oh nice, seems that they upgraded php to 5.3? no more 5.1
Am 09.11.10 20:55, schrieb Morten P.D. Stevens:
2010/11/9 Scott Robbinsscot...@nyc.rr.com:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2010-November/msg0.html
So, now we can all start saying, when will 5.6 be ready. :)
2010/11/10 Juergen Gotteswinter j...@internetx.de:
oh nice, seems that they upgraded php to 5.3? no more 5.1
No, that are additional packages. (called bind97 and php53)
For example:
yum install bind97-utils or
yum install php53-mysql
The old versions continue to be supported by Red Hat.
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:22:55AM -0700, Greg Bailey wrote:
Join the Red Hat executive team on November 10th, 2010 for a live video
webcast.
Register now.
If I was a betting person, I'd put my money on November 10... at least
For what it's worth...for those who haven't seen.
2010/11/9 Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2010-November/msg0.html
So, now we can all start saying, when will 5.6 be ready. :)
Hi,
RHEL 5.6 Beta:
- bind 9.7 - improved DNSsec support
- PHP 5.3 - support for namespaces
That sounds
Dne 17.9.2010 22:16, Tom Bishop napsal(a):
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 17.9.2010 22:16, Tom Bishop napsal(a):
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:22:55AM -0700, Greg Bailey wrote:
Join the Red Hat executive team on November 10th, 2010 for a live video
webcast.
Register now.
If I was a betting person, I'd put my money on November 10... at least
the CentOS devs have a couple of days to get the FAQ set up
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:51:39 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
[]
Redhat does not discuss release dates []
Well, the beta is up :
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta/
so the corporate experience on this list may be able now to make an
educated guess (still an unofficial guess,
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, BeartoothHOS wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:51:39 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
[]
Redhat does not discuss release dates []
Well, the beta is up :
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta/
that is already the *second* beta of RHEL 6, so it's not really
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 07:08:30PM +, BeartoothHOS wrote:
Well, the beta is up :
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta/
It's been up for many months; in fact this is the second beta
cut.
so the corporate experience on this list may be able now to make an
educated
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
When it is ready and not a second before.
I would suggest you ask upstream but
Thanks and Yes and I agree and know that, but I was just wondering if they
had a potential target date.I have read September and also October but
was wondering if any of that was more than speculation
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:05 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep
On 9/17/2010 4:05 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
When it is ready and not a second before.
Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 potential release date???
On 9/17/2010 4:05 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release
date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:14:19PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Thanks and Yes and I agree and know that, but I was just wondering if they
had a potential target date.I have read September and also October but
was wondering if any of that was more than speculation
It's *all*
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:19:21PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
I thought that was the debian mantra. And also the reason we don't use it.
Who is this we you speak of? What I posted was the hard cold
truth of the matter. Redhat does not discuss release dates
with the
17 matches
Mail list logo