R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an NFS mount,
and that I missed it
On Friday 03 April 2009 05:11:15 R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted
/home left.
I have /home exported and ran the upgrade from this laptop over the
network, where that directory is mounted and displayed in
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 03 April 2009 05:11:15 R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted
/home left.
I have /home exported and ran the upgrade from this laptop over the
network, where that directory is mounted and
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Tsai Li Ming wrote:
Found this on upstream bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483071
Good catch! Panu Matilainen posted what appears to be the answer,
though I haven't tested it yet:
To have rpm semi-reasonably deal with NFS-mounts on rpm owned
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I just kicked everyone off, killed all apps with open file
descriptors on /home, umounted /home, upgraded the rpm, then
re-mounted /home. That worked just fine.
I confer 42 geek points on
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
The takeaway was that I need to 'test as I do, and do as I
test'. My testing regime will have to include 'cloning' a
test box, and simply 'moving into it' for an afternoon when
doing 'updates' QA testing.
I took it for granted that CentOS would be
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an NFS mount,
and that I missed it in testing. A workaround is:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home
left.
Say it ain't so!
--
Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an NFS
Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
No problem here, /home is exported as nfs4 with sec=kerb5.
regards
Olaf
___
CentOS mailing
Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home
left.
Say it ain't so!
It ain't so.
I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with the
filesystem rpm).
Should I implement the
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Hywel Richards wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home
left.
Say it ain't so!
It ain't so.
:-)
I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with
the filesystem rpm).
Should I implement the workaround suggested by
on 4-2-2009 2:00 PM Anne Wilson spake the following:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
I
Scott Silva wrote:
on 4-2-2009 2:00 PM Anne Wilson spake the following:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS
Tsai Li Ming wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 4-2-2009 2:00 PM Anne Wilson spake the following:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted
/home left.
I have /home exported and ran the upgrade from this laptop over the network,
where that directory is mounted and displayed in a folderview under KDE4. I
had no problems whatsoever.
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I just kicked everyone off, killed all apps with open file descriptors
on /home, umounted /home, upgraded the rpm, then re-mounted /home.
That worked just fine.
I confer 42 geek points on Paul -- hope that's enough to buy
armor to protect him from the
R P Herrold wrote:
Thank you for the confirmation, I have not had a chance to
file in the centos tracker yet, and hope to get it filed
tomorrow's business hours. Similarly I have not checked
upstream's tracker yet. If needee, I'll file there as well,
but I cannot imagine it will be
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Olaf Mueller wrote:
Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
No problem here, /home is exported as nfs4 with sec=kerb5.
As noted later, the problem is
R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I just kicked everyone off, killed all apps with open file descriptors
on /home, umounted /home, upgraded the rpm, then re-mounted /home.
That worked just fine.
I confer 42 geek points on Paul -- hope that's enough to buy
armor
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Hywel Richards wrote:
I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with the
filesystem rpm).
Should I implement the workaround suggested by Russ for each machine, or
will a fixed rpm come along eventually? (I'm not impatient!)
Thank you for the
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Michael A. Peters wrote:
My guess is a scriptlet is failing - quite possibly because an SELinux
chcon command fails in those conditions. They probably need to change
the chcon portion of the scriptlet to add a ||: after the command so it
doesn't bomb out.
Guessing is fun
R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Michael A. Peters wrote:
My guess is a scriptlet is failing - quite possibly because an SELinux
chcon command fails in those conditions. They probably need to change
the chcon portion of the scriptlet to add a ||: after the command so it
doesn't bomb
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
I sorta-kinda remember this when going from 5.1 to 5.2, but that
memory is hazy.
--
Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/
24 matches
Mail list logo
