Re: [CentOS] Networking help

2008-04-24 Thread Ray Leventhal
Chris Mason (Lists) wrote: I have a centos 4.0 box that has three network interfaces and is used as router. It runs shorewall as a two-ISP firewall for a single LAN. This morning, the motherboard's LAN interface gave trouble, spewing out IRQ problems, so I disabled it and changed the network

Re: [CentOS] Networking help

2008-04-24 Thread Ray Leventhal
Les Mikesell wrote: Chris Mason (Lists) wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: I'm no expert, but I'd be the HWADDR values in your /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-ethx files need to be updated to reflect the new MAC addresses of the physical interfaces in the box. Done that. The ifcfg-ethX is referencing

Re: [CentOS] Irritant

2008-05-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
Dag Wieers wrote: You may be interested in a blog post of mine: Improving Putty settings on Windows http://dag.wieers.com/blog/improving-putty-settings-on-windows If you have other best-practices, add a comment :) Thanks, Dag, Thanks for that *very* helpful post. Putty is now far

Re: [CentOS] disk partitioning - I'm missing something simple, I think

2008-05-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 15:36 -0400, Ray Leventhal wrote: Hi all, Excuse the question as I'm sure those more experienced will find it simple. I've a CentOS5.1 box with six physical drives, two of which are used for nightly rsync backups. Contents of /etc/mtab, /etc

Re: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Ray Leventhal
Kevin Thorpe wrote: I found Amanda rather complex for what we wanted to do (simple backup of a single server to a single tape drive). We eventually decided on BRU (www.tolisgroup.com). It's not free, but the simple 'workstation' version isn't very expensive. Their support staff are really

Re: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Ray Leventhal
Martyn Drake wrote: snip Arkeia (at least when I last used it several years ago) was pretty much all point-and-click. Regards, Martyn And therein lies one of the downfalls of Arkeia. Its ease of use requires X. I don't generally enable X on servers, but as this particular network is

Re: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning

2008-05-16 Thread Ray Leventhal
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GBword1=Anne+Wilsonword2=Jim+Perrin :-) Anne But...if it were not for the sister-rock band Heart, would that be the case? Namesake and all. ;-) -R

Re: [CentOS] awstats, webalizer or...

2008-05-20 Thread Ray Leventhal
Ray Van Dolson wrote: So what does everyone out there use to generate web statistics these days? Are the tried and true awstats or webalizer still the best out there? Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] question on minimal install using CF as /dev/sda

2008-05-22 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi all, We're attempting to use CentOS 5.1 on a test platform which uses a CF card as it's primary storage. (MB: ETX-LX) The BIOS supports booting from CD and/or the CF. Issues we've run into are: During installation of CentOS 5.1, it appears all goes well through partitioning, package

[CentOS] slightly OT - gphpedit on CentOS 5?

2008-06-02 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi all, Advance apologies for being slightly OT. Has anyone had successes with installing gphpedit on CentOS 5? There don't seem to be any rpms avail for our distro and I'm far too new to roll my own. Thanks in advance (off - list replies are welcome if that's more appropriate) -Ray

Re: [CentOS] slightly OT - gphpedit on CentOS 5?

2008-06-03 Thread Ray Leventhal
snip You might try RPMs for Fedora Core 7 (not a perfect match, but maybe close enough): ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/fedora/releases/7/Everything/i386/os/Fedora/gphpedit-0.9.91-3.fc6.i386.rpm Otherwise, try building the RPM yourself, it's not that hard. Basically, create a file named ~/.rpmmacros

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing hacker tools

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Jim Wildman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Better, google for tiny centos and build a new box with the minimum on it. Hmmm, that looks exactly like what I'm looking for! I'm actually trying to find someone who has already done the

[CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
HI folks, I've an up-to-date CentOS 5.x box on a small intranet (20 users). We did a reboot over the weekend and all appears well except that clients on the LAN can no longer send email. Just hangs/times out. No clear identifiers in the /var/log/maillog or /var/log/messages. We're not

