On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Nicolas Ross wrote:
By looking at the man page, distro-sync wouldn't re-install a package with
the same version. For exemple, on my rhel boxes, I have
tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch installed, and on my sl6's one, I have
tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch. It's the same exact version
By looking at the man page, distro-sync wouldn't re-install a package
with
the same version. For exemple, on my rhel boxes, I have
tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch installed, and on my sl6's one, I have
tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch. It's the same exact version number. So the
installed package
Nicolas Ross wrote:
By looking at the man page, distro-sync wouldn't re-install a package
with
the same version. For exemple, on my rhel boxes, I have
tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch installed, and on my sl6's one, I have
tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch. It's the same exact version number. So the
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:03:14 AM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Only changed packages (not binary compatible) are in CentOS marked with
.centos. so those should be replaced without question. For others,
running yum reinstall \* is advised but not necessary. You are allowed
to run RHEL
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
And while CentOS does its best to be 100% binary compatible, I wonder how
supportable a combined system (partial upstream binaries, partial CentOS or
SL binaries) really will be over the complete release cycle, and what sort
of oddball bugs you might run
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:59:01PM +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
And while CentOS does its best to be 100% binary compatible, I wonder how
supportable a combined system (partial upstream binaries, partial CentOS or
SL binaries) really will be over the
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:03:14 AM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Only changed packages (not binary compatible) are in CentOS marked with
.centos. so those should be replaced without question. For others,
running yum reinstall \* is advised but not necessary. You are
I have a RHEL system and I'm thinking of changing to CentOW. How can
this be done most easily. It is important that the e-mail setup not be
disturbed, since it was crafted to work with an IP that requires
authentication.
Thanks,
--
John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:55 AM, John J. Boyer
john.bo...@abilitiessoft.com wrote:
I have a RHEL system and I'm thinking of changing to CentOW. How can
this be done most easily. It is important that the e-mail setup not be
disturbed, since it was crafted to work with an IP that requires
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 07:40:26 AM Kwan Lowe wrote:
Not sure if this will help, but I went the other way from CentOS to
RedHat by grabbing a list of packages with rpm -qa, cleaning up the
package names a bit, installing a base RedHat based on the same update
level, then yum update or yum
I have a RHEL system and I'm thinking of changing to CentOW. How can
this be done most easily. It is important that the e-mail setup not be
disturbed, since it was crafted to work with an IP that requires
authentication.
I switch a RHEL machine in EL6 to scientific linux a while ago, and I
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 09:43:24 AM Nicolas Ross wrote:
I switch a RHEL machine in EL6 to scientific linux a while ago, and I
suppose it's the exact same thing for Centos.
[snip process]
You do realize that you didn't replace the RHEL
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 10:30:18 AM Dvorkin, Asya wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 09:43:24 AM Nicolas Ross wrote:
I switch a RHEL machine in EL6 to scientific linux a while ago, and I
suppose it's the exact same thing for Centos.
[snip
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 10:30:18 AM Dvorkin, Asya wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 09:43:24 AM Nicolas Ross wrote:
I switch a RHEL machine in EL6 to scientific linux a while ago, and I
suppose it's the exact same thing for Centos.
[snip
14 matches
Mail list logo
