Hello,
I'm running fail2ban on my centos machine. It's handling sshd and
postfix, and is working quite well. From the reports I'm seeing all
the atempts are from a certain registrar's region, I won't name it,
and was wondering instead of blocking individual ip's if there was a
way I could block
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12:58, the following was written:
I'm running fail2ban on my centos machine. It's handling sshd and
postfix, and is working quite well. From the reports I'm seeing all
the atempts are from a certain registrar's region, I won't name it,
and was wondering instead of
Dne 11.5.2011 18:58, David Mehler napsal(a):
With regards blocking ip's and fail2ban, which method is better in
terms of system resources, blocking via iptables as in the case of
sshd or blocking via hosts.deny as in the case of postfix?
Robert Spangler wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12:58, the following was written:
the atempts are from a certain registrar's region, I won't name it,
iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -s x.x.x.x/24 -j DROP
I do not consider /24 subnet a region subnet. You would need to use
something like
Hello Everyone,
Thanks for all your suggestions. I have gone with iptables and blocked
off the necessary region ip blocks in my firewall. If anyone is
interested i'll send the list.
Thanks again.
Dave.
On 5/11/11, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote:
On Wednesday
On 5/11/2011 2:08 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12:58, the following was written:
I'm running fail2ban on my centos machine. It's handling sshd and
postfix, and is working quite well. From the reports I'm seeing all
the atempts are from a certain registrar's region,
6 matches
Mail list logo