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
Ray Leventhal wrote: HI folks, I've an up-to-date CentOS 5.x box on a small intranet (20 users). We did a reboot over the weekend and all appears well except that clients on the LAN can no longer send email. Just hangs/times out. No clear identifiers in the /var/log/maillog or /var/log

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
Ray Leventhal wrote: HI folks, I've an up-to-date CentOS 5.x box on a small intranet (20 users). We did a reboot over the weekend and all appears well except that clients on the LAN can no longer send email. Just hangs/times out. No clear identifiers in the /var/log/maillog or /var/log

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
lingu wrote: Hi lingu, Thanks for your reply. Check the below things on your server. 1) diskspace df -h shows 253GB free on the LVM which holds mail 2) mailq mailq says 'mailqueue is empty' 3) netstat -ntlp |grep :25 |grep tcp # netstat -ntlp|grep :25|grep tcp tcp0 0

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot UPDATE

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
This now seems like a timeout issue. Increasing client-side timeout to 180 seconds gets mail going just fine. Any ideas on what might be happening since a reboot to cause this change in MTA behaviour would be greatly appreciated. Regards, -Ray

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
Kai Schaetzl wrote: so, it's a connection to itself. was this a test to localhost? If not, that hints in the direction of the problem. Maybe you accidentally set the smarthost to itself or so? I'd try a manual connect and walk thru an SMTP conversation and send a mail. Also, clients can produce

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot UPDATE

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
lists-centos wrote: are you configured for spamassassin or clamav as milters on the server (in the sendmail.cf) and either/both of these didn't start up on the reboot? sendmail will still accept mail with sa/clamav not running, but it takes a bit longer. there's also the possibility of an

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot UPDATE

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
snip where does the server point to for its dns? if it's (supposed to be) running a nameserver (e.g., you're pointing to 127.0.0.1) but the dns server isn't running you'll get a timeout. if you have a second nameserver configured in /etc/resolv.conf you'll likely ultimately get a response, but

Re: [CentOS] netboot, vnc and no keyboard/mouse/monitor

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
Tim Nelson wrote: I know I would certainly be interested in this... please post!!! :-) ditto for me ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:42:27 -0400: Do you think it's wise to replace the sendmail.cf and sendmail.mc files from the snapshot (after backing them up, of course)? If you did not change the files: no. As I said: go thru a manual send and check

Re: [CentOS] Re: sendmail not sending after reboot

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
big snip All your Daemon_options (`port... definitions are turned off (dnl). You have effectively told sendmail to not listen to anybody. At a minimum you need DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA') turned on for local mail to move, or DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA') to

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot UPDATE

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
snip DNS. It's always DNS :-) (more accurately, host and IP address resolution). How long is it taking your server to resolve the IP address into a name? To resolve names into IP addresses? To resolve destination MX records? Hi Stephen, While I agree, I'm still a bit stumped.

Re: [CentOS] Re: sendmail not sending after reboot

2008-06-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
What you posted was the sendmail.mc file. That might not be the options your system was running on if you never actually ran it through the macro processor. As I was looking through the rest of the thread, it looks as if you are not running on the settings in the sendmail.mc file. Do you run

Re: [CentOS] sendmail not sending after reboot

2008-06-10 Thread Ray Leventhal
He already knows that sendmail accepts connections. Maillog is of no help (maybe with a higher log level, I know that you can get even more info with 14). He has to identify the cause of the timeout and the first step is to identify the phase where it happens. Kai Hi folks, Name

Re: [CentOS] Apache jserv monitoring?

