Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 2016-11-08 08:27, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes > helps across minor versions. So, this is for a friend of mine, and I have > been told that they will not currently consider updating their userland > from 6.3 to 6.8 but only

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/8/2016 9:28 AM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > >> Unfortunately, that's the constraint it seems hence, there's inquiry of >> other options. But, looks like, any el6 package should work as long as we >> meet the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/8/2016 9:28 AM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: Unfortunately, that's the constraint it seems hence, there's inquiry of other options. But, looks like, any el6 package should work as long as we meet the dependencies? mixing current 6.8 packages with very old 6.3 packages and libraries is a recipe

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Unfortunately, that's the constraint it seems hence, there's inquiry of other options. But, looks like, any el6 package should work as long as we meet the dependencies? Kindly thanks for many help. On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:55 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/8/2016 6:27

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/8/2016 6:27 AM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes helps across minor versions. So, this is for a friend of mine, and I have been told that they will not currently consider updating their userland from 6.3 to 6.8 but only selected

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 08:27 -0600, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > . So, this is for a friend of mine, and I have > been told that they will not currently consider updating their userland > from 6.3 to 6.8 but only selected few packages. The picture seems to be > that their company runs a lot of apps

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/08/2016 06:27 AM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: Show us this "no way to update system properly" to get a clear big picture that is allowing us to provide you with potentially better solutions. Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes helps across minor versions.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

> > > > Show us this "no way to update system properly" to get a clear big picture > that is allowing us to provide you with potentially better solutions. > Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes helps across minor versions. So, this is for a friend of mine,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Am 08.11.2016 um 07:14 schrieb Dipal Bhatt : > Thanks very much, understood. so, it seems, upgrading selected packages is > probably going to be fine except where the compatibility matters where it > would break all kinds of things. Let me rephrase it, to be clear. Its

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 00:14 -0600, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > Thanks very much, understood. so, it seems, upgrading selected packages is > probably going to be fine except where the compatibility matters where it > would break all kinds of things. Please be realistic and professional. You simply can

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/07/2016 08:53 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: Understood, but unfortunately, updating to latest version of CentOs 6 is not the option in this specific situation If you require support at a point release, you should consult Red Hat: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/238533

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Thanks very much, understood. so, it seems, upgrading selected packages is probably going to be fine except where the compatibility matters where it would break all kinds of things. Something of such nature of request would need to be internally tested by simply updating the selected packages,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/7/2016 9:43 PM, Frank Cox wrote: Upgrading "selected packages only" will leave you with something that's neither fish or fowl, and it won't meet your requirements as stated either. more specifically, it will be a completely untested configuration. considering that any single

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Yes you would break all kinds of things. In a nutshell folks are saying you are free to try but when it blows up...you better have a total backup to restore the entire box. Your first priority should be getting whatever is holding you back from proper system updates and security out of the way.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

The specs may have certain dependency on subset of 6.3 packages, but not for all other packages/binaries, as I mentioned earlier. So, to keep things rather intact, we would simply meet requirements by only updating "selected packages only". And, for now, that should be considered intermittent

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

What constraint is requiring you to run a highly vulnerable server? On Nov 8, 2016 00:34, "Dipal Bhatt" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce > wrote: > > > On 11/7/2016 8:33 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > > > >> Unfortunately, there's

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:33:56 -0600 Dipal Bhatt wrote: > But, yes, there's > no way to update the 6.3 to 6.8 as I repeatedly mentioned which is the only > requirement/constraint. It occurs to me to ask what you consider to be version 6.3. If you update any of the rpms to the 6.8 version you are

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/7/2016 8:33 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > >> Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to be >> able to update from 6.3 -> 6.8. >> > > any such external specifications that insist you run an old

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/7/2016 8:33 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to be able to update from 6.3 -> 6.8. any such external specifications that insist you run an old obsolete operating system are inherently broken. I hope this server isn't connected

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Thanks Frank and all. Understood, but unfortunately, updating to latest version of CentOs 6 is not the option in this specific situation, in stead, we are taking a look into options of updating only hand picked packages on Centos 6.3 to latest. Any other guidance is welcome and appreciated. On

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:33:22 -0600 Dipal Bhatt wrote: > Simply updating these packages on 6.3, would there be any issues w/o > updating rest of the packages from 6.3 to 6.8? I suppose you could try it and see what happens. That comes with a two-part warranty: If it breaks, you own both

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

Hi, Thanks for your responses. Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to be able to update from 6.3 -> 6.8. But, it would be nice to be able to update specific packages to latest that's available in 6.8 repo at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On 11/7/2016 6:03 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: The other option is to use CentOS 6.8 updated package on 6.3, but I am not sure of any upstream and downstream dependencies in 6.3 without updating the rest of the userland from 6.3 to 6.8. Nonetheless, would this option be feasible? yum update

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.

