On 07/11/2011 07:29 PM, Ed Heron wrote:
That sounded like a vote for maintaining CentOS versions of the
docs...
yes please, we should atleast have something there that clearly states
stuff that is not going to work on/for centos, like their management
interface and their mentions of
On 07/09/2011 04:13 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
It is my impression that we could and should 'adapt' the documentation
by removing the upstream provider logos and other marks (as applicable)
and mark the documentation as CentOS documentation. Obviously,
including references to the original
Am 11.07.11 20:29, schrieb Ed Heron:
This could create more traffic on the wiki. Is bandwidth or machine
time a concern?
Document type. The wiki is not really meant to serve, version, edit and
- well - import foreign formats. You can do so if a page needs an
attachement, but I don't really
On 07/12/2011 12:57 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Am 11.07.11 20:29, schrieb Ed Heron:
This could create more traffic on the wiki. Is bandwidth or machine
time a concern?
Document type. The wiki is not really meant to serve, version, edit and
- well - import foreign formats. You can do so
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:04:41AM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
I am more into creating some form of redirect from docs.c.o to
upstream's relevant docs.
Is this permissible now?
John
--
The Special Olympics is to winners as FOX
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:43:11AM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
IANAL but all their docs are licensed as CC-BY-SA.
And at one time they didn't permit deep-linking to content on their
website, open license or not. I'm just wondering if that restriction
has been relaxed.
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:04:41AM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
I am more into creating some form of redirect from docs.c.o to
upstream's relevant docs.
Is this permissible now?
Not that I am aware of .. I have invited the upstream to
Hi documentation team,
As CentOS 6 is now being released to the mirrors, it would be a good
time to think about putting the accurate documentation on
http://www.centos.org/docs
Red Hat changed their documentation license in the past and they are now
using the CC-by-SA license.
My own