2008-06-11 Thread Ray Leventhal
Sean Carolan wrote: In our environment we have many legacy application servers running apache/jserv. There is a web server front end, then a couple of load-balanced java servers on the backside. One of the problems we are faced with is hung or stuck jvms. I have looked at the java process

[CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

2008-06-13 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi all, I'm following a how-to for ISPConfig using CentOS5.1 and have run into the following instruction: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management - Server - Settings - Email. ISPConfig will

Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

2008-06-13 Thread Ray Leventhal
- Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management - Server - Settings - Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary configuration. Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't installed, what's the CLI

Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli

2008-06-13 Thread Ray Leventhal
Thanks for the answers, pointers and help. Haste makes not only waste, but exposes inexperience, as it has done here. (my own, of course) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Firefox 3

2008-06-17 Thread Ray Leventhal
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Scott McClanahan wrote: This is completely off topic but just curious if you guys had any extra insight into what time today Firefox 3 will be released. Thanks. http://spreadfirefox.com/ Ralph I'm guessing they're not ready just yet, since I get the 'Unable

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Firefox 3

2008-06-17 Thread Ray Leventhal
Ray Leventhal wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Scott McClanahan wrote: This is completely off topic but just curious if you guys had any extra insight into what time today Firefox 3 will be released. Thanks. http://spreadfirefox.com/ Ralph I'm guessing they're not ready just yet

Re: [CentOS] Automatic site selection for dowload

2008-06-27 Thread Ray Leventhal
Sorin Srbu wrote: Ok, any particular reason why not? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is no functional delta-addon for yum in CentOS-5, are you getting confused with Fedora here ? So this doesn't work with CentOS then, correct? Thats what I said earlier, we dont support delta

[CentOS] extract MIME attachments from 700MB imap folder

2008-07-01 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi all, Issue: I've been tasked with extracting a bunch of MIME attachments (M$Word docs) from emails which have been stored in an imap folder in /home/username/mail/imap foldername. As the subject states, the imap folder is about 700MB. Googling suggested that munpack might do the trick,

Re: [CentOS] extract MIME attachments from 700MB imap folder

2008-07-01 Thread Ray Leventhal
snip I've read the man page, but am wholly unclear as to: 1) will this do the trick for me 2) are there other known tools which might be recommended Mime::Parser will split out the body and attachments of a message into files. I've only used it on single files being delivered via procmail

Re: [CentOS] extract MIME attachments from 700MB imap folder

2008-07-01 Thread Ray Leventhal
Les Mikesell wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: I've read the man page, but am wholly unclear as to: 1) will this do the trick for me 2) are there other known tools which might be recommended Mime::Parser will split out the body and attachments of a message into files. I've only used

Re: [CentOS] Firewall in CentOS 5.1

2008-07-25 Thread Ray Leventhal
Robert Spangler wrote: On Thursday 24 July 2008 03:34, Gopinath Achari wrote: Please suggest me a good firewall package for Cent OS 5.1 Server. This server is going to face to internet and will be accessed by the branch offices. adding a late voice to this thread, I've used and

Re: [CentOS] enterprise backup solution (probably amanda?)

2008-07-30 Thread Ray Leventhal
Les Mikesell wrote: David Hl�c(ik wrote: hope i am not making an offtopic Currently we are looking for storage/backup solution in our company. snip My 2cents: For commercial backup, cross platform, I have found that Arkeia products are not only easy (rpm based!) and stable, but they

Re: [CentOS] Help: Server security compromised?

2008-08-07 Thread Ray Leventhal
Noob Centos Admin wrote: On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Sorin Srbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seen this? http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/2007/09/18/safely_change_firewall_rules_remotely.html Unfortunately, only after you pointed it out :( But thankfully

[CentOS] Intro

2007-06-29 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi all, I'm very glad to have found this list as I've made a leap of faith and installed CentOS5 as my new testbed/dev machine. An advance 'thank you' to all more experienced than I for answers and a promise to be concise in my (surely about to become) abundant questions and just as forthcoming

[CentOS] wrong subject...oops

2007-07-03 Thread Ray Leventhal
previous post should have been: alternate port for vsftpd. my apologies ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] alternate port for vsftp

2007-07-03 Thread Ray Leventhal
Stephen Harris wrote: On a fresh install of CentOS5, I need to use an alternate port for ftp. Currently vsftpd wants the standard port which is in use by another system on my NATted network. So...how does one go about reconfiguring vsftpd to do this? I've looked in /etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and CPU spikes?

