Hello,
I have been using chrome for a while now on other systems. I am having an
issue finding Chrome for Centos. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thnx.
--
Regards
Robert
Linux
The adventure of a lifetime.
Linux User #296285
Get Counted
http://linuxcounter.net/
On Wednesday 25 July 2012 17:47, the following was written:
I used dig from the email svr command line with the primary DNS svr up
and (naturally) it pulled from there as normal. Then I downed the
primary DNS svr, saw the nagios check fail and tried again. The same
dig lookup was
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 16:38, the following was written:
I have two seemingly identical (in this reglard, at least) machine - both
of them are running CentOS 6.2 with bind (bind-chroot) installed. I used
webmin to edit the DNS configuration. One one of them it seems to work
fine, on the
On Friday 27 April 2012 18:41, the following was written:
On 4/27/2012 5:05 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
dropping IPs by host machine, protecting the vms.
would something like this work
-A PREROUTING -s 66.77.65.128/26 -j DROP
or would my server die upon testing it...lol
On Thursday 15 March 2012 20:38, the following was written:
On 3/15/2012 8:09 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
Hello all,
Is this a known issue?
From what I can tell it started on Tuesday.
~ $ sudo yum -y update Password:
Setting up Update
Hello all,
Is this a known issue?
From what I can tell it started on Tuesday.
~ $ sudo yum -y update
Password:
Setting up Update Process
Setting up repositories
dag 100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
kbs-CentOS-Extras
On Saturday 10 March 2012 13:45, the following was written:
Thnx everyone. I was under the impression that even though you had access to
the directory you still could not touch a file that you were not part of the
owner or group unless the bits were set.
--
Regards
Robert
Linux
The
Hello,
I need to know if there is something I am missing about file permission as I
believe I am seeing some strange stuff on my system. I have a directory as
follows:
drwxrwxrwx 7 root root 4096 Mar 10 13:35 temp
In this directory I have a file:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 137 Oct 30
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could tell me why so many processes are started on
my system? Here is a list of them. I am trying to figure out why they are
running and if I can stop them. Thnx.
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S
On Thursday 08 March 2012 20:44, the following was written:
From the looks of things, you have 8 CPUs (or cores), and these standard
processes are being started on a 1 per core basis.
I have a quad-core proc, and have 4 of each of those processes (0-3).
That is what I was thinking but
On Saturday 03 March 2012 00:35, the following was written:
I escalated to the DC manager and this is what he replied:
I'm sorry your having a hard time with software raid on your server and
our install process. From what I remember talking with out techs long
ago about this is, that
On Tuesday 14 February 2012 15:21, the following was written:
Is there a way to add a rule to the nat table (CentOS 5.7) that would
alter the port number of tcp packets destined for the server itself? I
have ip_forwarding enabled, but the packets don't seem to hit the
prerouting chain.
On Saturday 04 February 2012 19:18, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want
On Friday 03 February 2012 08:07, the following was written:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
named br0.
Searching the web I only found about creating a file
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to
explicitely
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
named br0.
Searching the web I only found about creating a file
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 03:43, the following was written:
Hi,
This is a Centos 5.5 host with one xen guest.
About 2 weeks ago, the host randomly lost network connection. By
this I mean I could not connect to the services on it, or ping it.
Also was the status of the guest.
On Friday 07 October 2011 06:25, the following was written:
In the named.conf, located on main.example.com, I am adding my entire 16
IP block of addresses along with my localhost
options {
allow-recursion { localhost; xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx /29;};
allow-query { localhost;
On Tuesday 20 September 2011 04:10, the following was written:
On 19.09.2011 23:48, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Monday 19 September 2011 11:04, the following was written:
So
How do you specifiy the order in which NICs are enumerated?
or at least how to tell centos to stop
On Tuesday 20 September 2011 17:39, the following was written:
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 04:44:35 PM Robert Nichols wrote:
On 09/20/2011 02:49 PM, Craig White wrote:
Guessing that you didn't look/watch the console on first boot but
rather used ssh to connect from another
On Monday 19 September 2011 11:04, the following was written:
So
How do you specifiy the order in which NICs are enumerated?
or at least how to tell centos to stop messing with the
70-persistent-net.rules?
