On 11/24/2010 05:36 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
I find lists where there's fairly open discussion of topics more
useful than those that deal with very narrow topics. It's
generic lists are more suited to, as you pointed out LUG's and social
groups - this is a fairly product/ platform centric
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 11/22/10 10:28 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:09:59 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
I don't think they ever did a real native *nix verson - they had a slightly
custom version of wine wrapped around the windows code.
Native WP for Unix existed
Hi,
On 11/23/2010 01:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Did you really struggle to find a more appropriate place to discuss
something like this ? :)
Where is a group of people that might be more affected by the fallout? Not
that
there's much we can do about it...
Most of the conversation that
On 11/24/2010 10:32 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
That's going back to the character-mode days. I meant the GUI version.
I used an X11 version on some Unix variant a long time ago - possibly
IRIX, but it may have been the DEC one (or both.) This was several years
Thats good, but how is that even
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/24/2010 10:32 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
That's going back to the character-mode days. I meant the GUI version.
I used an X11 version on some Unix variant a long time ago - possibly
IRIX, but it may have been the DEC one (or both.) This was several years
On 11/24/2010 02:34 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ?
It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have
source code that would probably compile more or less directly under
CentOS, for the (currently unsupported) software
On 11/24/10 8:37 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/24/2010 02:34 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ?
It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have
source code that would probably compile more or less directly under
Toralf Lund wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/24/2010 10:32 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
snip
Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ?
It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have
source code that would probably compile more or less directly under
What we need is a What would a good sysadmin think? list where one of
the
criteria for being a good sysadmin would obviously be that you know
something
about Centos but the rest of the scope covers applications, conversions,
product
comparisons, legal issues, etc. The kind of stuff
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010, Toralf Lund wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/24/2010 10:32 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
That's going back to the character-mode days. I meant the GUI version.
I used an X11 version on some Unix variant a long time ago - possibly
IRIX, but it may have been the
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Novell sale news?
On 11/24/10 8:37 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/24/2010 02:34 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 at 10:00am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote
Not I can't resist the old quote:
Someone, somewhere on usenet, posted something that was ...wrong.
http://xkcd.com/386/
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin
UCSF
___
CentOS
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 at 10:00am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote
Not I can't resist the old quote:
Someone, somewhere on usenet, posted something that was ...wrong.
http://xkcd.com/386/
Yep. But I remember seeing that quote, hanging out on usenet, at least by
the
Les,
On 11/22/2010 06:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
company controlled by Microsoft?
Did you really struggle to find a more appropriate place to discuss
On 11/23/10 4:42 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Les,
On 11/22/2010 06:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
company controlled by Microsoft?
Did you really struggle to find
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 09:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 11/23/10 4:42 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Les,
On 11/22/2010 06:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
XHTML is supposed to be semantic, e. g. it indicates clearly that this
is a quotation, this is an abbreviation, etc. The only thing
Dreamweaver can do is put cleanly indented div/div brackets around
everything, to make sure no search engine leafing through the page will
ever have the
Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
company controlled by Microsoft?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
On 11/22/2010 01:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
company controlled by Microsoft?
I saw that, and can't help but wonder if we're in for another SCO. =/
--
Digimer
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 12:13 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
company controlled by Microsoft?
Oh, sheesh, here we go. Baseless speculation and the weaving on
On 11/22/2010 12:14 PM, Digimer wrote:
Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
company controlled by Microsoft?
I saw that, and can't help but wonder if we're in for another SCO. =/
SCO didn't get
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 13:26, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/22/2010 12:14 PM, Digimer wrote:
Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
company controlled by Microsoft?
I saw
Les Mikesell wrote:
Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious
'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding
company controlled by Microsoft?
Just saw that today. I wonder if any of those assets is the superior (and
utterly badly marketed)
Just saw that today. I wonder if any of those assets is the superior (and
utterly badly marketed) WordPerfect.
I thought Novell sold WordPerfect to Corel a long time ago.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Barry Brimer wrote:
Just saw that today. I wonder if any of those assets is the superior
(and utterly badly marketed) WordPerfect.
I thought Novell sold WordPerfect to Corel a long time ago.
Maybe - I've lost track. I'm still waiting for *anyone* to actually market
the damn thing - I'd *buy*
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 14:42 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote:
Just saw that today. I wonder if any of those assets is the superior
(and utterly badly marketed) WordPerfect.
I thought Novell sold WordPerfect to Corel a long time ago.
Maybe - I've lost track. I'm still
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 14:42 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote:
Just saw that today. I wonder if any of those assets is the superior
(and utterly badly marketed) WordPerfect.
I thought Novell sold WordPerfect to Corel a long time ago.
Maybe - I've
At Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:10:41 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 14:42 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote:
Just saw that today. I wonder if any of those assets is the superior
(and utterly badly marketed)
AND not a single word processor or web page building
I've seen writes them clean:
I beg to differ. I've used Dreamweaver for years and while I can't
speak for the latest versions, the MX version released in 2002
produced some of the cleanest (x)html I've seen. And with their tidy
command you
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I thought Novell sold WordPerfect to Corel a long time ago.
Maybe - I've lost track. I'm still waiting for *anyone* to actually market
the damn thing - I'd *buy* it (or rather, upgrade from 6.0.c for DOS)
I'll take it over Word
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:29:12PM -0500, Michael Semcheski wrote:
Windows only, unfortunately.
When did they stop publishing *nix versions? I worked
extensively with that monstrosity 15-16 years ago on
SCO / MWC Coherent.
On 11/22/10 9:57 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:29:12PM -0500, Michael Semcheski wrote:
Windows only, unfortunately.
When did they stop publishing *nix versions? I worked
extensively with that monstrosity 15-16 years ago on
SCO / MWC Coherent.
I
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:12:38PM -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
And I *still* use LaTeX. *I* won't touch a word processor (I tried
Feh. N00b. LaTeX. Feh.
% head -20 cv
.m1 0.05i
.m2 0.15i
.m3 0
.m4 0.11i
.po 0.6c
.ll 7.5i
.pl 10.5i
.SZ 11
.tr ~
.kern 0
.lg 0
.he
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:09:59 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
I don't think they ever did a real native *nix verson - they had a slightly
custom version of wine wrapped around the windows code.
Native WP for Unix existed back in the days of WP/DOS and the like.
WP ran on a huge number of
On 11/22/10 10:28 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:09:59 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
I don't think they ever did a real native *nix verson - they had a slightly
custom version of wine wrapped around the windows code.
Native WP for Unix existed back in the days of WP/DOS and the
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:09:59PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
I don't think they ever did a real native *nix verson - they had a slightly
custom version of wine wrapped around the windows code. And there was some
strange Microsoft involvement in the Corel company too - probably why you
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:12:38PM -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
And I *still* use LaTeX. *I* won't touch a word processor (I tried
Feh. N00b. LaTeX. Feh.
I used Chiwriter (DOS) during my college days. I'm surprised
Drew a écrit :
I beg to differ. I've used Dreamweaver for years and while I can't
speak for the latest versions, the MX version released in 2002
produced some of the cleanest (x)html I've seen.
XHTML is supposed to be semantic, e. g. it indicates clearly that this
is a quotation, this is
38 matches
Mail list logo