2007-07-09 Thread Ray Leventhal
Scott Ehrlich wrote: Is it just me, or does anyone else experience their CPU utilization spiking to 100% for about 5 to 10 seconds when Firefox is about to download a file, via http or ftp? Then, after the file starts to download, the CPU usage drops back down to normal. I've got Firefox

[CentOS] latest clamav update from rpmforge...no joy - CentOS5

2007-07-12 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi group, An easy question, I'm sure. I'm trying to update clamav to the new 0.91 version from rpmforge. I've v 90.3 installed (through yum). Executing: yum update clamav returns: Loading installonlyn plugin Loading priorities plugin Loading fastestmirror plugin Setting up Update Process

Re: [CentOS] latest clamav update from rpmforge...no joy - CentOS5

2007-07-12 Thread Ray Leventhal
Mogens Kjaer wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: Hi group, An easy question, I'm sure. I'm trying to update clamav to the new 0.91 version from rpmforge. I've v 90.3 installed (through yum). I got it to update by cleaning yum first: yum clean all yum update Mogens Hi all

Re: [CentOS] latest clamav update from rpmforge...no joy - CentOS5 - RESOLVED

2007-07-12 Thread Ray Leventhal
Ray Leventhal wrote: Mogens Kjaer wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: Hi group, An easy question, I'm sure. I'm trying to update clamav to the new 0.91 version from rpmforge. I've v 90.3 installed (through yum). I got it to update by cleaning yum first: yum clean

Re: [CentOS] upgrade my open ssl

2007-07-16 Thread Ray Leventhal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All, I have centos 4.5 final and when i installed it there is a openssl version openssl-0.9.7a-43.16 .. i need to upgrade it to openssl 0.9.8 .. also when i try to uninstall it it gives me a failed dependency errror actually i did a nodeps and uninstalled

[CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

2007-08-02 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi folks, As a breather from the thread-now-wider-than-my-headers-window-in-thunderbird conversation re: mixing repos, I have a question regarding a machine I'm about to put online. :) I run a web hosting company and my secondary (primary to the world) DNS box died from a massive rootkit/hack

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

2007-08-02 Thread Ray Leventhal
Feizhou wrote: As it will be a production server and this is my first foray into CentOS/SELinux in a production environment I was hoping to get a recommended list of what to include and, more specifically, what *not* to include from the distro CDs I will be doing a text based install,

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

2007-08-02 Thread Ray Leventhal
Jim Perrin wrote: 2 recent pitfalls for bind on RHEL5. 1st being that upstream has removed the default configs for bind. This was apparently intentional. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234508 for more information also, the last bind update modified some file

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

2007-08-02 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi Jay, et al, snip CentOS 5 is a .0 release, you might be better served using CentOS 4.5 which has had much more tme to prove itself as a DNS Server. 4.5 also has a good bit of time left on updates to (till Feb 29th, 2012) so you shouldn't worry to much about it becoming obsolete.