Add the hardware addresses to their ifcfg-eth# files.
On Sunday 11 September 2011 14:57, the following was written:
So why is ifconfig eth0 up not connecting?
Have you tried 'ifup eth0'?
--
Regards
Robert
Linux
The adventure of a lifetime.
Linux User #296285
Get Counted
http://linuxcounter.net/
On Thursday 08 September 2011 16:58, the following was written:
I'm not a pro or anything, but this bug report gives a bit more info.
Have you made any changes to the disk lately?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485921
find / -context *:file_t:*
The above command will
On Friday 09 September 2011 10:21, the following was written:
That's the total output?
Yep. Nothing more. I ran it again and here is the new output:
[Fri Sep 09 10:40:20] [rjs@bms] /home/rjs
~ $ sudo find / -context *:file_t:*
getfilecon(/proc/7408/task/7408/fd/4): No such file or
Hello,
I received the below SELinux message today and I am trying to figure out what
caused it. I see what it says under Allow Access but I am not sure this is
what I really want to do without know why it happened in the first place.
What should I be looking at to understand what or why this
On Wednesday 31 August 2011 17:37, the following was written:
The system involved is a 32-bit system, installed via the net about a
yum update
encountered the following diagonstic
Error: Package: yaf-1.3.2-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge)
Requires:
On Tuesday 19 July 2011 09:11, the following was written:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'm running CentOS-6 on an HP MicroServer
with a Billion 5200S modem/router connecting to the internet.
I'm running the standard CentOS-6 firewall on the server.
(1) I can open port 22 on the Billion,
On Monday 13 June 2011 14:02, the following was written:
We just went to replace the bridge/firewall services one one server with
the same on another. It's pretty simple, and I literally cloned (w/ rsync)
a third server that does this onto the one that will be the new one. Then
copied the
On Thursday 09 June 2011 17:34, the following was written:
How to configure sshd to required both ssh public key and user
password also? yes, stupid, but required on my setup..
Have you thought about securing your ssh keys with a pasword? I do that here
so if someone would happen to get a
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12:58, the following was written:
I'm running fail2ban on my centos machine. It's handling sshd and
postfix, and is working quite well. From the reports I'm seeing all
the atempts are from a certain registrar's region, I won't name it,
and was wondering instead of
On Friday 08 April 2011 14:32, the following was written:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johan Martinez wrote:
I have modified /etc/hosts file with IP address and hostname entries.
However, host command is returning 'Host vhost1.example.com not found:
On Tuesday 08 March 2011 12:39, the following was written:
And giving it 127.0.0.1 would tell it others to ignore it, I think.
Where did your user come up with this idea - clearly, they have *no*
clue what they're doing, and need at least a brown bag lunch about
TCP/IP, and they
On Monday 07 March 2011 15:22, the following was written:
Keith Keller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
loopback
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 16:43, Carlos S wrote:
Thanks for the help.
You are welcome.
Robert, you pointed out the mistakes correctly. Not sure why I used
iptables-save command at first place...
Most likely because in ever other distro and web page that is the way to do
it. It's just
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 13:36, Carlos S wrote:
I am forwarding traffic on port 8080 to port 80 with following rule.
# iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j
REDIRECT --to-port 80
Shouldn't that be '--to-ports'?
On Monday 31 January 2011 07:46, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to
$PROXY:3128 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 443 -j
DNAT --to $PROXY:3128
browser tell me invalid request.
