install on a server.
I got it working that also looks inzo the epel repositorie.
Now i want to install DRBD. But yum search drbd returns me only a
package i dont need.
Do i have to enable the epel-test repo to get itß
But test sounds not stable
Do i have to compile by hand?
Yeah, but generate rpm's for final installation, its trivial.
http://www.drbd.org/users-guide-emb/s-build-rpm.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks Joseph,
my thought ideas behind was, i like to maintenance systems via package
manager.
Each thing you install by hand brake this.
But it sounds okay for me.
Thank you.
marko (from rainy Hamburg)
Am 11.10.2011 12:22, schrieb Joseph L. Casale:
Do i have to compile by hand?
Yeah, but
Each thing you install by hand brake this.
Did you actually read my post and the link?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Vreme: 10/11/2011 07:47 PM, Joseph L. Casale piše:
Each thing you install by hand brake this.
Did you actually read my post and the link?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I think he did,
I think he did, but he would like an package done by someone who knows
what he is doing. Bear in mind that RHEL kernel is not stock kernel,
there are number of back-ported patches in it. It is safer to use a
package with applied RHEL specific patches (if necessary) done by people
working with RHEL
Vreme: 10/12/2011 12:09 AM, Joseph L. Casale piše:
I think he did, but he would like an package done by someone who knows
what he is doing. Bear in mind that RHEL kernel is not stock kernel,
there are number of back-ported patches in it. It is safer to use a
package with applied RHEL specific
I do not have to read it (although I understood you the first time). My
production server
is not going to be a ginipig for developers.
So if I understand you correctly:
If you build and rpm from the current stable release of a package provided to
you by the people
whom know this package best
Hi,
On 10/11/2011 06:23 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I do not have to read it (although I understood you the first time). My
its strange then you feel compelled to comment on something without
making an effort to even see what the other person is talking about.
production server is not
15 matches
Mail list logo
