Is the plan to get the qemu-kvm build provided by CentOS to include
the rhev-features? I recently updated to oVirt 4.1 and while my
hypervisors were in maintenance I performed an update of all packages,
including qemu-kvm and noticed the latest version
(0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.8) in the CentOS repos
On Jun 9, 2013 1:29 AM, aurfalien aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I ran gemu-img on a VM thinking it was down but in fact it was live.
I rebooted the VM and it does show the added space after running pv/lv
etc to resize the disk, also the KVM server if you will, also shows the
correct new
On May 26, 2013 6:52 PM, Sarah Newman s...@prgmr.com wrote:
On 05/26/2013 02:12 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/xen-c6
Still in development and testing but it has a lot of momentum behind it.
I saw packages for libvirt but not xcp-xapi. Do you know if there
On Oct 12, 2012 8:16 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
This cross-posted from the main Centos discussion list.
I installed a new CentOS-6.3 kvm guest on a recently provisioned kvm
host also running CentOS-6.3. This guest will not connect to the
network and the host cannot
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Julian price
centos@julianprice.org.uk wrote:
physical disk position shouldn't have such a marked effect should it?
Nanook wrote:
Actually the physical disk position can make a HUGE difference.
Thank you Nanook for your explanation. I think you're
I recently setup my Puppetmaster server to run through Passenger via Apache
instead of on the default webrick web server. SELinux made that not work
and I've found some documentation on making rules to allow it however mine
won't load. This is the policy I found via this website,
On Feb 18, 2012 10:41 PM, Al mailingl...@theflux.net wrote:
On Feb 18, 2012, at 9:34 PM, Les Bell wrote:
Al mailingl...@theflux.net wrote:
Any suggestions on what to run on a centos box to verify that the
server isn't compromised or being sniffed? Thanks!
For isn't
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Radek Bursztynowski
ra...@bursztynowski.waw.pl wrote:
**
Dnia 2012-01-14, sob o godzinie 15:08 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn pisze:
On 01/14/2012 02:59 PM, Radek Bursztynowski wrote:
Hi,
I have installed CentOS 6.2 x86_64 and KVM/Qemu and I have some
I wrote an article some time ago for CentOS 6 and have been using this
setup in production since.
http://itscblog.tamu.edu/joining-samba-to-a-windows-2008-r2-domain/
My servers that interact with AD allow both AD based file sharing and also
SSH access. The most updated configs I use can be found
On Dec 29, 2011 2:25 AM, Johan Kooijman m...@johankooijman.com wrote:
Hi all,
We're running RHEV as our main virtualization platform. Most of our
guests are CentOS though. Do you guys know if there's a guest tools
package for CentOS available like there is for Windows for example?
Can't
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 12/29/2011 10:26 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
On Dec 29, 2011 9:50 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 12/29/2011 02:21 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Would this spec file (and source tar ball) built
On Dec 29, 2011 9:50 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 12/29/2011 02:21 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Would this spec file (and source tar ball) built the proper package?
If not, where would I get it.
I would be happy to build the proper source for centos extras for CentOS
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:29 PM, John J. Boyer john.bo...@abilitiessoft.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:54:34PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
imho, the easiest way to do this would be to install VirtualBox.
So I tried to install the latest version of VirtualBox from
virtualbox.org It
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:42 AM, John Beranek j...@redux.org.uk wrote:
On 02/11/2011 10:31, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 11/02/2011 11:02 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
What is a socket in their pricing model? The word can mean so many
different things...