From the man pages:
DNAT
On Thursday 20 January 2011 09:14, Ross Walker wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Bob Eastbrook baconeater...@gmail.com wrote:
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how
can I disable this
On Friday 14 January 2011 04:01, Ritika Garg wrote:
When I give the command cp file1 file2 then the error comes:
cp: cannot create regular file `file2': Input/output error
This occurs sometimes and it occurs when I am giving the command inside a
external hard disk which is mounted by
On Friday 14 January 2011 05:45, Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 13/01/2011 21:45, Daniel Heitmann wrote:
On 13.01.2011, at 22:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You should probably give RH a call with your questions, or try this
mailing list:
Or wait a few more weeks for CentOS 6, if it's a
On Sunday 09 January 2011 13:33, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Our intranet's WAN interface just stopped working yesterday, and I
can't figure it out.
Look in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. There you should see ifcfg-eth# If
ifcfg-eth0 isn't there copy ifcfg-eth1 to ifccfg-eth0 and then configure
On Friday 03 December 2010 19:30, Michael D. Berger wrote:
In the control script of my daemon in /etc/init.d?, I have
# chkconfig: 35 97 3
The result of this is that I have links:
/etc/rc.d/rc1.d/K03...
/etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S97...
/etc/rc.d/rc5.d/S97...
As mentioned in a
On Tuesday 30 November 2010 11:59, Matt wrote:
Have a CentOS 4.x 32 bit server running on a single 500M SATA drive.
What is easiest way to convert too RAID 1 on it? Anyone have a link?
Would be open to hardware or software just do not want to reinstall
the entire mess.
On Friday 26 November 2010 21:47, Scott Robbins wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM
It has couple of points the OP may need to know. One is that
NetworkManager needs to be disabled. The other is how to handle
iptables (OP disable it while troubleshooting).
Ah, aikawarazu,
Hello,
Presently I am running CentOS release 5.5 (Final). I am looking to setup
bridging as I would like to setup some KVM virtual hosts on my system as a
test lab. I am following the the instruction at this site
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO/index.html
but I cannot figure out
On Friday 26 November 2010 12:22, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
Presently I am running CentOS release 5.5 (Final). I am looking to
setup bridging as I would like to setup some KVM virtual hosts on my
system as a
Time to test if ping works:
~ $ ping -c3 192.168.1.254
PING
On Friday 26 November 2010 12:27, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I recommend you look at the documentaion available from
docs.redhat.com. For setting up bridged networking, see:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html-single/Vi
On Friday 26 November 2010 12:28, Robert Heller wrote:
works before committing it to the config:
brctl addbr br0
ifconfig eth0 down
ifconfig br0 192.168.1.100 up
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up
brctl addif br0 eth0
You need to add the physical interface(s) to the bridge
On Thursday 18 November 2010 12:25, John Hodrien wrote:
DHCP will always over write the resolv.conf file when started.
Importantly, no. PEERDNS=no is designed for exactly this purpose.
Thnx for the information and setting me straight.
--
Regards
Robert
Linux
The adventure of a life
On Thursday 18 November 2010 07:09, Lanny Marcus wrote:
Box is fully updated CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). DHCP is from the ADSL modem
192.168.1.1. After I update the DNS settings and restart the network,
the DNS changes do not hold. I have tried using this GUI, as a regular
user, after giving the
Hello,
I am looking for good website with information on the above 2 items listed in
the subject. I have place some with RAID and believe I am picking that up
but XEN is another story. I have some free time coming and would really like
to learn both and build my present machine into a VM
On Thursday 16 September 2010 16:03, alexus wrote:
I'm trying to do some simple tcp port forwarding
The first thing you need to do is drop the RH-firewall BS and create a new
firewall rule set setup for your needs. If you don't know how to setup a
firewall then I would suggest you get one
On Monday 17 May 2010 09:58, Len Kuykendall wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:13:43 +0200
From: gavro...@gavroche.pl
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: iptables]
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:08:45PM -0400, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 23 April 2010 15:20
On Saturday 08 May 2010 14:46, Jerry Geis wrote:
How does someone debug iptables?
