On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Sarah Newman wrote:
> On 01/21/2016 04:32 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>> I'm a developer, not a server admin, so I can't gauge how important
>> this issue is. Before making such a change, I'd like to hear opinions
>> from other people in the
On 11/02/16 06:07, George Dunlap wrote:
> BTW, we had a discussion about this particular idea at the Virt SIG
> meeting, and KB said that different naming of packages like this can
> cause dependency problems. For example, a package depends on
> "xen-version >= $N" will fail because as far as rpm
On 02/02/2016 08:47 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 06:57 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>> As mentioned yesterday, Xen 4.6 packages are now available for
>> testing. These also include an update to libvirt 1.3.0, in line with
>> what's available for CentOS 7. Please test, particularly the
On 01/14/2016 06:57 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
As mentioned yesterday, Xen 4.6 packages are now available for
testing. These also include an update to libvirt 1.3.0, in line with
what's available for CentOS 7. Please test, particularly the upgrade
if you can, and report any problems here.
To
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Manuel Wolfshant
wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 06:57 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> As mentioned yesterday, Xen 4.6 packages are now available for
>> testing. These also include an update to libvirt 1.3.0, in line with
>> what's available for
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 15/01/16 05:57, George Dunlap wrote:
>> As mentioned yesterday, Xen 4.6 packages are now available for
>> testing. These also include an update to libvirt 1.3.0, in line with
>> what's available for CentOS 7. Please
raig Thompson, President
>
> Caldwell Global Communications, Inc.
>
> +1 (423) 559-5465
>
> caldwellglobal.com
>
>
> -Original message-
> *From:* George Dunlap <dunl...@umich.edu>
> *Sent:* Thursday 21st January 2016 7:32
> *To:* Discussion about
.
On the other hand If your picking xen up from
http://someplace.org/riskey-development/xen.repo then your getting what
you ask for.
On 01/21/2016 08:09 AM, President wrote:
RE: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 6 Virt SIG Xen 4.6 packages available in
centos-virt-xen-testing
My .02 is to stay
On 15/01/16 05:57, George Dunlap wrote:
> As mentioned yesterday, Xen 4.6 packages are now available for
> testing. These also include an update to libvirt 1.3.0, in line with
> what's available for CentOS 7. Please test, particularly the upgrade
> if you can, and report any problems here.
Per
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Phill Bandelow wrote:
> Well when the last upgrade 4.2 > 4.4 went live and XM was disabled by
> default it took many hosts down without warning. 4.4 > 4.6 may cause the
> same issues. It's a dangerous upgrade for sure. Why can't 4.4 be LTS for
6 7:32
To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS <centos-virt@centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 6 Virt SIG Xen 4.6 packages available in
centos-virt-xen-testing
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Peter <pe...@pajamian.dhs.org> wrote:
> On 15/01/16 05:57
On 01/21/2016 08:02 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Phill Bandelow wrote:
>> Well when the last upgrade 4.2 > 4.4 went live and XM was disabled by
>> default it took many hosts down without warning. 4.4 > 4.6 may cause the
>> same issues. It's a
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/21/2016 09:29 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> This is a community SIG .. and xenproject.org does NOT release XSAs for
>> 4.2. The goal of Xen4centOS was to use an upstream LTS kernel and
>> update those as required to
On 01/21/2016 09:29 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> This is a community SIG .. and xenproject.org does NOT release XSAs for
> 4.2. The goal of Xen4centOS was to use an upstream LTS kernel and
> update those as required to stay on an LTS. Also to do every second
> point release of xen (ie, 4.2, 4.4,
velopment/xen.repo then your getting what
> you ask for.
>
>
> On 01/21/2016 08:09 AM, President wrote:
>> RE: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 6 Virt SIG Xen 4.6 packages available in
>> centos-virt-xen-testing
>>
>> My .02 is to stay the course. As a server admin, I w
On 01/21/2016 09:52 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 01/21/2016 09:29 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> This is a community SIG .. and xenproject.org does NOT release XSAs for
>>> 4.2. The goal of Xen4centOS was to use an
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Alvin Starr wrote:
> My comment was targeted more at naming than support.
>
> I appreciate that there are vanishingly few resources to throw at support.
>
> I am glad to see any xen support for C7 and am thankful of all those who are
> putting in
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Phill Bandelow wrote:
> Well when the last upgrade 4.2 > 4.4 went live and XM was disabled by
> default it took many hosts down without warning. 4.4 > 4.6 may cause the
> same issues. It's a dangerous upgrade for sure. Why can't 4.4 be LTS for
On 22/01/16 01:32, George Dunlap wrote:
> 1. In the Xen 4.4 packages (first released October 2014), xend was
> disabled by default; so anyone using xend at the moment has already
> manually intervened to enable deprecated functionality
Xen4CentOS was first available in CentOS 6.4 with Xen 4.2, so
On 01/21/2016 04:32 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> I'm a developer, not a server admin, so I can't gauge how important
> this issue is. Before making such a change, I'd like to hear opinions
> from other people in the community about how important (or not) it is
> to avoid breaking xm, given the
As mentioned yesterday, Xen 4.6 packages are now available for
testing. These also include an update to libvirt 1.3.0, in line with
what's available for CentOS 7. Please test, particularly the upgrade
if you can, and report any problems here.
To upgrade:
yum update
21 matches
Mail list logo