Afaik it refers to a physical cpu
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/01/2011 09:12 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
Do you have the
allow_httpd_mod_auth_pam
boolean turned on?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/2011 03:23 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com
mailto:dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/01/2011 09:12
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Trey Dockendorf wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:42 AM, John Beranek j...@redux.org.uk wrote:
On 02/11/2011 10:31, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 11/02/2011 11:02 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
What is a socket in their pricing model
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 07 November 2011 22:23:09 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.11.2011 22:50, schrieb Marko Vojinovic:
Typically, you have no way of knowing the physical structure of the
cloud machine where your virtual machine is
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Daniel Bird db...@sgul.ac.uk wrote:
On 06/11/2011 00:49, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Look into google 'apps' (which is really corporatized google
documents). you edit your documents via your web browser, everything
is hosted in googles cloud so its
I'm setting up a dedicated database server, and since this will be a
central service to my various web servers I wanted it to be as secure as
possible...so I am leaving SELinux enabled. However I'm having trouble
getting Apache to use mod_auth_pam. I also now can't get setroubleshootd
working to
Do you have the
allow_httpd_mod_auth_pam
boolean turned on?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk6wVZgACgkQrlYvE4MpobOg8gCgzbPmuUBJJ20iBhAQnCoTvZVU
Do you have the
allow_httpd_mod_auth_pam
boolean turned on?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk6wVZgACgkQrlYvE4MpobOg8gCgzbPmuUBJJ20iBhAQnCoTvZVU
One difference I ran into with samba authentication is in cent 5
/etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac is the file to change but in cent 6 its
/etc/pam.d/password-auth-ac. I found that changes I made only to
system-auth-ac in 5 had to be made to both system-auth-ac and
password-auth-ac in 6. This was to
You can do virt-manager remotely. Either connect to libvirt remotely
through a locally running instance of virt-manager or via X11 forwarding. I
do the 2nd method with no GUI installed on the server. See here for minimal
packages needed...
Eric is right. You can connect remotely without even installing
virt-manager on the server. Only needs to have libvird running.
I did a minimal install of CentOS 6 with the 4 virtual package groups. My
system as no startx or run level 5. In my case I have to use X11 forwarding
but that doesnt
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm trying to install a gem named Fabulator on CentOS 6 CR x86_64. It's
failing on libxslt-ruby. This is the error I get when trying the gem
manually...
--
# gem install libxslt-ruby
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/17/2011 03:40 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
On Oct 17, 2011 2:06 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com
mailto:dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/17/2011 02:09 PM
I'm trying to install a gem named Fabulator on CentOS 6 CR x86_64. It's
failing on libxslt-ruby. This is the error I get when trying the gem
manually...
--
# gem install libxslt-ruby --no-rdoc --no-ri
Building native extensions. This could take a while...
ERROR:
Forwarding back to list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com
Date: Oct 17, 2011 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] SELinux triggered during Libvirt snapshots
To: Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa
On Oct 17, 2011 10:30 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/17/2011 11:19 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
Forwarding back to list. -- Forwarded message --
From: Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com Date: Oct 17, 2011
10
On Oct 17, 2011 2:06 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/17/2011 02:09 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
On Oct 17, 2011 10:30 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com
mailto:dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/17/2011 11:19 AM, Trey
I recently began getting periodic emails from SEalert that SELinux is
preventing /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm getattr access from the directory I store
all my virtual machines for KVM.
All VMs are stored under /vmstore , which is it's own mount point, and
every file and folder under /vmstore currently
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rswrote:
Vreme: 10/13/2011 04:23 PM, Bob Hoffman piše:
the way intended for a brand new install just to install a guest via
command line.
I am thinking new video card.
First time sorely disappointed with
to build my own packages rather than rely on an
external repo.(that was I can always build what ever version I need to).
Its not the building of the RPM it the use of mock thats failing.
What is the best way of sending you the source RPM.
Regards
On 8 October 2011 14:22, Trey Dockendorf
On Oct 7, 2011 3:34 AM, Morgan Cox morganco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Thank you for your extremely quick (and faster than support from any
company..) reply.
Sorry, can you give more detail ?
From the look of the error the 'mock centos5' is missing these files :-
I just upgraded my home KVM server to CentOS 6.0 CR to make use of the
latest libvirt and now my RAID array with my VM storage is missing. It
seems that the upgrade to mdadm-3.2.2 is the culprit.
This is the output from mdadm when scanning that array,
# mdadm --detail --scan
ARRAY /dev/md0
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Steve Brooks ste...@mcs.st-and.ac.ukwrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
I just upgraded my home KVM server to CentOS 6.0 CR to make use of the
latest libvirt and now my RAID array with my VM storage is missing. It
seems that the upgrade
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, William Warren
hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:
On 10/8/2011 3:14 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Steve Brooksste...@mcs.st-and.ac.uk
wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
I just upgraded my home
On Oct 8, 2011 7:23 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Vreme: 10/09/2011 12:16 AM, Trey Dockendorf piše:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, William Warren
hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:
why bother with bios FAKERAID using PIO mode(effectively). Make
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Jason Brian Friedrich m...@friedrich.org.uk
wrote:
Hey Trey,
just a quick update. If you add the CR repo for CentOS 6.0 you will
get an updated RPM which solves the problem for me.