Seems like the local eth0 is working , eth2 is working but connections
on eth1 dont seem to go anywhere.
How can I tell what is happening for eth1 and iptables?
Maybe its your routing? Post both the
On Friday 23 April 2010 15:20, cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
how or why i have redesigned it to this and it seems like worked :
See big problems in your future.
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
Anyone with a little bit of security awareness would never set the
On Monday 29 March 2010 16:48, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've got a server with several ip's on eth0. I want to block all traffic
*except* to port 80 on them, but not on any other IPs, so that
eth0 is www.xxx.yyy.zzz
eth0:1 is www.xxx.yyy.ggg
eth0:2 is www.xxx.yyy.hhh
I've tried
-A
On Saturday 27 March 2010 05:07, John R Pierce wrote:
for all practical purposes its the same thing. if it was really
stripe then mirror, a naive mirror handler would think it would have to
remirror both drives when one half of one of the stripesets failed and
was replaced. but in
On Saturday 27 March 2010 09:22, Ross Walker wrote:
for all practical purposes its the same thing. if it was really
stripe then mirror, a naive mirror handler would think it would have
to
remirror both drives when one half of one of the stripesets failed and
was replaced.
On Thursday 25 March 2010 18:10, Robert Heller wrote:
The prefered way to go would be RAID10 (RAID1 (mirror) + RAID0 (stripe)).
Form pairs as RAID1, then strip the pairs. With 8 disks, this would 4
pairs, 1.5TB/pair = 1.5*4 = 6TB total.
I am just starting to look into this RAID and I was
On Sunday 21 March 2010 10:54, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Recently I played around with FreeNX on my own desktop, and I'd like to
install it on these two computers. On my PC, I just redirected port 22
in the router, so SSH (and thus FreeNX) requests from the outside get
redirected to my desktop
On Monday 08 March 2010 20:08, Robert Spangler wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction?
I am receiving these in my log file and do not know what they mean or what
to look for;
Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction?
I am receiving these in my log file and do not know what they mean or what to
look for;
Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0
action 0x0
Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: cmd
Hi,
I was wondering if bash or inputrc has changed form CentOS v4 to CentOS v5?
Reason I ask is at the bash cli I can type, for example 'su' and then with
the up and down arrows I can scroll through my history and will only see the
commands that begin with 'su'. In CentOS 5 this isn't the
On Friday 19 February 2010 12:42, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 2/19/2010 11:30 AM, Robert Spangler wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if bash or inputrc has changed form CentOS v4 to CentOS
v5? Reason I ask is at the bash cli I can type, for example 'su' and
then with the up and down arrows I
On Thursday 04 February 2010 14:21, adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I change eth1 from realtek to dlink but the centos is showing eth2 instead
of eth1
Edit your ifcfg-eth1 and add the MAC Address of the card.
I would do this for every interface.
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
On Monday 25 January 2010 09:35, Roland Roland wrote:
it's all working fine, right now i want to change the main public dns
from one IP to another to do some testing (the new public dns ip has
records which the old one doesnt have and it's done as such for testing)
so i got into
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 13:57, Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 09:50 -0800, R-Elists wrote:
ummm, why do the two different networks need an IP on the same
subnet ?
I have had a number of people ask me why I want this arrangement, where
I have two modems on a single
On Friday 08 January 2010 15:32, James B. Byrne wrote:
:BRUTE_FORCE - [0:0]
. . .
-A BRUTE_FORCE -p tcp -m tcp -m state -m recent --set -i eth0
--dport 22 --state NEW
-A BRUTE_FORCE -m comment -j RETURN --comment Return to calling chain
COMMIT
Check out this TUTORIAL
Hello,
I received for X-mas an APC UPS system form my computer. I'm looking for how
I can integrate it into the system so that the system will shut down either
after the UPS power is low enough or a timed event after the power is out
will automatically shutdown. Would also like it to be
On Friday 18 December 2009 16:05, Peter Serwe wrote:
I don't know jack about IPSet, but I know enabling or disabling hosts in
bare stock PF without the gui in front of it is about as easy as it gets.