On Nov 7, 2016, at 9:03 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote: > Hi, > IT seems, centos6.3 does no longer get any updates esp security fixes as > per readme here: > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.3/readme > I believe there’s some confusion

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3

On 12/1/2014 11:29 PM, Hadi Motamedi wrote: I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? As the others said, the OS is CentOS 6...

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3

As has been pointed out several times here, you should NOT assume you can just install individual fixes such as the latest openssl for the heartbeat fixes, and so forth, as these have only been tested running with ALL the latest packages, not every conceivable combination of component

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3

On 12/02/2014 10:29 AM, Hadi Motamedi wrote: Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? It is generally unsafe to run a

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/12/14 08:29, Hadi Motamedi wrote: Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3

On 02/12/14 02:29 AM, Hadi Motamedi wrote: Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? Thank you The heartbleed and

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Thanks to especially Mark Sir. After *yum -y update* system is now enjoying GUI !! One thing to mention is that my system processing also increases considerably !! Thanks again to All !! -- *Cheers, Mayur*. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello, I have done following steps: Press Ctrl+Alt+F2 By root login, I entered following command : yum groupinstall basic-desktop desktop-platform x11 fonts Then I reboot system; only blank screen appears ; not even cursor. Then I tried this : yum groupinstall -y ' X

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 23.04.2013 16:49, schrieb Mayur Patil: Hello, I have done following steps: [...] I have google for this but not find confirm solution. Am I missing something; please help ?? Seeking for guidance, It is virtually impossible to deduce

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

You should not have removed the i686 packages. The packaging system ensures that there are no conflicts. I suggest that you reinstall them. It may be that there is no need of them, but second-guessing the packaging system is never a good idea, unless you know *exactly* what you are doing. Cheers,

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello, One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for GUI of the centos. If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer screen back in action that will be a great help to me. And I also want to ask that is it possible to install that files from

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Mayur Patil wrote: Hello, One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for GUI of the centos. If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer screen back in action There is no explorer - that's a Windows thing. You should have command line

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello Sir, One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for GUI of the centos. If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer screen back in action There is no explorer - that's a Windows thing. You should have command line login using

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Mayur Patil wrote: One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for GUI of the centos. If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer screen back in action There is no explorer - that's a Windows thing. You should have command line login

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello Sir, sorry for late reply. One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for GUI of the centos. If anyone has Idea which files I need to get Login and other explorer screen back in action There is no explorer - that's a Windows thing. You should have

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Mayur Patil wrote: One more thing as per I think I have lost only file which responsible for GUI of the centos. You should have command line login using ctrlaltf2 Problem is Appearance of login window. System boots normally; now I will try out your said command. gnome or kde? snip

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello Mark Sir, Sorry if you feel bad due to my foolishness and inadequate knowledge. My actual problem is that my setup is at college and due to internet connectivity problems as well as college hours are over, I am responding from home. So as per your instructions I will again go

Re: [CentOS] [centos-6.3-desktop] Unable to login

Hello, My X windows system is not working So, Mark sir has recommended following steps that what I understand: 1 Press ctrl+alt+f2 2. Then run these commands yum groupinstall basic-desktop desktop-platform install installs video drivers; if you add a desktop

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application

Ahh, premature send! My apologies. Seemingly random times every day the following appears in /var/log/messages gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application --snip-- Anyone have any

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 gpgv: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the application

If it helps, I figured out the application causing the error message. It's Ksplice's uptrace-upgrade which runs via cron... Still not sure what the solution is, or if this error is benign. On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:18 AM, P J pauljfli...@gmail.com wrote: Ahh, premature send! My apologies.