- Jason
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 01:43, Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Jason Brian Friedrich
m...@friedrich.org.uk wrote:
System: CentOS Linux release 6.0 (final)
Kernel: 2.6.32-71.23.1.el6.x86_64
KVM: QEMU PC emulator version 0.12.1 (qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2)
Libvirt: ibvirtd (libvirt) 0.8.1
Hi everyone,
I only recently
On Sep 30, 2011 10:58 AM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote:
I think Trey needs to push back - *IF* I understand him correctly, it
sounds like duplicate websites, but running as different users. That,
to
me, literally makes no sense..., unless a) the source of the request
doesn't
On Sep 30, 2011 11:43 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 09/30/11 9:26 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
However they also
want to have the CMS write to the .htaccess files to dynamically control
which users can access the dowloads portion of the sites. That Im
strongly
against
this to secure each site.
I hope this helps.
On 30 September 2011 19:15, Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 30, 2011 11:43 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 09/30/11 9:26 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
However they also
want to have the CMS write
I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each
website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then
example2.com has its own instance of Apache as apache2. Is this even
possible or realistic?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having
each
website use a different user to run the hosting service. So
example1
On Sep 21, 2011 7:51 PM, Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com wrote:
Finally got a new server the other day.
You know I had to try out centos 6 with this one.
dual quad cores, 24 gb ram (12 for each cpu) 6 working drives bays.
My first big surprise was the partition system with anaconda. It is a
I think a local mirror is really your best option. Or possibly two repos.
One for testing, which you sync when you want to test updates and point all
test systems at it. Then a production repo for production systems that
pulls from the frozen test repo. One addition to your idea would be to use
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote:
On 09/14/2011 01:59 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
Based on the bug report for the snapshot-create issue, it seems it's in
libvirt 0.9.0 and that it's something that may be solved completely in
Fedora 16
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote:
On 09/14/2011 01:30 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
What is the preferred method for submitting patches from upstream
projects ? I have two patches for libvirt-0.8.1.el6_0.6. One adds ESX
4.1 support to things like
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
raju.rajs...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com
wrote:
That considered I saw no benefit in my
case to use LVM when some other tools could combine the ability to do
both
qcow2
What is the preferred method for submitting patches from upstream projects ?
I have two patches for libvirt-0.8.1.el6_0.6. One adds ESX 4.1 support to
things like virt-v2v (
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-July/msg00480.html) and the
second fixes the broken virsh snapshot-create
I'm trying to install libvirt to /opt/libvirt, in order to test a patch I've
worked into the current release, but it seems RPM is ignoring the --prefix
command.
The RPM I built has Prefix: /opt/libvirt in the spec, and correctly shows
as relocatable by RPM...
# rpm -qpi
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Thomas Dukes tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 12:36 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Vitualization
On Sep 5, 2011 2:47 AM, James Nguyen ja...@callfire.com wrote:
I'm managing two data centers and some instances on rackspace cloud
servers. Currently running Cobbler+Puppet+Mcollective. So far it's been
great for a team of one, myself.
At the moment I'm looking into either using Aeolus or
I have a shared web server that users can SSH / SFTP into to access their
web content. Each users home directory is in a change root, and I use
mount -o bind to put their respective webpage's document root into their
home directory. Recently I was made aware that the contents of the mount's
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:15 PM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 August 2011 20:48, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de
wrote:
On 08/22/2011 07:01 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
I have a shared web server that users can SSH / SFTP into to access
their
web content
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
On Aug 9, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 8/9/2011 10:44 AM, Craig White wrote:
There's probably a way to add apache to that group with a configuration
on the local machine so it doesn't have to query
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/9/2011 12:32 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
Now I have a new requirement passed to me, which is a bit more
complicated.