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

2007-08-03 Thread Ray Leventhal
snip I'm coming in late to this thread. We too are a hosting provider (small time), hosting approximately 1600 live domains. Not to say tinydns is a bad alternative, as it has it's strengths, but we moved away from [outgrew] it 2 years ago. If you were already running Bind, CentOS 5 is a

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

2007-08-03 Thread Ray Leventhal
Feizhou wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: Tomasz Napierała wrote: snip Apart from installation, I would suggest using PowerDNS as a secondary DNS. It's not only robust, fast and secure, but also has very interesting capability of automated zones depolying (espacially usefull for secondary NS

[CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes

2007-08-05 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi folks, I've put my new DNS server in place, told the primary that this IP would be pulling zones and restarted BIND on the primary. I configured my named.conf file to pull zones from the primary, started BIND on the new box. Here's where I get confused [EMAIL

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes

2007-08-05 Thread Ray Leventhal
Craig White wrote: On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 18:07 -0400, Ray Leventhal wrote: Hi folks, I've put my new DNS server in place, told the primary that this IP would be pulling zones and restarted BIND on the primary. snip So the new BIND sees the conf file and recognizes that there are 169

Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Ray Leventhal
big snip You will need a backup solution too, don't forget have a backup strategy from the start! -Ross Amen to that, Ross. I've used a few, but have found that the paid solution from Arkeia[1] is pretty damned solid and easy to use. HTH, ~Ray [1] http://www.arkeia.com/

Re: [CentOS] dns propagation problem

2007-08-15 Thread Ray Leventhal
Mark Quitoriano wrote: On 8/12/07, *James Gray* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As others have said, you MUST increment the zone's serial. Addtitionally, on the master you may want to add notify yes; to the zone stubs. This will make sure bind sends out a

[CentOS] repost: SELinux questions, upon restarting BIND

2007-08-17 Thread Ray Leventhal
As this remains an issue for me, I'm reposting. Please forgive the redundancy, but I've been unable to find the answer and am hoping for some guidance. Thanks in advance, ~Ray ==Original Posts follow== (full output is in the original thread) Ray Leventhal wrote: Hi all

Re: [CentOS] repost: SELinux questions, upon restarting BIND

2007-08-17 Thread Ray Leventhal
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:16 -0400, Ray Leventhal wrote: As this remains an issue for me, I'm reposting. Please forgive the redundancy, but I've been unable to find the answer and am hoping for some guidance. Thanks in advance, ~Ray ==Original Posts follow== (full

Re: [CentOS] SATA vs. SAS

2007-08-22 Thread Ray Leventhal
Bowie Bailey wrote: snip Recovery from the failures seems to be more a matter of the raid implementation than the interface type. My 'day job' is with a data recovery firm. I cannot agree more fervently with Bowie's comment above. ~Ray ___

Re: [CentOS] quick FTP server with default vsftpd installation

2007-08-22 Thread Ray Leventhal
Simon Jolle wrote: Hi list I just installed vsftpd and started it (CentOS 5). Then put some files in /var/ftp/pub (for testing purposes with rights 777) and try to connect with local user to download those files. $ lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ls ls: Login

Re: [CentOS] quick FTP server with default vsftpd installation

2007-08-22 Thread Ray Leventhal
Simon Jolle wrote: Hi Ray 2007/8/22, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is SELinux running? if so, what mode? SELinux is running in enforcing mode. I recall having to construct an setsebool statement to get vsftpd opened up correctly. I'll look back at my notes

Re: [CentOS] BIND issues, server not responding

2007-08-22 Thread Ray Leventhal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: first, if you turn query logging on you'll likely get some more hints. Rick, I did miss that comment before I posted. I'll do that and query...will report the log here this evening. Kind regards, ~Ray ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] BIND issues, server not responding

2007-08-22 Thread Ray Leventhal
Ray Leventhal wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: first, if you turn query logging on you'll likely get some more hints. Rick, I did miss that comment before I posted. I'll do that and query...will report the log here this evening. Kind regards, ~Ray

Re: [CentOS] BIND issues, server not responding

2007-08-22 Thread Ray Leventhal
snip Do a netstat -na|grep 53 Lets be really sure. Hi Robert, Thanks for the reply. as requested: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ray]# netstat -na|grep 53 tcp0 0 64.135.16.15:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:53 0.0.0.0:*