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:38 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: 2013/4/12 Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com Big snip... You are, none the less, not suppose to use addresses in that block for ANYTHING. The fc00::/7 block is intended for what you want to do. Even if they happen to work, they are

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

Hello, I may be totally off base here but... On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 18:06 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: hello, i met a problem in configuratiion of ipv6 gw in my box i install centos 6.3 (64 bit) on my boxs, which have four netcard. i use a straight-through cable to connect centosv0:netcard-2 and

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

Slight Clarification on v6 addressing... On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 15:38 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: Those may be routed between your machines but may not be routed on the global net either as a source or destination address. Your machines should also be given link local addresses which

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

2013/4/12 Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com Hello, I may be totally off base here but... On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 18:06 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: hello, i met a problem in configuratiion of ipv6 gw in my box i install centos 6.3 (64 bit) on my boxs, which have four netcard. i use a

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 09:28 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: 2013/4/12 Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com Hello, I may be totally off base here but... On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 18:06 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: hello, i met a problem in configuratiion of ipv6 gw in my box i install centos

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 ipv6 default gateway

2013/4/12 Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 09:28 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: 2013/4/12 Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com Hello, I may be totally off base here but... On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 18:06 +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: hello, i met a problem

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

Hello Svavar This was the first time that this problem occurred - with 60 Servers and about half a year of Centos 6 (5 before). But because the interfaces have a permanent load - really 24x7 - problems with power management would be a disaster. I will try to switch off. Thanks Hartmut How

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

After you have tried the pcie_aspm boot option, also try : echo performance /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy This will disable ASPM on PCIe and operate with maximum performance. This is what I use today on the DL380 G7. On 25.3.2013, at 09:06, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern)

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

On Mar 19, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern) hartmut.woeh...@sbb.ch wrote: Hello Mailing List I got a severe network error message at a HP DL360 Server. The kernel log says: If that's a DL360 G7 server, make sure you've applied all of the latest firmware

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

How often are you getting these crashes ? I had simular problem on my HP DL380 G7 server. I disabled Active State PowerManagement on the PCI-E express. Try it. Add pcie_aspm=off as optional boot option. Best regards, Svavar O Reykjavik - Iceland On 19.3.2013, at 15:32, Woehrle Hartmut

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 Network bnx2 Problem on HP DL360

On Mar 19, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern) hartmut.woeh...@sbb.ch wrote: Hello Mailing List I got a severe network error message at a HP DL360 Server. The kernel log says: If that's a DL360 G7 server, make sure you've applied all of the latest firmware patches from

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 early panic on Xeon E3-1270V2 - CentOS 6.4 too

Having read that RHEL/CentOS 6.4 came with new VMware drivers I checked whether this problem might perchance be fixed. It isn't. In the meantime I got a report that Windows 8 (64 bit) showed a similar problem. So, updated problem matrix (ESXi build omitted as it has no influence): Processor

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

On 10/17/2012 05:51 PM, SilverTip257 wrote: I recall others on this list are using fail2ban to block brute force login attempts. Packages are from the EPEL repo, so I'm just sharing some knowledge here. For about two months now I've had a CentOS 6.3 box (web host) in production that

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Theo Band theo.b...@greenpeak.com wrote: On 10/17/2012 05:51 PM, SilverTip257 wrote: I recall others on this list are using fail2ban to block brute force login attempts. Packages are from the EPEL repo, so I'm just sharing some knowledge here. For

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

Theo Band wrote: I have updated recently to 6 and see that fail2band ssh dos no longer works. Indeed after log rotate fail2ban seems to follow the old log file instead of the newly created /var/log/secure. I had backend = auto in /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf and gamin and pyinotify are both

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

On 03/12/2013 05:35 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I'm running fail2ban on my server (under CentOS-6.4) and it seems to be running according to - [tim@grover fail2ban]$ sudo service fail2ban status Fail2ban (pid 31794) is running... Status |- Number of jail: 1 `-

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

2013/3/12 Theo Band theo.b...@greenpeak.com: On 03/12/2013 05:35 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I'm running fail2ban on my server (under CentOS-6.4) and it seems to be running according to - [tim@grover fail2ban]$ sudo service fail2ban status Fail2ban (pid 31794) is

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

Dne 12.3.2013 19:03, Fabien Archambault napsal(a): I too have the same problem but couldn't figure where is the issue. It stops working even if the service says all is right. I have to restart the service to let it work again... I will try to find through your idea. Thanks, Fabien As

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Theo Band theo.b...@greenpeak.com wrote: On 03/12/2013 05:35 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I'm running fail2ban on my server (under CentOS-6.4) and it seems to be running according to - [tim@grover fail2ban]$ sudo service fail2ban

