On Thu, 23 May 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 16:43, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I might actually be able to have a workable answer:
alias drf='/usr/bin/df -x tmpfs'
/usr/bin/df \
-x autofs -x binfmt_misc -x cgroup
On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 16:43, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > I might actually be able to have a workable answer:
> >
> > alias drf='/usr/bin/df -x tmpfs'
>
> /usr/bin/df \
>-x autofs -x binfmt_misc -x cgroup -x configfs -x debugfs \
>-x
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 16:22, mark wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I *swear*, I may get aggravated enough to write a drh - d *real* h.
>> Between C7, with all the /tmpfs, and this debian 18.04 that has a dozen
>> /snap all showing up All I want it to display is physical
On Thu, 23 May 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I might actually be able to have a workable answer:
alias drf='/usr/bin/df -x tmpfs'
/usr/bin/df \
-x autofs -x binfmt_misc -x cgroup -x configfs -x debugfs \
-x devpts -x devtmpfs -x efivarfs -x hugetlbfs -x mqueue \
-x nfsd -x proc -x
I might actually be able to have a workable answer:
alias drf='/usr/bin/df -x tmpfs'
On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 16:22, mark wrote:
>
> I *swear*, I may get aggravated enough to write a drh - d *real* h.
> Between C7, with all the /tmpfs, and this debian 18.04 that has a dozen
> /snap all showing
I *swear*, I may get aggravated enough to write a drh - d *real* h.
Between C7, with all the /tmpfs, and this debian 18.04 that has a dozen
/snap all showing up All I want it to display is physical drive
partition space
mark
___
CentOS
Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my
/dev/md0 That it reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb
available. What would cause this?
# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 71G 1.6G 66G 3% /
/dev/sda1 99M 22M
Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my
/dev/md0 That it reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb
available. What would cause this?
# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 71G 1.6G 66G 3% /
/dev/sda1 99M 22M
Dnk wrote on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:04:38 -0700:
What does that command do exactly?
what about using man?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
On 25-Apr-09, at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
Dnk wrote on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:04:38 -0700:
What does that command do exactly?
what about using man?
Kai
--
Been there, done that since I had gotten back to a Linux box. :-) I
was out and about when I read
The amount shown under Avail does not include the reserve, even if
it is set. If the reserve is used, then avail (and Use%) become a
negative value. For example it might say -2.5GB Available.
The Size does include the reserve however.
I agree with Jake that this is due to it rounding 99.5%
Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my /dev/md0 That it
reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb available. What would cause this?
# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 71G 1.6G 66G 3% /
/dev/sda1 99M 22M 73M 23%
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:43 PM, dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my /dev/md0 That it
reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb available. What would cause this?
Because when an ext2/3 file system is formated by default 5% is
reserved for root
Use
On 24-Apr-09, at 10:00 AM, Laurentiu Coica laurentiu.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:43 PM, dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my /dev/md0 That
it
reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb available. What would cause this?
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:43 PM, dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my /dev/md0 That it
reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb available. What would cause this?
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2
At Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:43:57 -0700 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my /dev/md0 That it
reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb available. What would cause this?
# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Lunix1618 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is work well on my laptop that running Fedora 9 with no LVM but on
CentOS 5.2 with LVM it cann't calculate the LVM volume, below is output of my
system :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -kPl
Filesystem
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 01:12:58AM -0700, MHR wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Lunix1618 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -kPl
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 274405432 18584656 241656808
Stephen Harris wrote:
And, remember, that the output of df might have changed in between
times you ran df and you ran the awk command; there's only 7Mbytes
difference. Did someone delete a 7Mbyte file? Send email? Finish a
print job? Or... could be plenty of reasons for the used amount to
go
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:34:35PM +0700, Lunix1618 wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
18167 Mb used
But the whole system used only 18 MB ? That's not true.
*blink* That's 18167 Mbytes reported there (or 18Gbytes). Which is
correct.
