On 09/25/2014 12:26 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
No packages for EL6 AFAIK,
Seamonkey is available in EPEL.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
If this inconvenience's an innocent web user, I have neither ability to
detect the inconvenience nor to determine the user's innocence. I
understand your hotel analogue. In England many hotel guests use their
mobile
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 12:16 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
If this inconvenience's an innocent web user, I have neither ability to
detect the inconvenience nor to determine the user's innocence. I
understand your
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
The alternative is to be a willing victim.
It's more a question of why you run the service at all. If blocking
people from reaching it doesn't bother you, why not just shut it down?
Blocking people ? Data Centre
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 14:16 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
You said you were blocking IPs.
Yes my systems block IPs on the basis:-
Emails
--
Block if IP allocated to a data centre or to a commercial email sending
organisation.
Web
---
Hacking attempts - individual IP if a 'home-type'
On 09/25/2014 09:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 8:21 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/25/2014 09:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen
On Thu, September 25, 2014 10:27, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:09:15AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
developers to follow this:
Don't change anything unless it is absolutely necessary.
(it was excellent attitude to programming I was doing once: this way you
diminish the
On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
manager being happy with an eastern European individual's repo.
You, and your boss, should
James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
manager being happy with an eastern European individual's repo.
You,
On Fri, September 26, 2014 11:56 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
manager being happy with an eastern
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 11:56 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
manager
I hope, my government doesn't go into alliance with Russia behind my
back ;-) (I'm perfectly OK about Romania, no matter how much more
careful
I'll be about repositories hosted there compared to the ones hosted,
say,
in Finland, just based on statistics of compromised machines...)
These guys
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
So, because you have to check a box to get the menu, you want to look
for a new browser, which could just stop working at the whims of the
upstream guys (like chromium did) when they move on to the latest and
greatest
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
No, it is not because of that. At least in my case. I started looking for
decent open source browser that to an extent possible follows the rule
don't change anything unless it is absolutely necessary as far as
On Fri, September 26, 2014 1:27 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
No, it is not because of that. At least in my case. I started looking
for
decent open source browser that to an extent possible follows the rule
don't
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 12:22 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
. just based on statistics of compromised machines...)
Probably all Windoze :-)
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse today. my (patched) internet web server has logged 100s and
100s of attempts like...
66.186.2.172 - - [26/Sep/2014:00:49:29 -0700] GET
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse today. my (patched) internet web server has logged 100s and
100s of attempts like...
On 9/26/2014 3:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse today. my (patched) internet web server has
On 2014-09-26, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse today. my (patched) internet web server has logged 100s and
100s of attempts like...
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2014-09-26, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse
On Fri, September 26, 2014 6:05 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 3:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned
On 2014-09-26, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
66.186.2.172 - - [26/Sep/2014:00:49:29 -0700] GET /cgi-bin/test.sh
no. mod_cgi launches /bin/sh and passes it the command, even if the
file doesn't exist. and /bin/sh is
On Fri, September 26, 2014 6:05 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 3:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 16:05 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
no. mod_cgi launches /bin/sh and passes it the command, even if the
file doesn't exist. and /bin/sh is linked to bash
Don't use cgi. Have no /cgi directory. Don't load mod_cgi
Bash is patched (updated to new version).
On Fri, September 26, 2014 8:32 pm, Always Learning wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 16:05 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
no. mod_cgi launches /bin/sh and passes it the command, even if the
file doesn't exist. and /bin/sh is linked to bash
Don't use cgi. Have no /cgi directory. Don't load
Hi Valeri,
On Fri, September 26, 2014 8:32 pm, Always Learning wrote:
Don't use cgi. Have no /cgi directory. Don't load mod_cgi
Bash is patched (updated to new version). Automatically bloke IPs of
anyone trying to hack Apache. Am I safe ?
You are. But if you run the server you do
V,
Sorry that should be ...
I understand your hotel analogy.
P.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
op 25-09-14 02:46, Tom Bishop schreef:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all*
of my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...)
mark, CentOS 6.5
op 25-09-14 09:01, Johan Vermeulen schreef:
op 25-09-14 02:46, Tom Bishop schreef:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up,
*all*
of my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...)
mark,
On 09/25/14 03:09, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
op 25-09-14 09:01, Johan Vermeulen schreef:
op 25-09-14 02:46, Tom Bishop schreef:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all*
of my tabs were gone. Every one
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
On 09/25/14 03:09, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
op 25-09-14 09:01, Johan Vermeulen schreef:
op 25-09-14 02:46, Tom Bishop schreef:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back
up,
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
mark
Then maybe you are stuck in full-screen mode? Press f11 to exit that.
grts, Johan
You can press the Alt key to show the menu.