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:45 PM, David Hrbáč david-li...@hrbac.cz wrote: Dne 12.3.2013 19:03, Fabien Archambault napsal(a): I too have the same problem but couldn't figure where is the issue. It stops working even if the service says all is right. I have to restart the service to let it

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed Centos 6.3 over Centos 5.3. The internal video does not work in graphics mode (text works fine), though a monitor attacked to the VGA port works fine. Although my

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote: On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed Centos 6.3 over Centos 5.3. The internal video does not work in graphics mode (text works fine), though a monitor attacked to

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote: On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed Centos 6.3 over Centos 5.3. The internal video

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On 03/06/2013 03:47 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote: On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote: On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: On 03/06/2013 03:47 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote: On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote: On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware

On 03/06/2013 04:18 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote: On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: On 03/06/2013 03:47 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote: On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote: On

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

On 02/01/2013 01:33 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mogens Kjaer m...@lemo.dk wrote: Hello, In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) Requires: libreport

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

Luigi Rosa lists@... writes: Mogens Kjaer said the following on 01/02/2013 07:52: In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) Confirmed. Same issue here. Ciao, luigi The same

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

2013/2/1 odusseas piskopakis_antr...@hotmail.com: Luigi Rosa lists@... writes: Mogens Kjaer said the following on 01/02/2013 07:52: In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) Confirmed.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

Les Mikesell wrote: Using any single 3rd party repo is likely to work at least until the next update because the contents will have been tested against the base distro - as long as the packages are intended for use with RHEL/Centos. I have a slightly different question. I had

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: Using any single 3rd party repo is likely to work at least until the next update because the contents will have been tested against the base distro - as long as the packages are intended for use with

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johnny Hughes said the following on 01/02/2013 11:29: I am working this issue right now, should be fixed in about an hour. It is, thanks. Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ Mathematicians do it in theory. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

On 02/01/2013 05:41 AM, Fabien Archambault wrote: 2013/2/1 odusseas piskopakis_antr...@hotmail.com: Luigi Rosa lists@... writes: Mogens Kjaer said the following on 01/02/2013 07:52: In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update gives me: Error: Package:

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Bry8 Star bry8s...@yahoo.com wrote: When using multiple repo, then how would i know, an app/lib from non-CentOS (that is, 3rd party repo) is going to conflict or not with CentOS core, base, essential app/lib packages ? I don't think there is any way to know

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mogens Kjaer m...@lemo.dk wrote: Hello, In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) Requires: libreport = 2.0.9-5.el6_3.2 Removing:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3: libreport/abrt update problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mogens Kjaer said the following on 01/02/2013 07:52: In updates, there are new packages of abrt and libreport. But yum update gives me: Error: Package: abrt-2.0.8-6.el6.centos.2.x86_64 (updates) Confirmed. Same issue here. Ciao, luigi - -- /

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

* Another way to use multiple repo, other than what i mentioned in previous email (different repo with different priority# ), is to: * Set all repo's base, main/default, stable, extra, etc sections/channels on priority 10, and set all repo's other channels/sections like testing, (source,

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

When using multiple repo, then how would i know, an app/lib from non-CentOS (that is, 3rd party repo) is going to conflict or not with CentOS core, base, essential app/lib packages ? We need to know CentOS core, base, essential components. According to this file:

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 24.01.2013 23:26, Nux! wrote: If you'd like to try, I do maintain a desktop related repository meant to not conflict with @Base or EPEL (or Elrepo): You are backporting pkgs from fedora to el6. Imho you should supply your manpower to epel, because epel provides backported pkgs! -- Ibrahim

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

Sorry, mentioned [pgdg92] twice. Pls ignore/delete the [pgdg92] that has priority 15. Received from Bry8 Star, on 2013-01-28 10:16 AM: For PostgreSQL, i've done these (shown below) at initial/test stage: (pls DO NOT follow/copy it, try to understand pattern and do what fits for your

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 git core.sharedRepository = group/all not working?

On 01/30/2013 03:34 AM, Min Wang wrote: HI I have a git bare repo on centos 6.3 ( with selinux off) the config is: [core] repositoryformatversion = 0 filemode = true bare = true sharedRepository = all ( or true or group) chmod -R g+rs objects when git

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 git core.sharedRepository = group/all not working?