Re: [CentOS] quick FTP server with default vsftpd installation

2007-08-22 Thread Ray Leventhal
Simon Jolle wrote: 2007/8/22, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Does the ftp daemon respond properly if you issue: /usr/sbin/setenforce 0 Hi Ray Yes by disabling SElinux everything works as expected. I think I need some introductions docs about selinux ;-) Hi Simon

Re: [CentOS] BIND issues, server not responding

2007-08-23 Thread Ray Leventhal
snip not certain if you intend it to be, but your 64.135.16.15 machine is not reachable from outside. an attempt to telnet to port 53 (or 25) gets me no route to host and a traceroute ends with: 8 ge2-0.cr1.bct.fl.host.net (64.135.1.9) 34.779ms 35.102ms 35.413ms 9

Re: [CentOS] BIND issues, server not responding

2007-08-23 Thread Ray Leventhal
big snip Michel van Deventer wrote: From what I see you have iptables 'in the way'. Try to add the following rule to iptables and then try again :) iptables -I RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j ACCEPT -p udp --dport 53 If you like to have zone transfers or large queries done as well then you also

Re: [CentOS] need help on second Ethernet port (eth1) point to point connect

2007-08-29 Thread Ray Leventhal
John R Pierce wrote: mcclnx mcc wrote: I have two DELL servers with two Ethernet ports in it. Bith servers have CENTOS 4.5 installed. First Ethernet port connect to public Ethernet line and work correctly. Second Ethernet port I connect point-to-point as private Ethernet (cable direct

Re: [CentOS] Seeds for Centos 4.5 (s390) bittorrent

2007-08-29 Thread Ray Leventhal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I would like to download the DVD image for the s390x hardware – could someone seed the torrent or point me to an image I can download? Thanks, Mike.

Re: [CentOS] Why CentOS as a webhosting platform

2007-09-06 Thread Ray Leventhal
Karanbir Singh wrote: Hi, CentOS seems to be doing really well in the hosting business these days, and even for people who would normally have used Windows or OSX on the hosting previously, are now looking at using CentOS. And I thought it would be nice to have a section on the wiki about

Re: [CentOS] unable to add IP address to eth0:0 eth0:1 etc

2007-09-07 Thread Ray Leventhal
Dear Ray, Please assure me that: /sbin/ifconfig eth0:0 xx.xx.xx.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 http://255.255.255.0/ Is this the valid netmask 255.255.255.0 http://255.255.255.0 for static IP address for this machine you mentioned it will be ifconfig eth0:0 x netmask

Re: [CentOS] unable to add IP address to eth0:0 eth0:1 etc

2007-09-07 Thread Ray Leventhal
Karanbir Singh wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: Hi all, I need to (quickly!grrr) update IP addresses for which a given machine will answer. I did this: /sbin/ifconfig eth0:0 xx.xx.xx.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 you might want to investigate /sbin/ip - its been around for a few years now

Re: [CentOS] unable to add IP address to eth0:0 eth0:1 etc

2007-09-07 Thread Ray Leventhal
snip if you'd explain, I'd be grateful. You will need to add the routes for the other subnet in your routing table as such. route add -net XX.XX.XX.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0 I believe there is a place to add static routes in one of the startup scripts (besides rc.local), but

[CentOS] unable to add IP address to eth0:0 eth0:1 etc

2007-09-07 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi all, I need to (quickly!grrr) update IP addresses for which a given machine will answer. I did this: /sbin/ifconfig eth0:0 xx.xx.xx.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:1 xx.xx.xx.11 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:2 xx.xx.xx.30 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:3

Re: [CentOS] unable to add IP address to eth0:0 eth0:1 etc

2007-09-07 Thread Ray Leventhal
Karanbir Singh wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: I'm getting an error on adding the route. The machine's base IP is in the xx.xx.16.x /24. The additional IPs are in another /24. Base is physical, the others are virtual hosts. What Ross said, will work fine if your network bits match and your