JD
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
mark
Then maybe you are stuck in full-screen mode? Press f11 to exit that.
grts, Johan
You can
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
Then maybe you are stuck in full-screen mode? Press f11 to exit that.
No. 99.44% of
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:09:15AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
developers to follow this:
Don't change anything unless it is absolutely necessary.
(it was excellent attitude to programming I was doing once: this way you
diminish the chance to break something that works...)
Probably
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
Then maybe you are stuck in
On Thu, September 25, 2014 9:13 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
Then maybe you are
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that: no tool bar at all, no menus
snip
It is
On Thu, September 25, 2014 9:42 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup,
I'm in the same fix... But. When I will find open source, acceptable
browser which I can predict will last and will have the same great
attitude late netscape or mozilla had, I will start installing it
simultaneously with firefox, yet will make it default browser, which users
can switch to
On 9/25/2014 8:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
palemoon looks nice
My concern with Pale Moon is that it's based on the Firefox 24 extended
support release, which is no longer supported. Don't know how that'll
play out.
In the meantime I've added exclude=firefox to my yum configuration and
am sticking with Firefox 24.
On Thu, September 25, 2014 10:10 am, Ron Yorston wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
palemoon looks nice
My concern with Pale Moon is that it's based on the Firefox 24 extended
support release,
Sad. If there is no own developers team behind that, it hardly will
survive enterprise level length of
Tom Bishop wrote:
I'm in the same fix... But. When I will find open source, acceptable
browser which I can predict will last and will have the same great
attitude late netscape or mozilla had, I will start installing it
simultaneously with firefox, yet will make it default browser, which
Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo to my
manager, who understandably balked at a Russian server (this is a US gov't
agency (non-DoD) that we work at
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
I like the look of palemoon, I am going to drop an email to Nux and
see if we can get it added to his repo.
Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo to my
manager, who understandably balked at a
On 9/25/2014 9:07 AM, Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op
On Thu, September 25, 2014 11:16 am, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
I like the look of palemoon, I am going to drop an email to Nux and
see if we can get it added to his repo.
Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned
On 09/25/2014 04:38 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Yes, I still didn't find replacement for firefox... so, anyone who has a
any suggestions of decent open source browser, please, let me know.
maybe try seamonkey, I've been using it for ages (basically since
firefox split from mozilla suite ;-) )
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
I like the look of palemoon, I am going to drop an email to Nux and
see if we can get it added to his repo.
Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo to
my manager, who
Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo
to
my manager, who understandably balked at a Russian server (this is a
US
gov't agency (non-DoD) that we work at
li.nux.ro, that's Romania not Russia.
Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at
On 25/09/14 17:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
I like the look of palemoon, I am going to drop an email to
Nux and see if we can get it added to his repo.
Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned
Jake Shipton wrote:
On 25/09/14 17:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
I like the look of palemoon, I am going to drop an email to
Nux and see if we can get it added to his repo.
Maybe we can get it into
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:18 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Guess it's the old if it ain't American, it ain't right attitude? :-).
Don't be absurd. How 'bout can we be sure that no one's inserted nasties
into the code? How 'bout who else has looked at and compared the code to
the project
Sorry, missing footnotes to last email:
1] you'll notice I never mention the organization name - I really am not
allowed to speak for my organization, or my company.
2] Partly because I work for a federal contractor
mark
___
CentOS mailing
On 25/09/14 18:18, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jake Shipton wrote:
Guess it's the old if it ain't American, it ain't right
attitude? :-).
Don't be absurd. How 'bout can we be sure that no one's inserted
nasties into the code? How 'bout who else has looked at and
compared the code to the
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 09:09 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Don't change anything unless it is absolutely necessary.
Extremely wise advice. Seems upstream do not always agree :-)
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 18:16 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo to my
manager, who understandably balked at a Russian server (this is a US gov't
agency (non-DoD) that we
On Thu, September 25, 2014 7:32 pm, Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 18:16 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 09/25/2014 05:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo
to my
manager, who understandably balked at a
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all* of
my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...)
mark, CentOS 6.5
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all*
of my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...)
mark, CentOS 6.5
___
CentOS mailing list
63 matches
Mail list logo
