From: Benjamin Smith li...@benjamindsmith.com
Staging for a rollout of EL 6, and ran into a very strange permissions issue
with xinetd that defies all (my) logic.
It's a script called spfiled that we use for messaging between our server
cluster servers. I'm trying to get it to run with least
Staging for a rollout of EL 6, and ran into a very strange permissions issue
with xinetd that defies all (my) logic.
It's a script called spfiled that we use for messaging between our server
cluster servers. I'm trying to get it to run with least permissions
necessary. Because it reads/writes
2011/7/18 Benjamin Smith li...@benjamindsmith.com:
Staging for a rollout of EL 6, and ran into a very strange permissions issue
with xinetd that defies all (my) logic.
It's a script called spfiled that we use for messaging between our server
cluster servers. I'm trying to get it to run with
Benjamin Smith wrote:
Staging for a rollout of EL 6, and ran into a very strange permissions
issue with xinetd that defies all (my) logic.
snip
You're not using access controls lists, are you? And if this is accessed
via httpd, is the php directory visible in the apache configuration?
On Monday, July 18, 2011 10:02:18 AM Eero Volotinen wrote:
Strangely, setting permissions to o+x and it starts up fine, but I don't
want to leave permissions that open.
rx to owner is enought
Except the owner of the script is not the effective user running the script. I
want to use the x
On Monday, July 18, 2011 10:20:52 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Staging for a rollout of EL 6, and ran into a very strange permissions
issue with xinetd that defies all (my) logic.
snip
You're not using access controls lists, are you?
Not knowingly!
And if this is accessed
via httpd,
6 matches
Mail list logo