How would I allow individual users the ability only to access specific
subfolders
I'm setting up a shared web server running Apache. Each web root will
belong to a department, which has a corresponding Active Directory group to
give access. So far I've got samba working and such, but am having some
trouble wrapping my head around the necessary permissions to make all this
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 15:59 -0500, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
Well I verified that putting the following line in /etc/sudoers works
zabbix ALL=NOPASSWD: /var/lib/zabbix/bin/start_puppet
However if I put
Attempting to take snapshots of VM using virsh with the following command,
# virsh -c qemu:///system snapshot-create CentOS6-x86-001
Results in the following error,
error: internal error unable to execute QEMU command 'savevm': The command
savevm has not been found
The VM's virtual disks are
I'm not aware of a virsh attach disk command but if you duplicate the
entries for the existing disk you can then add the new one...something like
this...
# virsh -c qemu:///system edit VMname
disk type='file' device='disk'
driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='none'/
source
/11 4:41 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
I am unable to get the #includedir function to work with sudo. This
works just fine on all my CentOS 5.6 servers, but on 6 it is being
ignored. I have this line in the file /etc/sudoers.d/zabbix-puppet
zabbix ALL=NOPASSWD: /var/lib/zabbix/bin
If your using CentOS 5.x you may have a problem with perl...here's some
notes I have on the subject
# virt-v2v -f virt-v2v.conf -ic esx://server.com/?no_verify=1 -op vm_local
VMname
Can't locate object method show_progress via package
Sys::VirtV2V::Transfer::ESX::UA at
I am unable to get the #includedir function to work with sudo. This works
just fine on all my CentOS 5.6 servers, but on 6 it is being ignored. I
have this line in the file /etc/sudoers.d/zabbix-puppet
zabbix ALL=NOPASSWD: /var/lib/zabbix/bin/start_puppet
However sudo still requires a
, just did :q)))
# visudo -f /etc/sudoers.d/zabbix-puppet
/etc/sudoers.d/zabbix-puppet: syntax error near line 0
# visudo -c -f /etc/sudoers.d/zabbix-puppet
/etc/sudoers.d/zabbix-puppet: parsed OK
:-/
- Trey
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com wrote:
I am
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.comwrote:
On 7/16/11, Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com wrote:
I have successfully bridged one of the server's NICs to br0, and I can
ping
the IP remotely that is assigned to br0, but none of the VMs that worked
Running CentOS 6 I have noticed that Libvirt will automatically configure
IPtables once a VM is using the built in NAT , or default network. How do
I modify the IPtable rules without breaking libvirt's ability to configure
these rules?
This is the firewall settings on a fresh install with no VMs
I have decided to migrate my latest KVM server to CentOS 6.0 and am
beginning to get a little frustrated with some issues that worked perfectly
in 5.6.
Right now I've given up on getting virbr0 and NAT to work, but now I need
networking bridging to work, but nothing seems to fix the issue. I
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Eric Searcy emsea...@gmail.com wrote:
No experience with 6 here, but do your virsh-imported libvirt VM configs
show devices...interface type=bridge...source bridge='br0'/ ? i.e.
the bridge there matches the bridge name you're created with ifcfg scripts?
Eric
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have decided to migrate my latest KVM server to CentOS 6.0 and am
beginning to get a little frustrated with some issues that worked
perfectly
and chroot /etc/passwd
treydock:x:506:507:Trey Dockendorf:/home/treydock:/bin/bash
Thanks
- Trey
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
m3fr...@thesandhufamily.ca wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I downloaded the CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD ISOs and burned the first image to
a rewritable DVD. When I tried to boot my new home server off it, it
didn't, and then this was printed to the screen:
This was 64 bit install and the media checks were good. I also successfully
used the same install media on another system. Ill try the suggestions and
see if the drive is having problems.
On Jul 13, 2011 1:27 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Trey Dockendorf wrote:
Tried my first
This must have been an issue with my specific external dvd drive. Used
netinstall disk successfully...yay centos 6!
Now where is the best place to post bugs regarding KVM in centos 6?
On Jul 13, 2011 9:59 AM, Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com wrote:
This was 64 bit install and the media checks
Tried my first CentOS 6 install on a system currently running 5.6. My
attempt was not an upgrade, but a full re-format. I have verified the
checksums of the ISO and did the pre-install disk verify and everything
checked out. However after the screen for setting up the bootloader I get
the
Great news about CentOS 6.0 being available, and I figured I'd ask the most
obvious question, what can I expect when upgrading from CentOS 5.6 to 6.0?
I have not had to go from one major version of CentOS to another so this is
new territory for me. Is the processes just like an install except
78 matches
Mail list logo