IPTALES is the same;
iptables -A [INPUT/FORWARD] -d ip address -j [REJECT/DROP]
The PF
On Wednesday 25 November 2009 13:57, Boris Epstein wrote:
Happy Thanksgiving!
Same to you too.
Does anybody know if there is a convenient utility to configure
iptables on a CentOS 5.4 or 5.3 machine to do port forwarding? And if
not, where and how does one put the requisite commands?
I
On Sunday 08 November 2009 20:59, Sam Acosta wrote:
I'd like to view the Screen resolution in smaller text on my server
terminal. The server is not installed with any GUI so it's in plain text
mode.
Try adding 'vga=795' to the end of the kernel line in grub.conf file.
--
Regards
On Thursday 29 October 2009 19:57, Ryan Lynch wrote:
No offense, Robert, but I don't think yours is a very helpful
statement.
I think it is about time you get off my back!
When someone asks about alternative web servers, do we just
tell them Best bet is to stay with Apache? That's
On Friday 30 October 2009 16:34, tim_da...@cbca.com wrote:
The syslog is not working
Is it rumnning? check it with
ps -ef | grep syslogd
and also I installed Webmin, also it does not
work,
this is what the error is
Info Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
icon
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 16:36, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Ryan.
is there a way to combine iptables parameters like: iptables -A OUTPUT
-p UDP -p TCP -d $IP1 -d $IP2 ?
Each of those parameters is called a match, in IPTables-speak. You
can specify multiple matches in one
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 15:47, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
This is irritating: I've got a server I just upgraded to 5.4, then
rebooted, only to discover that it just *sits* there at the grub boot
menu. I looked at grub.conf, and uncommented hiddenmenu (which should have
been done long
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 16:44, Marcus Moeller wrote:
does it work to define iptables rules with a fqdn as destination
instead of an IP address? Or is it useful to resolve the name first
using e.g. nslookup, writing the result to a variable which is then
used within the -d statement?
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 04:11, vijay shanker wrote:
This file MUST be edited with the 'visudo' command as root.
NO, it MUST not be edited with 'visudo'.
YES, you should use 'visudo'.
You can edit sudoer with vi or vim and save the changes too. Just read what
it tells you you need to do
On Monday 19 October 2009 17:18, Bowie Bailey wrote:
The logs on my mail server are filling up with this kind of thing:
Oct 19 17:03:51 bnofmail kernel: REJECT: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX SRC=195.140.240.6
DST=XX.XX.XX.XX LEN=189 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=52
On Sunday 11 October 2009 01:22, Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to get the 2 in the Subject line to work? I have
read a lot about adding this or that repo but still no joy as usually
deps are missing. :(
Usually rpm -Uhv
On Sunday 11 October 2009 05:35, lostson wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to get the 2 in the Subject line to work? I
have read a lot about adding this or that repo but still no joy as
usually deps are missing. :(
Personally I use rpmfusion repo which you can fine here
Hello,
Can anyone tell me how to get the 2 in the Subject line to work? I have read
a lot about adding this or that repo but still no joy as usually deps are
missing. :(
Thnx
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
http://counter.li.org
___
CentOS
On Thursday 01 October 2009 16:56, ML wrote:
I have a home business circuit and I am gearing up to host my business
affairs in my place. I have Comcast and 13 static IP's.
I have an extra PIII 1U, 2 9gb SCSI, 1gb RAMm dual NICS.
If you can, I would place a 3rd NIC into this device and use
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 14:35, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org wrote:
If so, in CentOS 5.3 that package is called pirut and the individual
file that runs is called puplet.
It seems that puplet is not working correctly after the
On Friday 14 August 2009 23:31, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
If you are worried about valid config then you should be using
the tools that
come with Bind instead of relying on some third party software.
named-checkconf for checking the configuration of Bind
named-checkzone for
On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Here are my questions...