Hi thanks. I had a typo on my previsous emai it was: chmod -R g+rws objects -r--r--r--. 1 myuser mygroup 156 Jan 29 22:22 objects/fa/905054c795a3b7e5c244bfc6f3a30a0277c6d0 min On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Phil Dobbin bukowskis...@gmail.comwrote: On 01/30/2013 03:34 AM, Min Wang

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

For PostgreSQL, i've done these (shown below) at initial/test stage: (pls DO NOT follow/copy it, try to understand pattern and do what fits for your case/need). From a VE instance inside HN: yum has these plugins: fastestmirror, filter-data, keys, list-data, merge-conf, presto, priorities,

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Bry8 Star bry8s...@yahoo.com wrote: If ALL new apps/libs starts to change their API without backward compatibility, then, definitely updating/upgrading core/base apps would cause domino effect, like you have pointed out. Various apps and libs are

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 27/1/2013 5:11 μμ, Johnny Hughes wrote: Taking gtk2 as in our example here, if you wanted a new gtk2 in CentOS-5.9, then you would have to rebuild the following packages: A quick (?) question: What is the best way to view dependencies? 1. We can use yum deplist xxx.rpm to view

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 01/28/2013 01:26 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: On 27/1/2013 5:11 μμ, Johnny Hughes wrote: Taking gtk2 as in our example here, if you wanted a new gtk2 in CentOS-5.9, then you would have to rebuild the following packages: A quick (?) question: What is the best way to view dependencies? 1.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

I've tried this command: yum deplist gnutls --disableplugin=filter-data,priorities --disableexcludes=all --enablerepo=\* yum_01.txt ... that yum_01.txt file was around 202KB in my case. Result is formatted like this: ##...snip... package: gnutls.i686 2.12.22-1.fc18 dependency:

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 26.01.2013 22:07, schrieb James Freer: From what i have seen of fedora and centos in the rpm world the repos are very much better in the debian world. To me the stability comes from the distro and it's repos. Not

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

Hi Anthony, it would be really great, to see various types of repo-configs on centos wiki, now if few helpful experienced users can grab this idea and come forward and share their repo config (and their case/usage scenario along with that), then that would be great. I'm wondering, why no

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 01/27/2013 07:18 AM, Bry8 Star wrote: Hi Anthony, it would be really great, to see various types of repo-configs on centos wiki, now if few helpful experienced users can grab this idea and come forward and share their repo config (and their case/usage scenario along with that), then that

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 1/26/2013 4:21 PM, James Freer wrote: On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 26.01.2013 22:07, schrieb James Freer: From what i have seen of fedora and centos in the rpm world the repos are very much better in the debian world. To me the stability

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 01/27/2013 08:18 AM, Bry8 Star wrote: Hi Anthony, it would be really great, to see various types of repo-configs on centos wiki, now if few helpful experienced users can grab this idea and come forward and share their repo config (and their case/usage scenario along with that), then that

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 27/1/2013 5:11 μμ, Johnny Hughes wrote: So upgrading one package can cause a domino effect that means you have either broken a bunch of packages or you have to rebuild a bunch of packages. That is why you should *only* upgrade what is VITAL for your application(s), and in a carefully

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 01/28/2013 04:18 AM, John Hinton wrote: On 1/26/2013 4:21 PM, James Freer wrote: On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Reindl Haraldh.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 26.01.2013 22:07, schrieb James Freer: From what i have seen of fedora and centos in the rpm world the repos are very much

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 01/27/2013 05:46 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 01/28/2013 04:18 AM, John Hinton wrote: On 1/26/2013 4:21 PM, James Freer wrote: On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Reindl Haraldh.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 26.01.2013 22:07, schrieb James Freer: From what i have seen of fedora and centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 01/28/2013 04:43 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote: On 01/27/2013 08:18 AM, Bry8 Star wrote: Hi Anthony, it would be really great, to see various types of repo-configs on centos wiki, now if few helpful experienced users can grab this idea and come forward and share their repo config (and their

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3 - which repos to use?

On 01/27/2013 06:20 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 01/28/2013 04:43 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote: On 01/27/2013 08:18 AM, Bry8 Star wrote: Hi Anthony, it would be really great, to see various types of repo-configs on centos wiki, now if few helpful experienced users can grab this idea and come forward

  1   2   3   >