Probably OK to remove. The netcf-libs package is a dependency of,
among other things, libvirtd. Perhaps you installed and removed some
visualization related packages? If you are keen to remove unwanted
packages, have a look at the 'package-cleanup' command and the
'--leaves' option.
Hope this
On 02/11/15 15:00, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
Probably OK to remove. The netcf-libs package is a dependency of,
among other things, libvirtd. Perhaps you installed and removed some
visualization related packages? If you are keen to remove unwanted
packages, have a look at the 'package-cleanup'
On 12.12.2013 05:00, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down
some
equipment.
I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple
web
stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I am considering
I used to run everything in a similar manner, behind an IPCop system.
The UVerse gateway doesn't handle multiple IPs on the same interface, when
plugged directly into the gateway, so I wound up ditching the IPCop system
and using my server as both the server and a firewall/router as you're
asking
Mike Burger wrote:
I used to run everything in a similar manner, behind an IPCop system.
The UVerse gateway doesn't handle multiple IPs on the same interface, when
plugged directly into the gateway, so I wound up ditching the IPCop system
and using my server as both the server and a
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 09:00:25PM -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
equipment.
I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple web
stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
slackmoeh...@gmail.com wrote:
So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
equipment.
If you are in the USA, get yourself a Kill-a-Watt power meter. I'm sure
other parts of the world have similar products.
Fred Smith wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 09:00:25PM -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
equipment.
I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple web
stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static
Matt Garman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
slackmoeh...@gmail.com wrote:
So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
equipment.
If you are in the USA, get yourself a Kill-a-Watt power meter. I'm sure
other parts of the world
On 12/11/2013 22:00, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple web
stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I am considering
giving this server a public IP and plugging it directly into my cable
modem. This box can handle
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
slackmoeh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
equipment.
I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple web
stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down
some equipment.
I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple
web stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I am
considering
Mike Burger wrote:
I used to run everything in a similar manner, behind an IPCop system.
The UVerse gateway doesn't handle multiple IPs on the same interface,
when
plugged directly into the gateway, so I wound up ditching the IPCop
system
and using my server as both the server and a
Mike Burger wrote:
Mike Burger wrote:
I used to run everything in a similar manner, behind an IPCop system.
The UVerse gateway doesn't handle multiple IPs on the same interface,
when plugged directly into the gateway, so I wound up ditching the IPCop
system and using my server as both the
On 12/12/2013 9:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You misunderstand me: I have the router plugged into the phone co. router,
going into my router's uplink port.
so you have two layers of network address translation? or is one or
the other of those 'routers' set to bridge ?
--
john r pierce
John R Pierce wrote:
On 12/12/2013 9:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You misunderstand me: I have the router plugged into the phone co.
router, going into my router's uplink port.
so you have two layers of network address translation? or is one or
the other of those 'routers' set to bridge
On 12/12/2013 10:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
so you have two layers of network address translation? or is one or
the other of those 'routers' set to bridge ?
Not exactly: I just have my router in a different 192.168 address space
than the phone company one. As I said, I plugged the uplink
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
I'd keep the separate firewall, but put it on more efficient hardware.
You should be able to do this in about 5 W. At 11 cents per kWh, that's
about $5 per year if it runs continually. I suspect it could actually
be
Hi All,
So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
equipment.
I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple web
stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I am considering
giving this server a public IP and plugging it directly into my
certificate for each client, and reduces certificate administration to a
SINGLE
httpd.conf entry. (if your application is structured thusly)
Can you then use only one single SSL port for all subdomains?
I am using wildcard certificates as well, but I'm still allocating a
separate port per
On Thursday, December 23, 2010 07:10:36 am Ross Walker wrote:
As long as the forward DNS resolves to the common name the cert will be
accepted and you can have multiple host names resolve to the same IP.
There's also the possibility that you can use multiple subdomains. Instead of
Dne 23.12.2010 1:08, Les Mikesell napsal(a):
The issue is that the server needs to know the hostname given to the
browser to find the matching certificate, and the only way to do that
and stay on the standard port 443 with the apache version on centos is
to bind each virtual host to a
On Dec 23, 2010, at 3:03 AM, David Hrbáč hrbac.c...@seznam.cz wrote:
Dne 23.12.2010 1:08, Les Mikesell napsal(a):
The issue is that the server needs to know the hostname given to the
browser to find the matching certificate, and the only way to do that
and stay on the standard port 443 with
2010/12/22 S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
when i want to use ssl on my domain?
delicated port (443) is needed per ssl host. you can
In article 133721.39495...@web121405.mail.ne1.yahoo.com,
S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
when i want to
use ssl on my domain?
On 22.12.2010 11:05, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article
133721.39495.qm-j4irtxk+zdtuqs8rmknbopow+3bf1jufvpnb7ypn...@public.gmane.org,
S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 22:53 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
Yes.
Reverse DNS has to be working.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:53 AM, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
when i want to use ssl on my domain?
thank you
happy
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
Yes.
Reverse DNS has to be working.
Why is that? I have several ssl sites, and many of them
On December 22, 2010 02:05:26 am Tony Mountifield wrote:
The thing you CAN'T do is to have name-based virtual hosting with multiple
domains on a single IP address, with more than one of them using SSL.
Name-based virtual hosting relies on the HTTP Host: header to identify
which virtual host is
The question was:
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 22:53 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
and one reply asseted:
On Wed,
On 22/12/10 11:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's the easiest way to do it. If you allow someone else to hold your
SSL keys, they can do interesting things to act as your front end to
Where in the original post did it mention using a system that's not
under their control? The question was
On 12/22/2010 5:40 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Most people wanting SSL on their website see it as a business
requirement and most of those sites are running on shared or VPS
hosting.
The issue is that the server needs to know the hostname given to the
browser to find the matching certificate,
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address, when
i want to use ssl on my domain?
thank you
happy Christmas! :)
___
CentOS mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/22/2010 12:53 AM, S Mathias wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
when i want to use ssl on my domain?
thank
35 matches
Mail list logo