1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
Yes, you should already have something like this in case the main/master
server would fail.
2. Can I have each subnet be a master for itself and a
On Friday 14 August 2009 21:29, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Robert Spangler Sent: August 14, 2009 16:18
On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Here are my questions...
1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
Yes, you should already
On Monday 03 August 2009 00:36, Les Mikesell wrote:
Drew wrote:
It's a bit of bad form to use NAT and private addresses at all because
the internet really wasn't designed to be segmented, but everyone does
it.
Why is NAT bad form?
I don't mean to imply it shouldn't be used -
On Friday 17 July 2009 08:14, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The mirrorlist entry in my Fedora-11 /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-update.repo
reads:
mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released
- f$releaseverarch=$basearch
As far as I can see, this means that yum is
Hello,
Is it possible to have more then one version of KDE installed and switch
between them? I'd like to try out the new KDE but don't want to lose what I
have now. Thnx
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
http://counter.li.org
___
CentOS
On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:14, Mintairov Mikhail wrote:
iptables -F
iptables -F -t nat
iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -s 192.168.127.0/24 -j SNAT
--to-source [my internet ip]
I know how some like to do the SNAT thing, but a simple rule will get this
On Friday 24 April 2009 18:51, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote:
How do I add 5900 to the centos firewall? How do I edit the conf file?
I don't know your knowledge so
Lets go through this step by step.
Commands will be between [].
Examples will be between ''.
You are looking to see why
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 21:26, William L. Maltby wrote:
If your torrent has distributed hash table capability, I suggest that
you also use that feature.
Happy sharing!
So what is everyone using for their torrent?
What is the best?
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:22, mcclnx mcc wrote:
I just setup CENTOS 4.7 with latest patches on DELL server. I also
configured NTP point to out time server. I found /var/log/messages file
every 20 to 30 minutes will generate a error message :
Mar 15 14:28:15 SER1 ntpd[25037]:
On Saturday 28 February 2009 23:45, Devraj Mukherjee wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to get fail2ban going on my server and its log message
reports the following error
2009-02-16 17:42:05,339 ERROR: 'iptables -L INPUT | grep -q
fail2ban-SSH' returned 256
2009-02-16 17:42:05,354 ERROR:
On Friday 06 February 2009 15:57, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Hi Again.
Iptables -nL
Show?
Here is the complete output (there are a lot of other rules active on
that machine):
[snip]
Your rule is not showing up. How did you set this rule up?
If you added it to your firewall rules
On Saturday 07 February 2009 13:17, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Iptables -nL
Show?
Here is the complete output (there are a lot of other rules active on
that machine):
[snip]
Your rule is not showing up. How did you set this rule up?
If you added it to your
On Saturday 07 February 2009 14:22, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
I suggest you verify the output of iptables -nvL after you load the
rule again, and verify the contents of /etc/sysconfig/iptables after
you run service iptables save again. If there is indeed a problem,
looking at those
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 21:45, Agile Aspect wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote:
Do you have a rule like this:
-A OUTPUT --m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
No I don't.
It doesn't work under CentOS 5.2. But it works on my laptop
which is running Fedora 9.
I don't
On Thursday 22 January 2009 17:28, Agile Aspect wrote:
Regarding item (2), I would guess I would have to add the following
entries:
Active:
-
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 20
--sport 4:6 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp --sport
On Friday 02 January 2009 00:16, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
On 1/1/2009 8:13 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
Your rules are in need of help.
First off I am not even sure what you are doing will work, i.e.;
--append or --table
These are written as '-A' and '-t'
--append and --table
On Wednesday 31 December 2008 16:05, chloe K wrote:
ls the network address traslation in centos5.2 different?
Nope.
I disable the default iptable rule and use the following commands but I
can't connect http://public:8080 from outside to this host 192.168.0.10
port 80
eth1 is
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