Re: [CentOS] unable to add IP address to eth0:0 eth0:1 etc

2007-09-07 Thread Ray Leventhal
Karanbir Singh wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: Sounds like the issue is at hand. xx.xx.16.xx is the inital /24, base for the unit and default address on eth0 The additional, alias addresses are in the xx.xx.106.xx /24. They gateway on 16.1 and 106.1 respectively. Since you are using legacy

Re: [CentOS] imap webmail client needed

2007-09-08 Thread Ray Leventhal
Sokol wrote: Hi list, I´m searching a webmail imap client including a calendar and a todo list (last is not necessary) for 2 or 3 users. I have tried zimbra but it´s too oversized for my claim. Do someone have a hint? Thanks. Kamill ___

[CentOS] question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x

2007-09-14 Thread Ray Leventhal
When using ifcfg-eth0:x files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/, should each file (where x increments appropriately) point to DEVICE=eth0:x or DEVICE=eth0:0? I apparently have my alias files all ifcfg-eth0:0 - ifcfg-eth0:7 show DEVICE=eth0:0. Is this right? It seems odd to me and while it does

Re: [CentOS] question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x

2007-09-14 Thread Ray Leventhal
Jim Perrin wrote: On 9/14/07, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/RangeOfIpsOnEthx Hi Jim, Thank you for the link...it's definitely good to know one can assign a range of IPs with ease using that type of directive. As my additional IPs were

Re: [CentOS] question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x

2007-09-14 Thread Ray Leventhal
Barry Brimer wrote: I apparently have my alias files all ifcfg-eth0:0 - ifcfg-eth0:7 show DEVICE=eth0:0. Is this right? It seems odd to me and while it does seem odd, the alias IPs are being appropriately responded to, answering pings and nameserver requests.

[CentOS] dual boot w/WinXP

2007-09-18 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi folks, I've been asked advice in an area that I'm not well versed and am hoping for some help. Having read a recent thread where booting to anaconda's kickstart wiped a partition table unexpectedly (to the user...it did what it was configured to do), I'm following the 'measure twice, cut

Re: [CentOS] Re: dual boot w/WinXP

2007-09-18 Thread Ray Leventhal
snip I have a working WinXP SP2 workstation with an unused partition on the primary HDD. I'd like for the unused area to be used for dual booting CentOS5 but am not sure what needs to be done (if anything) to the config file for kickstart prior to booting with CD1 in the drive. Any

Re: [CentOS] webmin

2007-09-20 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hiep Nguyen wrote: hi there, i just insalled centos 4.5 minimal, but want to use yum to install webmin? anybody know how?? i try: yum install webmin but not found. thanks, T. Hiep ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] iptables question

2007-09-20 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi all, With SELinux in permissive mode and iptables running, I'm unable to retrieve directory listings with ftp. stop iptables, and all appears again. This seems to be unrelated to passive/port modes for ftp client. If this is off topic, please let me know offlist and I'll take my question

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2007-09-20 Thread Ray Leventhal
Fabian Arrotin wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 14:55 -0400, Ray Leventhal wrote: Hi all, With SELinux in permissive mode and iptables running, I'm unable to retrieve directory listings with ftp. stop iptables, and all appears again. This seems to be unrelated to passive/port modes

Re: [CentOS] mysql and windows

2007-09-28 Thread Ray Leventhal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's worse than mysql? dd? cpio? Geoff Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld. oh, I dunno...perhaps cfdisk? grub? I'm literally laughing out loud here ~R ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Error while running YUM UPDATE today

2007-10-24 Thread Ray Leventhal
Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894 wrote: error viewed: Updating : openssl ### [ 1/48] /sbin/ldconfig: /lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is not an ELF file - it has the wr ong magic bytes at the start. Updating : openssl

Re: [CentOS] Error while running YUM UPDATE today

2007-10-24 Thread Ray Leventhal
Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894 wrote: error viewed: Updating : openssl ### [ 1/48] /sbin/ldconfig: /lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is not an ELF file - it has the wr ong magic bytes at the start. Updating : openssl

