On 22/03/16 10:02, François Cami wrote:
> With that said, provided we find a way to mention how to mention that
> unambiguously, I'm ok with it.
the way to do this is to self host the content, with relevant
disclaimers and an effecient/functional process to edit and remove
content not relevant.
On 22/03/16 07:30, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was having a look at that page, and was wondering what we can do for
> point #3 (Manuals and other documentation)
> As we have no real content for CentOS 6 and 7 , my idea was just to
> explain in one line that (while technically not the CentOS
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> On 22/03/16 10:21, François Cami wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Manuel Wolfshant
>> wrote:
>>> On 03/22/2016 09:30 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Hi,
I was having a
On 22/03/16 10:21, François Cami wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Manuel Wolfshant
> wrote:
>> On 03/22/2016 09:30 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was having a look at that page, and was wondering what we can do for
>>> point #3 (Manuals and
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Manuel Wolfshant
wrote:
> On 03/22/2016 09:30 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was having a look at that page, and was wondering what we can do for
>> point #3 (Manuals and other documentation)
>> As we have no real content
On 03/22/2016 09:30 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Hi,
I was having a look at that page, and was wondering what we can do for
point #3 (Manuals and other documentation)
As we have no real content for CentOS 6 and 7 , my idea was just to
explain in one line that (while technically not the CentOS
Hi,
I was having a look at that page, and was wondering what we can do for
point #3 (Manuals and other documentation)
As we have no real content for CentOS 6 and 7 , my idea was just to
explain in one line that (while technically not the CentOS
documentation) , almost all the points coming from