Re: [CentOS] Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.

On Apr 21, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > 1.) Run Red Hat Linux 5.2 (or similar vintage) on KVM on CentOS 7; For what it’s worth, I couldn’t get it working under a modern flavor of VMware, either. I find that telling because VMware tends to have the best driver

Re: [CentOS] Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.

On 04/22/2017 11:24 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: Obviously, the system is designed for this - but why is nobody doing this for Linux? The time commitment necessary to keep up with the sometimes dramatic changes in the typical Linux distribution is very large; I would guess that's the reason

Re: [CentOS] Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.

> Am 22.04.2017 um 15:42 schrieb Lamar Owen : > > On 04/21/2017 12:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: >> ... >> The latest version of libc5 I know of that was shipped by Red Hat is in RHL >> 6.2, libc-5.3.12. (There is a 5.4, but not sure of stability or >> compatibility). >> ... >>

Re: [CentOS] Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.

On 04/21/2017 12:11 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: ... The latest version of libc5 I know of that was shipped by Red Hat is in RHL 6.2, libc-5.3.12. (There is a 5.4, but not sure of stability or compatibility). ... I've successfully set up the bridging; a CentOS 7 VM on the same host has full

[CentOS] Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.

I have an application with is binary-only, does its job well, and is only available for either libc5 (!) or early early glibc2.0 (!!). It has been running on a Red Hat Linux 5.2 (NOT RHEL; RHL) server for a really long time, and it honestly does its job and it's not easily replaced by an