On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 14/01/15 23:38, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Please help us (me, especially) understand what we may be doing to the
detriment of your use of CentOS and thereby avoid that negative
result.
Lets flip this around - just
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Trevor Hemsley
trevor.hems...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 14/01/15 23:38, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Proposal:
The Third Party
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Proposal:
The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories,
but should only note there are difficulties in making several independent
repositories safely usable and give a thorough explaination of
On 14/01/15 23:38, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Please help us (me, especially) understand what we may be doing to the
detriment of your use of CentOS and thereby avoid that negative
result.
Lets flip this around - just going by your comments in the last few
days, it seems to me that you dont
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with
discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel
having issues with Atomic
On 14/01/15 23:51, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
Now as far as the term Community Approved goes: I think it's fairly
accurate and I'm not sure what the objection to it was. We have to have
a way to say These repos are ok and these suck and these suck worse
than that. The way the page reads at the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Proposal:
The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories,
but should only note there are difficulties in making several
The rules I went by weren't so cut and dried. EPEL was recommended because
it is recommended -- the epel-release package is in centos-extras, packages
from it are built to Fedora guidelines, are from Fedora packagers, it
endeavors to not overlap upstream, and -- perhaps most importantly -- it is
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Manuel Wolfshant
wo...@nobugconsulting.ro wrote:
On 01/15/2015 03:44 AM, Mark Hahn wrote:
CentOS repos. There are others that do. Some of the repos that overwrite
core packages do so with little packages like sqlite (yum uses sqlite so
changing the version of
On 01/15/2015 01:09 AM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with
discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Manuel Wolfshant
wo...@nobugconsulting.ro wrote:
On 01/15/2015 02:56 AM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
I want to use CentOS to explore the aspects of operating systems that
I was not allowed to explore with a proprietary system. I had a couple
of 32-bit machines I
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Manuel Wolfshant
wo...@nobugconsulting.ro wrote:
On 01/15/2015 01:09 AM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
wrote:
On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
KB -- I made those changes several
On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with
discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel
having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing
problems...) and the continued
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/05/2015 04:34 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Could someone please replace the contents of
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
with the contents of
On 01/05/2015 04:34 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Could someone please replace the contents of
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
with the contents of
http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ?
I dont understand the concept of community
Patrick, looks fine to me. Thanks for the work -- when I did a major
revision I tried to remove some of the rot and got tired of trying, along
with refactoring the page in general. Your dedication is appreciated.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:34 AM, PatrickD Garvey patrickdgarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tom Sorensen tsoren...@gmail.com wrote:
Patrick, looks fine to me. Thanks for the work -- when I did a major
revision I tried to remove some of the rot and got tired of trying, along
with refactoring the page in general. Your dedication is appreciated.
You're
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote:
On 5 January 2015 at 16:34, PatrickD Garvey patrickdgarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Could someone please replace the contents of
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
with the contents of
18 matches
Mail list logo
