Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 12:51:50PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > The bug report mentioned in the message you replied to indicates that the > problem was fixed in samba's master branch with this commit: > > https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commit;h=4d5680e9ae531c6dc4d0a6687abe6293b5d4f4f2 >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

On 05/20/2017 06:10 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Six months later, now on CentOS6.9, we still see the same issue - constantly logging this message. Server packages are all up-to-date. I find multiple reports on the Internet - but no solutions. The bug report mentioned in the message you

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 16:50 +0100, isdtor wrote: > > Not sure what would cause that error message, nor have I > > experienced it. Looks like other people have seen it: > > https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=gss_init_sec_context+failed+wi > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 04:53 +, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017, 7:41 AM James B. Byrne wrote: > > > On Fri, March 10, 2017 11:57, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > > > > > > Looks like only one sector's bad. Running badblocks should, > > > > You'll need to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017, 7:41 AM James B. Byrne wrote: > On Fri, March 10, 2017 11:57, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > > > Looks like only one sector's bad. Running badblocks should, > > I think, mark that sector as bad, so the system doesn't try > > to read or write there.

Re: [CentOS] Centos-6.8 fsck and lvms

On 03/18/2017 10:46 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: When I try to run fsck on any of them I see the following error: fsck from util-linux-ng.2.17.2 e2fsck 1.41.12.(17-May-2010) fsck.ext2: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/vg. . . Once you've completed enabling the logical

[CentOS] Centos-6.8 fsck and lvms

I have a CentOS-6.8 system which has a suspected HHD failure. I have booted it into rescue mode from a CentOS-6.5 minimal install CD in order to run fsck -c on it. The system hosts several vms. I have activated the lvs associated with these vm using pvscan -s ; vgscan ; vgchange -ay. An lvscan

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

On Fri, March 10, 2017 11:57, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Looks like only one sector's bad. Running badblocks should, > I think, mark that sector as bad, so the system doesn't try > to read or write there. I've got a user whose workstation has > had a bad sector running for over a year. However,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

Talk about missing the email I wanted to reply too. Disregard... >> On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Valeri Galtsev >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, March 10, 2017 9:52 am, Warren Young wrote: On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

I get up around 0630, u can come anytime after that. I want to hit the range that morning but if I KNEW when you are arriving, I could plan around that... > On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, March 10, 2017 9:52 am, Warren Young wrote:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > On Fri, March 10, 2017 9:52 am, Warren Young wrote: >> On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: fsck's not

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

On Fri, March 10, 2017 9:52 am, Warren Young wrote: > On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> >> On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: >>> >>> fsck's not good at finding disk errors, it finds filesystem errors. >> >> If not fsck then what? > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: >> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, James B. Byrne wrote: >> >>> This indicated that a bad sector on the underlying disk system might >>> be the source of the problem. The guests were all shutdown, a >>> /forcefsck file was created on

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:32 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: >> >> fsck's not good at finding disk errors, it finds filesystem errors. > > If not fsck then what? badblocks(8). ___

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> This indicated that a bad sector on the underlying disk system might >> be the source of the problem. The guests were all shutdown, a >> /forcefsck file was created on the host system, and the host

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, James B. Byrne wrote: This indicated that a bad sector on the underlying disk system might be the source of the problem. The guests were all shutdown, a /forcefsck file was created on the host system, and the host system remotely restarted. fsck's not good at finding disk

[CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count

We have a remote warm standby system running CentOS-6.8 as a KVM system with multiple guests. One of the guests began reporting an error when running aide. Caught SIGBUS/SEGV while mmapping. File was truncated while aide was running? Caught SIGBUS/SEGV. Exiting The /var/log/messages file

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.8

well it's simple really the ssh-copy-id routine does not copy [in my case] the client /root/.ssh/id_rsa.pub to the server man says thats the default but that's not what is happening. whatever it copies allows me to run a shell script from a console without passwords but not from cron hmmm

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.8

> has something changed in cron? > has there been an update? > Have looked in all the usual places. > > any help/suggestions? The environment maybe, enable debug output on the job and redirect or make sure the output is logged or picked up and mailed to you. More than likely the ssh config that

[CentOS] Centos 6.8

I have a file on a Centos 6.8 server that I want to download to another Centos 6.8 box in a remote location. rsync used to work fine from within a shell script run by cron using ssh and having set up passwordless login on each machine the script runs fine from the command line, but not when

[CentOS] CentOS-6.8 PCI Hwdr issue?