[CentOS] Question regarding hardened-php

2007-11-07 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi all, Please forgive what may be an OT question: I'm considering using hardened php and am interested in any comments which may be offered regarding hardened php and CentOS5. For reference: http://www.hardened-php.net/hardening_patch.14.html Is hardened php available as an RPM from any of

Re: [CentOS] About md5sum

2007-11-20 Thread Ray Leventhal
Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi all, A friend of mine gives me a copy of Centos5 DVD. I then make an iso of it using dd if=/dev/cdrom of=centos5.iso command. I then check it using sha1sum. But the result is different than of listed in Centos website. Should it the same? Or we simply cannot compare

Re: [CentOS] About md5sum

2007-11-20 Thread Ray Leventhal
Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi all, A friend of mine gives me a copy of Centos5 DVD. I then make an iso of it using dd if=/dev/cdrom of=centos5.iso command. I then check it using sha1sum. But the result is different than of listed in Centos website. Should it the same? Or we simply cannot compare

Re: [CentOS] Re: Support policy CentOS 5

2008-08-22 Thread Ray Leventhal
Do you have a link to this application's website? Maybe we could determine why it might be stuck to a limited set of OS releases. If a software can't keep up with a limited subset of OS updates, maybe they are concerned more with costs then security. The OP is happily incorrect on the

Re: [CentOS] quarantine mail

2008-10-01 Thread Ray Leventhal
kcc wrote: Hi In my mailscanner, i have mail in quarantine folder. How can I get back attachement in quarantine folder? I use mail user message. but the attachment is just coding not the attachment thank you I'm not certain this is *the* way to do it, but...assuming you've allowed the

[CentOS] 'severe errors' listed in nightly logwatch emails

2008-10-28 Thread Ray Leventhal
HI folks, If this is the wrong forum for this question, please let me know (with a gentle pointer to the right place)...TIA for that. I've started to receive some 'Severe Errors' in my nightly logwatch emails. As the system had been initially misconfigured for logwatch emails, I've only

Re: [CentOS] disk space issues...any help is greatly appreciated

2008-11-26 Thread Ray Leventhal
Rudi Ahlers wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Please pardon my newbie-ness on this issueI've a / partition which is full (quite suddenly, actually) and I'm not sure how to fix this. I've searched for uneeded logs, etc in /var/log

SOLVED Re: [CentOS] disk space issues...any help is greatly appreciated

2008-11-26 Thread Ray Leventhal
Sorin Srbu wrote: Ray Leventhal scribbled on Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:50 PM: I have additional HDDs available if growing the partition is in order (would appreciate pointers to that, if applicable), but I'm really stumped as to where the space is being eaten up. Try a yum

Re: [CentOS] disk space issues...any help is greatly appreciated

2008-11-26 Thread Ray Leventhal
Sorin Srbu wrote: Ray Leventhal scribbled on Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:50 PM: I have additional HDDs available if growing the partition is in order (would appreciate pointers to that, if applicable), but I'm really stumped as to where the space is being eaten up. Try a yum

Re: [SOLVED] [CentOS] disk space issues...any help is greatly appreciated

2008-11-26 Thread Ray Leventhal
Sorin Srbu wrote: Ray Leventhal scribbled on Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:50 PM: I have additional HDDs available if growing the partition is in order (would appreciate pointers to that, if applicable), but I'm really stumped as to where the space is being eaten up. Try a yum

Re: [SOLVED] [CentOS] disk space issues...any help is greatly appreciated

2008-11-26 Thread Ray Leventhal
Robert wrote: snip original stuff I noticed the chorus of agreement that your problem was likely a result of failure to mount your backup drive. My backup script, which also uses rsync begins like this, insuring a good mount before shoving bytes around. It's not SUPPOSED to be mounted

  1   2   >