--
rgds
Stephen
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 01:12:58AM -0700, MHR wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Lunix1618 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -kPl
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 274405432
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 01:12:58AM -0700, MHR wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Lunix1618 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -kPl
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:09:23AM -0700, MHR wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 01:12:58AM -0700, MHR wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Lunix1618 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -kPl
Filesystem
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Nifty Cluster Mitch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ cat /tmp/checkspace
#!/bin/bash
df -Pkl /tmp/checkingdiskspce
echo -e \nInput is:
cat /tmp/checkingdiskspce
echo -e \nAdding up the bits
cat /tmp/checkingdiskspce | awk '/^\/dev\// { used += $3/1024 } END {
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 02:45:43PM -0700, MHR wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Nifty Cluster Mitch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ cat /tmp/checkspace
#!/bin/bash
df -Pkl /tmp/checkingdiskspce
echo -e \nInput is:
cat /tmp/checkingdiskspce
echo -e \nAdding up the bits
cat
Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote:
I did notice in this discussion that no one looked at inode counts.
A filesystem might be full for want of an inode I cannot
recall if ext[23] will allocate additional inodes dynamically like xfs will.
ext3 doesn't(at least not by default). I had a system fill
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:23:24PM -0700, Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 02:45:43PM -0700, MHR wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Nifty Cluster Mitch
$ cat /tmp/checkspace
#!/bin/bash
df -Pkl /tmp/checkingdiskspce
echo -e \nInput is:
cat
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:07:09PM -0700, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
value. I suggest using the -P switch to df, so you don't have to deal
with multi-line output per filesystem.
Ugh, hasn't RedHat fixed that? Sun have (for a long time) automatically
done this
Is there a flag for the df command to get the total disk space used on
all filesystems as one number? I have a server with a lot of mounted
shares. I'm looking for a simple way to measure rate of data growth
across all shares as one total value.
___
Is there a flag for the df command to get the total disk space used on
all filesystems as one number? I have a server with a lot of mounted
shares. I'm looking for a simple way to measure rate of data growth
across all shares as one total value.
Not directly, but you can add up all the
Dear Sean,
No, there isn't. You'd have to parse the df output to get that
value. I suggest using the -P switch to df, so you don't have to deal
with multi-line output per filesystem.
The following will return kilobytes of disk space used (third column
in the df -kP output):
df -kP |grep
df -kl | awk '/^\/dev\// { avail += $3/1024 } END { printf(%d Mb
used\n,avail)} '
Awesome, this is going into my bag of goodies. Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:07:09PM -0700, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
value. I suggest using the -P switch to df, so you don't have to deal
with multi-line output per filesystem.
Ugh, hasn't RedHat fixed that? Sun have (for a long time) automatically
done this if stdout is not a terminal.
As long as you only want the absolute amount of data (not the percentage of
total file space that is used) you could use du -sh / on that server.
--On 11. August 2008 14:00:09 -0500 Sean Carolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a flag for the df command to get the total disk space used on
Sean Carolan wrote:
Is there a flag for the df command to get the total disk space used on
all filesystems as one number? I have a server with a lot of mounted
shares. I'm looking for a simple way to measure rate of data growth
across all shares as one total value.
You've had a few replies
Can anyone help make sense of this? This is an ext3 partition. It's
only showing 403GB out of 426GB used, but then it says only 632MB
available? Where'd the extra ~25GB go?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] df -H /disks/vrac5
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb2
Sean Carolan wrote:
Can anyone help make sense of this? This is an ext3 partition. It's
only showing 403GB out of 426GB used, but then it says only 632MB
available? Where'd the extra ~25GB go?
Those are the ~ 5% which are automatically reserved for root ...
man tune2fs
Ralph
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 15:09 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Sean Carolan wrote:
Can anyone help make sense of this? This is an ext3 partition. It's
only showing 403GB out of 426GB used, but then it says only 632MB
available? Where'd the extra ~25GB go?
Those are the ~ 5% which are
Also, when making the file system, reducing the amount reserved for
root is usually safe on today's larger drives, especially on a
relatively stable system/user base/file/system usage.
I gather this can't be done after creation?
Kai
Remember: You can tune a file system, but you can't
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 16:38 +0200, Jens Larsson wrote:
Also, when making the file system, reducing the amount reserved for
root is usually safe on today's larger drives, especially on a
relatively stable system/user base/file/system usage.
I gather this can't be done after
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:26:21 -0400:
Also, when making the file system, reducing the amount reserved for root
is usually safe on today's larger drives, especially on a relatively
stable system/user base/file/system usage.
I gather this can't
41 matches
Mail list logo