I have begun to see these messages in my morning reports: WARNING: Kernel Errors Present pciehp :00:1c.0:pcie04: Link Training Error occurs ...: 146 Time(s) pciehp 0ng Error occurs ...: 1 Time(s) pcieport :00:1c.0: bridge window [mem 0xd0a00.0 failed with error -22

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8, Iptables 1.4.7, and MASQUERADE

On 09/20/2016 04:03 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > I have a server that is also a firewall router at a public library with > a fiber optic Internet connection. It is running kernel > 2.6.32-642.4.2.el6.x86_64 (current CentOS 6.8) and Iptables 1.4.7 > (current stock CentOS 6.8). I having trouble

[CentOS] CentOS 6.8, Iptables 1.4.7, and MASQUERADE

I have a server that is also a firewall router at a public library with a fiber optic Internet connection. It is running kernel 2.6.32-642.4.2.el6.x86_64 (current CentOS 6.8) and Iptables 1.4.7 (current stock CentOS 6.8). I having trouble with Internet throughput. I am supposed to be getting

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

Am 14.09.2016 um 17:50 schrieb isdtor : > >> Not sure what would cause that error message, nor have I experienced it. >> Looks like other people have seen it: >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

> Not sure what would cause that error message, nor have I experienced it. > Looks like other people have seen it: > https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=gss_init_sec_context+failed+with+%5BUnspecified+GSS+failure.++Minor+code+may+provide+more+information:+No+credentials+cache+found I found no

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

> > net ads keytab create -U username > > 8. Verify the contents of the Kerberos keytab file: > > klist -ke > > This is a step I was missing. What is the purpose of the keytab? Can it help > with the default ticket FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 expiration? A Kerberos keytab contains Kerberos principals and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

> You might want to take a look at "Integrating Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 with > Active Directory". It's the best document I've seen on this topic. I found > that Samba/Kerberos/Winbind is the most complete solution for attaching a > Samba fileserver in my AD environment. >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

> I have another samba server and upgraded it to samba4. testparm returns > clean with the old config (ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC) and starts up fine. smbclient > seems to work fine. > > The next thing now is to try and make it a domain member so it can auth > against AD. > > Thanks, Andrew, I appreciate

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

I have another samba server and upgraded it to samba4. testparm returns clean with the old config (ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC) and starts up fine. smbclient seems to work fine. The next thing now is to try and make it a domain member so it can auth against AD. Thanks, Andrew, I appreciate the pointers.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

> Samba 4.x is an intimidating piece of software. If it can perfrom the same > function and use the same config, I'm willing to try it. Without log messages or process table info, it's hard to advise any further. Generally speaking, Samba4 can do everything that Samba 3.6 does. If your server

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

> 1. What is your output of testparm? No errors or warnings, apart from rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) > 2. If you run top, are any Samba related processes (winbindd, smbd, etc) > consuming excessively high amounts of CPU? I did not observe this,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

> Other than the original 6.8 release version 3.6.23-33, samba has not been > functioning correctly for me under 6.8. > > The symptoms are that about 6-7 days after starting the server, users start > complaining that they can no longer open documents on their share. Upon > inspection, I find

[CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

Other than the original 6.8 release version 3.6.23-33, samba has not been functioning correctly for me under 6.8. The symptoms are that about 6-7 days after starting the server, users start complaining that they can no longer open documents on their share. Upon inspection, I find several,

[CentOS] centos 6.8 creates install to sde instead of sda

greetings one and all. when attempting to install centos 6.8 to an i386 mid tower, during setup of hard disk partitions, selection is for /dev/sde. if continued, after reboot, error is displayed after 'welcome to centos'. lines read: Checking filesystem fsck.ext4: no such file or directory

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 with current kernel fails with pm-hibernate (cifsd refuses to freeze)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 wwp kirjoitti 3.8.2016 12:36: > Hello Jari, > > > On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 23:15:21 +0300 Jari Fredriksson wrote: > >> OK. I fixed this case just by dismounting the share before hibernate, >> but I'll leave this here anyway. Just a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 with current kernel fails with pm-hibernate (cifsd refuses to freeze)

Hello Jari, On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 23:15:21 +0300 Jari Fredriksson wrote: > OK. I fixed this case just by dismounting the share before hibernate, > but I'll leave this here anyway. Just a historic note or something ;) I think this is a very common issue: cifs vs hibernation, it's

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 with current kernel fails with pm-hibernate (cifsd refuses to freeze)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK. I fixed this case just by dismounting the share before hibernate, but I'll leave this here anyway. Just a historic note or something ;) - -- ja...@iki.fi -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1

[CentOS] CentOS 6.8 with current kernel fails with pm-hibernate (cifsd refuses to freeze)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Now, this is not apparently very common to CentOS or EL server, but I need to hibernate one of myservers after a batch job daily. Current kernel appears to fail with pm-hibernate now. $ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.8 (Final) $ uname -a

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.8 GDM possible bug: can't log into another user

Hi, I am also using CentOS 6.8 but it was a pristine installation on my side, in my case everything is working fine. You may be facing this issue due to upgrade. --Regards Ashishkumar S. Yadav On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Gilbert Sebenste < seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu> wrote: > Hello

[CentOS] Centos 6.8 GDM possible bug: can't log into another user

Hello everyone, Since I upgraded to CentOS 6.8 last week, I am having an issue whereby I log out, and then it attempts to log me in as the same user. I then click on another user and try to log in, but it instantly blows me right out and back to the login prompt for the original user. I do have

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and libGL failures

On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 14:41 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x4CA90C826AC163B3 > > (my public key) Thanks. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and libGL failures

On 05/31/2016 12:44 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 15:04 +0100, isdtor wrote: > >> (Btw., Johnny, your signatures haven't verified in months. Don't know if the >> list server is the problem or our corp mail server). > > On mine I get "Signature exists, but need public

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and libGL failures

On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 15:04 +0100, isdtor wrote: > (Btw., Johnny, your signatures haven't verified in months. Don't know if the > list server is the problem or our corp mail server). On mine I get "Signature exists, but need public key" -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and libGL failures

> > Yet, it is strange that it all worked under 6.7 and before. > > You've got the 3rd-party nvidia packages installed. Do you know which > repo you got them from? elrepo. I thought I had mentioned that somewhere. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and libGL failures

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 03:04:56PM +0100, isdtor wrote: > # ldd `which glxinfo` |grep nvidia > libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib64/nvidia/libGL.so.1 (0x7f6de0558000) > libnvidia-tls.so.346.35 => > /usr/lib64/nvidia/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.346.35 (0x7f6de0352000) >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and libGL failures

> (Btw., Johnny, your signatures haven't verified in months. Don't know if the > list server is the problem or our corp mail server). Must be our mail server ... sorry for the false alert. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and libGL failures

(Btw., Johnny, your signatures haven't verified in months. Don't know if the list server is the problem or our corp mail server). > [johnny@localhost ~]$ glxgears > 1054 frames in 5.0 seconds = 210.750 FPS > 1064 frames in 5.0 seconds = 212.735 FPS > 1077 frames in 5.0 seconds = 215.366 FPS >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 Apache-2.2.15-53 re-write question

On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:33 +0100, Always Learning wrote: > RedirectMatch 301 ^(.*)$ http://new.domain.com/$1 should be:- RedirectMatch 301 ^/(.*)$ http://new.domain.com/$1 -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 Apache-2.2.15-53 re-write question

On Sat, 2016-05-28 at 13:03 -0600, Paul R. Ganci wrote: .. How about RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/test/ [NC] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/my-folder/[NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L] or

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 Apache-2.2.15-53 re-write question

On 05/28/2016 02:26 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: May I suggest you enable special logging for the mod_rewrite activity? https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritelog https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriteloglevel Yes this is a good idea. -- Paul

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 Apache-2.2.15-53 re-write question

Am 28.05.2016 um 22:08 schrieb Paul R. Ganci: On 05/28/2016 01:35 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: Am 28.05.2016 um 21:03 schrieb Paul R. Ganci: Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 31 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/olddomain.conf: RewriteCond: bad argument line '%{REQUEST_URI}!^/test/ You missed a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 Apache-2.2.15-53 re-write question

On 05/28/2016 01:35 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: Am 28.05.2016 um 21:03 schrieb Paul R. Ganci: Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 31 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/olddomain.conf: RewriteCond: bad argument line '%{REQUEST_URI}!^/test/ You missed a whitespace between the server variable %{REUQEST_URI}

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 Apache-2.2.15-53 re-write question

Am 28.05.2016 um 21:03 schrieb Paul R. Ganci: I was wondering if somebody could help me with an Apache re-write rule. Apparently CentOS 6.8 is running apache-2.2.15-53. I am trying to redirect all pages except for two pages. The apache rewrite directives in the httpd config are: RewriteEngine

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 Apache-2.2.15-53 re-write question

On 28.05.2016 21:03, Paul R. Ganci wrote: I was wondering if somebody could help me with an Apache re-write rule. Apparently CentOS 6.8 is running apache-2.2.15-53. I am trying to redirect all pages except for two pages. The apache rewrite directives in the httpd config are: RewriteEngine on

[CentOS] CentOS 6.8 Apache-2.2.15-53 re-write question

I was wondering if somebody could help me with an Apache re-write rule. Apparently CentOS 6.8 is running apache-2.2.15-53. I am trying to redirect all pages except for two pages. The apache rewrite directives in the httpd config are: RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}!^/test/